What do you think?
Rate this book
The American Heritage Dictionary of Science
With more than 16,000 entries from astronomy to zoology, this dictionary contains the most accurate, up-to-date, and understandable definitions currently available to the general reader.
740 pages, Hardcover
First published August 22, 1988
7 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
July 12, 2019
Excellent reference work that needs a new edition
The immediate question might be, why buy a science dictionary that is 18 years old? There are two good reasons. One is cost. Compared to the newer dictionaries that I have seen, this book is a bargain.
The second reason is that this is an excellent and handy volume that will answer the vast majority of your questions about the definitions and usage of scientific terms. While it is true that scientific knowledge is speeding ahead at breakneck pace, most of the fundamentals of science haven't change since this dictionary was first released in 1986. This is a comprehensive dictionary of science, not to be confused with popular and much shorter works like the Dictionary of Scientific Literary from John Wiley and Sons which concentrate on only the most popular scientific ideas.
Want to know what joule is? Or a fermion? Or how the phrase "heat sink" is used? How about the "uncertainty principle" from quantum mechanics? Or what the letter "c" means across the disciplines of science? There all here along with about 16,000 other entries. The entry for "c," for example, includes nine definitions for the lower case "c" (including "charm" in subatomic particle physics) and nine more for the capital "C."
Or take a term like "orbit." There are entries from astronomy, physics, and anatomy for the noun form of the word, and four more entries for the verb form. Or the abbreviation "Ig" (immunoglobulin). This dictionary explains in some detail the differences between "IgA," "IgE," "IgG," and "IgM."
There are numerous small black and white illustrations throughout and many cross references. Many entries include quotations demonstrating the use of the term in question. How the term is pronounced is given. I recently checked on the pronunciation of "prion" (the infectious agent of mad-cow disease) expecting to see "pri'-on" with a long "I" sound, but instead found the correct "pree'-on."
Although this is a comprehensive science dictionary it is not exhaustive. For instance, the moons in the solar system are not included. The use of the letters "r" and "k" in evolutionary biology referring to parental strategies of species (the former standing for many offspring, the latter for good care of fewer offspring) should appear but do not. Terms that have been coined in recent years obviously do not appear, but there are also some terms that were in use before 1986 but were not considered important enough at the time for inclusion. "Gaia" is an example, as are entries for "complexity" theory and "chaos." Even a term like "neoteny" which refers to child-like features in an adult organism is missing although it appears in the unabridged second edition of the Merriam-Webster dictionary from the thirties.
Nonetheless, until such time as the publishing industry brings out a scientific dictionary that is both affordable and comprehensive, this book will continue to be a find. Curiously enough I was at major book store a couple of weeks ago and found a brand new copy on sale at the jacket price. That says volumes about the publishing niche that this book continues to occupy.
--Dennis Littrell, author of “The World Is Not as We Think It Is”
The immediate question might be, why buy a science dictionary that is 18 years old? There are two good reasons. One is cost. Compared to the newer dictionaries that I have seen, this book is a bargain.
The second reason is that this is an excellent and handy volume that will answer the vast majority of your questions about the definitions and usage of scientific terms. While it is true that scientific knowledge is speeding ahead at breakneck pace, most of the fundamentals of science haven't change since this dictionary was first released in 1986. This is a comprehensive dictionary of science, not to be confused with popular and much shorter works like the Dictionary of Scientific Literary from John Wiley and Sons which concentrate on only the most popular scientific ideas.
Want to know what joule is? Or a fermion? Or how the phrase "heat sink" is used? How about the "uncertainty principle" from quantum mechanics? Or what the letter "c" means across the disciplines of science? There all here along with about 16,000 other entries. The entry for "c," for example, includes nine definitions for the lower case "c" (including "charm" in subatomic particle physics) and nine more for the capital "C."
Or take a term like "orbit." There are entries from astronomy, physics, and anatomy for the noun form of the word, and four more entries for the verb form. Or the abbreviation "Ig" (immunoglobulin). This dictionary explains in some detail the differences between "IgA," "IgE," "IgG," and "IgM."
There are numerous small black and white illustrations throughout and many cross references. Many entries include quotations demonstrating the use of the term in question. How the term is pronounced is given. I recently checked on the pronunciation of "prion" (the infectious agent of mad-cow disease) expecting to see "pri'-on" with a long "I" sound, but instead found the correct "pree'-on."
Although this is a comprehensive science dictionary it is not exhaustive. For instance, the moons in the solar system are not included. The use of the letters "r" and "k" in evolutionary biology referring to parental strategies of species (the former standing for many offspring, the latter for good care of fewer offspring) should appear but do not. Terms that have been coined in recent years obviously do not appear, but there are also some terms that were in use before 1986 but were not considered important enough at the time for inclusion. "Gaia" is an example, as are entries for "complexity" theory and "chaos." Even a term like "neoteny" which refers to child-like features in an adult organism is missing although it appears in the unabridged second edition of the Merriam-Webster dictionary from the thirties.
Nonetheless, until such time as the publishing industry brings out a scientific dictionary that is both affordable and comprehensive, this book will continue to be a find. Curiously enough I was at major book store a couple of weeks ago and found a brand new copy on sale at the jacket price. That says volumes about the publishing niche that this book continues to occupy.
--Dennis Littrell, author of “The World Is Not as We Think It Is”
March 29, 2016
It's a dictionary, not an encyclopaedia, so the definitions are brief rather than comprehensive. And bear in mind that it was published in the eighties, so cutting-edge it is not.
I find that I rely on Google-fu these days to answer my questions, science or otherwise, but it is nice to have a dedicated tome to thumb through, even if for no other reason than for the pleasure of erudite bathroom reading.
But for that I'd peruse more contemporary offerings. Maybe Collins Dictionary of Science? It has the added bonus of having 666 pages - an amusing count for a book that will never be read by red-state religious tract thumpers. ;)
Reviewed at the request of my friend Teresa.
I find that I rely on Google-fu these days to answer my questions, science or otherwise, but it is nice to have a dedicated tome to thumb through, even if for no other reason than for the pleasure of erudite bathroom reading.
But for that I'd peruse more contemporary offerings. Maybe Collins Dictionary of Science? It has the added bonus of having 666 pages - an amusing count for a book that will never be read by red-state religious tract thumpers. ;)
Reviewed at the request of my friend Teresa.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews