What do you get when you mix nine parts of speech, one great writer, and generous dashes of insight, humor, and irreverence? One phenomenally entertaining language book.
In his waggish yet authoritative book, Ben Yagoda has managed to undo the dark work of legions of English teachers and libraries of dusty grammar texts. Not since School House Rock have adjectives, adverbs, articles, conjunctions, interjections, nouns, prepositions, pronouns, and verbs been explored with such infectious exuberance. Read If You Catch an Adjective, Kill It and:
Learn how to write better with classic advice from writers such as Mark Twain (“If you catch an adjective, kill it”), Stephen King (“I believe the road to hell is paved with adverbs”), and Gertrude Stein (“Nouns . . . are completely not interesting”).
Marvel at how a single word can shift from adverb (“I did okay”), to adjective (“It was an okay movie”), to interjection (“Okay!”), to noun (“I gave my okay”), to verb (“Who okayed this?”), depending on its use.
Avoid the pretentious preposition at, a favorite of real estate developers (e.g., “The Shoppes at White Plains”).
Laugh when Yagoda says he “shall call anyone a dork to the end of his days” who insists on maintaining the distinction between shall and will.
Read, and discover a book whose pop culture references, humorous asides, and bracing doses of discernment and common senseconvey Yagoda’s unique sense of the “beauty, the joy, the artistry, and the fun of language.”
Ben Yagoda (born 22 February 1954 in New York City) is a professor of journalism at the University of Delaware.
Born to Louis Yagoda and the former Harriet Lewis, he grew up in New Rochelle, New York and entered Yale University to study English in 1971. He became a freelance journalist for publications such as The New Leader, The New York Times, Newsweek, and Rolling Stone, and published a number of books including About Town: The New Yorker and the World it Made. Yagoda currently lives in Swarthmore, Pennsylvania with his wife and two daughters.
Ben Yagoda has written a most enjoyable book about the English language, parts of speech, and grammar. Yes, that's right--enjoyable, and quite humorous. For example, he writes:
"... shall call anyone a dork to the end of his days, who insists on maintaining the distinction between shall and will."
Yagoda devotes a chapter to each part of speech. With the advice in this book, you can learn to write in an unpretentious manner. You can learn to use correct grammar, and learn how to write (and speak) in a more direct manner. Use verbs, not adjectives. Don't get caught up in mistakes with prepositions, and limit their use whenever possible. Loaded with references to pop culture, this book has a modern ring to it, unlike the grammar classics that I remember from years ago.
I absolutely LOVE this book, but the caveat is that I come from a long matriarchal line of grammar geeks! My mom was chastised by the nuns at Catholic school (she was Jewish, but that's another story) for hiding a grammar book under her desk and reading it instead of attending to religion class.
Several chapters resulted in uncontrollable laughing which left my husband quite confused. English is not his native language so there was no way to explain these English grammar jokes.
Here's an example from Chapter IX, V.
"MAN STEPPING INTO A TAXI AT BOSTON'S LOGAN AIRPORT: Do you know where I can get scrod around here? CABDRIVER: I've been driving a hack for thirty years, and that's the first time I've heard it in the pluperfect subjunctive". -Popular joke
You will find out why the "epicene pronoun" or singular "they" is, not only correct, but preferable.
Highly recommended for those who enjoy wordplay, the history of language, and a good laugh about parts of speech!
Catchy title; (mostly) dull, monotonous writing. I could see Yagoda being a stellar grammarian and/or grammar teacher, but as Matt already noted in his review, this reads a lot like a lecture, and made me remember how psyched I am not to be in college anymore.
I suppose I may be one of the few people who will consider a book on grammar to also be a book belonging in the humour category, but there you go. Yes, I am a geek. If this is news to anyone, then somebody doesn't know me all that well.
I did actually learn a few things and I enjoyed myself while I did it. I would absolutely recommend reading this book for anyone who either needs a little grammar refresher or is a member of the grammar police.
Another book I read on vacation and have be slack in my reviewing. Again, though, I took notes! Like, a ridiculous amount of notes. Most of them are quotes that connected with the English Major in me.
Adjectives that can be rearranged without changing the meaning have commas, those that can’t don’t. Ex: wide, rough, freezing river and stately seaside motel. (pp. 20-1)
“Adjectives are tools of lazy writers.” P. 22
NOAs = Needlessly Obscure Adjectives p.23
“Reviewers of all kinds are probably the most notorious abusers and over-users of adjectives, plugging them into sentences and relieving themselves of the need to think.” p. 29
The most commonly used adverbs don’t end in “ly” and are referred to as “stealth adverbs” pp. 44-5 or “flat adverbs” e.g. it’s fast not fastly. P. 47
Adverbs are used when the writer didn’t use the right verb to convey their meaning. That said, it’s ok to use an adverb when there isn’t a verb. P. 51
Adverbs can modify adjectives, too. P. 52
The over-use of “like” started in the beatnik era. P. 55
Hopefully is etymologically wrong. It’s sadly not sadfully. P. 70
The placement of “only” is often wrong. E.g. I only answered one question on the test- only describes answered. I answered only one question on the test- only means I answered one question precisely. P. 70
& is a ligature, or a combination, of the letters “e” and “t”. The symbol dates to the 1st century but the name, ampersand, only to the 19th. P. 108
The ABC song included the symbol as the 27th letter and ended it “and, per se [i.e., by itself], ‘and’. This eventually became corrupted to ‘ampersand.’” P. 109
“Appellation cacophony” referring to the many ways to spell Rock ‘N Roll. P. 109
The chapter on Interjections begins with Homer’s “D’oh!” Then goes on to mention “mmm” pp. 125-6
In fact, TV has interjections a-plenty…woka woka is mentioned! P. 127 (specific page numbers missing) p. 148 mentioned
Swahili has 11 genders.
The many ways to create a noun made me realize that most new words that rub me the wrong way are new nouns. Just as he mentioned on page 149 it seems like everyone is creating nouns. Shawn Fanning’s nickname was a -ster noun creation. It was a comment on his nappy hair…Napster
In 1672, John Dryden’s critique of a Ben Johnson poem gave rise to the myth that you can’t end a sentence with a preposition. The line: “The bodies that these souls were frightened from.” The comment: “The preposition at the end of a sentence; a common fault with him…”
It seems that phrasal nouns (take off) and verbs (sleep with) are the preposition’s majority use. P. 177
The traditional grammar rule that states “they” can’t be used as singular dates back to only the 18th century. Pp. 185-6
“…using [generic masculine pronouns] is a maker of retrograde chauvinism.” P.186
The word “verb” comes from the Latin verbum or “word” p. 212
Snuck started its movement to replace sneaked only in 1897. P. 220
70% of the time we choose a verb, it’s an irregular. P. 222 (source: Steven Pinker’s Words and Rules)
As someone who loves languages and everything about them (grammar, etymology, style, syntax, etc.), I absolutely loved this book. It was written with just the right balance of information and humor, and its entertaining style had me reading through it at a pace somewhat faster than what is usual for me for a non-fiction book.
The book addresses each part of speech in a different chapter, picking apart several of the most noticeable examples of modern changes, trends, and evolutions in its category. As he puts it in the title: some are clearly for better, while others are for worse (and, for the most part, I happen to agree with him in his various assessments). Some of these trends have “crept up” on me over the decades, or had already started in my formative years, and were therefore somewhat of a surprise to me when made to stop and take notice of them.
While incredibly enjoyable to me, I can still see how the average reader, uninterested in such finer nuances of the English language, might not find this book as interesting as I have. I would probably direct my recommendation, then, to those readers who appreciate the subject in the first place. I also recommend this book highly to anyone who is a “language professional”: English teachers, writers/journalists, editors, etc.; whether or not you agree with each of his observations, this book is definitely a whole banquet of food for thought.
Yogada's take on the so called "parts-of-speech" had me turning the pages like a good mystery potboiler. His tone swings gleefully from irreverent to respectful, and he is at all times illuminating. He gladly takes on the presciptivist school of thought (although ever careful to point out the flows in the descriptivst's camp, as well), and zings with great one-liners as: "[...] the only response to anyone who says, 'I shall go to the store' is 'And I shall call you a dork till the end of your days'" (11). Yogada acknowledges that language is a dynamic rather than a static process, but has no problem looking to the past for examples of what we should consider, if not "proper," then functional English; my favorite example of this enlightened approach is the easy dismissal of the 19th c. schoolmarmish ban of "their" as a singular possessive pronoun for an indefinite subject. He argues, quite convincingly, that everyone understands what the sentence "someone left their book on the table" means, and takes care to point out that "their" has functioned in this capacity for a little over 500 years (it didn't bother the likes of Shakespeare, the writers of the King James Bible, Austen, Wilde, or Stein, among many, so why should it bother us?) A great read, even if you aren't a dork like me.
It is indeed as written on the back cover, “Not since Schoolhouse Rock! have adjectives, adverbs, articles, conjunctions, interjections, nouns, prepositions, pronouns, and verbs been explored with such infectious exuberance." The book takes the parts of speech and does its dance with them. He goes over each of them and extensively talks about them with the full realization of the philosophical camps and yet dances over and along the fence with gusto and skill. As an aspiring writer, it is a great read and has very useful tips. He certainly blurs the lines when it comes to conventional notions of what category certain words fall under. And when reading this book, there is a dizzying effect between what is said and what is written, for what book can possibly say anything without using words? Yet for all the linguistic and pedantic gymnastics, the book is a fun read even for one who loathes linguistic snobbery. As such, even for a book on grammar, I couldn't help but give it 5 stars. The book is truly a work of art. In some ways it reminds me of the Tao Te Ching in its sagacity, better yet, the Chuang Tze yet it is nicely polished. And you'll learn new words. Keep a dictionary on hand when reading. I found myself laughing out loud at times at the wit and humor displayed through the examples.
Not many writers can tackle the sometimes tedious subject of the parts of speech. Ben Yagoda's fascination with the English language is clear, and I couldn't help but take part in his excitement, joy, and occasional irritation that is involved in defining and determining proper usage of the parts of speech.
Each chapter takes a stab at the sometimes shady definitions of the parts of speech. Quotes and anecdotes from famous editors, writers, and pop culture icons bring the language to life.
Yagoda comes to the defense of those parts of speech and grammatical uses that having been getting a bad wrap over the years, such as adverbs, adjectives, and more. He reveals the source of the almost superstitious hatred against such uses, explains why the hatred is unfounded, and offers examples from famous and well-loved authors who have broken the 'rules' and used this kind of language to powerful effect.
As I read, I found myself paying extra attention the Yagoda's use of words, his own sentences in describing the language illuminating in. As the he predicted I will be forevermore shifting 'only' back and forth. This is an excellent book for any english language aficionado.
This is definitely one of the nerdiest books I've ever read. Imagine the most thorough grammar teacher trapped within pages of printed text. Devoting one full chapter to each part of speech, Yagoda keeps it interesting by detailing tidbits of insight into our lexicon. I feel like I learned a lot from reading it, but at the same time, I almost feel too terrified to write anymore, because I'm sure I'm not doing it right. I tried to keep a running count of how to incorporate the correct percentages of each speech part necessary to write well and I couldn't quite come up with it. (And, since Yagoda's strong suit is English, there's a chance it wouldn't add up right, anyway).
I'd recommend this book if you really like words and writing, but if not, you're probably fine passing it by. I enjoyed reading it slowly and trying to get a full understanding of all that was shared. I may even look into some of Yagoda's other books. And, before I finish here, I feel compelled to reveal that I came across two typos in the text - one is negotiable, but one is absolutely certain ("Greyound" instead of "Greyhound").
Ok, I really liked this book and it has lots of insight into the division of words in English. It is well written and interesting. That being said, since it is a discussion on the parts of speech, Dr. Yagoda includes "off color" words in his discussion as pertaining to how they are used in context of written English. I have gone through my copy and edited so that it will be acceptable to read. Here are the pages to avoid: p.4 ignore the example in the middle of the page, middle of p. 61-middle of 62 where he discusses "off color" words are intesifiers, example on p. 115, and two words are mentioned in the list on p. 131. I have to qualify that he is using the off color words as part of the lexicon in the English language and the discussion is very clinical and not profane. I just do not like reading them at all and I think his book would have been better if he had just left them out or just mentioned where they fit into the parts of speech without identifying them specifically.
"The fact is I think I am a verb instead of a personal pronoun. A verb is anything that signifies to be; to do; or to suffer. I signify all three." -Ulysses S. Grant
Recommended for all writers. What I learned:
Keep preposition ratios in sentences to about 1:9 or 1:11.
Cut adjectives, use verbs. Or pair adjectives unexpectedly, don't use dead words.
C.S. Lewis' notes on Kenneth Tynan's paper: "Keep a strict eye on eulogistic & dyslogistic adjectives--They shd diagnose (not merely blame) & distinguish (not merely praise)."
Whom = him/her, who = he/she.
Never use an abstract noun for a sentence subject. Your verbs will flag.
"I believe he," not "I believe that he..." In such cases, "that" must be a conjunction.
"To be" presents tautological fallacy. Compare "The man is drunk" to "The man acts drunk." "There is no solution to this problem" to "No one has solved this problem yet."
This is a lot more entertaining than a book on parts of speech ought to be. Yagoda includes enough pop-culture references (many are from The Simpsons), literary quips, and bad jokes (including the best Tom Swiftie of all time: "'I manufacture tabletops for shops,' Tom said counterproductively") to keep the material from being dry and dull. He manages to point out sins of amateur writing (over-reliance on adjectives and adverbs, for starters) that some readers (myself included... gulp) will recognize in themselves, without being a jerk about it. He's friendly and accessible, conversational even. I think I may have had some conversations on these topics, so I'm more "primed" for this than most people I know.
(I'll probably be adding this to the Potential Summer Reading for High Schoolers list I'm compiling.)
"...as far as not getting respect goes, adjectives leave Rodney Dangerfield in the dust. They rank right up there with Osama bin Laden...". [p 15].
Imagine a book filled with English language quirks, stuffy linguists, and enough pop culture references to make a schoolmarm scream. In When You Catch an Adjective, Yagoda delivers a funny and well-balanced look at the history and future of our language. I am delighted that he sometimes throws dusty grammar rules upside down, but other times defends grandma's grammatical pet peeves. This book will keep your attention and teach you nifty facts, such as why the "&" is called an "ampersand," as well as the linguistic importance of "getting your freak on."
Would recommend: Yes, if you can get excited about whether "they" can be a singular pronoun
Ben Yagoda, the author of When You Catch an Adjective, Kill It, is a professor at my alma mater, the University of Delaware. I never had him as a teacher, but now I wish I had. Despite its dry subject matter, Yagoda uses a light, slightly sarcastic tone, and the result was entertaining and enlightening. I now know that the full title of Huck Finn has no "the," as well as the origin of the term "ampersand." Although the book occasionally rambles on with lists of examples, the overall effect is quite enjoyable, and even more so if you care that "fun" has made the transition from a noun to an adjective.
Anyone who loves languages, wonders about them, or wants to learn and be entertained would do well to buy this book immediately. Yagoda's tone is a perfect balance of humor and authority, knowledge and playfulness. This isn't 'build a nuclear reactor in fifteen cut and dried steps,' this is both an exploration and celebration of the language, in the hands of someone who's love of language and ear for humor shine through in every page. Wonderful book, through and through. First book by Mr. Yagoda I have read, and certainly not the last.
An entire book dedicated to the eight parts of speech? This was an English nerd's dream. Slightly pedantic, but never boring, I enjoyed it from beginning to end.
As for reviewers feeling too intimidated to write after reading this, all I can say is "don't." The English language is always evolving, and as the author points out on multiple occasions, the best results often happen when the "rules" are broken. Being aware of grammatical strictures is good for any writer. But feeling as if you have to conform to them at all times is another matter entirely.
Overall, it's a really nice overview of the different parts of speech. But personally, I've found it rather dry, despite the humorous tone, and lacking something... applicability, maybe?
Maybe my opinion comes from reading this book right after finishing Yagoda's "How Not To Write Bad", which I've found supremely helpful due to its many tips on practical usage. This one, however, is what it is: an overview and nothing more. Therefore, this 3-star review is highly subjective due to unfulfilled expectations on my part.
“Anything for 185?” I ask, stopping by to check my PO Box. “Just a second, honey. Let me check in the back,” someone usually says. I’m pretty convinced that the people who run my little PO franchise are related.
And sometimes they emerge from the back room with a package for me.
The last time this happened, I got this book: a gift from Dad, who’d heard the author interviewed on NPR.
"Specifically, speakers can use 'oh' to correct themselves, request clarification, correct someone else, make a request for elaboration, introduce a suddenly remembered question or remark, indicate ignorance of the just given information, display recognition, or mark an intense reaction. When kicking off the answer to a question, the word can also be used as a way of neutralizing, or removing any tension from, the conversational moment."
A enjoyable romp through the english language, examining how it works and how it has changed through time. This book also offers a great slice of americana, with the author quoting or referencing, it seems like, every band, movie, TV show, commercial, advertisement, author, novel, and politician you've heard of. Just a fun book that really makes you realize how rich the english language can be.
I love this book. For any armchair grammarian or word nerd, Yagoda offers both instruction and entertainment as he covers the fundamental parts of speech, their history, application, and amusing misapplications. He is not afraid to voice his own opinion, which keeps the reader amused and engaged by what might easily have been a very dry topic indeed. I am thoroughly enjoying this book.
If you need a fun way to look at parts of speech, this is it. I don't agree with all his perspectives, but he writes interestingly and insightfully about our changing language. I like his other book, The Sound on the Page, better--but this is still one that had me reading paragraphs out loud to people around me (if you know me, you know I do this when something tickles me).
An interesting examination of parts of speech - not just adjective, as the title says. My favorites sections are about adjectives, adverbs, and conjunctions. The book is full of anecdotes and real-world examples. At times, Yagoda sounds pedantic and certain chapters, especially, pronouns and prepositions are boring. Those monolithic paragraphs (oxymoron) didn't help the cause.
I truly believe this might be a good book, but I suggest that you are either a native English speaker or study languages if you aim to enjoy this. It is clearly written with a lot of humour and meant to be easy to read. And it's not difficult language per se, but still a bit heavy if English is not your first language.
Are there enough snarky grammar guides out there? Yes. Few of them are as fun to read as "If You Catch an Adjective, Kill It." The book dedicates a chapter to every part of speech. Plus, it has a great moral. Writers use adjectives and adverbs too often.
This book is so much fun! Yes, it's all about the proper usage of the parts of speech, kind of. But it also discusses the roots of the parts of speech (i.e. Latin doesn't have one of them -- gasp, I've forgotten already! -- I think it was prepositions. This is a book I'll buy.
This humorous look at the parts of speech will always be one of my favorites. It is part grammar guide, part comedy. I suggest it to any writer who has ever wondered the origin of the parts of speech, or even, really weird words. It is a quick read, but it will stay with me forever.