Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “American Nations: A History of the Eleven Rival Regional Cultures of North America” as Want to Read:
American Nations: A History of the Eleven Rival Regional Cultures of North America
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

American Nations: A History of the Eleven Rival Regional Cultures of North America

4.19  ·  Rating details ·  6,203 ratings  ·  1,106 reviews
An endlessly fascinating look at American regionalism and the eleven "nations" that continue to shape North America

According to award-winning journalist and historian Colin Woodard, North America is made up of eleven distinct nations, each with its own unique historical roots. In American Nations he takes readers on a journey through the history of our fractured continent
Kindle Edition, 384 pages
Published (first published November 14th 2011)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about American Nations, please sign up.
Popular Answered Questions
Andrey Davydov It's a very fast-paced read as far as history books go. Not a lot of dates or minutiae, few footnotes. Even if you frequently check out the people and…moreIt's a very fast-paced read as far as history books go. Not a lot of dates or minutiae, few footnotes. Even if you frequently check out the people and events mentioned in the book on the net, you can still easily get back into the narrative. It reads like a description of a setting in a PC game.(less)

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
4.19  · 
Rating details
 ·  6,203 ratings  ·  1,106 reviews

Sort order
Jan 08, 2012 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: history, favorites
Growing up in the South I always wondered why my family was so different from those around us. We were friendly with the people in our community but when serious discussions came up my parents grew quiet. Our friends and neighbors had no such reservations. They were opinionated and always eager for a fight of any kind whether with fists or words. We lived side and by side and spoke the same language but I always got the sense that we were just not ‘one of them.’

My family was never really gung-ho
Nov 17, 2013 rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: history
The good first: I buy the premise of this book, that the U.S. is made up of rival nations with borders vastly different from the regions depicted on common maps of the country. And I enjoyed the parts that seek to illustrate the founding and spreading of U.S. colonies and what later became U.S. territory.

When Woodard tries to characterize the people of the land, however, he brushes with broad, unflattering strokes that I found hard to take seriously. His discussion concerns missionaries, slave
John Parris
It was good, but particularly toward the end became more the author's opinion rather than statistical evidence or other facts. He is from Maine and allowed his predjudices to show. According to him, all Southerners (comprised of Tidewater, Deep South, and Appalachia) are Republicans, conservative, racist, backward and so on with the usual stereotypes. New Englanders are, of course, progressive, educated, and egalitarian, though he does admit to past intolerance. I live here and let me tell you t ...more
Steve Kettmann
Sep 21, 2011 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Jon Stewart can’t do it all alone. The Daily Show has evolved toward more open-minded consideration of the issues of the day and less outright comedy because Stewart still thinks honest people of good faith can cut through the nonsense and figure out problems in a way any reasonable person can admit makes sense. Colin Woodard’s American Nations: A History of the Eleven Rival Regional Cultures of North America pulls off the unlikely feat of both offering the tools for just such a broader, deeper ...more
Jan 31, 2013 rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Journalist and amateur historian Colin Woodard makes a lot of interesting assertions on the back of thin evidence. Splitting North America into eleven competing “nations,” or more accurately, cultural archetypes, Woodard goes to great lengths to explain the history of the United States, not as a single hegemonic unit, but as many smaller, competing units within a federal framework.
Woodard himself explains his work as a synthesis, and looking through the footnotes of American Nations, one wonder
Jim Mullen
Mar 04, 2013 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
I don't care how much American history you know, or think you know, this book, awkwardly sub-titled “A History of the Eleven Rival Regional Cultures,” is a revelation. I'll give you an example of my own -- where is the oldest building made by Europeans in the U.S? If you grew up in the Northeast, you're probably thinking it’s in Boston or Philadelphia. Went to school in the Southeast, maybe it’s in St. Augustine or New Orleans. So where you grew up has a lot to do with what you think you know. D ...more
Mike Ratner
Jan 30, 2012 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Recommended with reservations; the first half of the book, covering the historical origins of the 11 diverse "nations" that comprise modern United States, is brilliant. For instance, most people don't realize that the vibrant multicultural entity that is New York was just like that continuously all the way back to its founding as New Amsterdam, which was the most diverse and "progressive" city of its time. Or that Deep South was founded by Barbados plantators, unlike the "Tidewater" area of Virg ...more
Jan 28, 2014 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: history
Our country finally makes sense. The facts haven't changed, and even the history we were taught in high school and college retains its basic outlines. But why we are the way we are, with all the frustrations we suffer because of our politics, our religions, our battling/baffling cultural wars: now I begin to understand.

Of course we all knew that the parts of North America were settled by people with different - wildly different, as it turns out - origins. But because American history as it's usu
My problem with broad-stroke history books is that they are far too broad, and that you cannot really make claims or assertions because there simply isn’t enough evidence provided to back them up. Ultimately this is the greatest weakness of Woodard’s book. It’s a very interesting premise, and one that I largely find to be true and intuitive if you travel and live in different places in this country. I grew up in Nebraska, and found my time in North Carolina to be an interesting study, mostly in ...more
Dec 17, 2014 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
I can't recommend this book highly enough. It explains why the different territories of the country have the different political bents that they do. And I learned facts about American history that I had never previously heard. The ending gets a little too biased and subjective, but up until then it's fascinating.
Historically this is excellent. And the groupings/ regional cultures fairly accurate by name and value cores for their political stances. Yet, he analyzed the entire (not just one or two but nearly all the main 6 to 8 groups) through slanted "eyes" toward their progressions, IMHO. The more modern he approaches in placements to 2011 (when this was printed)- the more crooked the "truth" gets. Because he uses language and measurements that are chuck filled with his Maine end bias.

The historical is
Dec 05, 2011 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Enlightening, imperfect and potentially dangerous. Woodard creates a narrative of the US as several nations living side by side. The story is compelling enough to ring true in my experience. So many competing cultural values are articulately described as having roots in various waves of immigration. Unfortunately, it needs better citation and more evidence to be really mind blowing. He relies heavily on the work of David Hackett Fischer but is much more judgmental. The dangerous part is that it ...more
Jun 07, 2012 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
There's something inherently compelling about this narrative. I found myself talking about the ideas in this book nonstop to my friends and anyone who would listen. It's a powerful explanation for the evolution of politics and power in the US.

I'm always interested in stories that explore the nature and development of power-and this book definitely scratches that itch. Towards the end, I found myself making connections with recent political developments. Of course Republicans emphasize a strong m
David R.
Mar 26, 2012 rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Woodard's effort to rethink North American demographics is a disappointment. And it's really not his own model, either: the Eleven-nation concept is entirely derivative of Garreau's "Nine Nations" of the '80s and Fischer's "Albion's Seed" of the 90s. I suppose the model can help to explain some of North America's history, but it doesn't apply well to the modern world. And it doesn't help that Woodard seems obsessed with breaking up the US, Canada and Mexico with especial emphasis on new states o ...more
David Huff
Jan 01, 2019 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: audio-book
Most of us, when we hear the words “United States”, likely make an immediate mental reference to the 50 states which form the Union, and this of course is by definition correct. Author Colin Woodard, in his fascinating book “American Nations”, presents a remarkably different and compelling viewpoint: that America as we know it is actually comprised of eleven different “nations”, each having its own unique historical, cultural and political features and views. Further, these “nations” are actuall ...more
Pete Jones
This book starts as what appears to be a well researched look at how 11 different regions of the United States (nations, as the author calls them) have shaped the culture and politics of the United States. As the book progresses, it turns into something approaching a screed. At the end of the book, it’s clear that the author is a dyed in the wool citizen of Yankeedom and that in his opinion only Yankeedom and its progeny (according to his research) the Left Coast have it right. The real problem ...more
Christian Geirsson
An incredible, paradigm-shifting cultural studies book, for my understanding personally. I considered giving it 5 stars, but generally reserve that rating for the spiritually-moving, like Zen and the Art and Life of Pi, and fiction of that ilk. Anyway, a re-orienting learning experience that changes the way one can contemplate American history and culture.

Essentially, this is the story of 11 distinct cultures playing influential roles on each other and the geopolitical development of North Amer
Aug 14, 2012 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Reading the reviews of this book on goodreads I am struck by how little people know about American history, and that is, the American continent, not the false association of America as the United States. The fact is that the thesis presented in American Nations is not really a very innovative concept, but more of a nuanced one. The melting pot versus salad bowl concept has been around for going on generations now. The historian David Hendrickson just a few years ago put out a book, Peace Pact, w ...more
Mar 01, 2013 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: non-fiction, history

Forget the conventional North America map and take a look instead at the map on the cover of AMERICAN NATIONS...

Yankeedom? New Netherland? the Midlands? Tidewater? Greater Appalachia? The Deep South? New France? El Norte? The Left Coast? the Far West? First Nation?? What kind of North American map is that??

Well, even folks who think they don't know much about geography surely know plenty enough to do a double-take. And that's what happened to me. I saw that map and meant to keep walking, but
Bob Pearson
I really give this book 3.5. The thesis is quite intriguing -- that America is actually composed of 11 (count 'em) different nations, and the outcome of domestic political events is the function of the interplay among these relatively distinct groups. Moreover Woodard posits that these 11 nations have persisted in their original orientation over time, in fact since the moment they arrived on the North American continent. To think about this notion, you might remember THE EUROPEANS by Luigi Barzi ...more
Lauren Albert
It's interesting how Woodard traces out voting patterns and cultural attitudes according to which "nation" inhabits a region rather than dividing people up by state. My only problem with the book is that, while I tend to agree with all the axes he has to grind, I always worry about a writer's objectivity in reviewing evidence when he or she so agressively and openly grinds those axes in a book. It also means that some people who might find the book very interesting will be turned off by his opin ...more
Jay Perkins
In this book, Colin Woodard explains that the United States (and broader North America) is so divided culturally and politically because the country is actually made up of unseen, borderless nations, which have different values coming from their diverse pasts and experiences. Those who move into these areas assimilate the values of that particular nation.

Woodard names eleven different nations: "Yankeedom" (founded by Calvinistic Puritans who valued community and authority over the individual); t
Aug 02, 2014 rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
This is the sort of thesis that you might come up with at bar trivia night with your friends, and you get all excited and write it all down on napkins, and then in the morning when you sober up you look at your napkins and realize that this all falls apart way too quickly. It works as a brief thought exercise. I could see myself introducing this concept to an American History class during one early lecture, just to get people thinking about the various colonies and how they were settled, and how ...more
Feb 14, 2012 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: history
I found this a very interesting book which provides a lot of insight on the red state, blue state cultural distinctions that exist today. I did not find this book as good as David Hackett Fischer's Albion's Seed, but it does describe more American cultures including Spanish and French.

It's "nations" are: El Norte (Spanish), New France (Quebec and Creole Louisiana), Tidewater, Yankeedom (New England), New Netherland (New York City), Deep South, Midlands (Pennsylvania), Greater Appalachia (Border
Robert  Baird
The first 22 (of 28) chapters, or so, of this book are a very rich and engaging historical analysis of significant North American events, even if the author is overly general and un-nuanced in the descriptions of his various regional subcultures, and even if he slips into dogmatic political rants in a few brief spells. The most rewarding stretches of this book are the author's unpacking of complicated social-cultural-political backstories to North American colonization, the US Revolutionary War, ...more
Interesting premise to explain today's political atmosphere. The author looks into the founding of the various regions of the country ("nations") to help explain why people from different parts of America have different viewpoints. To quote from p. 261, "It is fruitless to search for the characteristics of an 'American' identity, because each nation has its own notion of what being American should mean." Someone from Puritan Massachusetts has a different viewpoint than someone from 49er Californ ...more
Sep 13, 2013 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
This book is fascinating in its beginning and overall thesis. The front two thirds are quite good and deserve better than three stars. Its key ideas have been largely harvested from Joel Garreau's 1981 "The Nine Nations of North America," a debt the author barely acknowledges. Nonetheless Woodard, a journalist by trade, does a fine job using historical anecdotes to illustrate the theory thus appropriated and to put his own interesting twist on it. Are there 11 or so durable regional cultures tha ...more
Cardyn Brooks
Apr 23, 2018 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: non-fiction
The first 200 pages of this fascinating history of the North American continent had me ingesting each page like a word glutton. Digging into the nitty-gritty to the U.S. Civil War, Reconstruction, and the Jim Crow south was emotionally hard, which considerably slowed my reading pace. American Nations is packed with details about every facet of the social, political, economic, and cultural evolution of regions of the North american continent. It often reads like a multi-generational saga about th ...more
Mar 02, 2017 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: history
I am here reviewing two books, each of which has made a little splash in its own way. Of the two, Edward Said's Orientalism has had more time to develop a following in the academic community than Colin Woodard's much more recent American Nations. However, Said's work is both less entertaining and far more frustrating in that it posits what amounts to a banal observation via ponderous exposition. Said says nothing much at great length in complaining that academia, infected by colonialist thought ...more
Jan 08, 2014 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
I really liked this extraordinarily thought-provoking book and could just as easily have given it five stars. It is US history as you have never had it served-up before.

Short summary: The European colonies in North America were each founded by different sorts of people with different mind-sets and with different goals in mind. Those differences persisted as the people from those colonies---or Nations, as Woodard calls them---pushed westward, as they cooperated to a degree in throwing off English
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
Caveats in the sweeping claims about the upper midwest 1 36 Feb 13, 2014 03:22PM  
  • The Nine Nations of North America
  • Albion's Seed: Four British Folkways in America (America: A Cultural History, Vol. I)
  • That's Not What They Meant!: Reclaiming the Founding Fathers from America's Right Wing
  • A Necessary Evil: A History of American Distrust of Government
  • Railroaded: The Transcontinentals and the Making of Modern America
  • Why Americans Hate Politics
  • Founding Faith: Providence, Politics, and the Birth of Religious Freedom in America
  • The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America is Tearing Us Apart
  • The Founders and Finance: How Hamilton, Gallatin, and Other Immigrants Forged a New Economy
  • Do Not Ask What Good We Do: Inside the U.S. House of Representatives
  • Almost President: The Men Who Lost the Race but Changed the Nation
  • This Mighty Scourge: Perspectives on the Civil War
  • Smuggler Nation: How Illicit Trade Made America
  • Our Patchwork Nation: The Surprising Truth about the "Real" America
  • The Skeptic's Guide to American History
  • Secrets: A Memoir of Vietnam and the Pentagon Papers
  • 1913: In Search of the World Before the Great War
  • Age of Fracture
“The Inuit language has no difference between he or she, or between mankind and animal,” she adds. “They’re all equal.”5” 5 likes
“I am an aristocrat," Virginian John Randolph would explain decades after the American Revolution. "I love liberty; I hate equality.” 5 likes
More quotes…