Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “India: A History” as Want to Read:
India: A History
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

India: A History

3.95  ·  Rating details ·  3,255 ratings  ·  241 reviews
John Keay's India: A History is a probing and provocative chronicle of five thousand years of South Asian history, from the first Harrapan settlements on the banks of the Indus River to the recent nuclear-arms race. In a tour de force of narrative history, Keay blends together insights from a variety of scholarly fields and weaves them together to chart the evolution of th ...more
Paperback, 608 pages
Published 2000 by Grove Press
More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about India, please sign up.
Recent Questions
This question contains spoilers… (view spoiler)
India After Gandhi by Ramachandra GuhaThe Discovery of India by Jawaharlal NehruIndia's Struggle for Independence by Bipan ChandraGandhi by Mahatma GandhiThe Wonder That Was India by A.L. Basham
Indian History
294 books — 146 voters
India After Gandhi by Ramachandra GuhaThe Discovery of India by Jawaharlal NehruThe Argumentative Indian by Amartya SenIndia Unbound by Gurcharan DasIndia by John Keay
India on My Mind
387 books — 95 voters

More lists with this book...

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
Average rating 3.95  · 
Rating details
 ·  3,255 ratings  ·  241 reviews

More filters
Sort order
Start your review of India: A History
Randol Hooper
Dec 25, 2014 rated it did not like it
Shelves: my-books
I purchased this book looking for a good survey of Indian history. I have a degree in history and I am perfectly familiar with the heavy, ratkilling monograph. I am in no way intimidated by them and sat down to tackle Keay's work like I would any other such book.

The book wouldn't let me.

One comes to expect certain things of a historical survey. That is what this book purports to be. I expect to see chronology, events follow in sequence as best as possible. I don't expect, for example, to be read
Roy Lotz
Before reading this book, if somebody had asked me how much I knew about the history of India, I would have responded “very little.” Now I know that even that answer would have been optimistic. Though I normally like to consider myself an informed, educated, well-rounded person, the reality was that one of the largest and most populous countries in the world—a place with a deep history and a rich culture—was virtually unknown to me, aside from a few common clichés. It is amazing how ignorant one ...more
Tom Nixon
Jul 27, 2011 rated it liked it
How do you boil down thousands of years of civilization, empires, kingdoms and conquests too numerous to mention here into one book? I haven't the faintest idea how he manages to pull it off, but in India, A History John Keay does exactly that- and more to the point, does it extremely well.

This book represents the best one volume answer to everything you ever wanted to know about India but were afraid to ask. Starting with the earliest civilizations (the Harrapans of the Indus Valley) and wendi
Scott Ray
Aug 05, 2011 rated it it was ok it has been on my wall for a year and I still have only read 1/2. I am officially giving up. I will probably continue to read parts on and off but this book is too encompassing.

India is far to eclectic to try and cover it's thousands of years of history for all parts into one book. The south and the north have very different histories. The rise and fall of kingdoms to be covered in one book comes across very rushed and hard to follow.

I would find it much more beneficial to pick an area
Brian Griffith
Sep 25, 2020 rated it really liked it
Keay's history is incredibly detailed, with so much that was new to me that I felt like a complete ignoramus. It's also a very disciplined, focused history. Keay shuns speculative reflection, sticks to the available evidence, orders things chronologically, and focuses on matters of governance far more than on culture or ecology. This means he has fairly little to say concerning the epic pre-Maurya past, but gives massive detail on the political life of all major historic administrations. Althoug ...more
Feb 18, 2019 rated it really liked it
Shelves: india
John Keay points out in his introduction that given the lack of source materials and specialist nature of recent discoveries, a current overview is needed for Indian history prior to the 13th century. If a generalist approach is needed, Keay is a most likely writer to provide it. His study of India over the past fifty years and eloquent writing style add a shine to this work that other more academic renderings have failed to achieve. Despite concerns about the survey format, I found it was a goo ...more
Katia N
Oct 04, 2019 rated it really liked it
Without particular prior knowledge, I wanted to get an overview of the history of India. And this book was very effective for my purposes. It encompasses around 5000 years of Indian history and it does not focus more on the later periods, which was an asset for me. Obviously, it is not comprehensive, but it is cohesive and contains a lot of interesting nuggets of information, especially about the older periods where there was no written evidence per se. In the later periods, I would prefer more ...more
Manas Gupta
Apr 18, 2014 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: history
Keay's India: A History is an insightful book. Insight into the past of the vast Indian subcontinent. To pack 5000 years of diffusive and tumultous history into 650 pages seems unattainable but Keay manages to do it, and impressively.

Keay's meticulousness and resourcefulness are quite evident in the book. Referenced from many excellent sources - old and new; western and indian - it is extremely informative and fluent. It's like an old wise man sitting beside you and recounting what all he ha
Oct 07, 2010 rated it it was ok
The main problem with this book is its scope. Purportedly a book about India's history, it is quickly apparent that there is hardly any available data on which a plausible history for the three thousand plus years BCE. While this is no fault of the author, it does disappoint a little to find that instead of an actual history, what is provided is founded largely on myth.

Where facts were available, the book suffered from the fact that it was extremely difficult to relate what was happening in Nort
Andrew Fish
Jun 21, 2014 rated it it was ok
The history of a subcontinent is bound to be a complex affair. The more people, the more going on, and the more needs to be simplified and cut down to make a manageable volume. Most historians look for trends: if you're writing a history of Europe, for example, then the Black Death, the Reformation and the Age of Enlightenment are all pan-continental developments which can be discussed either in broad terms or through the prism of one country's experience.

Maybe for India these developments don't
Sean McKenna
Feb 19, 2014 rated it really liked it
Going into my first visit to India, I realized that I had almost no knowledge of its history, so I was seeking a readable single volume that would bring me somewhat up to speed. I had followed a similar approach with Leonard Thompson's "A History of South Africa" and very much enjoyed it. While I enjoyed Keay's book as well, it became clear pretty early on that it would be a bit more of a slog.

The fundamental difference, of course, is that while South Africa and India have both been inhabited fo
Jan 21, 2016 rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: history
Alright. I give up. Here's my most-of-the-way (and slow-going) review.

The author knows what he's talking about. He has taken centuries and centuries of data and compiled it into a logical timeline, showing the rise and fall of the dynasties throughout Indian history. He takes events that seem isolated and unimportant and places them in a historical context - a valuable skills for any historian.

The problem is that while the author clearly has a fine grip on the facts (or at least the evidence an
This book is kinda terrible. The beginning was ok, and the end was decent, but everything after Harappa and before the Mughals was absolutely brutal to read. This makes some sense given that India has never been a unified state until independence, although it did come close under the Mughals and the British Raj. Because of India's disunity, it is difficult to write a historical narrative (especially when earlier documents are scattered, if extant at all). But, surely there would have been some b ...more
Mar 05, 2018 rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: politics-history
A fascinating subject was unfortunately rendered extremely dull. John Keay’s prose is akin to a stream of conscious. This might suite a novel but it does not suit a history book at all. I want to know who the important people and events were and a bit about them. I thus feel very let down by this. Keay likes to introduce people with little background build up and then get rid of them just as quickly. He likes to drop in Nehru and Gandhi when talking about civilisation 2000 years before their tim ...more
Ernesto Alaniz
Oct 03, 2009 rated it it was ok
The history seems to be conjecture until we get to Alexander the Great. It is hard to construe a narrative out of next to nothing. Once we enter recorded history, the book actually becomes interesting.
Bryan Alkire
Jan 07, 2019 rated it it was ok
Good enough overview but makes for good bedtime reading....
Nov 18, 2016 rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Keay's well-cited history of the sub-continent reads a bit like India itself: big and messy and difficult to quite pin down. In a country, this is an understandable quality; in a book, less so. Despite having read 600 pages of Indian history, I don't feel as I'm much better equipped to understand India (nor Pakistan or Bangladesh, for that matter) than I was at the beginning. I suppose this is a tall order for such an immense subject, but I suppose I'm demanding.

Having said that, it really is e
Frank Peters
The book covers the entire history of India, from the most ancient times to the near present. As a result, the history tends to be brief and unfortunately dry. Thankfully the book was well written, and was therefore somewhat interesting. I greatly appreciate the effort the author took to outline areas of debate, presenting both sides. I certainly understand modern India more as a result of completing the book.
Nelson Minar
Feb 18, 2015 rated it did not like it
Hate to be so negative, but I only managed a third of the book before I totally lost interest and quit. Bought this to read ahead of a trip to India. It started off strong and I'm glad I read the section on Ashoka. But then it got deep in the weeds of the details of specific princes who are only remembered for one specific thing. Too much detail, not enough story. In retrospect I probably wanted the 200 page history of India, not the 600 page one. ...more
Jim Dudley
May 19, 2018 rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
I haven't failed to finish a book for many years but this one is so replete with references to things which I don't know or need to research separately that I can't get through it. Defeated by page 200. It's just not interesting, the chronology is all over the place and the geography and reference material far too obscure for enjoyment. Back to John Julius Norwich for history I think. ...more
Jan 13, 2015 rated it did not like it
It is hard to decouple facts from authors opinion, the later being heavily biased and anti India at times. The book is extremely well written and easy to read in-spite of the complex topic it covers. Good for facts and statistics but not a true understanding of India or Indians.
Nick Woodall
Jan 22, 2016 rated it it was ok
Shelves: india, history
While John Keay is an excellent writer, I found the book thoroughly boring. Unless one understands Indian geography and a timeline of it's kings, it is total jibberish, especially to an American reader. ...more
Apr 20, 2018 rated it it was ok
Ho. Ly. Shit. That took forever. Probably a good history if you already have a background, but he name drops so often with so little information I felt like I still didn't know much after reading a chapter. ...more
Martin Willoughby
Sep 21, 2013 rated it it was ok
Dry and academic, but a worthwhile addition to a historian's shelf or as a reference book. ...more
Jul 05, 2014 rated it it was ok
A history of India from 3000 BC to 1999 AD.

A comprehensive account, readable, of course very interesting.
Maria Ní Fhlatharta
May 20, 2017 rated it did not like it
"For the Nations of the Indian subcontinent, as for the rest of the colonial world, the 20th century peaked at Independence"

Not so much an apology for colonialism but a love letter to it.
Sandeepan Mondal
Jun 10, 2013 rated it really liked it
John Keay has done a wonderful job in condensing the varied and diverse history of India in a 600 page book. The description of various major and minor periods of Indian history have been dealt with good hands but the flow of narration is a little difficult to get hold of sometimes. Also, the reader who is totally unaware of Indian history (this being the first instance he has laid his hands upon an INDIAN HISTORY book) would be a little disappointed since the author, going by his writing style ...more
Nov 12, 2020 rated it did not like it
This is a shoddy attempt to write a history of a country and civilization that is probably the oldest in the world. The author clearly writes with a bias throughout the book and hindu "nationalism" or BJP party, etc. is routinely referred to as zealots, extremists, and other such blanket derogatory terms. Just one example of his bias is that he claims the discriminatory jizya tax against Hindus in Mughal era was rarely enforced! He provides no references for such bizarre statements and in genera ...more
Harini Gopalswami Srinivasan
Oct 31, 2011 rated it did not like it
Maybe I'm not being fair to this book. I confess I've read only the introduction. But it struck me as being so patronizing, I couldn't get through any more. Of late, I've been prejudiced against any book that talks about the Aryan Invasion with a straight face. Come on, who really believes that rubbish any more, and why are we perpetuating it? ...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Readers also enjoyed

  • The Argumentative Indian: Writings on Indian History, Culture and Identity
  • The Last Mughal: The Fall of a Dynasty: Delhi, 1857
  • India After Gandhi: The History of the World's Largest Democracy
  • Indian Summer: The Secret History of the End of an Empire
  • The Wonder That Was India: A Survey of the History and Culture of the Indian Sub-Continent before the coming of the Muslims
  • The Discovery of India
  • Freedom at Midnight
  • India Unbound: The Social and Economic Revolution from Independence to the Global Information Age
  • Aurangzeb: The Man and the Myth
  • The Hindus: An Alternative History
  • City of Djinns: A Year in Delhi
  • France: A History: from Gaul to de Gaulle
  • The New Penguin History of The World
  • India's Struggle for Independence
  • Land of the Seven Rivers: A Brief History of India's Geography
  • Empires of the Indus: The Story of a River
  • The Anarchy: The East India Company, Corporate Violence, and the Pillage of an Empire
  • The Moor's Last Sigh
See similar books…
John Stanley Melville Keay FRGS is an English journalist and author specialising in writing popular histories about India and the Far East, often with a particular focus on their colonisation and exploration by Europeans.

John Keay is the author of about 20 books, all factual, mostly historical, and largely to do with Asia, exploration or Scotland. His first book stayed in print for thirty years; m

News & Interviews

Need another excuse to treat yourself to a new book this week? We've got you covered with the buzziest new releases of the day. To create our...
41 likes · 12 comments
“In Vedic society the bard was originally the chief’s charioteer. His function was not necessarily hereditary nor exclusively reserved to a particular social group.” 0 likes
“Alamgirpur” 0 likes
More quotes…