Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Reactionary Mind: Conservatism from Edmund Burke to Sarah Palin” as Want to Read:
The Reactionary Mind: Conservatism from Edmund Burke to Sarah Palin
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Reactionary Mind: Conservatism from Edmund Burke to Sarah Palin

3.97  ·  Rating details ·  1,713 ratings  ·  205 reviews
Late in life, William F. Buckley made a confession to Corey Robin. Capitalism is "boring," said the founding father of the American right. "Devoting your life to it," as conservatives do, "is horrifying if only because it's so repetitious. It's like sex." With this unlikely conversation began Robin's decade-long foray into the conservative mind. What is conservatism, and ...more
Hardcover, 290 pages
Published September 29th 2011 by Oxford University Press, USA (first published August 9th 2011)
More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Reactionary Mind, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Reactionary Mind

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
Average rating 3.97  · 
Rating details
 ·  1,713 ratings  ·  205 reviews

More filters
Sort order
Start your review of The Reactionary Mind: Conservatism from Edmund Burke to Sarah Palin
Bill Kerwin
Sep 22, 2012 rated it really liked it
Shelves: politics

Corey Robin's take on conservatism has helped me understand not only the Tea Party and pro-Trump movements, but also the triumphalist EWTN element of the American Roman Catholic Church.

People who call themselves "conservatives," Robin argues, are not conservatives at all, but rather reactionaries. (In my opinion, real conservatives--who usually do not call themselves "conservatives"--conserve; they are part of a living tradition, doing their best to preserve and adapt it, helping their
Feb 04, 2018 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: criticism, sociology
Cultural Criticism Is a Tricky Business

Corey Robin’s essay on contemporary conservatism was published in 2011, five years before Pankaj Mishra’s The Age of Anger (See: and Mark Lilla’s The Shipwrecked Mind (See: The Reactionary Mind covers much of the same ground at a time when the contours of that ground were less clear than they have become. And, unlike the later books, it was written more for academic
Dec 28, 2012 rated it it was ok
I'm tempted to one star it, but I've read worse. The theory felt like Foucalt-lite. And the second half of the book didn't even feel like it was an attempt to write about the mind, just "reactionaries." I really wanted a psychological study of conservatism (or types of conservatism). This wasn't it. It was so crude that it even attempted to lump all "Conservatism" under a single word for hundreds of years. It's sort of laughable in a philosophically naive way. But also somewhat intellectually ...more
Peter (Pete) Mcloughlin
This book takes a serious look at the conservative or right wing mind and finds a thread from Hobbes and Burke to the present. The main thread of the conservative mindset is the protection of privilege and the perogatives or power against the lower orders. It defends the rights to exercise power on what it deems lesser people. Whether it be racial, Gender, class conservatism makes its appeal to the protection or restoration of an order that benefits those who believe themselves superior. It can ...more
Apr 02, 2017 rated it really liked it
I enjoyed Corey Robin's collection of essays on conservatism and I do like his approach and analysis. But one must be aware and understand he approaches things from the left. That is where he stands and it's a good idea to be aware of that, I think. Also this is far from comprehensive, it is a slight collection of essays that represents more of an outline or sketch than anything.

I don't know enough about the history of conservatism, so I'm a bit leery to accept all the arguments in here where
W.D. Clarke
Sep 17, 2018 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Loved it. It's great for academics and the general reader both. Even if you are in the field there's a lot you'll get out of it. His reading of Edmund Burke is superbly and subtly argued. I wrote a much longer review on my blog here. If/when I have time, I'll try to scale it down here, but here are the first few paragraphs:

In the new edition of 2011’s The Reactionary Mind, Cory Robin updates what is sure to become a classic in the history of political thought.

As I write this the populist,
C. Varn
Jun 16, 2012 rated it really liked it
So much for the Utopianism of the left, we have to understand the inverse utopianism of the right? Indeed, The Reactionary Mind is a braid of linked essays divided into two related sections. The first section is the popular manifestation of conservative intellectual tradition, and the second is on the profound relationship between conservatism and violence.

First, a few caveats: there are a few points in which I have somewhat profound disagreements with Robins, and second I found some of the
Sagar Jethani
Feb 12, 2013 rated it did not like it
Shelves: political-theory
Rather than serving up a historical overview of conservatism "From Edmund Burke to Sarah Palin", as the subtitle promises, author Corey Robin has produced a familiar, if unoriginal, polemic against the destructive impact of today's Republican party. The briefest of historical narratives is offered early on, providing the reader with a basic understanding of Burke and the French Revolution as a defining moment for conservatism as a political idea. But these topics are quickly dispensed with so ...more
Jul 22, 2019 rated it liked it
This is a somewhat disjointed collection of essays that is rescued in the end by the author's uncharacteristically elegant (for an academic) prose. The argument of the book is summed up in the first and last essays: conservatism is at heart a movement based around resistance to the emancipation of society's lower orders. The essays in between riff on different themes from Nietzsche to Ayn Rand to Antonin Scalia and are of varying quality. I don’t think that anyone who is already generally ...more
Charles David Edinger
Sep 16, 2014 rated it did not like it
Robin's extremely simplistic pamphlet adds nothing to anyone's understanding of the great Classical Anglo American Liberal Edmund Burke's thinking or philosophy. Like most empty-headed Progressive sheep, the author demonstrates his pathetic ignorance of Burke's historical context by referring to Mr. Burke as a "Reactionary" which is a wildly inappropriate label for one of the the leading thinkers behind the American Revolution's dramatic break with the authoritarian Collectivism that had held ...more
May 12, 2018 rated it it was amazing
NOTE: I read the 2018 version of this and that's the one I highly recommend because he talks about Trump a lot.

This is the book that I've been waiting for to help fully explain this past election. I've read every post-election memoir and doomsday book and they've all left me cold (if not enraged). But in this brilliant book, Robin links Trump to Hobbs and Burke and Hayek and Bush and every other conservative counter-revolution. Granted, this book is not super flattering to conservatives, but I
Apr 23, 2012 rated it it was amazing
I'm doing an interview with the author for Guernica magazine, probably within the month. Given the book's subtitle--"Conservatism from Edmund Burke to Sarah Palin"--I was expecting this to be a massive, meticulous, and painstaking excavation and rethinking of conservative thought, in chronological order from the French Revolution to the 21st century. It's actually a collection of essays, mostly book reviews. But I'll be damned if this isn't one of the best, most fascinating collections of book ...more
I was being conservative (pun intended) downgrading this book to 4-stars because of my unfamiliarity with the political theory of the book’s first half. The middle is worth it, the end is hilarious, and hats off for the time spent inside the reactionary mind!

The Good:
--NOTE: Make sure to read the 2nd edition (2017), which has well-deserved updates such as replacing Palin with Trump, and focusing more on reactionary economics (see below).
--The main thought-experiment is seeing pass the docile “
Peter (Pete) Mcloughlin
This is a revised version of Robin's book that was updated for the Trump era. It spends less time on neocon's and militarism of the Bush-era politics and takes up more the economic aspects of conservatism. I really liked the chapter on the Austrian School of economics and critique of Hayek which gets to the heart of what this form of economics is about. Of course, Ayn Rand is deservedly skewered but the piece on the Austrian school by itself made my purchase of the second edition (after buying ...more
Jim Coughenour
A philosophically entertaining examination of the reactionary roots of contemporary conservatism, from Burke and Hobbes to the impresario antics of Donald Trump. I liked Corey Robin's short definition:
Conservatism is an elitist movement of the masses, an effort to create a new-old regime that, in one way or another, makes privilege popular.
A couple months ago I read Arlie Russell Hochschild's Strangers in Their Own Land, which aimed to explain why a community of white southerners supported an
Laura Brahm
Oct 13, 2012 rated it it was amazing
The beauty of Robin's book is that he doesn't get sidetracked by typical liberal-conservative debates over things like gun control, taxes, or whether "conservatives are just stupid." Instead he takes conservatism seriously at its theory and practice, traces its roots and, in so doing, ultimately reveals the bankruptcy and nihilism at its core. What conservatism is really about, he argues, is the belief in fundamental, "natural" inequality: between the rich and poor, CEO and worker, husband and ...more
Dec 12, 2011 rated it it was amazing
The Republican primaries were the perfect time to read about this. I love political theory, but it's rare to see a scholar really dig deeply into conservative intellectual thought, especially as far back as the French Revolution. This might be the first time I felt the subject was adequately explored. It reads as a series of essays that fall into one of two parts - the first emphasizing the role of the conservative as a counterrevolutionary, the second about the importance of violence in the ...more
One of my all-time favs. This most recent edition draws the lineage of thought in ever starker relief. The new Trump bits are great, but nothing will ever match Robin’s savage evisceration of Ayn Rand. I purchased the audiobook, so I could listen to it each morning, and let the brutal owns wash over me like an enlivening allegro vivace.
C. Scott
Jan 12, 2018 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
This is a fairly uneven book - but the good parts are truly excellent. Reading the first two chapters, newly added for this edition, I was blown away. I found Robin's critique of conservatism absolutely devastating - it was soooooo friggin great! The early section of the new edition makes this book worth the price of entry. If Robin had been able to maintain that level of incisiveness and deadliness this would have been not a five star book but a six or seven star book. We would have to add ...more
Kate Woods Walker
Jan 04, 2012 rated it it was amazing
At the close of The Deepening Darkness: Patriarchy, Resistance, and Democracy's Future by Carol Gilligan and David A.J. Richards, another five-star book, the authors ask why patriarchal men are so fearful of meeting females on equal footing. Corey Robin, in The Reactionary Mind: Conservatism from Edmund Burke to Sarah Palin, has the answer.

Without hierarchy, they would not exist. Without some external measure of their supposed superiority, they are nothing. Without someone to stand upon, they
Mar 11, 2012 rated it really liked it
The ambitious premise is to try to define/understand conservatism through time and space. The author logically explores various popular assumptions about conservatism (it's about following rules, traditions, etc.) and explains why they are false. He makes a good case for his use of the word "reactionary" as a frame.

This is a collection of essays but they are connected enough that the whole thing works as a book. Robin is not a conservative but his points are based on quoting famous
tom bomp
Jul 23, 2012 rated it liked it
Interesting, but falls down in that it's a collection of disconnected essays with only a somewhat loose theme connecting them - contrary to what the book's description would lead you to believe. The book is most interesting as a brief survey of conservative thought historically. When it talks about the past decade it doesn't really connect the ideas about conservative thought that he's developed with modern movements. The introduction is really a pretty good summary of the whole book and ...more
Apr 16, 2014 rated it did not like it
Shelves: non-fiction, politics
This is the epitome of how unfairly liberals mis-characterize and misrepresent conservatives' motives and arguments. The Tea Party is the single-most important movement that has arisen in America, but the author is quick to dismiss them as "counter-revolutionaries" bent to deny "freedom to all" and defend their "privilege."

I could go further but the scathing reviews published in The New York Times and The New York Book Reviews do a pretty good job.
Nov 07, 2011 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
A fascinating journey into the mind of darkness. The author ties together conservative strains of thought that, on the surface, may appear dissonent, but when you unpack the history and logic, make perfect "sense." If you want to get a better understanding of how the modern American conservative "thinks," this is a must-read book.
Apr 24, 2019 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
I found that Robin did a great job of responding to his critics of the first edition in this book and really tightened his points up. This particular compilation of essays really did a great job in hammering Robin’s point down, in a way that was eloquently spread out and discussed. I definitely saw many of the frameworks build on each other as the book went on, despite the fact that these could all also just be standalone essays.

What I really enjoyed about this book was Robin connecting
Jan 04, 2012 rated it really liked it
Short summary: Very interesting thesis, but not worked out well enough to be an instant classic.
"From life's school of war. -- What doesn't kill me makes me stronger." (Nietzsche, Twilight of the Idols, Maxim 8)

As the title suggests, Robin's aim is to explain what drives the reactionary conservative, as well as reactionary political movements. His argument, in a nutshell, is that they are not concerned primarily with 'conserving' any particular status quo, or with keeping the rate of societal
Colleen Clark
Feb 21, 2012 rated it really liked it
Recommended to Colleen by: Chris Hayes/Up with Chris
Shelves: politics-terror
I bought this book on the recommendation of Chris Hayes from his MSNBC show Up With Chris when he invited Corey Robin and introduced him as someone who had written one of Chris' favorite books of the year.

Before I started to read it there was an article in the NYTimes (1/19/12) "Online Fracas For a Critic of the Right" with links to two book reviews - NY Times Book Review and NYRB. So I had conflicting opinions about the book before I opened it.

Well, I agree with Hayes and think the 2 reviewers
Adam  McPhee
Connor Kilpatrick's review for the eXiled says it better than I can:

Robin’s thesis is simple: ignore the Right-wing taxonomy. Conservatism–despite the seemingly incompatible respective ideologies of free-marketeers, slavers, neocons, neofascists, Buckleys, Federalists, Bloombergians, traditionalists, Tea Baggers, Randians, McCarthyists, libertarians, Birchers, Goldbugs, Jesus Freaks, J .Edgars, pro-lifers—has been, in reality, firmly united behind a single mission since the French Revolution:
Julia Deng
Oct 19, 2017 rated it liked it
Rubin is at his best when he's gleefully shitting on other people. The chapter on Ayn Rand, titled "Garbage and Gravitas," is particularly fun. The Scalia chapter is a good read too. Other than that, I don't feel like I got a whole lot out of this book.

I wonder if this book is trying to do too much. It's cultural criticism and biography and intellectual history all at once. I don't feel like it's especially innovative in any of these areas. Maybe I'm just misunderstanding its essential project?
Nicolas Brannon
Sep 15, 2012 rated it it was amazing
A brilliant, indispensable book about the core motivations of conservatism that defines and explains the essential philosophical differences between Left and Right. This is a must-read for anyone on the Left who wishes to understand the Right in depth. This is not a book about scoring political points. It is about understanding in great detail the political cycle of the challenge to hierarchies and inequalities and the reaction, focusing on the reaction, the counter-revolution. Robin's depth of ...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Readers also enjoyed

  • Nixonland: The Rise of a President and the Fracturing of America
  • The Socialist Manifesto: The Case for Radical Politics in an Era of Extreme Inequality
  • Give Them an Argument: Logic for the Left
  • The Chapo Guide to Revolution: A Manifesto Against Logic, Facts, and Reason
  • The Anatomy of Fascism
  • The People’s Republic of Walmart: How the World’s Biggest Corporations are Laying the Foundation for Socialism
  • Democracy at Work: A Cure for Capitalism
  • Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative?
  • We've Got People: From Jesse Jackson to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the End of Big Money and the Rise of a Movement
  • A Brief History of Neoliberalism
  • Master of the Senate
  • The End of the Myth: From the Frontier to the Border Wall in the Mind of America
  • The Origin of Capitalism: A Longer View
  • Racecraft: The Soul of Inequality in American Life
  • Alt-America: The Rise of the Radical Right in the Age of Trump
  • One Man Against the World: The Tragedy of Richard Nixon
  • Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media
  • The Authoritarians
See similar books…
“Saint Petersburg in revolt gave us Vladimir Nabokov, Isaiah Berlin, and Ayn Rand. The first was a novelist, the second a philosopher. The third was neither but thought she was both.” 41 likes
“Every once in a while, however, the subordinates of this world contest their fates. They protest their conditions, write letters and petitions, join movements, and make demands. Their goals may be minimal and discrete — better safety guards on factory machines, an end to marital rape—but in voicing them, they raise the specter of a more fundamental change in power. They cease to be servants or supplicants and become agents, speaking and acting on their own behalf. More than the reforms themselves, it is this assertion of agency by the subject class—the appearance of an insistent and independent voice of demand — that vexes their superiors. Guatemala’s Agrarian Reform of 1952 redistributed a million and a half acres of land to 100,000 peasant families. That was nothing, in the minds of the country’s ruling classes, compared to the riot of political talk the bill seemed to unleash. Progressive reformers, Guatemala’s arch-bishop complained, sent local peasants “gifted with facility with words” to the capital, where they were given opportunities “to speak in public.” That was the great evil of the Agrarian Reform.” 9 likes
More quotes…