Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Os exércitos da noite” as Want to Read:
Os exércitos da noite
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Os exércitos da noite

3.66  ·  Rating details ·  2,374 Ratings  ·  181 Reviews
'The Armies of the Night is an award-winning nonfiction novel written by Norman Mailer. He essentially creates his own genre for the narrative, split into historicized & novelized accounts of the 10/1967 March on the Pentagon. His unique rendition of the nonfiction novel was one of only a few at the time & received the most critical attention. In Cold Blood ('65) b ...more
Published (first published 1968)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Os exércitos da noite, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Os exércitos da noite

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Ian "Marvin" Graye
A Novel History

This loosely "fictionalised" account of the 1967 anti-Vietnam war March on the Pentagon won both the Pulitzer Prize and the National Book Award.

While many of Mailer's political and philosophical concerns could be said to have dated (like much of Sixties culture), I really enjoyed re-reading it.

I suspect that many of my own views about Sixties politics (particularly the relationship between the Old Left and the New Left) were shaped by my first reading.

To that extent, it's had a la
Larry Bassett
Jul 09, 2012 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: nonfiction, history
Occasionally I have to pay homage to my roots. No. Not the Detroit suburbs or the Missouri Synod Lutheran Church. To the 1960s where I spent what turns out to be my formative years.

In the past week I have read three Kindle mysteries that got my adrenalin pumping and my conscience thinking I had to do something better with my time. Part of the attraction was my new Kindle Paperwhite so I was feeling disloyal to old fashioned hard covers. Part of it was that I was burned out by serious classics th
Nov 07, 2007 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Mailer enthusiasts, 60's revisionists
Norman Mailer, Norman Mailer. I believe I will take a page from Mr. Christopher Hitchens, who did NOT have a problem blasting Jerry Falwell on national television while the corpse was still warm (, and make some honest yet unflattering remarks about Mailer, whose goodreads update feed currently shows him reading The Handbook for the Recently Deceased.

This book is kind of a 'literary' atrocity. It is everything I would expect from an overblown superfamous
May 12, 2008 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
In this nonfiction novel, Mailer depicts the Mailer character (the Mailer character should not be mistaken for the wilier flesh-and-blood Mailer) as a glowering, self-important drunk whose main objective is to marinate in whiskey and public adulation.

By Mailer's own admission, his attendance at the 1967 March on the Pentagon is a concession to his moral opposition to the Vietnam war, which he would rather practice in the company of fellow aesthetes at exclusive cocktail parties. Reluctantly, he
Dec 30, 2009 rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
This book made me hate Norman Mailer. Really. I wished him dead after reading this book. And this after I had read and fallen in love with his book "Executioner's Song." This book is narcissism pure and simple, the fact that it won the National Book Award makes me question the validity of that award. After I read this book, I picked up the memoir written by Mailer's second wife Adele, the one he stabbed.(Yeah, did you know Mailer actually stabbed one of his wives? One gets the impression he want ...more

Brilliant. Immediate, vivid, engaging, fly-on-the-wall account of some serious world/historical shit hitting the american fan.

A classic, and deservedly so.

Interesting: Mailer said that he had been surprised when he came upon the refer-to-yourself-in-the-3rd-person voice that was the essential narrative innovation of the book.

He said that when he was a student at Harvard he'd been assigned "The Autobiography of Henry Adams" and thought the third person referential move was odd and put the boo
Laurel L. Perez
Mailer's writing style in this book is very fast and pulled me through the first section quickly. I can easily see how Mailer’s book has been compared to Truman Capote’s In Cold Blood, which was the first non-fiction novel, whereas Mailer has created here an early example of historical and fictional journalism; which seems to combine novel style with reporting. The book reads as split between two sections, in "History As A Novel," Mailer uses the third person to describe his own experience parti ...more
Mar 18, 2017 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: favorites
Mailer's incredible intellect shines white hot here. Echoes of this time reverberate today through the Occupy and Black Lives Matter movements. So sad that we really haven't progressed in this nation from the barbarism described within these pages.
Nov 24, 2010 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Love this book - my favorite quote comes from it -- of the media (he was thinking mainly of the press, of course) --- as "silent assassins of the republic"
John Woakes
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
New Journalism (among a few other things) was about bringing the writer out front to share the footlights with the story, dressed up in the unselfconscious garb of literary style. Rather than dry facts, impressions. Rather than strict chronology, non-linear context and rat-a-tat punctuation.

Which makes this prime piece of New Journalism (Pulitzer Prize and National Book Award winner) curious, in that it's pure chronology in the first part (History as a Novel), an intricate and often painstaking
Logan Mahoney
Oct 22, 2014 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
“Washington’s scruffy Ambassador Theatre, normally a pad for psychedelic frolics, was the scene of an unscheduled scatological solo last week in support of an unscheduled scatological solo last week in support of the peace demonstrations”(Mailer 1). The start of Norman Mailer’s Magnum Opus, The Armies of the Night, is one of complete explanation of what happened the fateful afternoon of October 27th, 1967, the day the most important anti-war really occurred. This book not only is a prevalent acc ...more
Michael Steger
Nov 06, 2013 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
A fantastic book. Anyone who wants to understand the fraught history of the Left in America has to include this wild, ironic, and visionary title on her or his reading list...

A few quotes:

On the change of mood in the hippie movement, over the course of the 1960s, from bright and happy, to dark and tormented:

“A generation of the American young had come along different from five previous generations of the middle class. The new generation believed in technology more than any before it, but the gen
Mar 13, 2016 rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Look, the fact that I wanted to throw this book against the wall on at least five separate occasions probably means it has some merit because at least it elicited some sort of emotion. I'm sure there are even some intelligent thoughts in here. I respect the fact that Mailer can create a character I dislike so much (himself). The descriptions of brutality towards the end were shocking, which is what they should be. Also, Mailer was on Gilmore Girls, so I really tried to like this.

All that consid
Jul 18, 2011 rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: nonfiction
I read this book because it won the National Book Award and the Pulitzer Prize. I also thought that since Mailer was a novelist that this "History" might be more compelling than something written by a dry, academic historian. Well, I was very disappointed. Mailer's egomania is not nearly as charming or interesting as he believes it to be. For me, Mailer did not make a particularly good protagonist because I didn't really care for him and therefore was not all that concerned about what would happ ...more
Josh Fish
A record of Norman Mailer's involvement in the anti-Vietnam-war protests written by him in the third person about him. I found this book full of false modesty (he even uses the word modest when talking about himself. Who calls themselves modest?) and self aggrandizement. He describes himself as almost a superhero taking on the giant war machine. This attitude of great men fighting against tyranny is the same rhetoric used by warmongers which I thought was ironic and something it seems surely Mai ...more
Emerald Guildner
It was fine. There are some passages that I found funny and/or enlightening. Overall though, it felt a bit too much like a chore for me to finish. Maybe it was just not what I was in the mood for, most likely it had much to do with the fact that I needed to look up people and places every ten minutes. That's totally all my fault for being a bit dumb when it comes to history. I did learn quite a lot, which was in itself worth the read. However, I did not feel very "moved", in any way, and I found ...more
Jodi Lu
Aug 18, 2007 rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: psychologists
the brief journey of an egomaniac who here just flaunts his lame-o remonstrance role (which he himself derides throughout, creatively). after he gets carted off to jail, the second half of the book really makes you miss the ass's cocky--albeit lively--presence. the style gets dry and you think "awww where's norman??" even though you wanted to hate him at many points when he was around. he gives you all or nothing, so it's kinda manipulative like that. you don't care about vietnam half as much as ...more
Given the lunatic self-importance of this book's first section (a third-person novel with the author as its hero) and some truly annoying prose tendencies (things in this book that are like other things are outnumbered by things that are "not unlike" other things by at least five to one, and Mailer has apparently never seen an authority figure that he couldn't best describe physically by assigning them a position on an American football team), the fact that "The Armies of Night" ends up being mo ...more
Erik Graff
Oct 10, 2009 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Mailer fans, students of the 60s
Recommended to Erik by: no one
Although I can find no ready reference to it, I believe this book was published, perhaps in serialized form, in a magazine like Harpers or the Atlantic (both of which I subscribed to back then). In any case, I recall reading it in such a format while still in high school, when the Pentagon demonstration was still a fresh memory. It was, I believe, the first full-length book I'd ever read by Norman Mailer, an author familiar to me from parental and grandparental bookshelves.
Stephen Paul
Oct 31, 2013 rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
The biggest load of over-rated, self indulgent drivel I have ever read. A total chore to read. Just delighted to have finished it so that I can leave it to gather dust on a bookshelf somewhere. It was so dire, it was actually annoying.
May 22, 2008 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: 2008
#1 of 26: Very, very good.

New York Magazine's New York Canon
Guillermo Gonca
Norman Mailer, uno de los escritores norteamericanos más celebrados de los últimos tiempos, se sumó a la corriente del “nuevo periodismo” con su obra “Los ejércitos de la noche” publicada en 1968. El libro narra los hechos ocurridos alrededor del 21 de octubre de 1967 en Washington D.C. cuando una multitud de cientos de miles de personas marcharon hasta las instalaciones del pentágono, como protesta contra la guerra de Vietnam.

Nos ubicamos en Estados Unidos, justo después del llamado "verano del
Yash Khapre
In this nonfiction novel, Mailer depicts the “Mailer” as a glowering, self-important drunk whose main objective in life is to drown in whiskey and public praise.

By Mailer's own admission, his attendance at the 1967 March on the Pentagon is a concession to his moral opposition to the Vietnam War, which he would rather practice at posh cocktail parties that he attended. Reluctantly, he attends the march, flinging contempt in every direction: at the young, at the old, at radicals, and at himself. I
Elliot Panek
Mar 05, 2017 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
During the run-up to the 2016 election and its aftermath, I found myself thinking about the mid-to-late 1960's, which, by many accounts, was the last period of great sociopolitical tumult in the U.S. How did we find our way out it? How did we stay afloat? As with any great challenge, personal or societal, the answers are found in the work of great writers who are adept at creating coherence out of something that is sprawling, overwhelming, traumatizing, and chaotic. I found this in Mailer's book ...more
Sep 12, 2017 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
this is mailer at his strongest: politically insightful and self critical, his narcissism on full blast while his faculties for examining his self operate on all cylinders. at the crest of the radical student movement in 1968, armies of young politically active Americans marched on the Pentagon with the focus of shutting down the heart of the American war machine in response to the atrocities of the war in Vietnam. Mailer here catalogues that march from the inside and outside, using himself as a ...more
Aug 19, 2017 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Why did it take me so long to "discover" this book? Norman Mailer, despite his professed cynicism, honored his country by committing civil disobedience to protest the war in Vietnam. He felt admiration for the tenacity of those young people who marched on the Pentagon, stayed 48 hours, and were beaten bloody. Yes, I know he comically disdains the left and all its dry propaganda, the spoiled middle class kids, the angry black militants. But setting his brilliant, sometimes gelatinous prose aside, ...more
May 15, 2017 rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Luin kirjan osana länsimaisen kirjallisuushistorian kurssia ja nyt haluaisin takaisin ne tunnit, jotka käytin kirjan läpi raahautumiseen. Yön armeijat ei pidä sisällään mitään, mikä kiinnostaisi yhdeksänkymmentäluvun lasta. Kirjan tyyli oli mielestäni uskomattoman pitkäveteinen ja Mailer onnistuu luomaan itsestään äärettömän vastenmielisen kirjallisen hahmon. Yön armeijat on Mailerin omaa itseään glorifioivaa kirjallista itsetyydytystä. En voisi tuntea vähempää sympatiaa nurkkiin kuseksivaa, nai ...more
Oct 31, 2014 rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Recommended to Kennedy by: Course Literature: Creative Nonfiction
Pulitzer Prize winner, Norman Mailer. I’m reading through this book with much difficulty, straining to see the brilliance in it others have seen, and of course how it justifies its prize winning hype. Okay, it’s the same conundrum I faced in art school when they tried to convince me Jackson Pollock was an artistic genius. The very same! In fact, Mailer seems to be the Jackson Pollock of writing; the difference being instead throwing paint on canvas, he’s thrown words on a page.
After posing the q
Quinn da Matta
Mailer's mastery of the word is astounding, but his style... his books leave me in inspired awe and, at the same time, exhausted and frustrated.

This book -- his firsthand account of the 1967 March on the Pentagon -- reminds us about how important, and dangerous, those times were and how vital it was for more people to stand up and speak out. And, now, almost 50 years later, the book is more relevant than ever.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Wandering Through Winter: A Naturalist's Record of a 20,000-Mile Journey Through the North American Winter
  • Ashes to Ashes: America's Hundred-Year Cigarette War, the Public Health, and the Unabashed Triumph of Philip Morris
  • And Their Children After Them: The Legacy of Let Us Now Praise Famous Men: James Agee, Walker Evans, and the Rise and Fall of Cotton in the South
  • The Problem of Slavery in Western Culture
  • Children of Crisis: Selections from the Pulitzer Prize-winning five-volume Children of Crisis series
  • Move Your Shadow: South Africa, Black and White
  • Gandhi's Truth: On the Origins of Militant Nonviolence
  • So Human an Animal: How We are Shaped by Surroundings and Events
  • Carry Me Home: Birmingham, Alabama: The Climactic Battle of the Civil Rights Revolution
  • Rousseau and Revolution (The Story of Civilization, #10)
  • The Haunted Land: Facing Europe's Ghosts After Communism
  • Fire in the Lake: The Vietnamese and the Americans in Vietnam
  • Beautiful Swimmers: Watermen, Crabs and the Chesapeake Bay
  • Fin-de-Siècle Vienna: Politics and Culture
  • United States: Essays 1952-1992
  • The Social Transformation of American Medicine: The Rise of a Sovereign Profession and the Making of a Vast Industry
  • Common Ground: A Turbulent Decade in the Lives of Three American Families
  • Rethinking Camelot: JFK, the Vietnam War and US Political Culture
Norman Kingsley Mailer was an American novelist, journalist, essayist, poet, playwright, screenwriter, and film director.

Along with Truman Capote, Joan Didion, and Tom Wolfe, Mailer is considered an innovator of creative nonfiction, a genre sometimes called New Journalism, but which covers the essay to the nonfiction novel. He was awarded the Pulitzer Prize twice and the National Book Award once.
More about Norman Mailer...

Share This Book

“His deepest detestation was often reserved for the nicest of liberal academics, as if their lives were his own life but a step escaped. Like the scent of the void which comes off the pages of a Xerox copy, so was he always depressed in such homes by their hint of oversecurity. If the republic was now managing to convert the citizenry to a plastic mass, ready to be attached to any manipulative gung ho, the author was ready to cast much of the blame for such success into the undernourished lap, the overpsychologized loins, of the liberal academic intelligentsia. They were of course politically opposed to the present programs and movements of the republic in Asian foreign policy, but this political difference seemed no more than a quarrel among engineers. Liberal academics had no root of a real war with technology land itself, no, in all likelihood, they were the natural managers of that future air-conditioned vault where the last of human life would still exist.” 3 likes
“Years ago in 1959 when Dellinger was already an editor on Liberation (then an anarchist-pacifist magazine, of worthy but not very readable articles in more or less vegetarian prose) Mailer had submitted a piece, after some solicitation, on the contrast between real obscenity in advertising, and alleged obscenity in four-letter words. The piece was no irreplaceable work of prose, and in fact was eventually inserted quietly into his book, Advertisements for Myself, but it created difficulty for the editorial board at Liberation, since there was a four-letter word he had used to make his point, the palpable four-letter word which signifies a woman’s most definitive organ: these editorial anarchists were decorous; they were ready to overthrow society and replace it with a communion of pacifistic men free of all laws, but they were not ready to print cunt.” 3 likes
More quotes…