Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Why Your Five-Year-Old Could Not Have Done That: Modern Art Explained” as Want to Read:
Why Your Five-Year-Old Could Not Have Done That: Modern Art Explained
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Why Your Five-Year-Old Could Not Have Done That: Modern Art Explained

by
3.37  ·  Rating details ·  536 ratings  ·  73 reviews
Come on, you know you've thought it--while viewing a -masterpiece- of abstract art, you mutter, -A kid could do that.- Here Susie Hodge, author of How to Survive Modern Art, explains why the best examples of modern art are actually the result of sophisticated thought and serious talent. From Marcel Duchamp's notorious Fountain and the scribbles of Cy Twombly to Mark Rothko ...more
Paperback, 224 pages
Published September 25th 2012 by Prestel Publishing (first published 2012)
More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Why Your Five-Year-Old Could Not Have Done That, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Why Your Five-Year-Old Could Not Have Done That

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
Average rating 3.37  · 
Rating details
 ·  536 ratings  ·  73 reviews


More filters
 | 
Sort order
Start your review of Why Your Five-Year-Old Could Not Have Done That: Modern Art Explained
Cecily


Why I Could Not Have Written This - PG / R rated review

I enjoy visiting art exhibitions, but I do so in an experiential, rather than an intellectual, way. I wander the galleries, looking, feeling, and listening, but without much knowing. (I long to touch as well, especially sculpture.)

Classical, representational art often seems relatively easy to understand: a Venetian merchant, with age etched on his face, wealth displayed in the richly textured and decorated fabrics, and a view of St Mark’s gl
...more
Justin Evans
May 03, 2014 rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: history-etc, essays
I was visiting the Guggenheim in Venice over the Christmas break; on holidays I tend to make over-emotional decisions about all kinds of things, so it makes sense that at that wonderful building I wanted to buy a book. I chose this one, because it was cheap, and promised easy reading.

So Hodge had to do literally nothing to keep me on team Modernist. I like modern and postmodern art; I have some grasp of what 20th century artists were/are trying to do. The book is nicely laid out: nice reproduct
...more
Hal Johnson
Jan 15, 2015 rated it did not like it
“The painting seems to be the type of random arrangement that a five-year-old might come up with. However, it emerged from the mind of an intellectual” (p64); this is only the most annoying of innumerable nearly identical statements in this book that confuse what an artist produces and what an artist claims to be producing.

“So although this work might initially appear to be a childish scrawl, it actually conveys the preoccupations of the time” (p71), Hodge writes, actually citing the artist’s s
...more
Katheryn Thompson
I bought this book in the Gallery of Modern Art in Glasgow, as an art-lover who has always been sceptical about modern art. And I'm glad that I did.

'Why your five year old could not have done that' includes 100 pieces of modern art, with brief information about the artist and the artwork, including the artist's influences and motivation. While the book did not persuade me that a five year old could not have created most of the pieces of art, I loved the title nonetheless, and it did persuade me
...more
Kirsti
People say you can't stumble over new discoveries online the way you can find them in an actual bookstore or library, but I stumbled across this book while trying to find a different book in my library's online system, and I'm glad I did. I learned about some of my favorite artists (Claes Oldenburg, Felix Gonzalez-Torres, Louise Bourgeois) and some ones I had never heard of (Pipilotti Rist's Massachusetts Chandelier is great).

Also, I love that there's an entire chapter on tantrums.
Nabila
Jul 23, 2015 rated it did not like it
The problem with this book is that often the answer why your 5 year could not have done that, is contradicted by the fact that they could have, and this is something that the author readily acknowledges. I think the point trying to be made is that the art represents something more than what is immediately obvious (or is supposed to) and that is what makes it art. However, if your fall back explanation is that the art in question has several layers and represents a backlash to consumerism with wi ...more
Anna C
Mar 22, 2016 rated it did not like it
Or to be more accurate with the title:

"Alright, your five-year-old could indeed have done this, but they couldn't have done it while thinking about capitalism."

Facile, un-nuanced, redundant, overtly reliant on the intentional fallacy, and likely to confirm a skeptic's belief that children could do it all.

Andrzej
May 17, 2020 rated it it was ok
A very good replacement for a museum visit during pandemic. The reading experience is a bit like going through a gallery, watching the exhibits, and reading little clumps of text with commentary available in some museums. I really missed it under the lock down! I really enjoyed seeing the exhibits!

I can imagine this is also a decent coffee table book. Really a handy album in an (almost) pocket format. The prints are of good quality, and you can always read a single page without context and still
...more
Sam
Apr 10, 2020 rated it did not like it
As someone fairly interested in modern art, this book made me less interested in it so I can only imagine what someone who was even less interested in art thought. The title was fun and witty but explaining why a five year old could not have done EVERY piece actually had the opposite effect than the book intended; it made the pieces seem less artistic by pointing out how simple the technique was. Also, calling Navajo culture primitive is just offensive.
Shatterlings
Jun 25, 2019 rated it liked it
I like modern art but this book doesn’t do it any favours, the tone is kind of pompous mentioning lots of isms with out ever explaining them. The answer to why a 5 year old couldn’t have done this is mostly because a 5 year old didn’t do it.
Yvette
this book has been on my shelf for the past 5 years. i have finally finished it - yay me! interesting read. half of me is like, 'oooh cool insight i would not have been able to get by myself,' and the other half of me is like, 'man art is so much bs. seriously how does one art????'
Maxime Ouellet-payeur
Feb 06, 2019 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: art
I don't always understand modern art. This book helps
Katie B
Have always struggled to fully understand contemporary art, can confidently say I still don’t 😂 Was great to read about the history and the meanings of all the pieces along with the artists behind them. However, I still believe aesthetically some pieces are just madness💥
Leo Robertson
Apr 07, 2016 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Oops forgot to rate this...

This is an excellent light introduction to about a century's worth of art.

The title and concept I suspect were something invented by the publisher and not the author herself. There is a bubble beneath each piece of artwork explaining how a five year-old might have dreamt up the art pictured-- something the reader could do for themselves-- then going on to explain why it means more, something that the body of the text already did. I stopped reading these patronising lit
...more
Carys
Jun 07, 2019 rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Hodge’s writing and analysis: 4.5 stars
The ‘Why Your Five Year Old Could Not Have Done That’ question and answer she replies on every. single. page: 1 star

This book is great for people with an interest and respect for modern artists; Hodge is clearly a brilliant art writer, shown where she analyses the pieces. It’s something that would be really helpful to art students or fans of art that want to know more about these well-known pieces. However, her passion and talent is wasted on each paragraph
...more
Lucy
Aug 20, 2013 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: art-theory, 3-stars
Now before I begin this review properly and I appreciate there has already been a lot of waffle, I should state that I do study art history at university, although mainly the pre-19th stuff and therefore my critic of this book could be coming from a slightly different place they the majority of people buying this book (or not as I really don't know who brought this book).

Lets start with the bad:

Firstly the layout of the book makes it very simple and easy to understand, all the pages have a stric
...more
Kylie
Clearly inspired by the refrain heard in modern art galleries the world over, Why Your Five-Year-Old Could Not Have Done That: Modern Art Explained is a great idea that doesn't quite meet its potential. As a primer on modern art, the book is ideal: it discusses major modern artworks with references to the artist's life, cultural influences and motivations, as well as the period in which each artwork was created. As a study of why a five-year-old couldn't create or replicate certain works, the bo ...more
tom bomp
Jan 09, 2017 marked it as to-read
I've not actually read this but I've flicked through it a few times. it purports to be a defence of modern art by showing how seemingly simple art pieces could not have been produced by a child but it utterly fails at this. every piece of art has a section answering the question "could a child have done this" and for like half she's like "yeah of course they could but it wouldn't be with the same intentions as the artist" which is hilarious to me in how unconvincing it is. for the other half its ...more
Suzanne Arcand
Aug 02, 2015 rated it really liked it
Shelves: art
This book is worth 3,5 stars.

It might not be a well written book. The comments are rather trivial and don't necessarely help us understand mordern art. For some artwork, I came to the conclusion that it was trash. So why did I gave it so many stars? Because of the illustrations. It gives me a good retrospective of modern art and I discovered artists that I didn't know.

For someone who is already very knowledgeable about modern art, it's probably worthless but, for someone like me who is a diletta
...more
Chris
Jul 29, 2013 rated it it was ok
Well, maybe 2.5 stars.
It just wasn't strong enough. In her treatment of 100 different works of modern art, Hodge makes the same point over and over again: adults think differently from children, and so can allude to historical context, personal trauma, material qualities, craft, or the modern art world.
Cassandra
Jun 20, 2016 rated it really liked it
As an atlas of meaningful works represented well with suggestions to other important works, 5 stars.

As to the title and commentary, 2 stars.
Gavin
Jul 15, 2018 rated it it was ok
An attempted defence of the current reigning artistic paradigm: low-skill, high-concept, contemptuous of past, audience, and self; identitarian. Call it anaesthetic conceptualism. It is also a nice illustrated catalogue of some recent objects that have managed to piss various people off. 150 years ago, we direly needed people to make art larger, to stand against the Academic approach of Nice Hard Mimesis Only. The problem is that since the 50s many artists replaced that shallow spectacle of mere ...more
Gre
May 08, 2017 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
I'll be frank with you: this book has been my toilet reading for the past few months. I got through a couple of artists (4 pages) a day on most days. And I bloody loved it. Getting just a bit of art into my day, some ideas, a bit of background, has been amazing. Or you could have it as your coffee table book. Getting through it in one go probably isn't going to work out for you, it's quite fragmentary. It's surprisingly serious though. I maybe would have expected a little bit of humour from it, ...more
Dora
Nov 11, 2017 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
At first glance, the book seems easy to read and popularly written. All the colors, pictures and short paragraphs give off an amateurish impression. And then you start reading it and find that the book can serve equally as well for art historians, artists and the "wider public" alike. I was pleasantly surprised to read so many new pieces of information and in such a clearly written manner! I even concluded that I didn't fully understand certain phenomena until I read Hodge's explanations and int ...more
Samuel
Oct 16, 2019 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Sometimes Susie Hodge’s explanations are revelations. Others are slightly off the mark. But if you’re really baffled by a lot of contemporary and abstract art, this book will certainly help you to understand these works a bit better, while also introducing you to some great artists. However, you shouldn’t take Hodge’s interpretations as fact. Understanding this kind of art is about getting in touch with your own personal emotional responses and what they tell you about the work and yourself.
Olena Sovyn
Jan 14, 2018 rated it really liked it
Even though the name of the book contains reference to comparing modern art to child art, I wish author wouldn't so often return to this comparison in this book, and more concentrate on the explanation of the pieces of art that were presented, as to read under nearly each example - child can't do this, as this has the meaning, is slightly to straightforward
Katie Lazaro
I found it a little hard to read at first (language was a barrier IE felt it was pompous) but I started to enjoy it the more I read it. Learnt some new artists as well (which I am now looking more into!). If you can get past the language and wanting to know more about modern art id recommend giving it a read.
Nepala
Nov 24, 2019 added it
Shelves: eng
It is a quite straightforward book - mostly it will describe a bit about the author and the work and then say that a 5yo rather could have done that, but rather wouldn't have had the same intentions as the artist. Wasn't very entertaining but I don't regret it as it was a chance to see some oeuvres that I had missed.
Peter B
Mar 15, 2020 rated it it was ok
Shelves: art
I found this to be a fairly superficial, magazine-style book. The images and contextual information are of some interest but the sections included to justify the book's title seem unlikely to persuade any but an established art-lover, who would already know the reasons and, possibly, like a bit more detail.
Kayleigh Williams
3.75

An anthology of artworks from 1893-2010.
Overall it does provide a good beginners explanation to modern art but it could have gone into a lot more depth. After reading it cover to cover I was only left unconvinced on 2-3 of the works out of the 100+
« previous 1 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Readers also enjoyed

  • Wabi Sabi: Japanese Wisdom for a Perfectly Imperfect Life
  • Dream Psychology: Psychoanalysis for Beginners
  • The Adventures of the Stainless Steel Rat (Stainless Steel Rat, #4-6)
  • Essential English for Journalists, Editors and Writers
  • The DaVinci Code: A Quest for Answers
  • Обитаемый остров
  • A Stainless Steel Rat is Born (Stainless Steel Rat, #1)
  • The Memoirs of Victor Hugo
  • The Little Shop of Hopes and Dreams
  • Akik már nem leszünk sosem
  • No One Is Too Small to Make a Difference
  • Nyílt láng használata
  • Journey by Moonlight
  • Der goldne Topf
  • A Mester és Margarita
  • The Dispossessed
  • Skylark
  • Rabok tovább
See similar books…

News & Interviews

Myths and mayhem, the fantastical and the scientifically plausible, these are readers’ most popular sci-fi and fantasy novels published in the ...
59 likes · 12 comments