Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.

Start by marking “Physics of the Impossible” as Want to Read:

Other editions

Enlarge cover

Rate this book

Clear rating

1 of 5 stars 2 of 5 stars 3 of 5 stars 4 of 5 stars 5 of 5 stars

Open Preview

Physics of the Impossible

Michio Kaku

4.09 · Rating details · 37,586 ratings · 1,460 reviews

A fascinating exploration of the science of the impossible—from death rays and force fields to invisibility cloaks—revealing to what extent such technologies might be achievable decades or millennia into the future.

One hundred years ago, scientists would have said that lasers, televisions, and the atomic bomb were beyond the realm of physical possibility. In Physics of the ...more

Get A Copy

Hardcover, 329 pages

Published March 11th 2008 by Doubleday Books

More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Physics of the Impossible, please sign up.

Lists with This Book

A Short History of Nearly Everything by Bill Bryson

A Brief History of Time by Stephen Hawking

Best Science Books - Non-Fiction Only

1,684 books — 3,644 voters

The Devil in the White City by Erik Larson

favorite non-fiction

1,365 books — 1,001 voters

More lists with this book...

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30

Average rating 4.09 ·

Rating details

· 37,586 ratings · 1,460 reviews

More filters

Sort order

Start your review of Physics of the Impossible

Mar 07, 2018 Mario the lone bookwolf rated it really liked it

Shelves: kaku-michio, 0-natural-sciences

ENGLISH

Understandable and neutral, the bow spans from possible to fantastic.

To gild the skills of a highly regarded and successful scientist by cultivating such an accessible and entertaining writing culture that is second to none in the current non-fiction field is at least as much a part of Kaku as the co-founding of string theory. If not a bit more, because the awakening of enthusiasm of others for the miracles around us is considered to be almost even higher than the important, but for most ...more

flag 71 likes · Like · see review

Aug 06, 2020 Orhan Pelinkovic rated it really liked it

Shelves: cosmology, science, science-fiction, physics

While reading this book, I was thinking to myself, this book can easily be converted into a script for a television show. It's written in a form as if it was prepared in advance for a narrator to recite it on a stage set. Sure enough, a TV series was produced based on the Physics of the Impossible a year after the book's release.

Michio Kaku, who governs so well with all the complexities of modern physics, very briefly, but effectively, introduces the development of several branches of physics, s While reading this book, I was thinking to myself, this book can easily be converted into a script for a television show. It's written in a form as if it was prepared in advance for a narrator to recite it on a stage set. Sure enough, a TV series was produced based on the Physics of the Impossible a year after the book's release.

Michio Kaku, who governs so well with all the complexities of modern physics, very briefly, but effectively, introduces the development of several branches of physics, staring from Newtonian mechanics of the 17th century up to relativity and quantum mechanics of the 20th century. However, if you're looking for a more elaborate exposition of the theories and laws of physics, I would suggest Brian Greene's The Fabric of the Cosmos.

You should definitely consider reading this book if you're a fan of Star Wars and Star Trek and curious no know how probable and feasible is it to achieve, in the future, the hypothetical technologies illustrated in these blockbusters.

Kaku, a well known science popularizer, does a superb job explaining how Sci-Fi technologies and ideas depicted in these movies could function and what is restricting us from achieving them today? How realistic is it to expect for humans to overcome these engineering challenges? In order to do so, do we need a new branch of physics or mathematics? Will a robot ever achieve or surpass the capabilities of the human brain? Kaku maintains an optimistic tone throughout the book while his overall assessment is cautiously optimistic concerning accomplishing these technologies.

The book even suggests different methods and ways to make flights into orbit more cost-effective, but does not propose reusable rockets, that have substantially decreased the cost of launching payloads into orbit since SpaceX's successful launch in 2015. The book was written in 2008.

The authors writing style is clear, smooth, and easy to understand. I read most of the book while watering my garden (a grove of fruit trees) and getting a couple of scratches from the tree branches, which made all this talk about the possibility of achieving human teleportation and interstellar travel seem light-years away. But I have to remind myself of the main lesson of the book: to stay open to far-fetched ideas and not reject them before considering every aspect, even though they sound impossible. ...more

flag 60 likes · Like · see review

Mar 30, 2008 Servius Heiner rated it really liked it

Shelves: science

This book is standard Michio Kaku. He starts off discussing the three classes of impossibilities. (Understand that much of what you would think of as impossible is not really impossible. In order to be proven impossible it must break a law of physics, there is not much that does.)

“Class 1 Impossibilities: These are technologies that are impossible today but that do not violate the known laws of physics. So they might be possible in this century, or perhaps the next, in modified form. They includ This book is standard Michio Kaku. He starts off discussing the three classes of impossibilities. (Understand that much of what you would think of as impossible is not really impossible. In order to be proven impossible it must break a law of physics, there is not much that does.)

“Class 1 Impossibilities: These are technologies that are impossible today but that do not violate the known laws of physics. So they might be possible in this century, or perhaps the next, in modified form. They include teleportation, anti-matter engines, certain forms of telepathy, psycho kinesis, and invisibility.”

“Class 2 Impossibilities: These are technologies that sit at the very edge of our understanding of the physical world. If they are possible at all, they might be realized on a scale of millennia to millions of years. They include time machines, the possibility of hyperspace travel, and travel through wormholes.”

“Class 3 impossibilities: These are technologies that violate the known laws of physics. Surprisingly, there are vary few such technologies. If they do turn out to be possible they would represent a fundamental shift in our understanding of physics.”

He also goes into detailing the classes of civilizations, which is important because there are just something you can’t do until you have the power to do them. We are a class “0” civilization.

Type 1 civilization: Those that harvest planetary power, utilizing all the sunlight that strikes their planet. They can, perhaps, harness the power of volcanoes, manipulate the weather, control earthquakes, and build cities on the oceans. All planetary power is with in their control.

Type 2 civilization: Those that can utilize the total power of their sun, making them 10 billion times more powerful then a type 1 civilization. The Federation in Star Trek is a type 2 civilization. A type 2 civilization in a sense, is immortal; nothing known to science, such as ice ages, meteor impacts, or even supernovae, can destroy it. (In the event their mother star is about to explode they can just move to another system, perhaps even move their planet.)

Type 3 civilization: Those that can utilize the power of an entire galaxy. They are 10 billion times more powerful then a type 2 civilization. The Borg in Star Trek, the Empire in Star Wars, and the galactic civilization in Asimov’s Foundation series correspond to a type 3 civilization. They have colonized entire star systems and can exploit the black hole at the center of their galaxy. They freely roam the galaxy.

Over all I was fascinated by this book, Michio has a way of explaining heavy physics without losing a reader without a doctorate. There are some things I wish he would have went into in greater detail, but I guess there are always more books.

I am growing tiered of this universe I think I will go check out the one next door.
...more

flag 50 likes · Like · see review

Dec 02, 2009 Felicia rated it it was amazing

Shelves: non-fiction, faves, science

Looking for something substantive? Look for this author, his books are so interesting and engrossing. Here he dissects all the Sci-Fi tropes and explains how each of them is impossible, or what the hell it would take to make it a reality. I learned quite a lot and it was not too jumbled for a non-scientist like me to read.

flag 48 likes · Like · see review

Jan 22, 2017 Simon Clark rated it really liked it

Shelves: physics-books

When I was a schoolkid I studied physics in part because - like many physics students - I wanted to know how to build the cool stuff in science fiction. The death star. Lightsabers. Warp drive. This is the stuff of Kaku's riotous introduction to modern physics and if I'd read it when I was in school it would have blown my goddamn mind.

I went into this book anticipating that I wouldn't learn all of that much - after all I have a masters degree in physics and read widely before studying at univers ...more

flag 27 likes · Like · see review

Aug 09, 2009 Trevor rated it really liked it

Shelves: science

There is no denying that this is an interesting book and one that presented many of the problems of physics in a way that is comprehensive, comprehensible and engaging. I think other people (people with a greater interest in science fiction, particularly) will find this book even more interesting than I did and more accessible than your standard pop science book on physics. I hadn’t realised I knew quite so little about science fiction – I hadn’t ever really thought about the fact that I hadn’t There is no denying that this is an interesting book and one that presented many of the problems of physics in a way that is comprehensive, comprehensible and engaging. I think other people (people with a greater interest in science fiction, particularly) will find this book even more interesting than I did and more accessible than your standard pop science book on physics. I hadn’t realised I knew quite so little about science fiction – I hadn’t ever really thought about the fact that I hadn’t seen any of the Superman films or any of the Star Trek films or any of the Star Wars films after the first couple. If you’d asked me I would have said that my disillusionment with film had only really started a couple of years ago, but clearly it goes back much further than I realised.

I think it would have helped to have known more about popular culture and thereby to have gotten some of the references here – but really, I could make do without this knowledge. So, if you don’t know which end it is best to hold your light sabre or (and even though he doesn’t actually quote Dr Who) how to reverse the polarity of the neutron flow (sorry, that one always amuses me) you will still be able to follow what is going on.

This book looks at what it says it will look at – impossible stuff. It then tries to work out just how impossible this impossible stuff is. The answer generally being, not terribly. Basically, he identifies three levels of impossibility. Stuff that is impossible now, but might not be for all that long. Stuff that is impossible now and might remain so for the next couple of thousand years. And finally, stuff that is pretty damn well close to being totally impossible and is likely to stay that way unless there is a fairly impressive overturning of some of the fundamental laws of physics. (And do you know what, if I was killed by a bullet aimed under Newtons Laws and these ended up being proven to be wrong, well, I'd be asking for my money back)

What he doesn’t like to do is say stuff is completely impossible and will always remain impossible (even when discussing faster than light travel, for example, or perpetual motion machines – although he does point out that there are one or two fairly serious problems that need to be addressed if these are ever likely to work).

I really do understand that people don’t like it when other people (you know, like me) start talking about things being impossible. I know that they point back to past predictions of the impossible and smirk and tut or whatever they think is the best way to express their disgust. And look, all that is fine – but just because you’ve seen something rather cool happen on your favourite science TV show doesn’t mean that the world has to be made to conform to your desires. For example, it is pointed out in this book that to open a wormhole that might allow us to travel backwards in time might require all of the energy contained in a body the size of Jupiter. The wormhole still might not work, of course – it still might collapse as soon as we enter it – or it might not even open at all in the first place. Is there really ever going to be a time when we are likely to convert all of the matter in Jupiter into energy just so as to try out a wormhole that may or may not work? Look, I could be completely wrong (I have been known to be in the past) but I’d have thought we might have other uses for that amount of energy, even in some strange, undefined future. Margaret Wertheim’s criticism in Pythagoras' Trousers God, Physics, and the Gender Wars of the high priests of physics (ever noticed how often these boys talk about the mind of God?) and their preference for BIG science in a world were the majority of our species are barely scratching out an existence is apt and worth keeping in mind while reading this book, I think.

I know, I know, ‘where’s your sense of adventure and your desire to dream the dream, McCandless?’ But I want more than ‘there might not be anything in the laws of physics as we know them to stop us from …’ as a reason to believe my grandkids will be living on Mars. And he does a very good job in presenting the ‘problems’ here, even if he ends up being a bit more optimistic than I would be. Given I’ve rather strong doubts we will see out another century without destroying ourselves with nuclear weapons (a threat we seem to have ignored rather bizarrely as the threat increased following the collapse of the Soviet Union and the relative safety of the Cold War) many of these questions are likely to remain academic.

There is talk of interstellar flights (and this from a creature whose furthest adventures to date have been to the moon and who nearly kills astronauts (cosmonauts) whenever we leave them on space stations for any length of time). Still, we are talking millions of years into the future – so why not? Well, economics is probably one reason. If travelling away from Earth at near light speeds is necessary for those traveling to the stars it is hard to see why any future society would bother. The stars are an awfully long way away and by the time the people on the rocket would reach these far away places billions of years will have elapsed here on Earth. Why would the people on the Earth (the people paying the bills, after all) bother sending other people so far away only for us to never hear from them again? (Well, unless they are telephone hygienists, of course) I just can’t see how we would ever think that this would be the way to go. I’m not saying we never will go off to the stars, but if we do it will not be with the same sense of exploration that Columbus was sent off with. We will be sending off these ships with the certain knowledge that we will never hear from them again.

Despite Kaku being very interested in string theory, he does present it here as having many failings and also presents some interesting questions about the possibility of us ever developing a theory of everything, either made of strings or not. He discusses this concern on the basis of Gödel's incompleteness theorem in mathematics – and given physics is the most mathematical of the sciences this ought to provide some pause for thought. Gödel's theorem says that there will always be things in mathematics that we know must be true, but can never prove to be true within mathematics itself. The goal of mathematics throughout the ages (since the Greeks, in fact) has been to create a system of proven axioms that build upon each other to create the whole structure of mathematics as a logically complete whole – Gödel proved this dream could never be realised. The fear now is that this may also be true in Physics.

Kaku does not think that very much is impossible (given enough time, enough knowledge, enough energy). He also handles some of the philosophical issues in some of the impossibilities mentioned (teleportation is an interesting case – are you the same person on the other side of the teleportation device as you were on the side you entered or should Scotty be charged with your murder?) The stuff on lasers – and why light sabres might not be the weapon of choice for quite some time (a bit of a problem with the necessary power source) was very interesting.

There is a question I’ve always wondered about which is mentioned here, but not explained. We now have images of single atoms. In fact, I’ve seen pictures of atoms spelling IBM. All well and good (although I am rather surprised it didn’t spell Coke). But I’ve always wondered how this is possible given the uncertainty principle. The uncertainty principle says that we can’t know both the position and velocity of a particle with absolute certainty, I’d have thought a photo of an atom would violate that.

All the same, this book presents lots of material on many fascinating topics in a way that is very accessible (no maths required). My favourite was a discussion on how to point a star that is collapsing to form a black hole so that it becomes a kind of huge gamma ray weapon. I mean, you’d really have to hate the people you were aiming it at. I would say that to go to all that trouble you would really have to hate them rather a lot. Presumably they would need to be responsible for Vogon poetry or something equally atrocious.
...more

flag 23 likes · Like · see review

Mar 06, 2009 John Stevens rated it it was amazing

Dr. Michio Kaku is perhaps the or one of the most brilliant minds in theoretical physics living today. I've seen him present several concepts and theories on the Discovery Channel.
I am a man who truly appreciates the marvel of theoretical physics. The stuff of Albert Einstein. Although I have some education along these lines and have watched and read quite a lot, I still find it very difficult to follow.
In this book/audio book, Dr. Kaku takes us on a journey into all of those "sci-fi sciences" ...more

flag 18 likes · Like · see review

Mar 16, 2014 Muhammad rated it really liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: pop-science, english, non-fiction

How often do you wonder about The Future? Can you conceive of the technologies people are going to use in the next millennium? Or is it at all conceivable? Is the ever growing ‘Technology Monster’ finally going to define or explain ‘every’ phenomenon around us some time in the far future? What about super intelligent extraterrestrials? Do they really exist? Are they going to invade us like the Hollywood ones? Can humans use psychokinesis in their regular lives as Jean Grey does in the X-Men comi ...more

flag 16 likes · Like · see review

Feb 22, 2018 Bettie rated it really liked it

Shelves: winter-20172018, fraudio, spaaaaaace, nonfiction, tbr-busting-2018, published-2008, sciences

Description: A fascinating exploration of the science of the impossible—from death rays and force fields to invisibility cloaks—revealing to what extent such technologies might be achievable decades or millennia into the future.

One hundred years ago, scientists would have said that lasers, televisions, and the atomic bomb were beyond the realm of physical possibility. In Physics of the Impossible, the renowned physicist Michio Kaku explores to what extent the technologies and devices of science ...more

flag 15 likes · Like · see review

Aug 09, 2009 Kara Babcock rated it liked it

Shelves: technology, science, 2013-read, from-library, non-fiction

I was never promised a flying car.

What I mean to say is that my generation was never the generation of flying cars. We grew up knowing better. It’s been seventy years since we started breaking open atomic nuclei to harness their incredible capacity for destruction and creation, and we are still sucking fossilized plants from the bowels of the Earth and lighting it on fire as fuel. My parents grew up watching men go to the moon. I grew up watching NASA’s budget bleeding out on the table, their sh ...more

flag 13 likes · Like · see review

Dec 31, 2020 Julian Worker rated it it was amazing

This books shows a wonderful science writer at work. I don't take Michio Kaku for granted any longer having recently tried to read another science book, written by a less skilled writer, and found it to be slow progress.

This book is a joy. It explains all the scientific details clearly and simply, outlining why some of the impossibilites are more impossible than others. The writer refers back to leading figures of the past such as Newton, Maxwell, and Faraday as well as 20th-Century scientists s ...more

flag 12 likes · Like · see review

Apr 23, 2008 Doug rated it it was amazing

Great introduction to current issues in Physics - without the pain of complex equations. Also, fun as the author esplores the plausibility of the physics in the Star Trek, Star Wars, and Time travel movies and books.

flag 12 likes · Like · see review

Jul 01, 2020 Riju Ganguly rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Best thing about this book is that it covers EVERYTHING that comes to our mind while we are speculating about the future, but not in a dystopic manner.
Worst thing about this book is that it's FULL of Physics!
Now, don't get me wrong. The title fairly screams at us. And I was joking.
This is truly an amazing book. I have been one of the hardened admirers of Kaku ever since reading his absolutely awesome book 'Hyperspace'. This book only enhanced his reputation, as far as I'm concerned.
In the inimit ...more

flag 9 likes · Like · see review

Feb 22, 2019 owilkumowa rated it it was amazing

Shelves: nonfiction, science

If school textbooks were written by Michio Kaku, half of the kids would grow up to be engineers.

flag 8 likes · Like · see review

Jun 28, 2008 Eric rated it it was amazing

While I really liked this book, a lot, it felt incomplete to me in that much of the math and science behind these concepts is not very in depth. Sure, it's not a text book, but I would have liked to have seen equations or at least references to something that could explain the math.

Also, while there is a TARDIS on the cover, there is no TARDIS, and no mention of Doctor Who at all in the book. I felt slightly cheated, but not enough to not give it a five star rating.

Oh, and the other quibble. V ...more

flag 8 likes · Like · see review

Nov 22, 2014 Huda rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Shelves: favorites

i love love love this book.

There, I had to say that first before I get anything else out.

Searching for the right person to talk to me about science has proven difficult, and I probably didn't even know it was difficult to connect to an author on this subject before I got to know Michio Kaku.

In Physics of the Impossible, readers will explore possibilities of sci-fi features in real-time. So they would be questions like: how close are we to building a force field? Is invisibility actually possib i love love love this book.

There, I had to say that first before I get anything else out.

Searching for the right person to talk to me about science has proven difficult, and I probably didn't even know it was difficult to connect to an author on this subject before I got to know Michio Kaku.

In Physics of the Impossible, readers will explore possibilities of sci-fi features in real-time. So they would be questions like: how close are we to building a force field? Is invisibility actually possible? And can we successfully embark on an interstellar voyage?

What he does is categorise these 'impossibilities', from inventions that would take decades to build, to leaps of science that would take centuries to fulfil.

What makes it so special to me is the very approach used. Michio Kaku is an optimistic child where sci-fi is concerned -- something I think takes a real purist to be able to defend against time. I get the idea that most scientists, the deeper they get in calculations and theories, become more prone to dismiss ideas as impossible, because so much is riding on a conjecture alone. Humiliation among peers, the domino-effect of one theory proven wrong, positions, etc., all these factors can weigh down considerably on a scientist's pure ambition to discover scientific truth. That's why I think the optimism I see in Physics of the Impossible is a treasure -- it's an ambition unsullied.

Also, I read a book on Quantum Physics before I got to this, and although I'm pretty sure the book was simplified enough, I vowed to get something more 'elementary' in order to understand the subject. Michio Kaku had a wonderful gage on how to convey ideas to the masses, neither pandering nor caught up on his own interest. He wants you to know there are exciting things happening in the field, that there are players with interesting lives outside their contributions and what great things he thinks we can look forward to in the future.

One vivid moment I had while reading was when the ending of Men in Black was mentioned. It was a scene I remember well, because at the time I liked the idea so much, but I didn't know what to do with it. So carrying the memory of that scene until today, I end up in a giddy mess when it was pointed out in the book. Here's the clip: Men in Black Ending

I must be entirely biased, but everything about this book is interesting. From its characterisation of other scientists, timeline of discoveries or even all the movie spoilers it provides, Michio Kaku is my favourite professor now. ...more

flag 7 likes · Like · see review

Oct 26, 2013 Fred Forbes rated it really liked it

When the author appeared at a convention I attended last year I was surprised not to have heard of him as he was listed as a NY Times best seller. I was impressed enough with his talk to order a couple of his books, this one among them.

He divides phenomena into 3 levels of the impossible. Class I impossibilities are those that are "impossible today but that do not violate the known laws of physics." Examples would include teleportation, antimatter engines and "certain forms of telepathy, psychok ...more

flag 7 likes · Like · see review

Mar 18, 2015 Judyta Szacillo rated it really liked it

Shelves: natural-sciences

After a five-star impression that the Author had left me with his "Parallel Worlds", I couldn't give this book more than a four. I liked it very much, but I didn't feel that interested in all those ray guns, death stars and light sabres. The second and the third part of the book were more like "Parallel Worlds", exploring the very edge of theoretical physics and its impact on our understanding of the reality - and these parts I liked much better. I can't say I've understood everything, but even ...more

flag 7 likes · Like · see review

May 27, 2017 Mohamedridha Alaskari محمد رضا العسكري rated it really liked it · review of another edition

There's no denying in the scientific researches. Kaku encouraged for free thinking, "thinking out of the box!"

I believe teleportation is the most interesting matter in this book. Hence it doesn't matter what's your beliefs bit you need to bear in mind that everything is possible if not at the current time it going to be happening in the future. Whether you like it or not. Thank you Kaku ...more

flag 6 likes · Like · see review

Oct 03, 2022 Gorab rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Shelves: non-fiction, science, owned-paperbacks, 2022

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
This was a mind bending fascinating read!
The book is well structured into 3 classes of impossibilities.

Class 1:
The kind of possibilities that does not breaks any physical laws, but seems difficult to achieve in near future.
Examples: Invisibility, Teleportation, Telepathy, Death Stars, Antimatter and Antiuniverse - all of them possible as they adhere to the scientific laws that we know of today.

Class 2:
Deals with the stuff that is speculative - as in beyond our current realm of understandi ...more

flag 6 likes · Like · see review

Jan 23, 2010 Gendou rated it did not like it

Shelves: non-fiction, science-fiction, physics, futurism

Notice that I filed this one under fiction. Kaku is a HACK. This whole book is an exercise in misunderstanding the word "impossible". There is no scientific value to this book. It is a fanciful weave of outright scientific untruth, confusing metaphors, and semantic diarrhea. DO NOT READ THIS BOOK! ...more

flag 6 likes · Like · see review

Jun 23, 2019 Aya rated it it was amazing

This book is a must read. it explains whether the phenomenon happening in sci-fi are impossible or not with our current knowledge of physics. Its explaining physics in a fun way

flag 4 likes · Like · see review

Dec 03, 2012 Jenny williams rated it it was amazing

I love Michio Kaku's approach, theories and views. I follow his website from time to time to see what different discoveries he makes every day. Physics Of The Impossible is a novel that requires some background knowledge and understanding of physics to truly get what he is saying. This book had example after example after example of all of the different things they said we would NEVER be able to do as a human race and just a decade or so later we are doing far more than what scientists said was ...more

flag 5 likes · Like · see review

Apr 05, 2017 Ashley Reid rated it really liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: science, recommendations, non-fic-blnk, learning, mcb2, favorites, w2rfb

Absolutely loved this, but unfortunately had to gloss over some of the waffly parts as I too much uni reading to do at the time.

I will probably re-read this book at some point though because I enjoyed most of it, and the parts I skipped over may be worth revisiting when I'm in a better mood. ...more

flag 5 likes · Like · see review

Sep 08, 2019 Muhammad Abdullah rated it it was amazing

Shelves: 2019-reads, physics, space-travel-technology, personal-library-books

Superb and amazing

flag 6 likes · Like · see review

Dec 23, 2011 Terence rated it liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: science-general

Michio Kaku is nothing if not optimistic. Is there anything currently in the realm of SF that we cannot do (in some fashion), eventually? Apparently not. Even perpetual motion and precognition may be possible with a better understanding of our universe (or multiverse). In Physics of the Impossible, Kaku, theoretical physicist and one of the developers of string theory, looks at some of the common technologies found in SF and discusses – in a very general and user-friendly way – whether or not th ...more

flag 4 likes · Like · see review

Mar 04, 2015 Robert Day rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Shelves: knowledge

I don't have a TV.

That used to be a radical statement, but now that everything (yes - everything!) is on the Internet, people don't fuss so much.

Thing is though - I don't know people - unless they appear in movies or in the ads that clog up websites.

Which brings us to Michio Kaku.

Without my knowledge, he has sneaked into the world and done stuff like this: he is a futurist, populariser of science, and theoretical physicist, as well as a bestselling author and the host of two radio programs. He i ...more

flag 4 likes · Like · see review

May 19, 2013 Claudia rated it really liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: science, physics

Nothing is imposible :)

flag 4 likes · Like · see review

Jul 24, 2021 Kimberly rated it liked it

Shelves: science, bookclub-2021, nfbc-brs-botm

What do I think? What do I not think? Why should I think anything if Stephen Hawking can "change his mind" and make a total about-face on there being a theory of everything. My take on this book is that this is, in part, a tongue-in-cheek attempt by a physicist with a profound sense of humor to try to explain "everything" even when he discusses the debates about theories and the arguments amongst physicists themselves as to the "truth" of our universe. The best parts of this book are where the a ...more

flag 3 likes · Like · see review

Feb 01, 2014 Petra rated it really liked it

Theories have four stages of acceptance:
i. this is worthless nonsense;
ii. this is interesting, but perverse;
iii. this is true, but quite unimportant;
iv. I always said so.
—J. B. S. HALDANE, 1963

This is book basically deals with the concept of "Impossibility", and arrive at the conclusion that impossibility is a relative concept. Throughout history, notable scientists labeled things impossible, only to be realized in a relatively short time. For example :one of the most prominent scientist of ...more

flag 2 likes · Like · see review

« previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 … next »

new topic
Discuss This Book

topics	posts	views	last activity
Non Fiction Book ...: Physics of the Impossible (May 15 - July 15, 2021)	7	27	Jul 19, 2021 10:31AM
John Stewart Bell and/or Bell's Theorem not even mentioned!	8	30	Dec 09, 2014 07:01PM
صدر حديثا - كتب و...: فيزياء المستحيل - ميشيو كاكو	32	719	Jun 28, 2013 05:32PM

Readers also enjoyed

See similar books…

Genres

Science

2,112 users

Nonfiction

1,042 users

Science > Physics

631 users

Science > Popular Science

98 users

Science > Technology

49 users

Science > Astronomy

39 users

Space

33 users

Science Fiction > Time Travel

30 users

Audiobook

27 users

Reference

19 users

See top shelves…

About Michio Kaku

Michio Kaku

5,988 followers

(Arabic: ميشيو كاكو
Russian: Митио Каку
Chinese: 加來道雄
Japanese: ミチオ・カク)

Dr. Michio Kaku is an American theoretical physicist at the City College of New York , best-selling author, a futurist, and a communicator and popularizer of science. He has written several books about physics and related topics of science.

He has written two New York Times Best Sellers, Physics of the Impossible (2008) and Physic ...more