What do you think?
Rate this book
343 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1998
The introduction is rather lack-lustre. Silverberg provides a brief historical overview of the emergence of modern fantasy in the 20th century, following a lull where science fiction reigned supreme. At least he doesn't go on at great length. The mythos introductions vary greatly in detail and quality; on balance they provide a helpful grounding for those readers who are not familiar with the series in which the stories sit.
------------------------------------------------
Stephen King, The Little Sisters of Eluria: ★★★☆☆
This story was arguably the major draw-card for me when this anthology came out; I had gobbled up the Dark Tower books that had been released at the time, on the tail-end of a late-adolescent King-binge of epic proportion. At the time, the series had yet to go South with the drooling enthusiasm of a rabid dog trying to devour its own arsehole and King's baffling attempt to tie his entire oeuvre together in a tidy knot around Roland and his ill-fated quest had yet to become tangled in the unholy mess of later works like Black House. This was one of two stories that I actually read when I got this book in '98, and I remember enjoying it, but being a little disappointed that it didn't live up to the expectations that The Drawing of Three and Wastelands had built up in me. I guess it was a taste of things to come... I enjoyed it upon rereading; it is a well-paced, compact little tale that fairly aptly presents the tone of the series, offering a handy 50-page acid test for a reader unsure of whether or not they want to dive into Mid-World head-first.
------------------------------------------------
Terry Pratchett, The Sea and Little Fishes: ★★★☆☆
This was the other story I read in this anthology back in '98, being as I was at the time (and remain) a rabid Pratchett fan. It didn't really grab me at first read, perhaps as the Granny Weatherwax novels had never really grabbed me (I'm a Vimes man, me). Rereading it 20+ years after its publication, I quite enjoyed it. In purely functional terms, it's a well constructed story that finds a scope that fits its length, characterisation is smooth and efficient, and the conceit of shifting the perspective away from the central character in the story is played to good effect. It is, perhaps, a little shy on Pratchett's trade-marked cheeky wit (by comparison to his novels), but it did manage to get the odd chuckle out of me.
------------------------------------------------
Terry Goodkind, Debt of Bones: ★☆☆☆☆
This one just dragged. There wasn't any particular thing that stuck out to me as the prime suspect for my lack of enjoyment, it just never grabbed me, and I spent 60 pages or whatever not really enjoying myself. I mainly stuck with it because there were other stories in the collection (that I'd already read) that seemed pretty dull to start with but picked up. This one didn't.
I don't know the author or his other works so I don't know how this story fits into his world; it certainly didn't feel like I needed extra background to read it, so it was self-contained, whether it adds anything to the mythos or not would probably depend on the significance of the event that takes place, as there is minimal actual lore-building going on.
------------------------------------------------
Orson Scott Card, Grinning Man: ★★★☆☆
I am not at all familiar with Card's Alvin Maker stories; the only book of his I've read is Ender's Game. I enjoyed this tale, which was well-constructed and, like Pratchett's tale, did a great job of matching scope and length. My main complaints were that the world building was basically absent and the characterisation was minimal. Both of these things, I suspect, would non-issues for someone who had read the novels, as it was, I found I relied heavily on Silverberg's summary of the previous works to make sense of the world about which I was reading.
------------------------------------------------
Robert Silverberg, The Seventh Shrine: ★★☆☆☆
The Pontifex, supreme ruler of Majipoor, has emerged from his usual seclusion in an underground fortress to solve the mystery of a murdered archaeologist at a dig site at a supposedly cursed ancient city that serves as a focus for racial tensions between conquerors and conquered, tensions the Pontifex has sought to soothe during his reign and which now threaten to flare up again. The murder-mystery wrapping of this tale was pretty poor; the author seemed much more concerned with mythos-building, which might have been more interesting if I had any experience with Silverberg's previous works. As it was, this tale failed to stand on its own for me.
------------------------------------------------
Ursula K. Le Guin, Dragonfly: ★★★☆☆
Le Guin definitely didn't phone this one in; it has all the depth and humanity that one would expect from her writing. I'm not a huge fan of the Earthsea books -though I do like the world- so it's not saying that much but I think I preferred this to most of the novels...
------------------------------------------------
Tad Williams, The Burning Man: ★★★☆☆
Williams did a good job of writing a story within a larger mythos that managed to remain sufficiently self-contained to be interesting to a reader with no previous knowledge of the world. In a manner I find reminiscent of Le Guin, this tale had a strong personal focus on the inner world of the character, weaving her life around the exploration of a single incident of haunting. There was some world-building along the way, generally understated but serving to nicely sketch the backdrop of the story without getting lost in detail.
------------------------------------------------
George R. R. Martin, The Hedge Knight: ★★★☆☆
I have not read any of Martin's A Song of Ice and Fire. I have also not lived under a rock for the past decade so I am more than passingly familiar with the lore of Westeros and its neighbouring lands. Not that it would matter; Martin's tale is exemplary in terms of being self-contained, requiring no background knowledge of the reader. Like many of the tales in this book, The Hedge Knight is strongly character-focused, with the plot revolving around a single, simple moment of conflict. Martin provides a good cast of supporting-characters and builds the tension of the tale well, with a little bit of sleight-of-hand making the story evolve into something a little different from what the reader may have initially anticipated.
------------------------------------------------
Anne McCaffrey, Runner of Pern: ★☆☆☆☆
A young woman goes for a run. She gets knocked over. She has a bath. She goes to a festival, falls head-over-heels for the guy who knocked her over, and then fantasises about him knocking her up.
If you're a die-hard Pern fan (which I was, 25 years ago) then it's just possible that there is sufficient world-building in this story to make the setting a sliver richer for you than it was before, and it's certainly adequately written, but it falls short of actually being a story.
------------------------------------------------
Raymond E. Feist, The Wood Boy: ★★☆☆☆
Pretty much the opposite of the McCaffrey story: it doesn't summon much of a world to be appreciated, but it's a nice, tight short story.
------------------------------------------------
Robert Jordan, New Spring: ★★☆☆☆
I think this is a prologue or origin story of sorts? I've never had any interest in reading the Wheel of Time and this story didn't change that but it was a relatively well-told, self-contained tale, although it did have a bit of a "there's more to come" vibe.