Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering” as Want to Read:
The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering

4.01  ·  Rating details ·  13,120 ratings  ·  870 reviews
Few books on software project management have been as influential and timeless as The Mythical Man-Month. With a blend of software engineering facts and thought-provoking opinions, Fred Brooks offers insight for anyone managing complex projects. These essays draw from his experience as project manager for the IBM System/360 computer family and then for OS/360, its massive ...more
Paperback, Anniversary Edition, 322 pages
Published August 2nd 1995 by Addison-Wesley Professional (first published 1975)
More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Mythical Man-Month, please sign up.
Popular Answered Questions
Jacopo Farina The technologies mentioned in it are indeed very very old, but it's not important because it's about managing projects in abstract.
I would say the boo…more
The technologies mentioned in it are indeed very very old, but it's not important because it's about managing projects in abstract.
I would say the book is geared toward very big projects (i.e. spanning years and involving tens or hundreds of people), from my experience on small projects it may not fit well. I found it interesting nonetheless, and I suggest the read.(less)
Stavros Sachtouris You don't need to be experienced in anything to understand this book. To enjoy it, though, it might be necessary to be familiar with engineering or pr…moreYou don't need to be experienced in anything to understand this book. To enjoy it, though, it might be necessary to be familiar with engineering or project management. It doesn't have to be software or electrical engineering, any kind would do. IT people will enjoy it even more for its historical and anecdotal value.(less)

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
Average rating 4.01  · 
Rating details
 ·  13,120 ratings  ·  870 reviews

More filters
Sort order
Start your review of The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering
Dec 05, 2015 rated it it was ok
Except blatant sexism* it was a pretty good book. It's a series of experiences that you gradually pick up when you're working in the software industry. It's a little outdated, e.g. we don't have printed manuals anymore and we don't have to deal with the woes of constantly updating them, but a lot of wisdoms from this book are still valuable.

* the entire book never uses a female pronoun. ever. it makes it sound like engineers, managers, technical leads, clients are always only male. plus there's
Dec 09, 2009 rated it it was amazing
In this classic book on the software development process, Fred Brooks demolishes several persistent myths. They never quite go away: every new generation just has to learn them over again.

The first and most dangerous of these myths is the belief that putting more people on a project means it'll be completed more quickly. Brooks includes one of the most brilliant graphs I've ever seen, plotting number of women against time required to produce a baby. Would you believe it: the graph is flat at ni
David Bjelland
Oct 17, 2016 rated it liked it
Shelves: cs-software
As far as I can tell, the core tenets of this book aren't really even up for dispute anymore. I don't mean to sound like the grumpy reader mentioned in the epilogue, complaining that the book offered "nothing I didn't know already know" (however experienced he might have been, I still doubt it), but whether from my limited experience in the industry first hand or second-hand through the various managers I've had over the years, the tenet that developers and time aren't interchangeable resources ...more
Apr 03, 2016 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
I want to print many copies of this book.
I want to print many copies and roll them up.
I want to roll them up and take them to meetings with my clients.
I want to take them to meetings and hit them over the head repeatedly while screaming "more... than... 30... years... and you... still... don't... understand... anything... stop... making... me... write... bad... software...!"

Since what I know about programming probably could be written on the back of a postcard and wouldn't be worth reading there's nothing worthwhile that I can say about the software engineering side of this collection of essays about software engineering.

Further Brooks was writing in the 60s, in part based on experience from the 50s, which I suppose means I'll be making some claim to wider applicability with regard to project management & people management and understanding the nature of tasks.

I re
Brian Yahn
Apr 16, 2018 rated it liked it
The Mythical Man-Month starts of strong--with a solid mix of good humor, great story-telling, and even better analogies and metaphors. Most interesting, the claims Frederick Brooks made more than 40 years ago remain true today. But even so, the book has not aged well.

Chapters 5-8 and 9-15 seem wildly out of date. I give some reasoning below, but the gist is that the middle is mostly skippable. Worse is that the religious overtones get a little out of hand in this section. And to make it even mor
Dorin Lazăr
I was underwhelmed with how badly this text has aged. The references, which made sense 15 years ago, no longer hold water, and the most-referenced-project is certainly no longer the way we write software nowadays. While the idea remains valid, I think people writing about this text are more relevant than the text itself, holding only historical value, at most.
Nov 01, 2009 rated it really liked it
Shelves: computer-books
I read this book originally in college and then re-read it after a couple years of coding professionally. While there are certainly some dated sections, such as the idea of having the analog of a surgical team to code, many of the suggestions have held against the test of time.

The two most popular are "no silver bullets" and "adding developers to a late project makes it later." The former is that no new technology/technique will make an order of magnitude difference in productivity over 10 year
Dec 06, 2018 rated it it was amazing
I re-read this recently after recommending it to a colleague, mainly just for nostalgia and planning to read a few of the more popular essays, like "The Tar Pit." Instead I read the entire book again and still found it fresh and insightful, over 40 years since publication. The prose manages to be dense with ideas but brilliantly clear and often witty. Now as I read contemporary writing (blogs but even books), I deeply lament this lost art.

Aside from his bold statements, most famously Brooks' Law
Matt Diephouse
Dec 29, 2015 rated it liked it
I'm really surprised that people still recommend this book. It's primarily concerned with very large scale software projects (i.e., an operating system), much of the "data" is anecdotal, and many of the assumptions are simply outdated. For instance, Brooks writes about (1) creating paper manuals with documentation about the system that get updated daily for the engineers, (2) strategies for time-allocation on centralized computers, and (3) about optimizing for compiled code size. Those simply ar ...more
This is more of historical importance than a go-to book nowadays. Still, I'm glad to have read it.

I agree with the points made in these two reviews, especially the ones about the default male programmer and the overextended Christian viewpoint, which actually makes Brooks misstate one of his examples.

Still, I loved the positive and realistic message of "There is no royal road, but there is a road." I can stand behind both parts of this one.
Maria Ines
Sep 15, 2018 rated it it was ok
Shelves: it
Don't add people to a late software project or you'll make it later.

There, summarized the book for you.
May 09, 2019 is currently reading it  ·  review of another edition
en bilinen kısmı unutmuşum:) “The bearing of a child takes nine months, no matter how many women are assigned. Many software tasks have this characteristic because of the sequential nature of debugging.”
May 14, 2016 rated it it was amazing
Everybody should read this book, not just programmers or project managers. It's easy and fun. There are 9 chapters, but you only need to read 3 of them. You'll know which ones. When he starts slinging equations, skip over those parts. He uses cooking metaphors where most software books use building construction metaphors. The unconscious gender bias, typical of the time, is almost funny. He keeps saying how many "men" does it take to do a project.

I'm frequently surprised at how many software pro
Apr 18, 2010 rated it it was amazing

* Estimating software project completion time is really hard. (Requirements change, software is intangible and it has to fit with idiosyncrasies of human systems)

* Aristocracy in managing projects is better. There should be one final decision maker. Metaphor is a surgical team.

* Cost of coordination and communication within large teams is often ignored. This causes poor estimation.

* If a project is delayed - rescheduling or reducing scope is recommended. Adding manpower will result in further de
Aug 07, 2012 rated it really liked it
Interesting book with a pretty narrow focus, a collection of essays on the management and planning of good software engineering. The author instilled the mistakes and successes of his work on the IBM 360 Operating System in the 70s, and most of what he found still applies today. For example, wisdom like: more programmers make a project only late, and if you add programmers to an already late project, results will arrive even later. Have an architect and a manager, hopefully in two different pers ...more
Dated, unapproachable, and in some ways misogynistic (systemic but unintentional I'm sure). I really understand why this is still the #2 most popular programming book on Safari Books Online (right after Clean Code).

Probably more than half the lessons and suggestions don't make sense in the modern world of high-level languages, agile software development, and continual development/release.

Other lessons are still widely applicable... so widely applicable that they're near-universal knowledge alrea
James Oden
Oct 03, 2015 rated it it was ok
Shelves: computer
Many times when I read a book that is dated, its pearls of wisdom are still there in clear view to be harvested and made use of. I can't say the same thing about the Mythical Man Month. I will grant that Brook's Law still holds, and managers still today stumble over this one. However much of his advice fell flat in the face of the more recent agile development movement and still more recent devops movement. In the end he was still preaching a kind of waterfall type approach to development which ...more
Feb 28, 2020 rated it liked it
This book had some insightful ideas regarding software engineering practices, but a large portion of the book is no longer relevant.

The author dove into some specific details about situations that he had encountered, for example, practices involving developers planning how they would divide the debugging computers amongst themselves.

Modern machines can handle much more than computers could in the 70s, and this book needs an update to reflect that.

The main takeaways I got from this book are that
Freddie Sykes - "Quod licet Iovi, non licet bovi"
Contains much that is true and much that is trivial. Unfortunately, the stuff that's true is trivial and the stuff that's not trivial is not true. ...more
João Carlos Pires
Jan 11, 2021 rated it it was amazing
The quality of this book is so inquestionable that I don't even know where to start. First of all, I started by reading this book after a recommendation of the Professors of the curricular unit I have with the same name as the theme of the book: Software Engineering. The fact is that quickly, the book became something special, something I was reading and enjoying, something that just a few books can do, and I must say I never expected this to happen with a technical one. Having the privillege to ...more
Regis Hattori
I love to read "old" books. The fact they were written a lot of time ago and are still relevant prove that it really worth reading them.

But I didn't like this book as much as I wanted to. Maybe because I had an expectation far from reality based on so many good reviews of a lot of people I admire. I know its content is still relevant today. But some parts are not. And some parts are still relevant but we need to "translate" to our days. And some parts have been better explained by other books li
Jan 02, 2009 rated it it was amazing
I have read it as part of my PhD, since it's part of the classical books of software engineering. Yet the book tackles very important issues not only about management but how people interact during software development. I've recognised myself in many situations described by the author (even that I'm not part of a software development team).
One might wonder, as I did, how many of the concepts explained by the author apply to current technology of the 21st century, but the author tackles that in t
Senthil Kumaran
May 23, 2012 rated it it was amazing
This is a master piece of software engineering. Many people have read this one because this one is an extremely approachable account. When I read this book in 2007, I felt how much of value this one book brought which was written more than 20 years ago brought even then. Since then, I have heard many people talk and swear by this book. I have one gripe against the readers and people who talk about this. They use this book to support their stances and most often these people do not possess the ki ...more
May 12, 2011 rated it liked it
Shelves: non-fiction

Dr. Brooks is the founder of our department, more than enough reason to read his book.

The recent extension to our department building was named after Dr. Brooks. Apparently the money for the building came as an anonymous donation from an alumnus, on the condition that it be named after Dr. Brooks. That is the kind of respect he has won from several people.
James Prince
Mar 26, 2019 rated it really liked it
The book shows it’s age in a lot of places and it can be tough to power through sections which describe the status quo nearly 50 years ago - though some of these parts allow us to appreciate how far the field has come since then.

The reason I have given 4 stars is that there are a lot of good nuggets of information in this book - things that have stood the test of time. The book is very much ahead of its time with some of the observations made within.
Nov 07, 2011 rated it really liked it
Shelves: tech-books
Even for an inexperienced undergraduate student like me, this book made a lasting impression and left me pondering on the various human dynamics involved in software engineering. Definitely a must-read.

Warning: It does get a little dry at times, and most of the examples are very outdated,but the principles explained are timeless.
Jan 08, 2012 rated it it was amazing
If I would be asked to name just a one book about project management or software development in general — I'd say: "The Mythical Man-Month". Nice to read it again after more years and compare with own experience. Anniversary edition with later updates is a nice way to see the the history of software engineering and its management. ...more
John Mehrman
Sep 12, 2017 rated it it was amazing
Originally written in 1975, prior to the PC explosion in the mid-1980s, Brooks book is still relevant today. The same systems management "rules-of-thumb" and potential pitfalls still exist in largely the same form. Many of his bigger lessons expand beyond just software development and apply to program management as a whole. A must read for anyone in that develops complex systems. ...more
Jul 29, 2020 rated it it was ok
Shelves: it
It's a classic - but it's not timeless. For me, the book didn't click and I didn't get much takeaway. It just felt too outdated to connect the chapters with modern software development and agile practices. But maybe this is too much to ask in 2020, 45 years after the book was published... ...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
Sicurezza Sul Lavoro Corsi At Piemonte-Find The Right Place To Enrol And Discover 1 2 Nov 17, 2020 10:02AM  
ost zu pst Konverter Freeware 1 1 Nov 10, 2020 09:13AM  
Migration von OST zu Office 365 1 1 Nov 10, 2020 09:03AM  
Best Engineering & Management College in India 1 1 Dec 06, 2019 01:13AM  
Atom TechSoft Excel Password Unloker 1 5 Aug 12, 2019 10:40PM  
Unlock Excel Password By Atom TechSoft Excel Unlocker tool 1 1 Aug 05, 2019 12:18AM  
Edb mailboxes converter in PST format 1 3 Oct 19, 2018 10:36PM  

Readers also enjoyed

  • Peopleware: Productive Projects and Teams
  • The Pragmatic Programmer: From Journeyman to Master
  • Code Complete
  • Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software
  • Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code
  • Clean Code: A Handbook of Agile Software Craftsmanship
  • Domain-Driven Design: Tackling Complexity in the Heart of Software
  • Coders at Work: Reflections on the Craft of Programming
  • Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change (The XP Series)
  • Clean Architecture
  • The C Programming Language
  • The Cathedral & the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary
  • Patterns of Enterprise Application Architecture
  • The Clean Coder: A Code of Conduct for Professional Programmers
  • Designing Data-Intensive Applications
  • Joel on Software
  • JavaScript: The Good Parts
  • Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs
See similar books…

Goodreads is hiring!

If you like books and love to build cool products, we may be looking for you.
Learn more »

News & Interviews

If you're looking to fall head over heels for some LGBTQ+ romances, you'll find yourself quite lucky in love with recent books. In the first...
10 likes · 1 comments
“Adding manpower to a late software project, makes it later.” 16 likes
“Systems program building is an entropy-decreasing process, hence inherently metastable. Program maintenance is an entropy-increasing process, and even its most skillful execution only delays the subsidence of the system into unfixable obsolescence.” 13 likes
More quotes…