Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Noise/Music: A History” as Want to Read:
Noise/Music: A History
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Noise/Music: A History

3.63  ·  Rating details ·  314 ratings  ·  25 reviews
Noise/Music looks at the phenomenon of noise in music, from experimental music of the early 20th century to the Japanese noise music and glitch electronica of today. It situates different musics in their cultural and historical context, and analyses them in terms of cultural aesthetics. Paul Hegarty argues that noise is a judgement about sound, that what was noise can beco ...more
Paperback, 232 pages
Published September 1st 2007 by Bloomsbury Academic (first published August 15th 2007)
More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Noise/Music, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Noise/Music

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
Average rating 3.63  · 
Rating details
 ·  314 ratings  ·  25 reviews


More filters
 | 
Sort order
Start your review of Noise/Music: A History
Connor
Apr 03, 2014 rated it it was ok
About as engaging and informative as a review on Pulse Demon written by a 17 year-old RYM user who just discovered the work of Gilles Deleuze and Karl Marx. Both tinged in the same boring pseudo-academia pretenses.
Walid
Jun 05, 2008 rated it it was ok
starts off the discussion of noise on rather interesting therotical foundations, only to ruin things one step at a time with every chapter that is being read. despite his criticism of past teleological approaches to the subject matter (or avant-garde music), i find his book to be too chronological and teleological as it slowly leads the reader to a self-indulgent, culminating panegyric on merzbow (to whom he devotes an entire chapter, instead of exploring the richness of the japanese – or otherw ...more
Adam
May 22, 2012 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: musicians, outsider music fans, fans of Merzbow and electronic music
I was initially only going to read a chapter or two as research for a paper that I was writing, but after that paper was done I got completely immersed. Each chapter is set up like a research paper in and of itself, but obviously relating back to the overarching topic of "Noise" - either as music, in music etc.

Several chapters in the beginning actually begin as a very in depth study into the history of rock music and "other" music and where other histories of "rock" follow that branch from the B
...more
pianogal
Feb 27, 2008 rated it did not like it
Shelves: tried-to-read
Ok, I can't read this book because I totally disagree with the author's viewpoint that noise is bad. The first ten pages of this book (which, admittedly, is all the farther I read) discuss nothing but how noise is chaos, and it's negative, and how all noise is dangerous. All noise is not dangerous...yes, it can be potentially harmful...but the sound of water in the shower is not going to damage my hearing. In fact, I think that most people who fall asleep to white noise machines might also beg t ...more
M-R-N-D-R
May 06, 2009 rated it really liked it
Shelves: music-history
really helpful book, covers all sorts of western transgressive musics, mostly focusing on the "popular" forms (noise, japanoise, industrial, techno, prog, punk, rock and roll, sound art), and their theoretical precursors.

This book has a lot of faults. Unfortunately, free improv is only mildly covered, and classical music hardly at all covered. Both of these Heggarty looks down upon as "high" art, even though I'm not so sure it's that clear cut of a distinction--I think this is just his personal
...more
Graham
Dec 28, 2009 rated it liked it
Well-done work on the phenomenology of noise which utilizes and subverts trends in both academic writing and music criticism, most noticably the sort of A+B=C linear progression of influences and diffusions so well-loved by writers of both aforementioned fields. Hegarty pays some lip service to chronological progressions, utilizing a linear, teleological approach (which could be seen as either hypocritical or self-consciously post-modern, depending on how forgiving the reader is feeling), while ...more
Jürgen De blonde
Sep 03, 2013 rated it really liked it
Interesting book. Interesting insights and statements on the relation between noise and music. Some passages were rather difficult for me but in the end the point he was making always became clear. A whole chapter on Merzbow might seem obsolote or might come across as idolatry, but then again, as a case study and illustration of what noise can be about this was also very interesting and got me into checking some more Merzbow than I actually did. Having opened up for Merzbow once I was kind of bi ...more
KC
Jun 04, 2013 rated it it was ok
Shelves: musicology
ugh. Miles Davis as poster child for Adornian aesthetic theory? no, thank you. a sloppy, uncritical application of Frankfurt School theory to a wide array of cultural productions, further obfuscated by the author's refusal of linguistic consistency. as metafiction, a brilliant burst of failure-as-noise-as-success. as scholarship, an attempt to cash in on noise's brief celebrity that doesn't even reach for substantiality. ...more
sam
May 04, 2009 rated it it was amazing
This is an excellent analysis of the evolution of noise from natural to cultural phenomenon. Features chapters on pretty much the full spectrum of noise types. While the specific chapters are themselves, and Hegarty admits this himself in the introduction, not encyclopedic in their scope, overall the book is a great overview of both the sound genre and the aforementioned social appropriations of noise.
Dennis
Oct 10, 2008 rated it it was ok
This book was interesting, but horribly written. The first couple of chapters are ok, but after a while it becomes painfully apparent that this was written without an editor. It made me wonder if he was trying to make his writing an analogy to the noise he was writing about.

The names he drops are pretty good and reminded me to check out more than a few artists I'd either heard and forgotten about or heard of and never checked out. The discography is really helpful on this front.
...more
Christoph
Dec 31, 2008 rated it liked it
This is a book about music as noise: why it is, where it came from and how it came to be. Following in the footsteps of Attali's Noise this book extends the concept of noise as cultural jamming instrument and applies it to the modern era in several admittedly arbitrary genres (which would otherwise could not be respected based on the context). Those interested in abstract expressionist music and high-brow snobbery will love this book. ...more
Jeffrey
Aug 20, 2011 rated it liked it
I guess this book provided more or less what I expected it to, but it wasn't that much of a joy to read. I think it turns out that listening to this music is more enjoyable than reading about it. No prob, though, it's nice to see a thorough, scholarly take on this broad subject and I'm glad I read it. ...more
Bryan
Feb 08, 2008 rated it really liked it
Not perfect, but probably the best thing out there on the topic. I would prefer if the author would have stuck to either a purely theoretical-semiotic approach or a strickly formal analysis. It's a mixed bag with mixed results. It gets four stars because I'm in love with subject matter. ...more
Aaron
Jun 17, 2008 rated it liked it
Whew, welcome to academia!
You thought noise music was just scritches, throbs, fubs, whistles, snaps and farts? Nope. According to Hegarty it's
Derrida, Kant, Foucault and Masami Akita. Get with the program you Naysayers!
...more
Ben
Aug 07, 2018 rated it it was amazing
THE book on noise music. Unsurpassed.
Jesse
Sep 17, 2007 rated it it was ok
Not so much a history as an interpretation, and not nearly as compelling as it could be, at that. David Toop charts a much more readable/engaging course through similar material.
Patrick Brown
Aug 06, 2007 rated it liked it
In the end, this was a good book. Although, clearly the author is into some crazy shit. Like music that consists of nothing but feedback and chickens.
Justin
Nov 30, 2007 rated it it was ok
The book reads more like college textbook than fun historical rhetoric. My entire review of the book can be found soon on Tiny Mix Tapes.
David
Jun 24, 2008 rated it really liked it
Very rigorous treatment of noise as both musical form and philosophical approach. Can be a bit dry at times, but I wouldn't spite a music book for being theoretically demanding. ...more
Chris Bissonnette
Aug 26, 2014 rated it liked it
Dense and a bit of a chore to read at times. Explores the depths of noise in number of genres.
Dave
Jan 12, 2020 rated it it was ok
"This cozy humanism insists on diversity as a value in no need of further exploration, and modifies Derrida's notion of differance into a homespun, patronizing judgement, refusing alterity in favour of a recognizable, proximate form (to praise difference is to control it as a judged otherness). To think the difference between difference and alterity is to pit Levi-Strauss' positive view of culture being an accumulation of beneficial encounters against Baudrillard's insistence on alterity and tur ...more
Henrique Iwao
Dec 12, 2019 rated it liked it
O ruído na música é visto como mais que um barulho, mas uma categoria ligada à transgressão, ruptura, e um movimento que tensiona a dialética da inovação seguida de incorporação ao vocabulário. O ápice dessa incorporação do problemático teria se dado no Noise japonês, com Merzbow. Embora com vários exemplos difíceis de achar, o livro fornece um mapa de coisas musicais interessantes. Por vezes as observações conceituais são apressadas ou soam um pouco forçadas, o que torna os conceitos abertos de ...more
John
Sep 15, 2019 rated it liked it
Shelves: music
It took a few tries to get into this book, largely because of the irregular typesetting: small, long lines of sans-serif. I wish publishers would stick with normal font sizes and serif fonts. Anyway. This book is an academic take on noise music. A lot of over-inflated perceptions on the philosophy of what a lot of artists were meaning with there music. Not sure I buy all of it. However, the chapters "Industry", "Power", "Japan", and "Merzbow" were pretty good and basically covered why I thought ...more
Ross Baker
rated it liked it
Oct 19, 2013
Keefe
rated it liked it
May 06, 2013
Ally Rzeszutko
rated it it was ok
Jun 01, 2015
Herb
rated it it was ok
Aug 01, 2012
Tom
rated it really liked it
Jul 25, 2015
Kevin
rated it it was ok
Jul 15, 2013
C.Reider
rated it liked it
Feb 04, 2012
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Readers also enjoyed

  • Wreckers of Civilisation: The Story of COUM Transmissions and Throbbing Gristle
  • Art Sex Music
  • Noise, Water, Meat: A History of Sound in the Arts
  • Industrial Evolution: Through the Eighties with Cabaret Voltaire
  • Kraftwerk: I Was a Robot
  • Clothes, Clothes, Clothes. Music, Music, Music. Boys, Boys, Boys
  • The Musician's Journey: Crafting Your Career Vision and Plan
  • Japanoise: Music at the Edge of Circulation
  • Stand and Deliver: The Autobiography
  • The Age of Bowie
  • Unknown Pleasures: Inside Joy Division
  • The Haçienda: How Not to Run a Club
  • Chapter and Verse: New Order, Joy Division and Me
  • Lonely Boy
  • Bernard Sumner: Confusion - Joy Division, Electronic and New Order versus the world
  • Wire: Everybody Loves a History
  • Substance: Inside New Order
  • Pies and Prejudice: In Search of the North
See similar books…
11 followers
Paul Hegarty is an author, musician, and lecturer in aesthetics at University College Cork. He performs in the noise band Safe and is involved in running the experimental music record label dotdotdotmusic.

Related Articles

  Speaking with Adam Grant feels like having your brain sandblasted, in a pleasant sort of way. As an author, professor, and psychologist,...
32 likes · 0 comments