67 books
—
9 voters
Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Oil Kings: How the U.S., Iran, and Saudi Arabia Changed the Balance of Power in the Middle East” as Want to Read:
The Oil Kings: How the U.S., Iran, and Saudi Arabia Changed the Balance of Power in the Middle East
by
struggling with a recession . . . European nations at risk of defaulting on their loans . . . A possible global financial crisis. It happened before, in the 1970s
.
Oil Kings is the story of how oil came to dominate U.S. domestic and international affairs. As Richard Nixon fought off Watergate inquiries in 1973, the U.S. economy reacted to an oil shortage initiated by A ...more
Oil Kings is the story of how oil came to dominate U.S. domestic and international affairs. As Richard Nixon fought off Watergate inquiries in 1973, the U.S. economy reacted to an oil shortage initiated by A ...more
Get A Copy
Kindle Edition, 546 pages
Published
(first published August 9th 2011)
Friend Reviews
To see what your friends thought of this book,
please sign up.
Reader Q&A
To ask other readers questions about
The Oil Kings,
please sign up.
Be the first to ask a question about The Oil Kings
Community Reviews
Showing 1-30
Start your review of The Oil Kings: How the U.S., Iran, and Saudi Arabia Changed the Balance of Power in the Middle East
The premise for Andrew Scott Cooper’s book debut The Oil Kings is how oil has affected the shift of power, with an underlying cautionary note that it can still do so. He noted that the events at the time the book was published in 2011 reflect the events over thirty years ago that caused the toppling of the Shah of Iran’s government. The similarities were that there was a global financial crisis, an increasing dependence on oil, and the tumultuous political and economic atmosphere in the Middle E
...more
Mar 13, 2016
Trish
rated it
it was ok
·
review of another edition
Shelves:
history,
america,
nonfiction,
unutterably-painful,
audio,
foreign-affairs,
mideast,
politics
It seems a pity, when a person is so involved with a subject, that they cannot convey a better understanding of the issues with which they are so entranced. We get every flicker of the eyelash of persons ensconced in the Nixon White House conducting foreign policy with regards to the Shah Pahlavi of Iran. Considering this is some fifty years ago now, I’ll bet Cooper has difficulty finding many folks who share his enthusiasm for minutiae.
That said, I did become interested in reading more about I ...more
That said, I did become interested in reading more about I ...more
With All The Oil Talks Nowadays, This Book Has Been A True Eye-opener For Me. Like It Or Not Oil Is A (And Will Be) Controlling Factor In The Economic World And You Can Learn More From This One Book Than You Could Learn In School Of 4 Years Of International Economics (Exaggerated, But Yes If You're Good At Connecting The Dots There's Great Amount To Learn Here)
I Have Always Wondered Why Don't They Teach You This Sort Of Stuff At The School, And Now I Exactly Know Why.
With All The Dirty Politics ...more
I Have Always Wondered Why Don't They Teach You This Sort Of Stuff At The School, And Now I Exactly Know Why.
With All The Dirty Politics ...more
The book has several interesting facts and details, however, it is not well written. The book has so much minute details which aren’t very much relevant or critical hence leading the reader to get confused and sometimes becomes boring. Also, in general the information laid out in the book is not in a chronological order.
Despite the title this is really a book about US-Iranian relations during the 70's.
As a bankrupt Britain left the Middle East it created a power vacuum. To prevent the Soviets from expanding southward in to the oil rich region upon which the free world depended, Cold War politics dictated that America had to act. Unwilling to shoulder the burden itself, the US instead built up Iran to defend the region from the communist threat and a Soviet backed Iraq.
The American arms necessary to match the ...more
As a bankrupt Britain left the Middle East it created a power vacuum. To prevent the Soviets from expanding southward in to the oil rich region upon which the free world depended, Cold War politics dictated that America had to act. Unwilling to shoulder the burden itself, the US instead built up Iran to defend the region from the communist threat and a Soviet backed Iraq.
The American arms necessary to match the ...more
Finished reading it on the way back from London. A very informative account for those who wants to know the behind-the-scene details on power balance in the Middle East.
I have not been very familiar with geopolitics of the Middle East yet. It helped answer a few questions:
1. What makes Iran and the US enemies while Saudi and the US allies?
2. What role does oil play in the geopolitics calculation and what actual effect it had in history?(esp. 1974)
3. How does the negotiation and deal making wor ...more
I have not been very familiar with geopolitics of the Middle East yet. It helped answer a few questions:
1. What makes Iran and the US enemies while Saudi and the US allies?
2. What role does oil play in the geopolitics calculation and what actual effect it had in history?(esp. 1974)
3. How does the negotiation and deal making wor ...more
YESTERDAY:
How America’s unappeasable thirst for cheap oil led to foreign-policy bungling in the Persian Gulf?!
Once upon a time, United States of America was the world’s number one oil importer with Iran as his foremost ally in Middle East. To Americans, The Shah was the guardians of the Gulf. It was with United States of America’s approval that Shah raised the price of the oil and that kept America’s on top of richest countries in the world.
“I like him, I like him and I like the country. And so ...more
How America’s unappeasable thirst for cheap oil led to foreign-policy bungling in the Persian Gulf?!
Once upon a time, United States of America was the world’s number one oil importer with Iran as his foremost ally in Middle East. To Americans, The Shah was the guardians of the Gulf. It was with United States of America’s approval that Shah raised the price of the oil and that kept America’s on top of richest countries in the world.
“I like him, I like him and I like the country. And so ...more
“The Oil Kings” is an in depth study of the labyrinthine relationships that existed between the Shah of Iran, the Saudi Royal Family and the United States during the Nixon and Ford administrations. The story line is so involved that I can only begin to summarize the contents. A few examples will have to suffice to give you a taste of what is in store for the reader. Some of us remember the day when Iran was America’s ally in the Persian Gulf. Here we get a glimpse of what went on behind the scen
...more
I tend to think of book jackets as the publisher's exaggerations written to build up book sales, but here's a book which hit the mark with its description. It's touted as being "...Brilliantly reported and filled with astonishing details about some of the key figures of the time (early 1970's), and a history of an era that we thought we knew, an era whose momentous reverberations still influence events at home and abroad today", and I couldn't agree more.
It's generally recognized that the U.S. ...more
It's generally recognized that the U.S. ...more
This book is a fascinating account of the 1970’s oil crisis. It focuses mainly on the Nixon and Ford Administrations dealings with the Shaw of Iran Muhammad Reza Pahlavi and later Saudi ruler King Faisal and King Khalid.
It starts with American CIA agents in the Eisenhower Administration when they reinstated a young deposed Shaw into his inherited role as the Shaw of Iran. The loyalty generated by this act responded to the United States and particularly to President Eisenhower and Vice Presiden ...more
It starts with American CIA agents in the Eisenhower Administration when they reinstated a young deposed Shaw into his inherited role as the Shaw of Iran. The loyalty generated by this act responded to the United States and particularly to President Eisenhower and Vice Presiden ...more
An excellent book, which offers great insights on American foreign policy and the sort of strategic alliances made on the 1970s. The bulk of the book talks about 3 men: Nixon, Kissinger and the Shah. Although the book is a strictly narrative nonfiction, yet you tend to get that exciting page flipping urge associated with thriller fiction. In the beginning we know that Nixon is going to be eventually disgraced due the Watergate scandal, but it's exciting to see him battling his way to his demise.
...more
“The Oil Kings is the story of how oil came to dominate world politics”. I found this to be a fascinating read which gave me many insights into how oil and the need to protect its supply came to dominate the foreign policy of the Nixon and Ford administrations. Initially betting on the Shah of Iran and later Saudi Arabia. The Shah’s spending on Iran’s military build up was encouraged by America as they saw Iran as key to Middle East stability but they failed to heed the warning signs that the mi
...more
Good story to tell the story of the people involved with the 1970s Oil Crash and US dealings with Iran and the Saudi Arabia with regards to oil. However, I was very disappointed with the complete lack of analysis, the book reads (or sounds if you're listening to it on Audible like me) like someone who went through the archives and just copied what everyone told you. The whole story is basically told in the first chapter, without much analysis and explanations of the motives of, for example, Kiss
...more
Disappointing. I really would have liked more background. Political manuvers date back to pre- World War I. How can we understand what's going on in the mid-East if the history of outside influences are ignored. These people still have group memories of the Crusades for crying out loud.
...more
This book talks about the middle east mainly Iran, during period of 70's. The main focus of the book is about oil trades and how it changes politics and economics.
It is a well documented book and looks like unbiased. ...more
It is a well documented book and looks like unbiased. ...more
Sometimes you pick up a book based on your gut feeling even if the writer is someone you have never heard of and the book is his first foray into writing. Seldom you end up rating the book as 5 stars. This is one such book.
This book is based on the oil price, the politics associated and the western economy which got impacted due to it. Premise of the book is around how everyone talks about the religious and political aspects of Iranian revolution of 1979 but there is hardly anything written on t ...more
This book is based on the oil price, the politics associated and the western economy which got impacted due to it. Premise of the book is around how everyone talks about the religious and political aspects of Iranian revolution of 1979 but there is hardly anything written on t ...more
The Oil Kings focuses on the Shah of Iran and his relationships with the United States and the rest of the world during his time in power. The book follows the shift form US Client to trying to stand on his own and the Saudi shift that led to his fall. About 80 percent of this book focuses on Iran and the United States while the last 20 details the Saudis realizing their power within OPEC. The Saudi’s exploited the Shah’s foolishness in overspending his petrodollars and leaving his economy expo
...more
Oil, petty kingdoms, the advent coming of poverty, and a superpower that I will never understand, because it allowed such petty kingdoms to keep the oil, after they themselves, went through the trouble of finding it, extracting it, refining it, shipping it, creating a market for it, and consuming it. Not to worry, if you think baby boomers in the West are terrible, their counterparts in the oil-rich nations are ever worse. Incidentally, by contributing to global warming, people won’t be able to
...more
Does the breaking story of Saudi Arabia flooding the market with oil in order to drive down prices and at the same time curtail a regional rival's resurgence, on the back of rising oil prices, sounds familiar? If it does, be reminded this isn't 2015 but rather 1976. The difference is the rivalry between Riyadh and Tehran is now decidedly deadlier as it takes place in a region riven in sectarian strife, culminating in the rise of the brutal and nihilistic Islamic State. Back then, at least the Sh
...more
It does a decent job of providing a clear chronological account of US-Iran (and on occasion Saudi) relations and its impact on the world economy in the 70s. More descriptive than analytic.
I would prefer more extensive profiles of the key figures since there's so much emphasis on how their roles (and relationships) affect diplomacy and policy.
Some of the details are repetitive or tedious. Still, I can see their value in reinforcing the statements made as well as illustrating how numerous minor ...more
I would prefer more extensive profiles of the key figures since there's so much emphasis on how their roles (and relationships) affect diplomacy and policy.
Some of the details are repetitive or tedious. Still, I can see their value in reinforcing the statements made as well as illustrating how numerous minor ...more
Absolutely loved this book. It's engaging and gives you a good understanding of how vital the oil industry has been in the shaping of today´s world balance. Im fascinated by the fact that so much of the world intertrade relationships is created by a few set of people. The book also provides a good starting point for anyone interested in Middle East´s politics. Well referenced. Entertaining.
I feel enriched for having read it and am eternally grateful to the author.
...more
I feel enriched for having read it and am eternally grateful to the author.
...more
I had little or no knowledge of the subject beforehand. This was an enthralling read. Thinking critically, I'm sure there are a myriad of interpretations and perspectives on this period and these state actors, and this book may only be one, but I thoroughly enjoyed the analysis.
Was the sha justified in spending all that oil coin on a military buildup? Was he so threatening that this was his best course of action?
Did the Nixon doctrine of selling arms to allow other countries to fight the next V ...more
Was the sha justified in spending all that oil coin on a military buildup? Was he so threatening that this was his best course of action?
Did the Nixon doctrine of selling arms to allow other countries to fight the next V ...more
The Shah's interactions with Nixon, now that could have been the title or something like that.
...more
This is an geoeconomic history of US-Iranian relations in the lead up to the Iranian Revolution. It is okay but narrative driven not driven by data.
There are no discussion topics on this book yet.
Be the first to start one »
Andrew Scott Cooper is the author of The Oil Kings: How the U.S., Iran and Saudi Arabia Changed the Balance of Power in the Middle East, published in 2011, and an adjunct assistant professor at Columbia University. He is a regular commentator on US-Iran relations and the oil markets, and his research has appeared in The Guardian, New York Times, Washington Post and other media outlets. He holds a
...more
Related Articles
The last five years of world history have been nothing if not...eventful. When living in interesting times, there's nothing better for...
95 likes · 18 comments
No trivia or quizzes yet. Add some now »
















