Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.

Start by marking “No Animals Were Harmed: The Controversial Line Between Entertainment and Abuse” as Want to Read:

Other editions

Enlarge cover

Rate this book

Clear rating

1 of 5 stars 2 of 5 stars 3 of 5 stars 4 of 5 stars 5 of 5 stars

Open Preview

No Animals Were Harmed: The Controversial Line Between Entertainment and Abuse

Peter Laufer

3.16 · Rating details · 63 ratings · 8 reviews

Investigative journalist Peter Laufer is back with his third book in a trilogy that explores the way we humans interact with animals. The attack of a trainer at Sea World by a killer whale in February 2010 is the catalyst for this examination of the controversial role animals have played in the human arenas of entertainment and sports.

From the Romans throwing Christians t ...more

Get A Copy

Hardcover, 258 pages

Published October 18th 2011 by Lyons Press (first published January 1st 2011)

More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about No Animals Were Harmed, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about No Animals Were Harmed

Lists with This Book

Cows and Cow Science

118 books — 4 voters

More lists with this book...

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30

Average rating 3.16 ·

Rating details

· 63 ratings · 8 reviews

More filters

Sort order

Start your review of No Animals Were Harmed: The Controversial Line Between Entertainment and Abuse

Feb 16, 2012 C.S. Malerich rated it liked it

I appreciate the author's genuine honesty and curiosity in exploring the question: when does the use of animals become the abuse of animals? Not exactly a comprehensive look at the way human society uses animals, but kind of a random, let's-see-where-this-takes-us approach that's a little frustrating if you're looking for a strong position or linear argument. Otherwise it's enjoyable and interesting. The author shows a lot of compassion for humans and other animals, and asks some very good quest I appreciate the author's genuine honesty and curiosity in exploring the question: when does the use of animals become the abuse of animals? Not exactly a comprehensive look at the way human society uses animals, but kind of a random, let's-see-where-this-takes-us approach that's a little frustrating if you're looking for a strong position or linear argument. Otherwise it's enjoyable and interesting. The author shows a lot of compassion for humans and other animals, and asks some very good questions.

Ultimately, I got frustrated at the inadequate representation of an animal rights position (i.e., that no use of another being is acceptable). Perhaps it's the selection of material, perhaps the inarticulation of the author's sources, or maybe he just didn't probe far enough, but I felt like there were some simple answers to the rhetorical questions he asks in the text that could have been answered by his interviewees. E.g., how can an animal rights activist condone killing a bear that attacks you? Pretty simple: the principle of self-defense holds across species as well, just as a bear should be able to kill a human that attacked her. Animal rights doesn't imply or require utter passivity and nonviolence in any and all cases (although in some philosophies they go hand-in-hand), just the equal weighting of human and non-human interests in 1) living, 2) enjoying our lives, and 3) controlling our own bodies and what happens to them.

No doubt my exact opposites reading this book would feel that the counter position -- that animals exist for human use and we should stop penalizing people for so-called animal abuse -- is not adequately represented either. The author doesn't come to any conclusion (did you expect him to?) but the last chapter has some weak moralizing about how humans are pretty abusive to one another, too, so...I guess...let's all just be nicer. It's as if one would end a book about child abuse with a hopeless sigh and concession that, well, adults abuse other adults too. Kind of lame, Mr. Laufer. Kind of lame. Also lame: subtle (and not so subtle) condemnation of animal activists who propose direct action (in this book, anything from setting fire to an empty building, to simply removing cows from a dairy farm). ...more

flag 4 likes · Like · see review

Nov 12, 2011 Nancy rated it really liked it

Shelves: non-fiction

This book has the feel of a conversation with friends about the relationship between animals and man. The tone is civil even when Laufer is interviewing people with strong opinions. I think the draw of the book is eavesdropping on conversations with people you would never ordinarily talk with -- a heavily tattooed animal rights arsonist, a Cajun cock fighter, a woman dedicated to rescuing swans...

Laufer is not a disinterested observer or the passionate advocate. He describes his own eating habit ...more

flag 2 likes · Like · see review

Jan 06, 2012 Ann rated it it was ok

As a former English teacher, I was distracted by the apparent lack of thesis in this book. The author doesn't really take a stand on what constitutes animal abuse and indeed, keeps changing his mind. I guess the main idea is that it is up to individuals to decide what is abusive.

As a former employee of the American Humane Association, I was distracted by the title, which is a trademark and program of the Association, not just a public domain phrase. The author interviews one of my former colleag ...more

flag 2 likes · Like · see review

Oct 19, 2015 Amanda rated it it was ok

Shelves: animal-rights

Why why why why are you eating fish at the end of the book?!?! GRRR. I appreciated all the research he did, and I learned a lot from that, but his stance on the subject is both wishy-washy and frustrating. And I thought this was supposed to be about animals in entertainment, but we ended up spending a lot of time on food and clothing and animal testing as well? very random, and again, frustrating.

flag 2 likes · Like · see review

Jan 04, 2019 Brittany rated it did not like it

I’m giving it 1 star for effort and intent, but this book is really a mess. The author jumps around topics and is really disorganized. He also perseverates on cockfighting and cricket fighting and continues to bring it up throughout the book. Cockfighting should have ONE chapter, but why the hell is cricket fighting even in this book? It makes animal rights people look dumb—there is a hierarchy of animal abuse and cricket fighting is on the bottom of it. He also skips over many other animal abus ...more

flag Like · see review

Jun 03, 2012 Kathleen McFall rated it really liked it

What’s the difference between enjoying a cockfight and munching down on crispy fried KFC?

In a nutshell, that’s the central question explored in the non-fiction book No Animals Were Harmed: The Controversial Line Between Entertainment and Abuse by Peter Laufer, PhD.

To amplify this: How can a person object to bloody cockfights and then turn around, sometimes literally on the very next corner, and eat up a piece of fried (or broiled, or baked, or whatever) chicken? The book is about more than jus What’s the difference between enjoying a cockfight and munching down on crispy fried KFC?

In a nutshell, that’s the central question explored in the non-fiction book No Animals Were Harmed: The Controversial Line Between Entertainment and Abuse by Peter Laufer, PhD.

To amplify this: How can a person object to bloody cockfights and then turn around, sometimes literally on the very next corner, and eat up a piece of fried (or broiled, or baked, or whatever) chicken? The book is about more than just this specific question, of course. The author expands the context of inquiry to circus performers, zoos, pet ownership and more.

It’s a gray area. And a tough question.

I applaud the author’s willingness to take on this tough question and his thorough approach. I don’t agree with all of his conclusions, nor am I crazy about his writing style, but he has philosophical courage. The issue of animal rights is a central question of 21st century civilization. Laufer’s book will stand the test of time. Bravo!

From a stylistic standpoint, Laufer employs the “please, come along with me on my travels as I explore this question” approach. This style of “buddy” journalism has a predictable sequence – take a few trips, write about the revelations, string it all together in a chronological, reasonably entertaining narrative, and then close with a personal epiphany, extrapolated to the entire universe. I don’t care much for the narrative framework, but others may. Even so, I still like the subject.

From a content standpoint, for anyone interested in this topic, especially people who are new to the philosophy of animal rights, and for the vegan-curious, this book is well worth picking up. Go ahead and join the author on his stumble through this rich intellectual territory – Polish lion tamers, cock-fighting and more cock-fighting, entertaining or killer whales at SeaWorld, jailhouse interviews, more about cockfighting, along with his own very brief venture into veganism. (Fresh fish did him in, as it does many people.)

As Laufer realizes on his journey, veganism is an evolution, not a single galaxy jump. It's not for everyone. Laufer's conclusions make clear he, personally, is not ready for this step. The line between animal use and animal abuse is so wide, and animal use is deeply integrated into our civilization, rejecting it requires a life of constant vigilance. It can get tiring. And that's okay. But Laufer, in the end, rejects veganism with, in my view, a faux intellectualism designed to justify his choice when in fact, he's just not personally ready for the degree of vigilance. He need not be vegan. Laufer's curiosity on this topic is enough, and even inspiring. It’s okay -- for now -- if he wants to oppose cock-fights and still eat chicken.

Because his children, or maybe his grand-children, will someday give up chicken. It's the inevitable course of civilization. And his quest moves society an inch or two on that path. ...more

flag Like · see review

Apr 20, 2014 Melissa rated it it was amazing

This is a very eye opening book on some of the abuse that animals must withstand while living amongest us. Laufer explores, quite well, our relationship with animals and the very fine line between entertainment and abuse. The story follows his travels to zoos, chicken farms, chicken fights, circuses and roadside zoo attractions, and the exotic animals that are found there. His question is never really answered as he explores these areas, but he does find people who genuinely care about animals a ...more

flag Like · see review

Hi rated it really liked it
Jun 18, 2016

Brianna rated it it was ok
Feb 07, 2012

Anna rated it it was ok
Nov 24, 2017

Nova rated it did not like it
May 23, 2012

sharon rated it it was amazing
Apr 23, 2014

pat rated it did not like it
Dec 31, 2016

Kaitlyn rated it it was amazing
Jul 04, 2014

Kris rated it really liked it
Mar 28, 2014

Aimee rated it really liked it
Aug 09, 2013

Sue rated it really liked it
Jan 09, 2012

Ashley rated it liked it
Oct 26, 2014

Beth rated it really liked it
Jan 05, 2013

Laci rated it did not like it
Feb 14, 2012

Courtney rated it it was ok
Dec 09, 2011

Sandy rated it it was amazing
Jul 05, 2012

Tiffany rated it really liked it
Nov 15, 2013

Ashley rated it liked it
Jun 15, 2012

Seanzalcoatl rated it liked it
Jun 17, 2013

Mar 28, 2017 Mary rated it liked it

I found this book thought provoking but leaves me unsure of what I really gained by reading it... wish it were a bit heavier on the research and facts and included a bit less repetition and was structured in a more straightforward flow.

flag Like · see review

Bob Polis rated it liked it
Dec 30, 2019

Reem rated it liked it
Mar 22, 2019

Caitlin rated it it was ok
Sep 06, 2014

Florian rated it really liked it
Dec 03, 2014

« previous 1 2 3 next »

new topic
Discuss This Book

There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Recommend It | Stats | Recent Status Updates

Readers also enjoyed

See similar books…

Genres

Nonfiction

6 users

Animals

4 users

Food and Drink > Vegan

2 users

History

2 users

See top shelves…

About Peter Laufer

Peter Laufer

29 followers

Peter Laufer, Ph.D., is the author of more than a dozen books that deal with social and political issues, including "Mission Rejected: U.S. Soldiers Who Say No to Iraq," "Wetback Nation: The Case for Opening the Mexican-American Border," and "Iron Curtain Rising: A Personal Journey through the Changing Landscape of Eastern Eurpoe." He is the coanchor of "The Peter Laufer Show" on radio station Gre ...more