Early in life, he was T.S. Eliot's pupil. He became one of the United Kingdom's best-loved poets, both in terms of accolades and sales. This volume sold 100,000 copies when it debuted in 1958.
Yet it feels so terribly dated to this reader, a moribund verse tradition that's long outlived its welcome. Betjeman was poet laureate of England from 1972 until his death in 1984. I think the U.S. has adopted a much more sensible approach with the very limited tenure of our laureates. Considering the fact that most poets do not sustain their initial level of inspiration for too many years (doesn't Linda Pastan gauge it at "15 years" in one poem?) does a nation really want to get saddled with a fading seer-turned-bloviator? And then the culture grows and changes (if it's healthy!) and you might end up with a fossil "representing" the nation. But Betjeman seemed to remain a beloved fossil over there, across that Drink, until the end. I suppose they had to endure much longer tenures if one looks into the history of the office.
Maybe you should have to be English or English-born or English-born well back into that last century to review this book. Maybe it's unfair to look at it from a culture whose wildly-divergent poetics is so far afield the Official Verse Culture of that kingdom, in that time.
I assume many readers enjoy the bathos Betjeman substitutes for pathos, the sense that he's not-so-secretly lampooning the Official Verse Culture I mentioned above. He writes light verse quite often. He doesn't mind lampooning the poetic penchant for pathos, but at the same time he gets squirrelly and wants to employ that pathos sometimes. He wants to throw the cake in the face of poetry, but then eat it sensuously off her lips. He's alternately clown and sexton. Flip and grave, flip and grave, on and on, throughout the pages. You either like that or you don't, that binary tone.
"And when the match is over, I
would flop beside you, hear you sigh;
And then, with what supreme caress,
You'ld tuck me up into my press.
Fair tigress of the tennis courts,
So short in sleeve and strong in shorts,
Little, alas, to you I mean,
For I am old and bald and green."
These lines, from "The Olympic Girl," are rather typical of the tone Betjeman adopts. I don't think it would be draconian to call those lines doggerel.
The thing is that Betjeman memorializes so many English places in the vernacular familiar and dear to their denizens, that he earns a certain love for that alone. On this fact, his poetry skates. He becomes The Ethnographic Poet Laureate. One can see how this would serve a state function. And it probably didn't hurt that he was, essentially, a reactionary, a man who was in no way threatening to the social order. His poetry, whatever its charms, didn't express outrage at social injustice to any noticeable degree. It was a poetry about looking backward more than forward. Betjeman's poetry certainly wasn't interested in bending the moral arc of the universe. Perhaps it is not accidental that he was a preservationist interested in protecting Victorian architecture. He seems also to have wanted to preserve the Victorian architecture of erstwhile British poetry. Was it his fondest and not-so-secret desire to have been born A.E. Housman instead of John Betjeman? One smells a smoldering envy. A lifelong boy crush.
There are times that he approaches the fey lyricism of, say, James Schuyler in his finical attention to the loveliness of words serried to a proper and musical exactitude:
"Up the ash-try climbs the ivy,
Up the ivy climbs the sun,
With a twenty-thousand pattering
Has a valley breeze begun,
Feathery ash, neglected alder,
Shift the shade and make it run--"
(from "Upper Lambourne")
But the sing-song meters he favors and the elegaic or mock-elegaic tone that dominates the collection seem to situate the poems more in the nineteenth century than the period in which they were written. Literary Modernism didn't really penetrate Betjeman. The skin of his poetry was apparently impervious to th0se cosmic rays beaming at every writer in that period. I think this is what marks him a minor poet. Facture and drear. Parochialism. But this is, ironically, what makes him best-loved to some. Probably a dwindling "some," but still.
Maybe it's wrong to admit it's fun to hunt for cringeworthy lines in this collection, but it is a bit. Betjeman's defenders might say those were all intended effects, and to lambaste him for them is to miss his entire raison d'etre. Maybe.
Does the inveterate rhymer catch the feel of what it was like to live in that bygone (felicitously transformed) culture? Yes, I would warrant he does. So it is a bit of a time machine, this collection. Maybe it's a form of hubris to demand that art always reflect us. A narcissism. Maybe we should come to art on its own terms sometimes. Surrender.
"And all the time the waves, the waves, the waves
Chase, intersect and flatten on the sand
As they have done for centuries, as they will
For centuries to come, when not a soul
Is left to picnic on the blazing rocks,
When England is not England, when mankind
Has blown himself to pieces. Still the sea,
Consolingly disastrous, will return
While the strange starfish, hugely magnified,
Waits in the jewelled basin of a pool."
(from "Beside the Seaside")
(Even with these lines and some word choices I want to argue. But I'll pat his ghost on the hand for "consolingly disastrous" and the idea of the starfish suddenly "hugely magnified" by humankind's extinction.)