Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “A Farewell to Alms: A Brief Economic History of the World” as Want to Read:
A Farewell to Alms: A Brief Economic History of the World
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

A Farewell to Alms: A Brief Economic History of the World

3.73  ·  Rating details ·  1,093 ratings  ·  119 reviews
Why are some parts of the world so rich and others so poor? Why did the Industrial Revolution--and the unprecedented economic growth that came with it--occur in eighteenth-century England, and not at some other time, or in some other place? Why didn't industrialization make the whole world rich--and why did it make large parts of the world even poorer? In "A Farewell to Al ...more
Hardcover, 420 pages
Published August 13th 2007 by Princeton University Press (first published July 24th 2007)
More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about A Farewell to Alms, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about A Farewell to Alms

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
Average rating 3.73  · 
Rating details
 ·  1,093 ratings  ·  119 reviews

More filters
Sort order
Start your review of A Farewell to Alms: A Brief Economic History of the World
Riku Sayuj
Aug 23, 2013 rated it liked it

Jared Diamond should be given the Nobel. If not for anything else but for getting historians and economists up in arms shouting “Our field is not That simple, Mister!!” . He has kicked off so many responses and counter-responses that it has enlivened an entire gamut of fields. This is one more response/alternative to how the modern world is the way it is. In fact in the very beginning the author classes himself with the Diamonds, the Adam Smiths and the North & Thomass of the world and puts h
Oct 26, 2007 rated it it was ok
Phew finally! I've been reading this exclusively on the train for a few weeks now. I picked up this book because the reviews made it sound like Mr. Clark would be making a case that the Industrial Revolution occurred when and where it did for strictly Darwinian reasons of breeding. I wanted to see how he would navigate those dangerous waters which have taken out even the likes of Jimmy the Greek.

I began to get angry at the book during the introduction, when the author mentioned that he was tryin
Nov 24, 2010 rated it it was ok
Really interesting and readable, if somewhat contradictory and elitist. Clark seems to want to make a case for biological superiority being a main factor in developed countries, but doesn't quite spit it out...perhaps because his editor wouldn't allow him to actually say something so ridiculous. He does present very interesting data and pushes the reader to explore and justify Euro/American intervention in developing countries. ...more
Aaron Arnold
Nov 06, 2013 rated it really liked it
I keep thinking that someday, all these Big History books I read that violently disagree with each other on even minor points of history, data, or inferential technique will eventually add up to a single consistent theory, like lights of different wavelengths suddenly cohering prismatically into a pleasant glow of insight. Why are some societies more successful than others? Some argue national real estate (Diamond), others evolutionary dynamics (Turchin), others institutions (Acemoglu/Robinson), ...more
Charles Haywood
Dec 24, 2014 rated it really liked it
This book is part of the sub-genre that might be titled, if being honest, “Why Are All Today’s Rich People Europeans, Actually or Honorary”? It’s fascinating, though ultimately has, if not holes, lacunae that still need to be filled in before the argument becomes compelling.

Clark’s basic thesis is that certain desirable social traits arising in the English upper and upper-middle classes spread through the larger population, thereby allowing technological changes (which otherwise would not have d
Parag Waknis
Feb 06, 2012 rated it it was ok
I came across this interesting book on world economic history titled, “A Farewell to Alms” by Gregory Clark. Whenever, I open such a book my first impulse is to flip through pages and see what the author has to say about India. Most of the times, unfortunately, I am not surprised. A book that displays brilliance in its analysis and coverage otherwise, usually completely breaks down when talking about societies like India. It is almost always a typical representation of the Anglo-Saxon view of hi ...more
Feb 21, 2015 rated it really liked it
A controversial thesis: in an agrarian society with an open social structure and strong (Malthusian) upper limits on population growth, natural selection will favor the more productive. The evidence: in a small population of farmers in late medieval Suffolk, the more productive had more children than the less productive. The fixation of the traits of the productive in early modern England promoted the development and adoption of capital-intensive technologies.

Selection pressures were weaker in C
May 17, 2019 rated it liked it
Interesting idea, weak argument.
Joshua Hruzik
Sep 25, 2016 rated it really liked it
A Farewell to Alms by Gregory Clark is refreshing, clever, and well-written.

In his exceptional book, UC Davis Prof. Gregory Clark sets out to write A Brief Economic History of the World while focusing on the Industrial Revolution.

The book starts by introducing the reader to the static Malthusian world that spanned from the Neolithic age until 1800. For ordinary people, the Malthusian world was a world of economic stagnation not comparable to today's growth rates. Material well-being could (in th
Aug 24, 2007 rated it it was amazing
This is a fantastic book that uses some pretty interesting (and thorough) historical data to set a few economic assumptions about the Industrial Revolution on their heads. I highly recommend this book to anyone with an interest in economics and serious scholarship.

My only criticism: Clark spends a lot of time developing his theory on why the Industrial Revolution happened where and when it happened, but does very little to make suggestions to current economic policy. I'm very interested in how h
I thought it had been fairly well established even in mainstream economics that the value of animal, female, child, indentured, enslaved, environmental and natural resource inputs have not historically been adequately accounted for in the balance sheets of hierarchical western male economic systems.

Yet here is a man in a white tower: delusional, so removed from history, and the understanding of life as real people worldwide live and have lived it, that reading his book had all the blood-chilling
Aug 20, 2017 rated it it was amazing
lots of statistics and one simple theory - the only thing that counts is income and after essentially being flat per capita (though its distribution varied greatly from hunter gatherer societies to Versailles or the Dutch Republic of the 1600's say) from earliest known times until around the 1800's, it then exploded in some parts of the world but declined in others

lots of food for thought and a book for our times especially in its again simple prescription for ameliorating poverty in the world
Brian Yahn
May 05, 2017 rated it liked it
For thousands of years, living conditions didn't improve. As technology got better, population density increased, raw materials became scarcer, meaning that the vast majority of people continuously spent nearly all of their time gathering food, just to keep from starving to death. This is called the Malthusian Trap.

In England, during the Industrial Revolution of the 1800s, things changed. Living conditions increased quickly and dramatically. This book explains the conditions that were in place w
Dan Relluchs
Nov 17, 2019 rated it really liked it
I enjoyed this, interesting ideas and well presented.

I don't find the argument about the inevitability of the industrial revolution in other countries, if it did not occur England, particularly compelling. The reasons given for it occuring at all seem far too unfocused. Which is one of the reason I quite enjoy these books there's no goood compelling narrative and the author himself describes why he doesn't back various other explanations.

The book has this odd theory about genetic evolution tha
Matthew Ostrowski
Aug 02, 2017 rated it liked it
Overall a very interesting argument as to why the industrial revolution happened in England and not other nations as well as the continued discrepancies between advanced economies and the undeveloped world. In summary, Clark argues that higher birth/survival rates for the wealthy in England caused "middle-class values" to be passed down to their offspring who experienced downward social mobility. While other countries were also on the path to their own industrial revolutions, the demographics of ...more
Jan 21, 2008 rated it liked it
Not as controversial as the reputation that precedes it. The link to genetic adaptation is only casually and scarcely thrown out in the prose as a possible explanation, but is discussed as mere conjecture. To sum up in a cynical short way, we are no closer to understanding a link, if there is one, between genetic adaptions and a propensity to succeed at innovation, advances and social stability than we were before Clark undertook this project. Clark spends the vast majority of the book highlight ...more
Julian Haigh
Jul 26, 2011 rated it it was ok
This book was certainly not the brief economic history of the world its title purports. It was however (and I must excuse myself for my elemental understanding of economics), a nice catalog of differing opinions of the reasons for numerous economic realities.

His round-about conclusion suggests the importance of sociological differences as being the basis of current global inequalities as being related to beneficial Darwinian mating habits of the English. He shies away from his conclusion, but a
Mar 05, 2012 rated it it was ok
There is some good history, data and analysis in this book but also a bunch of ethical problems and flawed comparators. Ekr raised the ethical issues on his blog post, but it can be summed up as "please don't describe a society as well-off because of caloric intake and dismissing whether it has a high infanticide rate, infant death rate, death rate due to war or crime, plus completely ignoring issues of equality and violent crimes against minorities, minors and women."

There's also lots of white/
Peter Gehred
Mar 12, 2010 rated it it was amazing
A fascinating and provocative read. The book is dogged, heavy on evidence, and conceptually challenging. I am not sure that Clark's conclusions are right, but they are certainly worth wrestling with. In particular, the outline of history into a pre and post-Malthusian era, the emphasis on the startling revolution of the Industrial Revolution, and the exploration of the cause of that revolution, and, indeed, his thesis that it has been largely mislabeled all are difficult yet worthwhile subjects. ...more
Nick Lo
Mar 26, 2013 marked it as to-read
I've not rated this as I just completely failed to get into it. Perhaps I wasn't its target reader but it was hard to determine whether it was aimed at laypersons or academics with some background in the subject. I suspect the latter being that I constantly had the feeling I'd walked into some topic part way through the curriculum. My recommendation for anyone contemplating this book is to start where I should have and view Gregory Clark - Beyond Belief 2007 on YouTube and/or read the NY Times a ...more
Apr 14, 2010 rated it it was ok
Didn't take an economics course in college. Thought this might help make me less stupid. Barely worked.

The author states that virtually all societies, stone age or "developed", operated at the same level of personal wealth (as measured by the amount of labor needed to purchase a given commodity) for centuries until the Industrial Revolution. Then he attempts to explain why only some societies subsequently experienced increasing personal wealth and standard of living. floods his arguments with lo
Fernando Pestana da Costa
Jun 11, 2020 rated it really liked it
The main argument of this book is a brilliant thesis on the origins of the Industrial Revolution and economic development. The author argues that it was not the stability of political, economical, and legal institutions in seventeenth century England that was behind the onset of the Industrial Revolution, for those characteristics existed way before in England and elsewhere in the world. Clark, an economist at UC-Davis, argues that the main reason for the onset of the Industrial Revolution where ...more
Jindřich Zapletal
Apr 30, 2021 rated it it was ok
The book is concerned with the traditional big question of economic history: why did industrial revolution happen where and when it happened. The author comes to the conclusion that middle class values did it, and moreover that these values stem from genetic differences which set (Western) middle class apart from other people.

This is of course just a comical attempt to pander to a certain type of reader. Clearly, the industrial revolution was caused by massive experimentation and innovation. I l
Sep 22, 2018 rated it liked it
Disparity and Success in western world after Industrial revolution. He controversially hypothesizes that it was not due to existing strong institutions, since such institutions preexisted the Industrial revolution. The institutions were heavily influenced by the change in culture and attitudes away from the hunter gatherer mentality (violence, impatience etc.) Instead he encourages adopting economic habits such as patience, honesty, curiosity and learning as well as hard work rationality and edu ...more
Barbara Carder
Aug 01, 2018 rated it really liked it
For a novice to the formulas of economics, I managed to read and absorb this fascinating book. I read it because I was reading all of Dickens in recent years and wanted some background. Clark's honesty shines through; reading this book is not the same as a 60-second sound-byte which is what economics has been reduced to lately. The evidence speaks -- this is what Clark and his research are all about. If you want to truly grasp the sweep of world history in order to put right your political opini ...more
Jun 08, 2019 rated it liked it
Shelves: economics, history
Clark presents a grand view of the history of economics. He divides between the pre and post Malthusian era.

Yes. That malthus.
You understand,right?
Then you already see what he is doing here.

According to clark the industrial revolution led to the west exiting this Malthusian state of economics.
No this isnt a middle finger to the Neo-Malthusians like Paul Ehrlich, but the claim is that the west is now super wealthy and doesnt need to worry about not having stuff.

Basically to all those thinkin
Efe Udoro
Jul 01, 2020 rated it really liked it
Gregory Clark's work is fascinating. He explains to us that the Mathusian Trap is not new but has been going on for ages. That is the main reason for the Economic History as a subtitle.

It compares favorably with Jared Diamond's Collapse: How Society Chooses To Fail Or Succeed in the sense that it warns us of perilous times ahead, if we are not able to manage our society.

The section that talks about the Industrial Revolution in Great Britain is quite compelling. Comparing Britain with other civi
Gregory J.
this book was a bit of a challenge for me.

In the beginning of the book I couldn't follow the author, too many percentages and comparison.

I skipped the center of the book and went on to the section called the "Great Diversion" that tried to explain why the whole world didn't increase it's material wealth the way the west did.

This was a bit easier to follow. Even this section was filled with statistics about the ouput of the textile industry.

By the end of the book the author admitted that it' was
Jim Carroll
Dec 03, 2018 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Very interesting but somewhat inconclusive

The historical analysis, based primarily on historical data from England from 1200 to 1800, arrives at a premise that everybody was living in a world operating under a Malthusian consrtaint. Then the Industrial Revolution came along and changed everything. The problem as Clark notes in the conclusion is that nobody really knows why the Industrial Revolution happened or how the resulting economic gains can be more equitably distributed. The research is im
Sonia Albrecht
Apr 28, 2021 rated it really liked it
A really interesting book about the reasons for and effects of The Industrial Revolution. Makes a compelling argument that culture has more to do with how economies differ than is often supposed.

I’d give it five stars if it was published more recently and used more data from countries outside the ones he focuses on. I expect the problem in the first part of the book is more a lack of preserved data from historical times. It was also assigned as the World Economic History Before the Industrial R
« previous 1 3 4 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Readers also enjoyed

  • The 10,000 Year Explosion: How Civilization Accelerated Human Evolution
  • Why Race Matters
  • The Road to Serfdom
  • A Culture of Growth: The Origins of the Modern Economy
  • Capital in the Twenty-First Century
  • Who We Are and How We Got Here: Ancient DNA and the New Science of the Human Past
  • Albion's Seed: Four British Folkways in America (America: A Cultural History, Vol. I)
  • The British Industrial Revolution in Global Perspective
  • War and Peace and War: The Rise and Fall of Empires
  • The WEIRDest People in the World: How the West Became Psychologically Peculiar and Particularly Prosperous
  • Economics Rules: The Rights and Wrongs of the Dismal Science
  • Science Fictions: The Epidemic of Fraud, Bias, Negligence and Hype in Science
  • American Nations: A History of the Eleven Rival Regional Cultures of North America
  • Why Did Europe Conquer the World?
  • Empires of the Silk Road: A History of Central Eurasia from the Bronze Age to the Present
  • The Rent Is Too Damn High
  • The Agricola and The Germania
  • Central America: A Nation Divided
See similar books…
Clark, whose grandfathers were migrants to Scotland from Ireland, earned his B.A. in economics and philosophy at King's College, Cambridge in 1979 and his Ph.D. at Harvard in 1985. He has also taught as an Assistant Professor at Stanford and the University of Michigan.
Clark is now a professor of economics and department chair until 2013 at the University of California, Davis. His areas of research

Related Articles

You’d never know it from reading the books listed here, but good science writing is incredibly difficult to pull off. There is both an art...
23 likes · 0 comments
“Preindustrial living standards are predictable based on knowledge of disease and environment. Differences in social energy across societies were muted by the Malthusian constraints. They had minimal impacts on living conditions. Since the Industrial Revolution, however, we have entered a strange new world in which economic theory is of little use in understanding differences in income across societies, or the future income in any specific society. Wealth and poverty are a matter of differences in local social interactions that are magnified, not dampened, by the economic system, to produce feast or famine.” 0 likes
“The argument is instead that it rewarded with economic and hence reproductive success a certain repertoire of skills and dispositions that were very different from those of the pre-agrarian world, such as the ability to perform simple repetitive tasks hour after hour, day after day. There is nothing natural or harmonic, for example, in having a disposition to work even when all the basic needs of survival have been achieved.” 0 likes
More quotes…