Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Nuclear 2.0: Why A Green Future Needs Nuclear Power” as Want to Read:
Nuclear 2.0: Why A Green Future Needs Nuclear Power
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Nuclear 2.0: Why A Green Future Needs Nuclear Power

3.90  ·  Rating details ·  167 ratings  ·  16 reviews
Everything you thought you knew about nuclear power is wrong. This is just as well, according to Mark Lynas in Nuclear 2.0, because nuclear energy is essential to avoid catastrophic global warming. Using the latest world energy statistics Lynas shows that with wind and solar still at only about 1 percent of global primary energy, asking renewables to deliver all the world’ ...more
Kindle Edition, 71 pages
Published 2013
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Nuclear 2.0, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Nuclear 2.0

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
3.90  · 
Rating details
 ·  167 ratings  ·  16 reviews


Filter
 | 
Sort order
Peter
Apr 14, 2014 rated it really liked it
Oh boy....they say you should never talk politics or religion in company if you want to avoid a fight. Well, if you add global warming and the environment to that list then the fight can go nuclear.
And that's why Mark Lynas has written this book. As a former anti-nuclear campaigner he tries to defuse the issue and allow a relatively calm debate about the contribution nuclear power generation can make to protecting the future of the globe. By now, 99.9% of people reading this will have come down
...more
Chris Murray
Nov 25, 2013 rated it did not like it
Mark Lynas, in "Nuclear 2.0", commits the same errors he ascribes to the anti-nuclear movement, except that where anti-nuclear activists allegedly exaggerate, Mark Lynas relentlessly minimises.

Lynas quotes UNSCEAR and others in an effort at scientific respectability, but the quotes are often selective and misleading. For example, re Chernobyl, UNSCEAR is correctly quoted as offering reassurance to individuals that the personal risks are low, but there is no mention whatever that UNSCEAR also cle
...more
Jurij Fedorov
Nov 16, 2014 rated it really liked it
The only downside to this book is the fact that it is only 80 pages - short. But even for someone like me who knows a lot about nuclear power it was a great read. Mark Lynas is such a great and informative writer that I am going to read all of his books. I like writers who stick to facts and statistics, and Mark Lynas does just that.
Yves
Jun 11, 2014 rated it it was amazing
An important message: we need nuclear power to avoid the worst consequences of climate change. Nuclear and renewables should not compete with each other, but collaborate to drive out coal. Nuclear is safe, clean, and possible.

This book is a good, well argued, reminder for those who already agree and hopefully an eye opener for those who don't (yet).
Christopher
Aug 01, 2017 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Well written and concise tale of the author's mindset at he made a pivot on the issue of nuclear energy. To be clear he is still against the use of nuclear weapons, but what better way to dispose of warheads than down blending them into fuel for civilian electrical grids?

This might not be considered an in depth book, but it covers a variety of issues and has 15 pages of notes which allows the reader to thoroughly follow-up on any chapter which might pique their interest. There are a very few ite
...more
Clint
Sep 04, 2018 rated it really liked it
Short and simple. Good info and makes a strong nuclear case, but not much of a book.
Book
Aug 15, 2013 rated it really liked it
Nuclear 2.0: Why a Green Future Needs Nuclear Power by Mark Lynas

“Nuclear 2.0" makes the compelling case that in order to resolve the global warming crisis; nuclear power must complement other low-carbon power sources. Environmentalist, Mark Lynas provides the readers with a succinct, accessible book that makes the strong case for nuclear power. Time and scientific evidence has converted the author from the anti-nuclear camp to a pro-renewable and pro-nuclear outlook. This stimulating 71-page in
...more
Andrew Garvey
Aug 22, 2015 rated it liked it
Shelves: non-fiction
Formerly an anti-nuclear campaigner and writer, Lynas lays out the reasons for his conversion to the (very sensible) view that nuclear power is absolutely vital, along with a massive increase in use of renewables, to what looks like an increasingly hopeless aim of saving the planet from being cooked by carbon.

Making his case in short, fully referenced chapters, this little book is fascinating. On finishing it, I was more certain than ever that the world's media-fed fear of nuclear energy is disa
...more
Majed Mulla
Jul 25, 2014 rated it really liked it
Shelves: kindle
قرأت نصف الكتاب في رحلة و بعدين نسيتو و بعدها بشهرين تقريبا رجعت كملتو.فا معلومات بداية الكتاب ما استحضرها كويس.
كتاب صغير تقدر تخلصو في كم ساعة.

يستعرض قد ايش الخوف من الطاقة النووية غير منطقي او ما يستاهل الخوف الهائل دا ولا الحملات المكثفة ضدها. يجيب عدد الوفيات و عدد الناس الي اتعرضو للإشعاعات النووية و قد ايش تأثيرها و كم عدد الي اتاثرو و جاهم سرطان او فقر دم. في اكبر حادثتين في عالم الطاقة النووية. تشيرنوبيل في الاتحاد السوفيتي و فوكوشيما في اليابان. حتتفاجاء بالبروباقاندا الي مساويها الاعلا
...more
Jules
Jul 16, 2013 rated it liked it
While this book is a thought provoking and compelling argument for the use of nuclear power to reduce carbon emissions, I feel that the author damages his case somewhat by minimising the risks of past nuclear accidents. Particularly with the recent revelations about leaks from the Fukushima plant I feel this damages the book's credibility. The argument is surely not that nuclear power is risk free, but that it causes significantly less environmental damage than burning fossil fuel does and there ...more
Jon-Erik
Aug 12, 2013 rated it really liked it
Shelves: scientia
Here are your choices, world: (1) the extreme effects of global warming, (2) crushing third world poverty, or (3) a renewable+nuclear future. Every alternative has its plusses and minuses, but the minuses of (1) and (2) are so large and destabilizing, it is scary to contemplate.

People in Africa, Asia, and Latin America are not "noble savages." People in the developed world are going to want more and more power. What choice is left? The main drawback to (3) is not the potential for terrorism or t
...more
Tim Lemke
Jul 30, 2013 rated it really liked it
A concise and unemotional explanation of how nuclear power should play a bigger role in fighting global warming. The writer uses data to back up nearly all of his arguments (most of that data I plan to cross-reference, as there are some surprising conclusions.) But this is a great examination about an oft-overlooked aspect of the climate change equation.
Alan Hughes
Oct 04, 2016 rated it really liked it
Shelves: politics, science
An interesting read. Short but informative. The chapter on nuclear waste was particularly useful as was the information on the two recent disasters (Chernobyl and Fukushima). A useful antidote to much misinformation.
Brandon Finn
Apr 13, 2014 rated it really liked it
Really liked this book, although very short.
Compelling case for nuclear energy
Abi Killjoy
Apr 09, 2016 rated it liked it
I find this book a gross oversimplification of a complex issue. It does contain some solid arguments, but flounders as a cohesive piece.
Mohamad Saleh
Nov 01, 2013 rated it really liked it
This book sums up everything I've been telling people for years, it doesn't tackle natural pollutants but that's fine
kathleen hillman
rated it really liked it
Jul 11, 2014
❀ Hana
rated it really liked it
Aug 07, 2014
Xiaodong Jia
rated it it was ok
Sep 04, 2018
David Cooper
rated it really liked it
Oct 29, 2013
Judith Ryan
rated it liked it
Mar 13, 2017
Andre Pallett
rated it really liked it
Feb 04, 2014
Ralyn Longs
rated it really liked it
Sep 27, 2014
Baden J Cameron
rated it it was ok
Dec 30, 2018
Jarret
rated it liked it
Feb 20, 2015
zach
rated it it was amazing
Apr 01, 2014
Michael
rated it really liked it
Jun 07, 2014
Emma
rated it really liked it
Dec 19, 2014
Colin Cooper
rated it it was amazing
May 20, 2017
Alex Maxwell
rated it it was ok
Feb 10, 2019
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »