Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Half-Life of Facts: Why Everything We Know Has an Expiration Date” as Want to Read:
The Half-Life of Facts: Why Everything We Know Has an Expiration Date
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Half-Life of Facts: Why Everything We Know Has an Expiration Date

3.52  ·  Rating details ·  918 ratings  ·  144 reviews
New insights from the science of science
Facts change all the time. Smoking has gone from doctor recommended to deadly. We used to think the Earth was the center of the universe and that Pluto was a planet. For decades, we were convinced that the brontosaurus was a real dinosaur. In short, what we know about the world is constantly changing.
But it turns out there's an ord
ebook, 256 pages
Published September 1st 2012 by Portfolio
More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
Average rating 3.52  · 
Rating details
 ·  918 ratings  ·  144 reviews

More filters
Sort order
Start your review of The Half-Life of Facts: Why Everything We Know Has an Expiration Date
Mar 30, 2015 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition

Way back in 2012, I discovered Netgalley and requested a few books. But somehow, I lost track of my acceptances and eventually forgot all about Netgalley. My ARC of The Half-Life of Facts lay neglected, forgotten, and unread. The years went by, and eventually, I rediscovered Netgalley, only to find that I had a black mark on my record: I'd never read or reviewed The Half-Life of Facts. Although I've been slowly repairing my reviewing ratio, I only discovered recently that I could actually go back and right th
Grady McCallie
The Half-Life of Facts is an engaging, popular introduction to several topics within information science. The title comes from the notion that one can measure the rate at which papers within a discipline become obsolete, assigning a half-life to each field. The author explicitly uses 'fact' in a loose sense; he means, things we understand to be true about the universe.

The book is filled with anecdotes and is highly readable. On the down side, the author never presents an overarching framework f
Rich Mcghee
Jan 04, 2013 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This was a good book, but the writing left something to desired.

Overall, the ideas the author presents are sound, and he uses a plethora of examples to show the reader what he is talking about, which I liked very much. However, his style is somewhat jumpy, bouncing between three or four related topics per chapter. I think his point was to try and connect these related ideas in a meaningful way, but I felt he could have done this better.

The content of the book is obviously where this
Kevin Nuut
Dec 26, 2012 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: big-data
It gets repetitive but wraps with a good message. In the spirit of the book, I will soon forget it's advice.
Oct 15, 2012 rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: nonfiction
I actually thought this would be more about social media and the ultra fast news cycle, but it was still an ok read. I take issue on the very loose definition of "facts" used in the book, there's a big difference between discovering that the Earth revolves around the sun, figuring out the one billionth digit of pi, measuring a value with an increased level of accuracy and precision, and using meta-analysis to increase the statistical significance of a study. According to the author, an underlyin ...more
Mar 04, 2013 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
I wish I thought that I would be able to remember everything I learned from this book, though Arbesman did give me an out by suggesting that the time has come to outsource our memories to the cloud because that's the best way of getting the latest information. But already I'm forgetting some of the mechanisms of error that humans are prone to, lapsing back into them. I can feel my sharp edges blurring.

This is a wonderful book! Turns out that nearly everything can be quantified in way
Mark Shainblum
Mar 15, 2013 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Absolutely brilliant. I'll say more soon, but if you're interested in science and knowledge, do yourself a favour and read this book.
Nov 17, 2013 rated it liked it
Facts change over time. Some, we expect to change. One hundred years ago, the answer to “How many billion people on earth?” was: two. When I was at school that changed from four to five. Recently, it became seven. Others, like "How many fingers on a human hand?”, we expect to remain constant (at least for a very long time). Sometimes even these sorts of facts, however, change unexpectedly. From 1912 to 1956 scientists were certain there were 48 chromosomes in a human cell. Some even had to aband ...more
Jan 20, 2013 rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
My bottom line is that this is an interesting work and the reader will learn from it, but there were far too many poorly worded questionable passages and disastrous sentence structures in this book for either author or editor to be praised.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Maybe author Samuel Arbesman should have made his best points earlier. He almost lost this reviewer along the way.

To declare early, "I am choosing to use 'fact' in a loose fashion," sounds tantamount to "playing loose w
Kent Winward
Jul 12, 2018 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Not only are our politics fact challenged, our science is as well. Biggest difference? Science has a self-correcting mechanism built in. Wonderful wonky book on statistical reviews of how facts change over time.
Mar 02, 2018 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Insightful, optimistic description of how facts age and gets renewed and how knowledge creation is actually predictable.
Aug 16, 2017 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Was drawn to this book due to the relevancy of "alternative facts". Discusses the transfer, turnover rate, and origins of knowledge. Highly recommend if anyone is interested in how what we know as "fact" actually changes over time.
Dec 09, 2012 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This is a bit dry and mathematically-minded, but still a good discussion of change in truth as we know it over time. It covers corrections in scientific understanding (e.g. the nature of the atom) and things you would expect to shift, such as the biggest cities in the world or the best way to treat a nosebleed. Samuel Arbesman is looking at this mostly from the meta-science of looking at how knowledge changes, where it turns out that change in facts frequently behave predictably in the aggregate, where ...more
Michael Quinn
Apr 16, 2013 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Arbesman presents a very broad and entertaining survey of the current state of science. The book touches on a huge array of issues that concern scientific work, like falsification, reproducibility, the combination of different fields and the process of generating new knowledge. Similarly, these topics are illustrated with anecdotes from throughout science. Arbesman tackles behavioral issues, astronomy, paleontology, physics, chemistry and many more topics. His digressions tend to be brief, and t ...more
Bill Leach
Interesting, but unsurprising.

1 The Half Life of Facts
- facts, in terms of current knowledge, have a half life
2. The Pace of Discovery
- the growth of knowledge is exponential - 1947 Lehman study suggested doubling times from 20 years in Grand Opera to 87 years in medicine
3. The Asymptote of Truth
- knowledge decays, as in being over-turned and becoming obsolete, exponentially
4. Moore's Law of Everything
- discussion of the exponential growth of
Oct 17, 2012 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: non-fiction, kindle, 2012
After I saw Samuel Arbesman speak at Tedx Kansas City a few weeks ago, I knew I had to read his book. The premise of his talk and his book is that facts are not really information set in stone, the way we usually think about them. The world is constantly changing and nothing is for certain forever. I was floored by the notion that what my kids are learning in school may contradict what I learned in school. For some reason, that notion had never occurred to me!

The Half-Life of Facts i
Oct 27, 2012 rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
This book didn't really deliver. While it did provide estimates of turnover in facts in various areas of knowledge (though based on very doubtful methodologies), it didn't provide much guidance on how to deal with it and the guidance it did provide was little more than "look it up on the internet" - oddly this was seen as a good thing and it was touted as a good thing to effectively outsource our memories to the cloud. The problem with this is that it will ultimately lead to the death of innovat ...more
Pete Welter
Oct 03, 2012 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
A range of topics centered on the lifespan of facts - why go out of date faster than we think, and how we as human handle this. Arbesman looks at how various scientific and technological "facts" - the various types of facts and their certainty, measurement and transmission.

If you are interested in the way knowledge spreads, or in how we are handling the current explosion in technical and factual knowledge, this book is well worth the read. My takeaways:

* if you don't want facts to g
Dec 06, 2016 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
I tried very hard to like this book.
I want to like it a lot more than I did. I also want to remember everything I read because it is interesting. Overall, I know that won't happen, but the take-away is things change. Things that can be taken as fact change, so we should ensure to question what is a fact, where it came from, and understand the cycle of "facts".
He speaks about a lot of great ideas, uses many great examples, and diagrams. I just had such a hard time staying engaged for long
Peter Mcloughlin
Some interesting factoids about the changing nature of information and the speeds that certain facts change (they change at different speeds in different areas). Knowledge is balkanized. inside scientific literature that is growing exponential a lot of public knowledge never makes it to the public because it is buried in a pile of other papers. Doing meta-analysis on data we find the recent breakthrough was discovered and buried years before. We know there is a lot of churn on facts but some fac ...more
Hunter Williams
Reminiscent of Malcolm Gladwell - lots of entertaining anecdotes loosely woven together around a common theme, but not too deep and little "so what" - more descriptive than prescriptive. Strongest in the middle, beginning and conclusion both weaker. Definitely worth reading, particularly good complement to The Signal and the Noise.
Sep 26, 2014 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
An interesting discussion of how knowledge (facts, scientific discoveries, technology) changes over time. Occasionally it strays too far into "Did you know ... (interesting fact) ...?" territory, which is annoying, but I'm feeling generous, so I'll give it 4 stars instead of 3. In sum, a good start on an interesting topic, but doesn't quite go into enough depth to be really great.
Oct 05, 2012 rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition

The first chapter explains that the author employs a very loose definition of the word fact; in any number of other places, phrases like 'creation of facts' are used. In other words, the book consists of a massive reversal of consciousness and existence.

The two stars are for the only value the book has, which is to give insight as to how a lot of people see knowledge these days.
Feb 27, 2013 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
A fun account of misinformation and changes in knowledge. There isn't all that much of a unifying narrative though.
Boris Limpopo
Dec 31, 2012 rated it liked it
Arbesman, Samuel (2012). The Half-life of Facts: Why Everything We Know Has an Expiration Date. New York: Current. 2012. ISBN 9781101595299. Pagine 256. 14,10 €

L’idea di fondo del libro è originale e stimolante: i fatti e le nozioni che apprendiamo e formano l’insieme delle nostre conoscenze hanno una durata limitata, non definibile specificamente, ma prevedibile statisticamente, come succede per il decadimento degli atomi radioattivi. Arbesman articola e argome
Sean Goh
Aug 10, 2019 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: science
Interesting perspective on how scientific knowledge has an expiry date, though draggy at times. The bit about exponential growth propelling innovation seems to jar against the notion of sustainability, though allusions to logistic curves and carrying capacities alleviate that somewhat.
tl;dr - don't be so sure of what you know.

Perhaps more derivative fields (e.g. medicine) move more slowly compared to the basic areas of knowledge on which they depend.

By thei
Jan 20, 2018 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: non-fiction, 2018, science
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
3.5 stars.

I wasn't as interested in the middle chapters so I dragged my feet a bit while reading this, but I very much enjoyed it once chapters 8 and 9 (about statistics and human biases, respectively).

A good casual intro for those curious about scientific discoveries that contradict each other, i.e. "why did they tell us that fatty foods were bad but now they're saying some fats are good for you?"
Apr 12, 2019 rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
The more we learn, the less we know. And most of that knowledge will become obsolete, outdated, and/or incorrect quickly. We live in a fast-paced world, where "facts" are changing and adapting all around us. I found this a somewhat discouraging read. I won't be too disheartened though, as I won't remember most of what I read and will likely be long gone before it even matters.
Maya Evans
Dec 24, 2018 rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Very boring. The entire of the premise of this book is that science is an ever-evolving field. That's it. I don't know how the author managed to stretch that one idea into an entire book. He did a terrible job. The narrator also read this as if it were a fictional novel or short story when it should have been read more like a podcast or news story. Would not recommend at all.
« previous 1 3 4 5 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Readers also enjoyed

  • The Theory That Would Not Die: How Bayes' Rule Cracked the Enigma Code, Hunted Down Russian Submarines, and Emerged Triumphant from Two Centuries of Controversy
  • Turing's Cathedral: The Origins of the Digital Universe
  • The Master Switch: The Rise and Fall of Information Empires
  • The Idea Factory: Bell Labs and the Great Age of American Innovation
  • The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction
  • Liars and Outliers: Enabling the Trust that Society Needs to Thrive
  • Dreaming in Code: Two Dozen Programmers, Three Years, 4,732 Bugs, and One Quest for Transcendent Software
  • Too Big to Know: Rethinking Knowledge Now That the Facts Aren't the Facts, Experts Are Everywhere, and the Smartest Person in the Room Is the Room
  • Nine Algorithms That Changed the Future: The Ingenious Ideas That Drive Today's Computers
  • Proofiness: The Dark Arts of Mathematical Deception
  • What Technology Wants
  • How We Got to Now: Six Innovations That Made the Modern World
  • Thinking in Bets: Making Smarter Decisions When You Don't Have All the Facts
  • Darwin's Ghosts: The Secret History of Evolution
  • Lauren Ipsum
  • The Innovators: How a Group of  Hackers, Geniuses and Geeks Created the Digital Revolution
  • Cryptography: A Very Short Introduction
  • Taming the Infinite: The Story of Mathematics from the First Numbers to Chaos Theory
See similar books…
“Every day that we read the news we have the possibility of being confronted with a fact about our world that is wildly different from what we thought we knew.” 3 likes
“many medical schools inform their students that within several years half of what they’ve been taught will be wrong, and the teachers just don’t know which half.” 2 likes
More quotes…