Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Will in the World: How Shakespeare Became Shakespeare” as Want to Read:
Will in the World: How Shakespeare Became Shakespeare
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Will in the World: How Shakespeare Became Shakespeare

3.83  ·  Rating details ·  10,387 ratings  ·  815 reviews
A young man from a small provincial town moves to London in the late 1580s and, in a remarkably short time, becomes the greatest playwright not of his age alone but of all time. How is an achievement of this magnitude to be explained? How did Shakespeare become Shakespeare? Stephen Greenblatt brings us down to earth to see, hear, and feel how an acutely sensitive and talen ...more
Paperback, 430 pages
Published 2005 by W.W. Norton (first published 2004)
More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Will in the World, please sign up.
Popular Answered Questions
Rosie Brocklehurst No chance -seriously I have studied the subject thoroughly. Do not be fooled by the "Anonymous" crowd who wold not believe it was Shakespeare if they …moreNo chance -seriously I have studied the subject thoroughly. Do not be fooled by the "Anonymous" crowd who wold not believe it was Shakespeare if they met him and shook his hand. It is the nature of conspiracy theorists I am afraid. (less)

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
Average rating 3.83  · 
Rating details
 ·  10,387 ratings  ·  815 reviews

More filters
Sort order
Start your review of Will in the World: How Shakespeare Became Shakespeare
Jeffrey Keeten
Nov 26, 2015 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: shakespeare
”To understand who Shakespeare was, it is important to follow the verbal traces he left behind back into the life he lived and into the world to which he was so open. And to understand how Shakespeare used his imagination to transform his life into his art, it is important to use our own imagination.”

 photo Shakespeare_zpstd5fmxgh.jpg

There is no doubt he is an enigma, a man who quite possibly has had the greatest influence on the English language, and yet, strangely enough left very little personal correspondence behind. It
Meredith Holley
Apr 02, 2015 rated it did not like it
I never thought this would happen to me, but while I was reading this book, I actually had a sense of nostalgia for Harold Bloom.

A woman I work with forced this book on me with the guarantee that I would adore it. I later found out that she "hates music like the Velvet Underground." It's always people like that who are forcing book recommendations. Not that there are "people like that" who hate the Velvet Underground. I have a lot of faith that she is an isolated case.

This book pretty much hit
Jul 03, 2013 rated it really liked it
“Everyone understood that Latin learning was inseparable from whipping. One educational theorist of the time speculated that the buttocks were created in order to facilitate the learning of Latin.”
― Stephen Greenblatt, Will in the World: How Shakespeare Became Shakespeare


Every historian, critic, author or amateur who starts a book on William Shakespeare knows they are facing tremendous odds. Shakespeare was private, lived 400+ years ago, left very few written records about himself, and those
As any fule kno, 'twas Ben Jonson who famously said of his friend Mr William Shakespeare that he was "not of an age but for all time". Which bon mot is trotted out regularly, not least by yours truly when guiding German high school students through the vagaries of Macbeth: after all, you have to try to persuade them that the fate of an eleventh century Scottish king could, possibly, have some relevance to a twenty first century audience. So what do you do? Well, you emphasise the universal, of c ...more
Riku Sayuj
Possibly as far away from the reality of Shakespeare's life as any silly fairy tale, but highly readable and a wonderful companion to reading the plays.

Full review (maybe) later.
Jun 15, 2007 rated it liked it
Recommends it for: Shakespearean inclined people
I think the theory of Shakespeare that he's espousing is a little far fetched. I'm just going to put it out there. The way he gets from argument to argument is 'well, this probably didn't happen... but what if it /did/.... then this would be true...' and then he'll go on to spout some more historical facts that would then fall into place of that was true. So, as an academic argument? I don't find this book particularly strong.

However. There is a lot of information here about the life of Shakespe
Dec 17, 2008 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: literature, history
This book could have been (perhaps even should have been) so much worse than it turned out. Even stating the premise sends a shiver down my spine. The premise is, “How about we speculate on the life and loves of Shakespeare on the basis of the evidence we can find in his plays, poems and sonnets!” You can feel it can't you? It is like the shiver you get from a wind blowing off snow.

If I’d guessed the book was going to be about such speculations I would never have started it. I mean, I would jus
Dec 02, 2008 rated it did not like it
"If Shakespeare wore shoes--and we have reason to suppose he did--he might have worn some like the ones in this picture."

I'm paraphrasing, but not by much. This is Greenblatt's own special brand of persiflage that drove Germaine Greer to write her excellent Shakespeare's Wife, so I guess this book was good for something.

Read Greer instead. On her way to responsible speculation about the character of Anne Hathaway, traditionally assumed to have been a millstone around her husband's neck--on no
Feb 19, 2013 rated it it was amazing
I studied a lot of Shakespeare in college. I just like that guy. No one else can explore such huge themes so concisely and so beautifully, and I think he's the real deal.

And he's hard to biographize, partly because we famously don't know a ton about him, but also I think partly because he was just something special. Someone who wrote outside himself.

So, for example, in this terrific biography, Greenblatt points out that it's kinda weird that Shakespeare's son died and he appeared not to deal wit

I am not sure what to do with this book. On the one hand, I enjoyed the little tidbits about Shakespeare's family life and some of the context of how politics shaped his plays. Which is, really, what I thought I was getting with this book. I wanted to know how the culture of the time and his own life had come through in his writing.

But on the other hand, and I'm not sure here if it's just the way the author chose to write about it, or if this is the absolute truth, it seems that very li
Oct 13, 2008 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: nonfiction
My immediate response upon finishing this book?

Every Shakespeare play I read from now on will be funnier, deeper, more moving and generally more of a joy because I read this.

What we know of Shakespeare's biography is notoriously fragmented, but Greenblatt fuses an extraordinarily depth of knowledge with the facts we do have, along with the extensive context of the strange, bloody and beautiful world of Elizabethan England. To that potent mix, he adds a passionate and lucid understanding of Shake
Sep 21, 2007 rated it really liked it
Stephen Greenblatt is just wonderful. This book makes blood flow between the sonnets, plays and legal records that comprise the slim documentary record of Shakespeare's career.

His analysis is contextual. As you read the book, your attention is driven through a route that wends alternatingly through the terrains of Shakespeare's world, life and work. Greenblatt is a spectacular writer with amazing structural control.

Some bullet points will give you a sense of what I loved about this book:

• Shake
Charles Matthews
Dec 06, 2009 rated it really liked it
Perhaps. Probably. Maybe. These words hiccup through any biography of Shakespeare, and Stephen Greenblatt's is no exception. For the facts about Shakespeare's life are, as Greenblatt puts it, ''abundant but thin.'' We know all sorts of stuff about the property he bought and sold, the taxes he paid, the theatrical companies he worked for. We have his baptismal record, his marriage license and his last will and testament.

What we don't have are letters, diaries, manuscripts or anything that would
Jul 03, 2020 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
The title of this book is well-chosen as the book tries to be equal parts Will and his World. Fact is, though, historians have way more information about Will's world than they do about Will. Thus, you'll learn a lot about England at the turn of the 17th century and a little less than a lot about Will, who knew how to erase his personal trail because he valued this little thing called his life.

There's a reason for that. Elizabethan England, thanks to Henry VIII going rogue on the Roman Catholic
This is a speculative biography of William Shakespeare which was quite enjoyable to read (especially since the Greenblatts sketch of the Shakespeares contemporary world is quite detailed and rich). Shakespeare found himself in a very volatile environment which had only recently been turned protestant and where many still practiced Catholicism in secret. London was perpetually ravaged by various diseases and plagues. There was no police force and the citys administration had a tough time keeping ...more
Apr 07, 2008 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: um, Shakespeare fans? duh.
Recommended to Jonathan by: Puck
Not just a bio of Will, but also a great look into what made him tick, and how he may have come to write his plays. The book is an interesting look into the history of the late 16th and early 17th century, and how the events of the times shaped Shakespeare's life. Unfortunately, many of the details of Shakespeare's life are lost, but Greenblatt uses what is available to make educated guesses as what influences and experiences Shakespeare used to create his masterworks. An altogether fascinating ...more
May 29, 2007 rated it it was amazing
Recommends it for: Bardophiles
This is a thrilling read; even at its most speculative (and sometimes it goes a bit far), WILL IN THE WORLD is a feat of scholarship, an example of how a lively but discriminating imagination can engage with historical evidence. Greenblatt makes me feel that Shakesepare was human...which should be a given (after all, he wasn't a wookie), but I've always pictured him as a magical marble bust of himself from which lightning crackled and astounding language (in blank verse) emanated. Or as Joseph F ...more
Feb 26, 2012 rated it really liked it
Shelves: non-fiction
Greenblatt sketches out what is known about the life of Shakespeare, interspersing the meager details with background information about Elizabethan England. He tells of, for example, the tension between Catholics and Protestants, the vilification of the Jews, the myriad ways in which the society was brutal and bloody, and King James’ beliefs on witches and prophecy. The result is a very intriguing book with many interesting and extremely debatable propositions.

That some of the sonnets seem to be
Jun 29, 2015 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Greenblatt I have heard many times over my thirty years in the Shakespeare Association of America and in RSA; I found him better, and wittier, as a comparatist in Renaissance Self-Fashioning, where he wrote with more wit. His Swerve has a great account of the MS discovery in the first sixty pages, but declines into misdirected polemic. I've read Lucretius's Latin, and he is NOT behind the modern cosmos. Giordano Bruno (and of course Lawyer-Physician Copernicus) is.
This book falls way behind Sha
Some parts of this book raise very good points about the plays and sonnets (though a little over heavy on guesswork). I did like some of his comments on the later plays in relation to Shakespeare's daughter. Some parts of this book caused me to raise eyebrows. Greenblatt's reading of Shylock seems to be too modern, too "what iffy".

But I have to ask, what the he** did Anne Hathaway do to Greenblatt? He seems to hate her even more than Anthony Holden does.

Read the remarks about the plays, skip th
Aug 29, 2014 rated it really liked it
The library shelves groan under the weight of the tomes about Shakespeare, but, oddly enough, the writer himself was not much concerned with books. Certainly he read, that we know from his liberal borrowings from old Teutonic and Italian stories. But he never saw what we see in the bookstore, the sonnets were handed around among friends without prior thought for publication (at least in Stephen Greenblatt's reconstruction) and the various theater companies for which he wrote (and in which he inv ...more
Jun 20, 2014 rated it did not like it
I found this deathly dull, even too dull for listening on Audible while driving back-and-forth. Whole chapters are devoted to what should have been crammed into a footnote. I'm sure it's me, not you Stephen...! ...more
«He never, it seems, anticipated what turned out to be the case: that he would live as much on the page as on the stage.»

Will in the World: How Shakespeare became Shakespeare is a classic of literary criticism and biography on William Shakespeare I’ve thoroughly enjoyed and it has become one of my all-time favourite non-fiction titles.

Unravelling Shakespeare’s life with the fewer written records we have is a tremendously difficult task, but scholar Stephen Greenblatt has successfully done it
Jun 01, 2019 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Part fact, part literary criticism, part speculation, part hypothetical historical novel. This is inevitable for a Shakespeare biography, because the facts we have are extremely tenuous: some mentions in legal documents, a few things written about him by contemporaries, others written many years after his death, his disappointingly dry will, and of course: his works. Poems and plays where his presence is constantly felt, but never truly glimsped. Even in the sonnets, the tone is extremely person ...more
Adam Roberts
Jan 30, 2021 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
When you hear "Shakespeare biography" you probably don't think "gee, that sounds like fun." But that's exactly what Greenblatt's book is: a biography that's as violent at times as an episode of Game of Thrones (don't believe me? There are more disembowelments here than at any red wedding), scandalous (see: Shakespeare's will, where he leaves everything to his daughter and, for his wife, "the second best bed"), and subversive (reading this makes me think the Gwyneth Paltrow part in "Shakespeare i ...more
Hmmmmmm not my favorite. The nature of this projects is quite speculative, which is not something I think is fair to fault it for--but it's also really not my thing. It was an interesting enough read, but I would probably recommend other books of biography/criticism for anyone interested in Shakespeare. ...more
Jan 12, 2016 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: non-fiction
"Will in the World" enters the crowded arena of Shakespeare biographies with a bang. Many reviews have complained about the speculative nature of the text and the fact that Greenblatt takes "liberties" with many details of Shakespeare`s life. Well, how could he not?
Don't read this book for a run of the mill biography. Read it for its interesting analysis of Shakespeare's works and their possible connections to his life and values. Appreciation of biographies of Shakespeare are only as valuable a
Victor Sonkin
An excellent, vivid and powerful course of Shakespeare's career and writing. Gives you a real understanding of what is could be to be a power player in the end of the 16th and early 17th century; gives you a real feeling of Shakespeare if you want to doubt or support his authencity. He is what he is; he left what he left; deal with it. Greenblatt is a wonderful storyteller, obviously very much in the material, and, difficult though his story is, it is a pleasure to follow. A gem. ...more
Erik Graff
Aug 13, 2010 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Shakespeare fans
Recommended to Erik by: no one
Shelves: biography
This was a delightfully tendentious biography of William Shakespeare. During the course of it one gets not only some learned speculations about the psychology of the playwright, but also some interesting cultural history of Elizabethan England.
Ashley Lloyd
Nov 04, 2018 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Dr. Greenblatt is an excellent lecturer and by far the leading expert on Shakespeare. In video and in person, he is easy to follow and fascinating. Unfortunately, it is not quite as easy to follow on paper as he becomes much more circular in thought. I would have much more enjoyed this book if it were told in chronological order. However, it was still very interesting!
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
Non Fiction Book ...: July / August 2022 BOTM - Will in the World: How Shakespeare Became Shakespeare by Stephen Greenblatt 2 10 Jul 03, 2022 10:55AM  
literature 6 43 Apr 04, 2013 03:15PM  
Shakespeare Club: WS 1 6 Feb 09, 2013 07:07PM  

Readers also enjoyed

  • A Year in the Life of William Shakespeare: 1599
  • The Year of Lear: Shakespeare in 1606
  • Women of Will: Following the Feminine in Shakespeare's Plays
  • Henry IV, Part 2
  • Love's Labour's Lost
  • The Two Noble Kinsmen
  • King John
  • The Age of Shakespeare (Modern Library Chronicles)
  • Measure for Measure
  • King Henry IV, Part 1
  • America's Daughter (Dancing Soul Trilogy, #2)
  • The Brontës
  • William Shakespeare's Hamlet
  • Cymbeline
  • Wilson
  • Macbeth: A Dagger of the Mind
  • The Greek Way
  • How to Read and Why
See similar books…
Stephen Greenblatt (Ph.D. Yale) is Cogan University Professor of English and American Literature and Language at Harvard University. Also General Editor of The Norton Anthology of English Literature, Eighth Edition, he is the author of nine books, including Will in the World: How Shakespeare Became Shakespeare; Hamlet in Purgatory; Practicing New Historicism; Marvelous Possessions: The Wonder of t ...more

Related Articles

For those with a taste for nonfiction—or even just a curiosity about what’s out there—we’ve gathered below the most popular nonfiction titles...
24 likes · 14 comments
“at Cambridge, a graduate in grammar in the late Middle Ages was required to demonstrate his pedagogical fitness by flogging a dull or recalcitrant boy.” 4 likes
“Falstaff something roughly similar—a gentleman sinking into mire—but darker and deeper: a debauched genius; a fathomlessly cynical, almost irresistible confidence man; a diseased, cowardly, seductive, lovable monster; a father who cannot be trusted.” 4 likes
More quotes…