Jump to ratings and reviews

Descartes and His Contemporaries: Meditations, Objections, and Replies

Before publishing his landmark Meditations in 1641, Rene Descartes sent his manuscript to many leading thinkers to solicit their objections to his arguments. He included these objections, along with his own detailed replies, as part of the first edition. This unusual strategy gave Descartes a chance to address criticisms in advance and to demonstrate his willingness to consider diverse viewpoints—critical in an age when radical ideas could result in condemnation by church and state, or even death.

Descartes and his Contemporaries recreates the tumultuous intellectual community of seventeenth-century Europe and provides a detailed, modern analysis of the Meditations in its historical context. The book's chapters examine the arguments and positions of each of the objectors—Hobbes, Gassendi, Arnauld, Morin, Caterus, Bourdin, and others whose views were compiled by Mersenne. They illuminate Descartes' relationships to the scholastics and particularly the Jesuits, to Mersenne's circle with its debates about the natural sciences, to the Epicurean movements of his day, and to the Augustinian tradition. Providing a glimpse of the interactions among leading 17th-century intellectuals as they grappled with major philosophical issues, this book sheds light on how Descartes' thought developed and was articulated in opposition to the ideas of his contemporaries.

270 pages, Paperback

First published October 15, 1995

Loading...
Loading...

About the author

Roger Ariew

47 books3 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
4 (36%)
4 stars
3 (27%)
3 stars
3 (27%)
2 stars
1 (9%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 1 of 1 review
22 reviews2 followers
Read
March 30, 2015
It was interesting to see the template in the books of Descartes. That he would write an original work, someone would object, and he would reply. His replies always stated the opposing viewpoint before stating his actual reply. Also, I did agree that his metaphysical proof of God was unclear.
Displaying 1 - 1 of 1 review