Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Thinking Fragments: Psychoanalysis, Feminism, and Postmodernism in the Contemporary West” as Want to Read:
Thinking Fragments: Psychoanalysis, Feminism, and Postmodernism in the Contemporary West
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Thinking Fragments: Psychoanalysis, Feminism, and Postmodernism in the Contemporary West

3.57  ·  Rating details ·  21 Ratings  ·  4 Reviews
Thinking Fragments provides a brilliant critique of psychoanalytic, feminist, and postmodern theory. Examining the writings of Freud, Winnicott, Lacan, Chodorow, Irigaray, Derrida, Rorty, and Foucault, among others, Flax conducts a "conversation" among psychoanalysts, feminist thinkers, and postmodern theorists, evaluating the ways in which each group of thinkers succeeds ...more
Paperback, 277 pages
Published December 18th 1990 by University of California Press (first published January 1st 1990)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Thinking Fragments, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Thinking Fragments

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-10)
Rating details
Sort: Default
Nov 13, 2009 rated it really liked it
Shelves: feminism, theory
One of Jane Flax's projects in Thinking Fragments is to deconstruct or at least question some of the premises of Western metaphysics, such as the mind/body split. In reading Rene Descartes’ philosophy from a feminist perspective, Flax posits that “Descartes’ philosophy can be read as a desperate attempt to escape from the body, sexuality, and the wiles of the unconscious.” To show the erasure of the body evident in Cartesian thought Flax first quotes from Descartes’ Discourse on Method, “so that ...more
my advisor loves this book and talks about how smart this lady is. i don't doubt that she's brilliant--but i cannot understand what my advisor thinks is so great about this book. to me, it seems sloppy. lots of "poststructuralist" or "postmodern" theorists get pushed together, as though they represent a consistent, coherent school of thought. and the psychoanalysis stuff... i just don't get it. psychoanalysis is pseudoscience. while i can see that it was influential in the development of ideas, ...more
Dec 17, 2015 marked it as to-keep-ref
Es difícil generalizar sobre los numerosos discursos que se sitúan bajo las banderas del posmodernismo, pero la mayoría se inscriben, aunque sea indirectamente, bajo la crítica a las narrativas de los maestros modernistas de Jean-Francois Lyotard, las afirmaciones sobre el simulacro cultural de Jean Baudrillard, o la crítica a la metafísica Occidental de Jacques Derrida. En sus formulaciones más básicas y reduccionistas, las teorías posmodernistas son definidas por muchos de sus proponentes como ...more
Sep 04, 2011 rated it it was ok
Shelves: philosophy
was recommended to me along with lyotard's postmodern condition and foucault's archaeology of knowledge back in 1995 as the three main pomo texts to read. not a bad recommendation, as it turns out.
rated it really liked it
Jun 03, 2008
James Hansen
rated it it was amazing
Aug 24, 2012
Katie Glanz
rated it liked it
Jan 22, 2016
rated it really liked it
Jan 12, 2013
rated it liked it
Jul 13, 2008
rated it really liked it
Jun 24, 2007
« previous 1 3 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »