Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Revolt of the Admirals: The Fight for Naval Aviation, 1945-1950” as Want to Read:
Revolt of the Admirals: The Fight for Naval Aviation, 1945-1950
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Revolt of the Admirals: The Fight for Naval Aviation, 1945-1950

3.03  ·  Rating Details  ·  29 Ratings  ·  5 Reviews
Chronicles the showdown between the U.S. Airforce and the Navy over the role of carrier aviation in the national security framework.
Paperback, 442 pages
Published October 1st 1998 by Potomac Books
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Revolt of the Admirals, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Revolt of the Admirals

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 56)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Adam Yoshida
Jan 22, 2016 Adam Yoshida rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Clear and Well-Written

Though this book was originally produced as an academic work, it is blissfully-free of the well-known defect of that form - that is to say dull, jargon-filled impenetrability. Instead, this is a clear and excellent account of the strategic thinking of a portion of the senior leadership of the Navy and Air Force during the early days of the Cold War. While that might seem like an arcane and irrelevant topic today, the work is in fact shockingly relevant to the present and re
...more
Josh
Mar 24, 2010 Josh rated it did not like it
In sum, the book is a series of he said/she said accounts while never getting down to the real questions of: 1)How did the AF view it's role in national defense? 2)How did Navy aviation view it's role in national defense? 3)Where did their views conflict? 4) How did history and independent contemporary analysis (OSD/academia) support the two viewpoints? 5) How/why did the conflict degrade into political maneuvering?

If someone was interested in this event I would recommend reading the conclusion
...more
Nate Huston
To the extent that this book describes the DETAILED ins and outs of the interservice rivalry and animosity that existed in the wake of NSC 1947 and the end of WWII, it does a fine job. Where it falls short, in my opinion, is supporting its contention that the "Revolt of the Admirals" was critical to the future of naval aviation. There is some scant anecdotal evidence that the testimony was key to future procurement of a flush-deck carrier (necessary for big atomic-bomb carrying planes), but that ...more
Trav
Nov 18, 2012 Trav rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: history, airpower, saass, 628
Provides an overview of the inter-Service battles that waged in the late-1940s. Barlow's goal was to highlight the importance that the "Revolt of the Admirals" in 1949 in saving naval carrier aviation. However, though he does identify some of the key differences in perspective on national defense strategy that shaped the debates, Barlow's analysis seems to be more geared to the political machinations that were the real driving force behind the revolt.

An excellent examination of post-War defense
...more
Art Greer
Jul 04, 2007 Art Greer rated it it was amazing
Recommends it for: Navy History Buffs
A must read for readers interested in how the Navy shifted to a Carrier based vice Battleship based Navy. A clear picture of the infighting between the Navy and Army Air Forces/US Air Force dealing with control of forces and stratigic composition.
Mikko
Mikko marked it as to-read
Jan 24, 2016
Seth Kinkaid
Seth Kinkaid marked it as to-read
Jan 23, 2016
Bob
Bob is currently reading it
Jan 05, 2016
Bob
Bob rated it it was amazing
Dec 20, 2015
Frank Theising
Frank Theising rated it liked it
Aug 22, 2015
Ilhan
Ilhan marked it as to-read
Jun 24, 2015
Joseph Hillenburg
Joseph Hillenburg marked it as to-read
Jun 19, 2015
Gary Bialozynski
Gary Bialozynski marked it as to-read
Feb 01, 2015
Roger P. Lempke
Roger P. Lempke rated it really liked it
Jan 30, 2015
Steve Anzalone
Steve Anzalone is currently reading it
Jan 05, 2015
T
T marked it as to-read
Oct 21, 2014
Chris
Chris rated it liked it
Dec 06, 2014
Jason Zumwalt
Jason Zumwalt rated it liked it
Nov 17, 2014
Phil Webb
Phil Webb marked it as to-read
Sep 25, 2014
Mark Uberuaga
Mark Uberuaga rated it liked it
Oct 19, 2014
Roshow Meek
Roshow Meek marked it as to-read
Mar 22, 2014
Jp
Jp rated it liked it
Dec 18, 2013
J.A.
J.A. marked it as to-read
Nov 15, 2013
Victoria
Victoria rated it liked it
Oct 27, 2013
Mark Jacobsen
Mark Jacobsen rated it liked it
Oct 07, 2013
Brian Davis
Brian Davis rated it it was ok
Oct 03, 2013
Max Vollkommer
Max Vollkommer rated it liked it
Oct 03, 2013
AO
AO rated it liked it
Oct 01, 2013
« previous 1 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Share This Book