Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “This Is Improbable: Cheese String Theory, Magnetic Chickens, and Other Wtf Research” as Want to Read:
This Is Improbable: Cheese String Theory, Magnetic Chickens, and Other Wtf Research
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

This Is Improbable: Cheese String Theory, Magnetic Chickens, and Other Wtf Research

3.07  ·  Rating details ·  135 Ratings  ·  25 Reviews
Often, thinking seriously about outlandish problems is the only way to make progress in science. The rest of the time, it’s hilarious. Marc Abrahams, the founder of the famous Ig Nobel prizes, offers an addictive, wryly funny exposé of the oddest, most imaginative, and just plain improbable research from around the world. He looks into why books on ethics are more likely t ...more
ebook, 612 pages
Published November 27th 2014 by ONEWorld (first published January 1st 2012)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about This Is Improbable, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about This Is Improbable

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30)
Rating details
Sort: Default
~ Odette Knappers
Mar 28, 2017 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: 2017
I REALLY love the IgNobel prices. It is a great way so entertain people and show them science. the research awarded with an IgNobel price makes people laugh, but then think because the value for science or society is explained.

That last thing, that is what I'm missing in this book. That is why this book is disappointing for me, or at least, not meeting my expectations. But it is really funny at some times. I do have to admit I skimmed or even skipped some parts because it did not sounded very in
Brian Clegg
Oct 09, 2012 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
The Ig Nobel Prize has become something of an institution in the science world. Year after year, respected scientists turn up to have their leg pulled about the topic of an academic paper they have had published (or occasionally a patent application). The man behind the Ig Nobels, Marc Abrahams, writes a column on ‘improbable research’ and this book is a collection of these articles, though often enhanced for the book form.

The tag line of the Ig Nobels is that it is for research that makes you l
Aug 18, 2012 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Marc Abrahams, founder of the Ig Nobel Prizes which reward achievements which make people laugh and then make them think, brings us a collection of strange, funny and just plain amazing scientific research.

This is the kind of book that makes you want to read out snippets to whoever is near. I did this so often that my husband quickly became exasperated and took the book away from me. However, within 10 minutes of him starting to read it, he was doing exactly the same thing.

The research presented
May 17, 2015 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
As an easily amused person, i find this book as extremely amusing. A collection of highly improbable , Ig Nobel Prize winning research and others (several quirky research were even published in Nature journal!). I can't quite get the book's structure and I would love the discussions be made longer, but oh well, maybe the length is adequate to prove one point ; masses may wonder why scientists bother to investigate certain seemingly unimportant subjects (e.g contagious yawning among tortoise, imp ...more
Oct 12, 2014 rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Šo grāmatu nopirku pirms pāris gadiem, jo amazonē viņai bija liela atlaide. Atsauksmes un nosaukums šķita pietiekami interesanti, lai manu uz šādu pirkumu pamudinātu. Grāmatas autors ir pazīstams arī kā Ig Nobel Prize nodibinātājs, un tas vien liecināja, ka noteikti neviens cits labāk par viņu nepārzina dīvainos zinātnes pētījumus.

Reizēm zinātnes attīstība notiek pētot visdīvainākās problēmas. Vienmēr atrodas kāds zinātnieks, kuru uztrauks tādi jautājumi, par cik alus dārdzība samazina noziegumu
According to the blurb, this book is a ‘wry’ look at various science projects over the years. It was a little too ‘wry’ for my tastes though, the style of writing really didn’t appeal to me.

The author is the founder of the Ig Nobel prizes, which scientists win by publishing papers with funny or eye-catchingly odd premises. The idea is that at first glance the research seems to be pretty silly (like levitating a frog in an electromagnet or testing the material strength of cheese), but does nevert
Todd Stockslager
Review title: Outtakes from the Journal of Irreproducible Results?

The above named journal, an inside parody of the density and denseness of hyper serious scientific journals, was one of my favorite finds when I worked at the University of Maryland Engineering and Physical Sciences library back on the late 1970s. This book reads like a virtual index of the kinds of articles the journal published in jest--with the difference that these are apparently real. And thanks to the magic of the Internet,
Alaina Sloo
This collection of some of Annals of Improbable Research editor Marc Abrahams' favorite unusual research is lots of fun. Whether he's describing studies about an Australian beetle's mating behavior with beer bottles, the effect of saliva flow on the perception of custard flavor, or sheep personalities, Abrahams has a gift for explaining the research in a way that's humorous and also can't help making you think. For most people it will feel like an uneven collection: some will be hilarious and so ...more
Oct 17, 2014 rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
The problem with reading a book of "WTF research," as the subtitle calls it, is that you're reading an entire book of WTF research. Not nearly as funny as a good comedy, and not nearly as scientific as a typical science book, this book falls in a canyon between the two. I think the conceit works much better in its original form--a weekly column in the Guardian newspaper.

And this truly is "WTF research." Each entry is 1-1.5 pages on weird articles the author found in scientific journals--"Leftove
Since the entries are fairly short (about 1-2 pages each), there's enough to be interesting as a snapshot, but not so much that the entries prattle.

While reading, I was amused and even chuckled at times. But ask me what I read some 10 minutes later, and I probably couldn't tell you much.

(I do remember well that throw-away reference to "homosexual, necrophiliac ducks" in the prologue, though. And yet there's no English translation of Moeliker's De eendenman available. What justice is there in thi
Soh Kam Yung
Dec 23, 2013 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: science, reference
A brilliant book that will definitely make you laugh; and make you think.

Marc Abrahams has documented some of the most unusual papers, thoughts and experiments conducted in the name of science on people, animals and objects. Quite a number may seem trivial and make you wonder just why people would actually want to publish work on it. But others studies will make you think, and reconsider what the study shows about the world around you. Some, well, they appear to be there just to give Abrahams a
Lisa Kucharski
These studies are truly off the wall, around the corner and in the box of - wtf. Others are just completely useless in scope. The book could use even more humor from the author on some of the studies, but this book contains what feels like an endless supply of people wanting to understand the obscure and I'm not sure if they are doing it for the money or because they are really interested in finding out something. Some of the studies feel like they "had to come up with a study" and had really no ...more
May 03, 2013 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Not only is the research itself often amusing (or bemusing), Abrahams' writing about the research is hysterically funny. I understand that not all research has an immediate "purpose", but I am hard-pressed to explain why someone would build a career out of studying the history of underwear in the Soviet Union (as one study detailed). Teaching monkeys to play rock, paper, scissors? Sure, that's good fun. Statistical modeling of how sheep form groups in a pasture? Hmmm...
Apr 23, 2013 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: non-fiction, science
This is a collection of Abrahams' columns on weird science and improbably research, supplemented with some new work. It's chock-full of interesting and entertaining information but I prefer weird science books with a narrative flow - I think his columns are better left just as columns. This started to just feel long and you couldn't possibly remember all the stuff you'd read.
Oct 08, 2014 rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: abandoned
(ebook edition) nonfiction. I was hoping for something more like 'freakonomics' but these were inconsequential little blurbs, summaries of off-the-wall studies. I only skimmed the first chapter or so, but it wasn't catching my interest at all.
Oct 29, 2014 rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: not-finished
I liked the idea of WTF research, but it all seems a collection of random stuff put together just because. The author is trying to be funny with his comments, but that's about it. I don't know what I was expecting, but it wasn't this. Didn't ring my bell.
Jun 15, 2015 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: 2015
Too much information to follow the narrative thread.
Sharon 2013
Nov 01, 2012 rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Didn't get too terribly far. The stories were interesting, but they were just all brief snippets no more than a page long. Not really the type of book you'd read straight through.
Mohammed Al-Garawi
Alvaro Pérez
Amusing, but would have wish more in-depth descriptions or analyses of some of the research, the author tried to pack too much in this book.
Pedro Plassen
Sep 19, 2013 rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: science, humour
Something missed regarding the author's sense of humor. Too many postulates, too shortly described. A bit tiresome at the end of the day.
Richard Martin
This was interesting for about the first hundred pages. At that time reading became tedious.
Adam Cline
rated it really liked it
Jun 08, 2016
rated it liked it
Oct 24, 2012
Michelle Farley
rated it liked it
Sep 10, 2012
rated it it was ok
Jan 18, 2014
rated it liked it
Jul 15, 2013
rated it really liked it
Oct 26, 2016
rated it liked it
Dec 27, 2015
« previous 1 3 4 5 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • The Pseudoscience Wars: Immanuel Velikovsky and the Birth of the Modern Fringe
  • Solaris Rising: The New Solaris Book of Science Fiction
  • Neutrino
  • The Counter-Creationism Handbook
  • What's in Your Genes?: From the Color of Your Eyes to the Length of Your Life, a Revealing Look at Your Genetic Traits
  • Death
  • Dinosaur Art: The World's Greatest Paleoart
  • The Haskell School of Expression: Learning Functional Programming Through Multimedia
  • Theories for Everything: An Illustrated History of Science
  • Abominable Science!: Origins of the Yeti, Nessie, and Other Famous Cryptids
  • Feeding Frenzy
  • Ignorance: How it drives science
  • Massive: The Missing Particle That Sparked the Greatest Hunt in Science
  • Relics of Eden: The Powerful Evidence of Evolution in Human DNA
  • Haskell: The Craft of Functional Programming
  • The Alarming History of Medicine: Amusing Anecdotes from Hippocrates to Heart Transplants
  • Noodling for Flatheads: Moonshine, Monster Catfish, and Other Southern Comforts
  • Frozen Planet
Marc Abrahams writes the 'Improbable Research' column for the Guardian and is the author of 'This Is Improbable'. He is the founding editor of the science humour magazine Annals of Improbable Research and founder of the Ig Nobel Prizes, which are presented at Harvard University each year. Abrahams and the Ig have been covered by the BBC, New Scientist, Daily Mail, Times, and numerous other outlets ...more
More about Marc Abrahams...