Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Language and Mind 3ed” as Want to Read:
Language and Mind 3ed
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Language and Mind 3ed

3.87  ·  Rating details ·  962 ratings  ·  45 reviews
This is the third edition of Chomsky's outstanding collection of essays on language and mind, first published in 2006. The first six chapters, originally published in the 1960s, made a groundbreaking contribution to linguistic theory. This edition complements them with an additional chapter and a new preface, bringing Chomsky's influential approach into the twenty-first ce ...more
Paperback, 190 pages
Published September 11th 2017 by Cambridge University Press (first published 1968)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Language and Mind 3ed, please sign up.
Recent Questions
This question contains spoilers… (view spoiler)
Being and Time by Martin HeideggerThe Republic by PlatoKant by Immanuel KantThus Spoke Zarathustra by Friedrich NietzscheHegel's Phenomenology of Spirit by Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel
Best Philosophy Book
903 books — 1,336 voters
Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit by Georg Wilhelm Friedrich HegelKant by Immanuel KantBeing and Time by Martin HeideggerThe Republic by Platoگم شده ای در مه by سید مرتضی مصطفوی
Seminal Works
87 books — 76 voters


More lists with this book...

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
3.87  · 
Rating details
 ·  962 ratings  ·  45 reviews


More filters
 | 
Sort order
Roy Lotz
Noam Chomsky is one of those towering names one hears echoed in drunken college conversations about intellectual whatnot. Dropping a reference to his political activism or his linguistic theories is mandatory to covering all of your intellectual bases. I’m certainly guilty of engaging in not a few semi-inebriated conversations about Chomskyan linguistics without having had the slightest understand of it. Now, at least I can say I have the basic idea. So, as an act of good will, I have written a ...more
Leonard
Aug 05, 2015 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: linguistics
In the Anshen lecture, Noam Chomsky’s lays out his basic thoughts and concept on linguistics. For him, language isn’t communal. For example, a lay person’s conception of water is different from that of a chemist. Language is an agent’s perspective on the things of the world, rather than a reference to them. A many-to-one mapping of representations or symbols to an object. As such, he believes that we should focus on syntax rather then semantics to understand the nature of language. “In the study ...more
Nadi Ghaffari
پولشو دادم.نمرشم نگرفتم.چون نمیفهمیدم تکلیفشم ننوشتم...
دلم میخواد پاره کنمش و آتیشش بزنم...
#عصبانی
Marzie taram
یک قفسه باید درست کنم به نام "مشکل ها" کتاب هایی که باید بعد از خواندن کتاب های مرتبط دوباره خوانده شوند بلکه فهمیده شوند!
Armineh Nouri
Dec 22, 2013 rated it really liked it
I've read the very first edition of this book (p. 1968) and must therefore admit to my ignorance of all new/modified content in more recent editions—from what I've understood in other reviews, the newest edition includes more than six chapters, with the original three incorporated into a single, opening chapter.

As you would expect from a work of linguistics coming from Chomsky, this book is immensely insightful and engaging. Nevertheless, there are a few points that would do the publication goo
...more
Jonathan Chuang
Jan 20, 2016 is currently reading it
I initially picked this up to supplement the linguistics-themed music theory lectures I'm watching by late NYC philharmonic conductor Leonard Bernstein (a fantastic conductor of immense energy and subtlety of mind) because even though I didn't buy the phonetic analogies (the harmonic series has aesthetic qualities I don't believe phonemes in speech have, despite what people might make of the almost universal use of 'ma' to signify mother) he really convinced me about syntax. I will never see mus ...more
khers
اين كتاب مشتمل بر 6 مقاله است. دستاوردهاي زبانشناختي در مطالعه ذهن: گذشته، دستاوردهاي زبانشناختي در مطالعه ذهن: حال، دستاوردهاي زبانشناختي در مطالعه ذهن: آينده، صورت و معني در زبانهاي طبيعي، ماهيت صوري زبان و در نهايت زبانشناسي و فلسفه.

دكتر كوروش صفوي در مقدمه خود آورده است: اين اثر همانند تمامي آثار كلاسيك رشتههاي مختلف ويژگيهاي خود را داراست. با گذشت زمان، مخاطبان اين دسته از متون را متخصصاني تشكيل ميدهند كه با اهدافي ويژه به مطالعه آثاري ميپردازند كه شايد اعتبار علمي زمان خود را از دست داده
...more
Dale
Dec 26, 2015 rated it really liked it
Shelves: nonfiction, science

... if we contemplate the classical problem of psychology, that of accounting for human knowledge, we cannot avoid being struck by the enormous disparity between knowledge and experience - in the case of language, between the generative grammar that expresses the linguistic competence of the native speaker and the meagre and degenerate data on the basis of which he has constructed this grammar for himself.


It is this problem that motivates Chomsky's work in linguistics. When he began his linguist
...more
Ana
Aug 28, 2017 rated it it was ok
I am not assessing the book's quality, as much as I am rating my enjoyment in reading it - it felt more like a chore. Maybe I've been reading too much watered-down pop science to be able to handle this book, and I think I approached it with some flawed expectations.
For one, I didn’t know going in and from the title that it would be a collection of essays, so I was let down by a certain lack of structure or cohesive global arch. I think I would have benefited from the chapters/essays being a lit
...more
m2hozone
Mar 12, 2018 rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
كم حجم و مزخرف!!!!
خيلى بد بود ..
Cristina
Troppo per me. Non ho le basi per capirlo, purtroppo. Devo partire da un livello più basso.
K
Mar 31, 2016 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This is a very short book which is based on a lecture by Chomsky and subsequent commentaries by a philosopher (Akeel Bilgrami), a neurobiologist (James Schwartz) and a cognitive psychologist (George Miller). Given this diverse panel, it follows that Chomsky's essay is quite broad, covering an enormous amount of topics such as Fregean semantics, computational approaches to cognition, the mind-body problem, unification prospects in the sciences, and the limits of understanding.

What's most strikin
...more
Ghola
Mar 17, 2009 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Chomsky addresses what he considers to be the tough questions in the cognitive sciences. He implies the field(s) are going in a direction that is counterproductive. The book is short and divided into three sections: 1. the actual paper, 2. remarks and rebuttle from 3 fellow scholars, and 3. Chomsky's conclusions. Unfortunately, the first section is very dry. The last to sections more than make up for this. It's worth the read if you are into cognition, language, or Chomsky.
Martin
May 04, 2017 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: non-fiction
Sprache und Geist ist sicherlich kein schlechtes Buch. Es hat halt nur das gewaltige Problem, dass es auf drei Vorlesungen aus dem Jahr 1967 basiert, also der Inhalt in diesem Jahr 50 Jahre alt wird. Dadurch ist natürlich auch der Stand der Linguistik und der Psychologie ziemlich veraltet, ebenso gab es nach dem strukturellen Paradigma auch noch so etwas wie das poststrukturelle Paradigma.

Dennoch ist der Inhalt, soweit ich das beurteilen kann, gut beschrieben und beschreibt Forschungsstand der d
...more
Nesrine
Apr 29, 2013 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: linguistics
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
乂
Mar 05, 2016 marked it as to-read  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: methodological
زبان و اندیشه / نوآم چامسکی / تهران: هرمس، چاپِ چهارم 1391
زبان-روانشناسی، اندیشه و تفکر

(view spoiler)
...more
M. Nasiri
Aug 21, 2018 rated it really liked it
Glimpse of Chomsky's linguistics theories and idea ,nice to read
Emperador Spock
Jul 09, 2013 rated it liked it
The book does an amazing job of taking a few needles and working its hardest at hauling huge hay stacks around them. Furthermore, since texts from about 50 years ago occupy almost all of the book, the needles already are somewhat rusty and a bit dull.

6 of the essays, that is, the 'golden' oldies, are nothing but a number of fairly simple (although probably not so self-evident in the linguistics of the time) ideas, flooded with a deluge of barely structured, uninformative, philosophical meanderin
...more
Sarah
Feb 23, 2015 rated it liked it
Three and a half. Though a collection of six separate essays and lectures, these mostly share thematic content. The insights within, a continuation of Chomsky's theoretical ideas about, and search for, Universal Grammar, are poignant but also more technical than the average reader might need. Though I find Chomsky's theoretical psychological models fascinating, I shudder to think how underwhelming I would have found one of these lectures live--so detailed, like conference proceedings instead of ...more
Josiah Miller
Feb 22, 2010 rated it really liked it
This book is repetitive in parts where he argues the same points of view against some of the same critiques in a couple of different essays in the book. For me, this book helped me have a better understanding of some concepts that gave me problems in other explanations from other texts. The reiteration of these concepts really drove it into my brain.
Lester Ballard
Jul 09, 2011 rated it liked it
This book is worth reading if only for the first essay, in which Chomsky notes that a sentence's structure undergoes some sort of transformative process that gives it a pregnant meaning for its utterer or whomever hears the sentence. After a brief conversation of some of the implications of this idea, he descends into pedantry.
Michael
Jan 06, 2013 rated it really liked it
Over all well written and informative. Some specific problems with the edition, though. The e-book version was obviously hastily put together, as it featured many spelling and punctuation errors. It's disheartening when publishers obviously don't take the time and care to ensure they put out a quality product. Especially for a book on the topic of language itself!
M
Jan 04, 2010 marked it as to-read
Noam Chomsky Language and Mind was a part of the awakening reading during my psychology's studies. Need to re-read it.
Derek
Mar 19, 2008 rated it really liked it
i've read it before, but decided to again after reading Stephen Pinker's THE STUFF OF THOUGHT. if you're a Minimalist Syntax person (like me), this is Chomsky at his eloquent best (and not nearly so dense as his MINIMALIST PROGRAM).
110
Dec 01, 2009 marked it as references
Shelves: evolution
I didn't read the book.

http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/langua...

http://www.nybooks.com/articles/1643

Chomsky against Darwin through the innate humanity of the human brain as an argument. There is a metaphysical distinction between humans and animals.
Robert Run
Mar 20, 2009 rated it really liked it
Nice to read Chomsky on a subject other than power and politics. -Really-

I had to read this after reading Jaynes and getting a feel for the evolution of consciousness and the role language and symbolic language plays in that. Good to see variations on these themes.
Truyen Nguyen
Dec 13, 2008 rated it really liked it
You might want to learn another language. Noam is inspirational, and technical as he should be; for what he is all about a gnome.
Gadeer Al-Shathry
Oct 26, 2013 rated it liked it
The book tackles the development of language philosophy. It tries to find an answer to what is the nature of language learning and what are the processes that take place in the learner's mind.
jay niemeyer
Aug 03, 2014 rated it really liked it
Incredibly fascinating. Chomsky is a superb scientist, actually. Of course, he is a terrible political/ social theorist.
Kia Taheri
بخشی از خطِ زمانِ زبانشناسی در دهههای اخیر. ...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Readers also enjoyed

  • Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf
  • Studies in the Way of Words
  • The Atoms Of Language: The Mind's Hidden Rules Of Grammar
  • Course in General Linguistics
  • On the Way to Language
  • The Philosophy of Logical Atomism
  • Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution
  • The Articulate Mammal: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics
  • Linguistic Semantics: An Introduction
  • Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language: An Elementary Exposition
  • Syntax: A Generative Introduction
  • Historical Linguistics: An Introduction
  • Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language
  • Adam's Tongue: How Humans Made Language, How Language Made Humans
  • How Language Works: How Babies Babble, Words Change Meaning, and Languages Live or Die
  • Dying Words: Endangered Languages and What They Have to Tell Us
  • Language, Truth, and Logic
  • Counterfactuals
See similar books…
9,455 followers
Avram Noam Chomsky is an American linguist, philosopher, political activist, author, and lecturer. He is an Institute Professor and professor emeritus of linguistics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Chomsky is credited with the creation of the theory of generative grammar, considered to be one of the most significant contributions to the field of linguistics made in the 20th century. H
...more
“In fact, the belief that neurophysiology is even relevant to the functioning of the mind is just hypothesis. Who knows if we're looking at the right aspects of the brain at all. Maybe there are other aspects of the brain that nobody has even dreamt of looking at yet. That's often happened in the history of science. When people say that the mental is the neurophysiological at a higher level, they're being radically unscientific. We know a lot about the mental from a scientific point of view. We have explanatory theories that account for a lot of things. The belief that neurophysiology is implicated in these things could be true, but we have every little evidence for it. So, it's just a kind of hope; look around and you see neurons; maybe they're implicated.” 13 likes
“Plainly, such an approach does not exclude other ways of trying to comprehend the world. Someone committed to it (as I am) can consistently believe (as I do) that we learn much more of human interest about how people think and feel and act by reading novels or studying history than from all of naturalistic psychology, and perhaps always will; similarly, the arts may offer appreciation of the heavens to which astrophysics cannot aspire.” 11 likes
More quotes…