Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Conundrum” as Want to Read:
The Conundrum
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Conundrum

3.7  ·  Rating details ·  424 Ratings  ·  104 Reviews
"The Conundrum" is a mind-changing manifesto about the environment, efficiency and the real path to sustainability.

Hybrid cars, fast trains, compact florescent light bulbs, solar panels, carbon offsets: Everything you've been told about living green is wrong. The quest for a breakthrough battery or a 100 mpg car are dangerous fantasies. We are consumers, and we like to con
ebook, 272 pages
Published February 1st 2012 by Riverhead Books
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30)
Rating details
Sort: Default
Apr 24, 2012 rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
A lot of this book is a bunch of over-the-top contrarianism. It's heavy on complaints and light on solutions, and to the extent that is has anything constructive to say I could sum it up in a sentence if you grant me a semicolon: "Increased energy efficiency is a bad strategy to reduce total energy usage; it only helps if we force ourselves to reduce absolute usage and then use increased efficiency to keep our standard of living high while we do so." There, now you don't have to read it.
Jan 19, 2014 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Recommended to Asma by: Yussef
Shelves: never-finished
That main point of the book is that technology isn't necessarily good for the environment. We achieve advances by burning stuff: wood, coal, natural gas...etc.
Made me reconsider my whole set of thoughts, would've liked to finish it, maybe later.
2-2-2014 update:
This is one of those books that doesn't only change your whole way of thinking but also makes you keep on continuously thinking of it (like it was the only thing on my mind on today's ride), so it has been decided: I HAVE to
Mar 08, 2012 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: environment
Cars are evil, and we should live in dense cities are two propositions that are repeatedly impressed upon readers. That, and the conclusion that we lack the will, not the technology, to fight climate change. I agree with this conclusion and all its pessimistic implications, but I found the book lacking in meaty substance, and a tad toward sensationalistic writing than careful analysis. The complete lack of references and even a bibliography section undermines what the author is trying to say sin ...more
Oct 09, 2011 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: life-help
First, I need to say that I won this book as a first reads. That being said, I really enjoyed this book, honestly more than I thought I would. I generally don't read much non-fiction, but, like a lot of people nowadays, I'm concerned about the environment. This book was an eye-opener on so many levels and really shows the reader that what we think is 'doing our part' is not only never going to be enough at the current rate, but also may be doing more harm than good. So much of what the author sa ...more
David James
May 14, 2014 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
It's a little known fact that the more we design things to be energy efficient, the more energy we use. This seeming contradiction has been recognized by a few people since at least the nineteenth century, and among a growing number of economists it is now becoming an article of faith. As energy is freed up by replacing inefficient cars, appliances, devices, and the like with more efficient ones, humans simply increase their use of the newer items, ultimately outpacing the savings the new items ...more
John Devlin
Owen does a lot to puncture the smug bubble that so many affluent environmentalists float in.

No, locavores you are actually hurting the environment.

No, Prius fans your cars aren't helping the environment heal.

No, Solar and wind are never going to replace oil bc of the simple physics of energy density and portability.

His more insightful comments are saved for the area of efficiency. Essentially, the better gas mileage and extra amenities you have in a car, the more tempted you will be to drive fu
Apr 22, 2012 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
For anyone who is interested in the environment and/or how we should be dealing with energy, etc., this is a slim quick read book that may or may not challenge your thinking. It can be repetitive in the sense that the bottom line is this: we should not be thinking about improving efficiencies, we should be thinking about how to reduce......reduce how many miles you drive, how much electricity or gas you use in your home, what electronic devices you use. I gave this book 4 stars instead of 5 beca ...more
Feb 14, 2012 rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
I spent my time reading this book fluctuating between thinking the author had a good point (10%) and that he was a complete idiot (90%). It describes why most of society's efforts to be more energy efficient are actually total wastes of time, but offers no solutions. He bases some of his findings on the idea that people that consider themselves "green", will still jump on the energy-use bandwagon, purchasing all the latest gadgets, thereby offsetting their "greenness". And he claims that when pe ...more
Dick Edwards
Feb 11, 2012 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This is an interesting book that stands conventional wisdom on its head. Basically Owen is saying that increases in energy efficiency INCREASE energy consumption and environmental impact. Human behavior is the important thing. We must use less energy. The problem with the book is that the author’s proposed remedies seem not to be possible. He wants to make energy much more expensive, but only for the rich. It is not clear how this would be done, except that he hints that he would return to the i ...more
Jan 26, 2015 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
I felt like a quick skim of this book was enough - but did find a few things that I really value. Did you know that U.S. EPA says that if the powder from inside a broken compact fluorescent gets on your clothing, you should not wash it but instead seal it in a plastic bag & throw it away?

Dense cities provide the best environmental/sustainable future for the human race but all are not equal. NYC & HONG KONG are paragons but Dubai, which from a distance appears similar, is a disaster.

Jul 11, 2014 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: non-fiction
Owen makes the case that increasing efficiency is bad for the environment, because increasing efficiency is equivalent to lowering a price. When you lower the price of something, people often either buy more of it, or use the money saved to buy something else. The notion is called Jevon's paradox, after the Victorian British economist who enunciated it.

Own intermixes this basic idea with a fair amount of what might be called ranting, against for example organic farming and locovore movement. His
Sep 29, 2011 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: all
I received this book from a Good reads giveaway. I was very intrigued and wanted to know from a different perceptive how to be more revolutionary eco-smart. David Owen was the one to give me one. The Conundrum gives a no nonsense approach to serious problems we are continuing to create. The obvious issues that we continue to "try" and fix but in all reality are doing nothing but worsening. I recommend this book to all and hope that more real change will come. Thank you David Owen for stating wha ...more
Lori Tatar
Oct 07, 2011 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
David Owen brings s a revolutionary way of thinking in "The Conundrum". I half expected a bunch of hullabaloo over nothing, but Mr. Owen makes a rational, well-supported argument to encourage us to re-think everything we believe we already know about our lifestyle and its impact to the environment. The book follows very logically what we have mistakenly allowed to guide our decisions, and provides information and real results of our actions. We almost need to unthink all the things we try to be ...more
Feb 16, 2012 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: haveread
This is an amazingly important book. I hope Nancy will read it, I hope Lee will read it, David probably has either read it or knows everything in it already, and I hope President Obama and every member of Congress will read it. There were so many important facts in this book and it concluded with no positive suggestions, only the reality of the conundrums we face. My head is spinning!
Noran Miss Pumkin
Oct 07, 2011 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: 2011, first-reads
Give away book received from Goodreads first read give-away.
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Charlie Devlin
Aug 01, 2017 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
David Owen excellently reveals the utter hypocrisy of much of the green movement in its misguided quest to save the world. The book concisely analyzes and reveals the problems that come from misguided individuals trying to help the planet. The Conundrum was very eye opening revealing nearly unequivocally how much of the programs and laws made to protect the planet end up creating far more carbon emissions and encouraging even worse behavior.
An important subject, with a refreshingly realistic tone, and a readable style.

He lost me though with chapters 29-33 which were off topic, and subtly undermined his thesis.
Juan Prado
May 08, 2017 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Excelente libro
Bessie James
Sep 08, 2012 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: environment, green
I am half-way through this book and already I have learned about ten things that blew me away about our environmental mistakes:

1) New York, yes, that New York, is the greenest city in America. ("Oh, c'mon you've got to be kidding!" says the environmental saint in me but after I choked on my alfafa salad, I re-read it and it's quite undeniably true.)
2) China had a traffic jam that people were stuck in for ... wait for it ... two freakin' weeks. Why? Read David Owen.
3) Go to to f
Nov 07, 2016 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This is a fascinating and important book that looks at environmentalism through an alternate perspective. The basic idea is that as societies increase the efficiency of things such as cars and electricity generation, instead of lowering the environmental impact of our consumption, we actually consume more. Each short chapter in this book looks at a different aspect of environmental issues and all of them caused me to really ponder just how complicated any solution to our environmental problems i ...more
Gerald Kinro
Mar 04, 2012 rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Recommended to Gerald by: Wes
This book is based on the premise that man-caused climate change through greenhouse emissions, especially from burning fuels, defines “green”. On this matter Owens thinks outside the box. It is not our inefficiency in fuel burning that is the real problem. It goes deeper. We are a consumption driven and it is this drive that causes most of our problems. He cites a mass transit system putting more cars on the highway instead of less as an example. On the other hand, our economy is driven by consu ...more
Nov 20, 2013 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Dynamic, fast read. This book clearly and effectively attacks a lot of conventional wisdom about "green" living and energy issues, both at the societal and individual levels. "Efficiency" isn't really the answer - instead people should be living smaller (smaller living spaces), living closer (in cities and densely populated areas), and driving less (cars are major energy hogs).

Improved energy-efficiency on individual products, like cars and light-bulbs, does not actually lead to a drop in the t
Camille McCarthy
Sadly the title in itself is enough to make your heart sink: you know right away that there's going to be some bad news, that this isn't going to be another book about the miracle technology right around the corner that will solve all our problems. It covers the dangers of improving efficiency and inventing new technologies to "green" our economy, convincing ourselves that driving hybrids is saving the planet when in fact our energy consumption is ever-increasing. I am incredibly glad that I've ...more
Dec 20, 2013 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Dec 17, 2016 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: nonfiction
A must read for everyone. Perfect for book clubs. Just one example of the endless discussion opportunities: The author points out the ways in which the current emphasis on locally-sourced food overlooks its exponentially larger draw on fossil fuels, among other environment-damaging characteristics. I’d love to know the author’s thoughts about the value of local self-sufficiency in relation to its carbon footprint. If all food is produced in large, far away, factory farms, and a contamination eve ...more
Kelsey Breseman
Instead of reading this book, read the Wikipedia article on the rebound effect and Vaclav Smil's Energy Myths and Realities.

This is an odd book. I really appreciated the first couple of chapters, introducing and giving examples of the rebound effect.

But then it gets weird– launching into adulatory biographical chapters about the authors' two favorite people, Jevons and Griffiths.

These odd, rather off-point chapters are interspersed with "why this technology will not save us" chapters, a useful c
Feb 16, 2013 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Spoiler: We're hosed. The longer story: Just in terms of resources, every method scientists and inventors come up with to save or conserve energy, water, minerals, etc., results in additional use of resources. How? Whatever is saved is used in other ways (look up the Jevons paradox for more on this). Look around your house. Do you have more or fewer energy-using devices, appliances, etc., than you did ten or twenty years ago? Plus, new inventions mean people upgrade to the next new thing rather ...more
Feb 17, 2012 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This book points out that advancements in fuel efficiency merely increase our desire for it. Example: making cars more fuel efficient and comfortable and cost efficient increases our desire to drive: take road trips, live farther from work, giving us suburban sprawl and more paved roads, which make us want to live there, drive there, in an endless circle. Conundrum. According to the author, the most ecologically correct people are city dwellers who have their workplaces and services close enough ...more
Jeff Raymond
This book really is a conundrum. The conundrum, according to the book, is how technological advances and sustainable living practices are doing little to help the environment that said advances/practices are trying to save. A lot of it is based off of some compelling historical theoretical data, a lot of it based on simply how we've gotten used to living overall.

The conundrum, for me at least, is that the focus is overwhelmingly on the answer to this question and how to deal with it while comple
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
Two Steps Forward, Two Steps Back? Book Review 1 13 Feb 07, 2012 02:37PM  
  • Hot: Living Through the Next Fifty Years on Earth
  • At Left Brain, Turn Right
  • The End of Growth: Adapting to Our New Economic Reality
  • How the End Begins: The Road to a Nuclear World War III
  • The Great Disruption: Why the Climate Crisis Will Bring On the End of Shopping and the Birth of a New World
  • The Rambunctious Garden: Saving Nature in a Post-Wild World
  • The End of the Line: How Overfishing Is Changing the World and What We Eat
  • Storms Of My Grandchildren: The Truth About The Climate Catastrophe And Our Last Chance To Save Humanity
  • Global Weirdness: Severe Storms, Deadly Heat Waves, Relentless Drought, Rising Seas and the Weather of the Future
  • Why We Disagree about Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity
  • The Once and Future World: Nature As It Was, As It Is, As It Could Be
  • Water Wars: Privatization, Pollution, and Profit
  • Ecological Design
  • Plastic: A Toxic Love Story
  • Now or Never: Why We Must Act Now to End Climate Change and Create a Sustainable Future
  • The God Species
  • Ecological Intelligence: How Knowing the Hidden Impacts of What We Buy Can Change Everything
  • Eaarth: Making a Life on a Tough New Planet
“One of the least meaningful and most overused words in the English language is 'sustainability.' For most Americans, it means something like 'pretty much the way I live right now, though maybe with a different car.' A good test of any activity or product described as sustainable is to multiply it by 300 million (the approximate current population of the United States) and then by 9 or 10 billion (the expected population of the world by midcentury) and see if it still seems green. This is not an easy test to pass” 3 likes
More quotes…