Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “What Did the Romans Know? An Inquiry into Science and Worldmaking” as Want to Read:
What Did the Romans Know? An Inquiry into Science and Worldmaking
by
Daryn Lehoux
What did the Romans know about their world? Quite a lot, as Daryn Lehoux makes clear in this fascinating and much-needed contribution to the history and philosophy of ancient science. Lehoux contends that even though many of the Romans’ views about the natural world have no place in modern science—the umbrella-footed monsters and dog-headed people that roamed the earth and
...more
Hardcover, 288 pages
Published
February 13th 2012
by University of Chicago Press
(first published February 2nd 2012)
Friend Reviews
To see what your friends thought of this book,
please sign up.
Reader Q&A
To ask other readers questions about
What Did the Romans Know? An Inquiry into Science and Worldmaking,
please sign up.
Be the first to ask a question about What Did the Romans Know? An Inquiry into Science and Worldmaking
This book is not yet featured on Listopia.
Add this book to your favorite list »
Community Reviews
(showing
1-30
of
32)
This book is a history of roman science and understanding of the world that takes into account contingencies of the time (the better aspect of relativism) and comparing Roman science to modern knowledge using the best part of scientific realism in the present to compare their knowledge with modern knowledge which can only be described as closer to the truth. There are two chapters in defending Weak realism and the Coherence theory of truth to hold onto social aspect of science in any age influen
...more
Very close to giving it one star. I briefly questioned during one of the last chapters whether I was experiencing a dumbpiphany, and I basically called the author a moron in the margin because I got angry at him for wasting my time with crap.
The first half of the book was reasonably interesting, and there are a few interesting observations in the latter half as well. I was at a 2,5 rating or so after the first half, but then it went downhill fast.
The book could have been great, but the choices ...more
The first half of the book was reasonably interesting, and there are a few interesting observations in the latter half as well. I was at a 2,5 rating or so after the first half, but then it went downhill fast.
The book could have been great, but the choices ...more
This book is not so much an analysis of Roman science as it is an analysis of how ancient Romans apprehended the world in which they lived. In this regard, the author succeeds brilliantly. He shows that ancient Romans had a significantly and dramatically different view of "reality" than modern humans, and that one can only understand them by understanding this worldview. Lehoux deconstructs primary Roman sources in order to reconstruct the Roman worldview. In my opinion, the book is more suited
...more
There are no discussion topics on this book yet.
Be the first to start one »


























