Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Conviction of a Time Traveler” as Want to Read:
Conviction of a Time Traveler
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Conviction of a Time Traveler

3.35  ·  Rating details ·  17 Ratings  ·  2 Reviews
This groundbreaking new book reveals never before known information about the time traveler from 2036 using the name John Titor. In 2000, a man calling himself John Titor began posting online claiming to be a time traveler from 2036. His mission? Travel to 1975, make contact with his own grandfather and retrieve an obscure IBM computer to help in the reconstruction of Amer ...more
Paperback, 284 pages
Published November 16th 2010 by Createspace Independent Publishing Platform
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Conviction of a Time Traveler, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Conviction of a Time Traveler

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-31)
Rating details
Sort: Default
|
Filter
Web
Jan 12, 2015 rated it liked it
I was thrilled when I stumbled across this book. The John Titor story fascinated me all those years ago. The whole idea of someone coming from the future, or putting on an elaborate hoax to say they did, is a good read whether you believe or not. It's just darn interesting to try and pull the story apart and work out your own truth, which the author openly suggests you do.

There are moments in the book where I thought, 'hmm, there you go, that IS suspicious', maybe there is something to this time
...more
Justin
Oct 29, 2015 rated it liked it
I do not believe a man traveled through time, but the book was interesting. The one critique is that the author tries to claim that he or she is unbiased and doing "investigative journalism" when in reality they are starting with a clear bias that they want the story to be true.
Julia
rated it really liked it
Feb 18, 2015
3v1lcl0n3
rated it really liked it
Jun 28, 2017
Mike Wagner
rated it it was ok
Aug 13, 2012
Alex
rated it liked it
Jul 21, 2015
Lzr
rated it really liked it
Jan 03, 2015
Marion
rated it liked it
Jul 02, 2012
Colleen
rated it liked it
Jun 26, 2014
Liam Smith
rated it liked it
Jul 03, 2014
Kim Brown
rated it really liked it
Oct 07, 2015
Frank Kaestner
rated it it was amazing
Jul 06, 2015
Todd Paoletti
rated it it was amazing
Sep 12, 2014
Paul Berick
rated it it was amazing
Jan 14, 2017
Mike
rated it liked it
Aug 15, 2014
Maggie Lugo
rated it it was ok
Aug 06, 2017
Stephen Hinkle
rated it did not like it
Feb 21, 2013
Rebekah
marked it as to-read
Sep 11, 2011
Jared
added it
Jan 03, 2013
Jordan
marked it as to-read
Jul 19, 2013
Jackie
marked it as to-read
Dec 19, 2014
Maria Alvarez
marked it as to-read
Aug 25, 2015
Heather Lowther
marked it as to-read
Dec 05, 2016
Jeremy Maddux
marked it as to-read
Feb 14, 2017
Monique Swauncy
marked it as to-read
Nov 03, 2017
Nedeljković Dalibor
marked it as to-read
Jan 15, 2018
Adam
marked it as to-read
Feb 17, 2018
Sophie Amalie Eslund
marked it as to-read
Jun 24, 2018
Chelsae
marked it as to-read
Aug 17, 2018
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
1,800 followers
Books can be attributed to "Anonymous" for several reasons:

* They are officially published under that name
* They are traditional stories not attributed to a specific author
* They are religious texts not generally attributed to a specific author

Books whose authorship is merely uncertain should be attributed to Unknown.