Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West” as Want to Read:
The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West

4.07  ·  Rating details ·  76 ratings  ·  8 reviews
This very readable book by a distinguished economist, Wall Street Journal editor, and Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury is a major challenge both to economic theory and to media explanations of the ongoing 21st century economic crisis. The one percent have pulled off an economic and political revolution. By offshoring manufacturing and professional service jobs, US co ...more
Kindle Edition, 182 pages
Published February 12th 2013 by Atwell Publishing
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

Be the first to ask a question about The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
4.07  · 
Rating details
 ·  76 ratings  ·  8 reviews


Filter
 | 
Sort order
Connie
May 28, 2014 rated it it was amazing
Not only is this a very well researched book (a hallmark of all books written by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts), it is also very well written. Considering that he was Pres. Reagan's Cabinet, I have been pleasantly surprised to see that over the years he has eschewed supply-side/trickle-down economic theory as being a workable model!

However, the main gist of this book deals with the harm that has been done not only to our country but also to Third World nations by the explosion of outsourcing. Even tho
...more
Darrell
Mar 31, 2013 rated it really liked it
Excellent exposition on how the off-shoring of U.S. jobs are turning the country into a Third World nation. Roberts brings out some interesting points that are not considered when speaking of the current economic crisis. One point is that with the collapse of the Soviet Union, there is no counterbalancing power. Another point is that "Free Market" actually means the off-shoring of manufacturing where the cheapest labor can be had. Another key point is the notion of "education". While politicians ...more
Sam Dunn
Oct 27, 2018 rated it it was ok
Is this guy a shill for Putin? Can't decide
Louis
Paul Craig Roberts’ The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West is critique of economic theory and how it has failed to match-up with reality. Roberts examines Keynesian policies as well as the Ricardian free-trade theory, including the shortcomings of both He also questions whether offshoring functions the way many free-market economists suggests, especially with regards to how successfully displaced workers are able to find new jobs.

Roberts emphasizes the fail
...more
Ben
Apr 23, 2016 rated it it was amazing
This book has some very sound arguments against mainstream economic theory. This has made me rethink a lot if the stuff I studied in university and my own view on free trade and globalization. Current trade theory is based on a world 200 years in the past that is very different than the economic landscape today. This is a must read for anyone who studies economics.
Don
Aug 05, 2013 rated it liked it
Shelves: read-in-2013
Interesting and well-researched. I just wish there had been a lot more to it.
Hattan Zahid
Dec 31, 2014 rated it it was amazing
An excellent look at the currents US economy, and how modern economics theories fails to maintain the economy!
John Rezac
Mar 13, 2013 rated it liked it
alarming
Mark
rated it it was amazing
Jun 11, 2014
Popebrak
rated it really liked it
May 27, 2015
Eoin White
rated it really liked it
Sep 28, 2017
John Kelly
rated it it was ok
Jan 01, 2014
Tham Treval
rated it liked it
May 12, 2013
Joe Goncalves
rated it liked it
Apr 08, 2016
Charles D Kausler
rated it really liked it
Dec 01, 2014
Angie
rated it really liked it
Nov 16, 2016
Klaus D Neumann
rated it really liked it
Apr 08, 2016
Lynn Wheeler
rated it really liked it
Feb 22, 2016
Dawie
rated it really liked it
Jul 16, 2016
Trojangoat
rated it really liked it
Oct 25, 2013
Sheikh Tajamul
rated it really liked it
Nov 23, 2015
Ian David
rated it it was amazing
Apr 17, 2015
rjok
rated it really liked it
Mar 29, 2014
Tom Laney
rated it it was amazing
Sep 02, 2014
Jarka
rated it it was amazing
Feb 06, 2017
Brian Spurling
rated it it was ok
Jan 02, 2015
Josh Clausen
rated it really liked it
Jul 09, 2017
Alma Deal
rated it it was amazing
Mar 24, 2017
Tom Kando
rated it it was amazing
Apr 12, 2017
Claire
rated it liked it
Jan 15, 2018
« previous 1 3 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
“Ricardo’s other necessary condition for comparative advantage is that a country’s capital seeks its comparative advantage in its home country and does not seek more productive use abroad. Ricardo confronts the possibility that English capital might migrate to Portugal to take advantage of the lower costs of production, thus leaving the English workforce unemployed, or employed in less productive ways. He is able to dismiss this undermining of comparative advantage because of “the difficulty with which capital moves from one country to another” and because capital is insecure “when not under the immediate control of its owner.” This insecurity, “fancied or real,” together “with the natural disinclination which every man has to quit the country of his birth and connections, and entrust himself, with all his habits fixed, to a strange government and new laws, check the emigration of capital. These feelings, which I should be sorry to see weakened, induce most men of property to be satisfied with a low rate of profits in their own country, rather than seek a more advantageous employment for their wealth in foreign lands.” 0 likes
“Ricardo’s other necessary condition for comparative advantage is that a country’s capital seeks its comparative advantage in its home country and does not seek more productive use abroad. Ricardo confronts the possibility that English capital might migrate to Portugal to take advantage of the lower costs of production, thus leaving the English workforce unemployed, or employed in less productive ways. He is able to dismiss this undermining of comparative advantage because of “the difficulty with which capital moves from one country to another” and because capital is insecure “when not under the immediate control of its owner.” This insecurity, “fancied or real,” together “with the natural disinclination which every man has to quit the country of his birth and connections, and entrust himself, with all his habits fixed, to a strange government and new laws, check the emigration of capital. These feelings, which I should be sorry to see weakened, induce most men of property to be satisfied with a low rate of profits in their own country, rather than seek a more advantageous employment for their wealth in foreign lands.”   Today, these feelings have been weakened. Men of property have been replaced by corporations. Once the large excess supplies of Asian labor were available to American corporations, once Congress limited the tax deductibility of CEO pay that was not “performance related,” once Wall Street pressured corporations for higher shareholder returns, once Wal-Mart ordered its suppliers to meet “the Chinese price,” once hostile takeovers could be justified as improving shareholder returns by offshoring production, capital and jobs departed the country.   Capital has become as mobile as traded goods.” 0 likes
More quotes…