Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.

Start by marking “Restless Souls: The Making of American Spirituality” as Want to Read:

Other editions

Enlarge cover

Rate this book

Clear rating

1 of 5 stars 2 of 5 stars 3 of 5 stars 4 of 5 stars 5 of 5 stars

Open Preview

Restless Souls: The Making of American Spirituality

Leigh Eric Schmidt

3.57 · Rating details · 84 ratings · 18 reviews

Yoga classes and Zen meditation, New-Age seminars and holistic workshops, The Oprah Winfrey Show and books by Deepak Chopraâ”all are part of the ongoing religious experimentation that has surprisingly deep roots in American history. By tracing our unique spiritual heritage along its many colorful highways and eccentric byways, Restless Souls profiles a rich spirituality

...more

Get A Copy

Hardcover, 352 pages

Published September 1st 2005 by HarperOne

More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Restless Souls, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Restless Souls

Lists with This Book

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30

Average rating 3.57 ·

Rating details

· 84 ratings · 18 reviews

More filters

Sort order

Start your review of Restless Souls: The Making of American Spirituality

Aug 18, 2013 Larry Hansen rated it really liked it

Shelves: religious

This book made me realize my spiritual quest was hardly unique or contemporary.
Very worthwhile read.

flag 1 like · Like · see review

Mar 11, 2014 Charlie rated it really liked it

Shelves: american-history, spirituality

Overview: In this chronological sketch of American spirituality, Leigh Schmidt argues that many of the sentiments and practices of the contemporary American "spiritual marketplace" are rooted in an indigenous tradition of seeker spirituality deriving from liberal Protestantism.

Argument: Schmidt's narrative takes place against a background of popular books and scholarship that refer to spirituality and individual religion as something new (a boomer fad), detrimentally individualistic, and Overview: In this chronological sketch of American spirituality, Leigh Schmidt argues that many of the sentiments and practices of the contemporary American "spiritual marketplace" are rooted in an indigenous tradition of seeker spirituality deriving from liberal Protestantism.

Argument: Schmidt's narrative takes place against a background of popular books and scholarship that refer to spirituality and individual religion as something new (a boomer fad), detrimentally individualistic, and imported. A representative of this work is Habits of the Heart by Robert Bellah et al., which presents liberal religion as a a narcissistic, solopsistic solvent corroding bonds of family and community. Bellah's thin reading and lack of attention to historical context make it easy for him and his fellows to ridicule seemingly narcissistic statements by spiritual practitioners (269-71). Similarly, in the case of The Making of the New Spirituality by James Herrick, all non-creedal spirituality "from Ralph Waldo Emerson to UFO aboductees" (285) is grouped together as an Other contrasted unfavorably with orthodox Christianity.
In contrast to readings such as these, Schmidt offers the construct of a "Spiritual Left" with deep roots in American religion and a consistent set of sensibilities, though not teachings. This Spiritual Left arose out of liberal Protestantism's desire for a religion that was both interior (possessing mystical sensitivity) and expansive (curious about world religions, yearning to overcome dogmatic and sectarian controversies). In the aftermath of the Enlightenment, religious liberals desired a religion amenable to the Age of Reason but also more than mere rationality, a combination of scientific realism and romantic impulse. Schmidt charts the Spiritual Left in four broad periods: "the Transcendentalists of the 1830s and 1840s, their radical heirs of the 1850s to 1880s, the realizing agents of liberalism’s universal vision between 1890 and 1910, and the seekers who brought to fruition the emergent spirituality after 1910" (14). These groups were linked through key personalities and a series of institutions, but even more so by a burgeoning literary tradition.

As the Spiritual Left ventured beyond orthodoxy, it had to appropriate or create terminology as well as refashion old concepts. "Mystical" referred to a type of exegesis practiced by (usually Catholic) Christians; "mystical theology" was bound up with classical theological ideals and the monastic traditions. The Spiritual Left had to disentangle these connections in order to arrive at an individual yet universal religious interiority that could be explored without dogmatic guidelines. Likewise, the term "seekers" that so aptly described the aims of many in the Spiritual Left had to be reappropriated from the Christian tradition, in which it named (rather accurately) a heresy. Also, the notion of solitude, central to Transcendentalist experience and all American spiritualists thereafter, had to be transformed from its original home in the Christian desert fathers and reshaped to meet the needs of Americans who did not desire to abnegate society but who did need a break from the hustle and bustle of modern life. Perhaps most significantly, meditation as a practice blended the Transcendentalist tradition of reflective interiority with specific techniques learned from the East: from Buddhists, Vedantists, yogis, and other spiritual masters.

Schmidt is extremely sympathetic to his subjects, but he does note tensions in the enterprise of individual spiritual exploration. Having set out to explore, is the point to find something or merely to go on exploring forever? If seekers did settle down, would those still seeking view it as a betrayal? Furthermore, practitioners disagreed over whether the quest for universal religion meant a homogenous transcending of all existing particular forms of religion or a principled pluralism that recognized validity in individual expressions. However, Schmidt considers these more problems for individuals or specific institutions than for society as a whole. He repeatedly remarks that seekers tended to be very socially engaged, contrary to the narcissistic portrait promoted by critics.

Method: In a work like this, the author's greatest task is showing that his subject exists as a definable entity rather than as a random collection of particulars. Schmidt tackles this problem by tracing the institutional ties that link people. He signals his intention to proceed in this fashion early on when he states that mysticism in America was born on May 20, 1838 in Medford Massachusetts, at a meeting of the Transcendental Club. Various institutions form the hubs from which individual biographies radiate. An especially important one for Schmidt's argument is Greenacre, a spiritual center that connects dots in his narrative. Owned by Sarah Parker from 1894 until her death in 1916, it was an experiment in comparative religion. Enshrining the memories of Emerson, Thoreau, and Whitman, it demonstrated continuity with the American spiritual tradition. Yet many of its guests were representatives from other religions, especially Eastern ones. Finally, Greenacre highlights the tensions of seeker spirituality, as Farmer eventually converted to Baha'i; the property passed into Baha'i ownership after her death, thus ending the experiment in comparative religion. Where insitutional ties are wanting, there are often literary ties, for example, a shared admiration for Swedenborg or Whitman.

Schmidt is sensitive to the gendered properties of seeker religion. Women occupy key roles in his narrative. Moreover, he stresses how seeker spirituality appealed to women who were shut out of leadership roles in traditional churches. Some seekers were influential in movements for women's equality, while many more were sympathetic. Class issues are not as pronounced in Schmidt's narrative. He does mention that much of this culture was perpetuated by books, a certain set of books. This requirement would seem to indicate that until the boomer generation, the Spiritual Left was an elite movement. His attention to biography and not to material culture or quantitative studies makes it difficult to know how representative his subjects are. ...more

flag Like · see review

Jun 16, 2019 Dan Gorman rated it really liked it

Shelves: us-history, religion

Schmidt makes a good argument for the importance of religious liberalism — individuals choosing their own beliefs, instead of participating in the groups that society or peers mandate —as the core of U.S. religious history. I don't agree that liberalism is the key trend; I think combination/experimentation and immigration are also super important to shaping American religious life. Nonetheless, I like how Schmidt documents how terms such as mysticism and spirituality evolved away from Christian ...more

flag Like · see review

Nov 11, 2016 Shane Wagoner rated it really liked it

Fantastic history of American spirituality that reveals the deep roots of religious mysticism in our nation's past. Successfully refutes the charges of narcissistic individualism put forth by Robert Bellah and others.

flag Like · see review

Aug 04, 2019 Maurice rated it did not like it

Shelves: religion, couldn-t-finish

Couldn’t finish. Very dry and too scholarly.

flag Like · see review

Jun 28, 2018 Yetiboy rated it liked it

Very comprehensive. Perhaps too ambitious but not enough about each figure in terms of their thought. Reads like a PHD thesis.

flag Like · see review

Nov 10, 2010 Teddee rated it liked it

Shelves: history

Originally read this hoping to learn some of the history of the American Protestant tradition. Took a very different route than I expected. Liberal political impulses of the American Enlightenment on individual rights and human freedoms were also applied in the religious sphere. Idolatry and uncritical submission to authoritative interpretations were rejected by religious liberals. Emboldened by this rejection of religious authority, the individual became the ultimate arbiter of religious Originally read this hoping to learn some of the history of the American Protestant tradition. Took a very different route than I expected. Liberal political impulses of the American Enlightenment on individual rights and human freedoms were also applied in the religious sphere. Idolatry and uncritical submission to authoritative interpretations were rejected by religious liberals. Emboldened by this rejection of religious authority, the individual became the ultimate arbiter of religious experience. The American Enlightenment at the time of the revolution produced support for toleration and also deism, a belief in religion consistent with science and reason, among some of the founding fathers. But the religious paths of many others took a different course, and skepticism of all religious authority allowed some to arrive at religious belief founded on personal mystical experience. Interestingly, mysticism became a religious defense of religion against attack by science, by offering anecdotal evidence of the spirit realm (p54). These seekers embraced mysticism, spirituality, transcendentalism (Emerson, Thoreau, Walt Whitman), hermits and solitude, and even Eastern religions and practices such as meditation under the idea that a universal unifying truth underlay all religious traditions (e.g. Unitarians). Still these notions of tolerance sometimes were at strict odds with the traditions these seekers embraced, and some turned back to single parochial and exclusive worldviews. And so this book was mainly a history of the American spiritual left, those who embraced radical individual mystical experience, what most of us assume is a recent tradition of "New Agers" and related seekers but is in fact an American tradition arising directly out of American Protestantism in the 1800s. What this book failed to answer for me was why the spiritual left branched off onto this deeply personal mystical path and what social or historical trends may have caused this, or if mysticism is simply the tail end of a normal distribution in any population. ...more

flag Like · see review

Feb 03, 2012 Collier Brown rated it really liked it

Shelves: home-inventory

Far too often, writers frame the history of American religion within a network of Protestant faiths. Leigh Schmidt approaches the subject from a more liberal stance, stressing the equal importance of "spirituality" to some of America's most influential religious leaders and activists. Within the wide and often inchoate definition of "spirituality," Schmidt notes the importance of mysticism, meditation, and seeking--specifically how these three tools helped those like R.W. Emerson, Thomas ...more

flag Like · see review

Oct 12, 2011 Susie Meister rated it really liked it

Shelves: american-religious-history

Schmidt takes a different approach to the american spirituality than did Roof by couching it in culturally and intellectual history. He describes the growth of spirituality as connected to liberal progressivism and the religious left. Schmidt believes the personalized spirituality that has grown in popularity but has roots in transcendentalism and other traditions inevitably leads to social activism. Schmidt believes his Restless Souls fused civic engagement and liberal religious traditions.

flag Like · see review

Dec 29, 2011 Liam rated it liked it

"'The chief cause of our failure to lead a blessed life,' he [William Alger] wrote, 'is the immodesty of our demands, and their fitfulness. Happiness cannot consist of orgasms.'" (87)

"'The emancipation from the idea of Self is the real bliss. ... It is ignorance that makes one think that there is bliss in the idea of "I am I."'" (170, quoting Anagarika Dharmapala)

flag Like · see review

Jan 11, 2013 Kristi rated it really liked it

Excellent! Insightful, witty, and a pleasure to read. This is an important history of American Spirituality, beginning with Transcendentalism and ending with twenty-first century spiritual seekers. Schmidt deftly contextualizes the evolution of alternative American spirituality within broader cultural movements. His narrative is fluid and enthralling. Very well done.

flag Like · see review

Mar 10, 2010 B rated it did not like it

Shelves: historical, non-fiction, why-did-i-go-through-with-it

It's not that it wasn't good...

it's just that...

well, let me put it this way: authors of historical events do one of two things

1. They gussy it up far too much and the message gets lost
2. They stick to the cold, hard facts and no one gives a shit

This book got lost in the latter category and drowned there.

flag Like · see review

Feb 22, 2009 Cynical rated it really liked it

This book is very interesting, and serves as a good reminder that the American religious tradition isn't just Puritans and neocons. I think the only disappointment here is that there was much more to say about every topic--not Schmidt's fault--so it feels like a bare-bones survey at some points. Overall, it's a valuable read.

flag Like · see review

Jun 01, 2009 Elizabeth rated it really liked it

A well-written fascinating look at American spirituality as opposed to American religion. Leigh Schmidt discusses mysticism, solitude, piety and all the facets of spirituality up to and including Oprah. It's a wonderful look at our evolving nature.

flag Like · see review