Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.

Start by marking “Twilight of the Idols/The Antichrist/Ecce Homo” as Want to Read:

Other editions

Enlarge cover

Rate this book

Clear rating

1 of 5 stars 2 of 5 stars 3 of 5 stars 4 of 5 stars 5 of 5 stars

Open Preview

Twilight of the Idols/The Antichrist/Ecce Homo

Friedrich Nietzsche

4.06 · Rating details · 177 ratings · 16 reviews

Translated by Antony M. Ludovici. With an Introduction by Ray Furness.

The three works in this collection, all dating from Nietzsche's last lucid months, show him at his most stimulating and controversial: the portentous utterances of the prophet (together with the ill-defined figure of the �bermensch) are forsaken, as wit, exuberance and dazzling insights predominate, forc ...more

Get A Copy

Paperback, 288 pages

Published June 5th 2001 by Wordsworth Editions

More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Twilight of the Idols/The Antichrist/Ecce Homo, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Twilight of the Idols/The Antichrist/Ecce Homo

Lists with This Book

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30

Average rating 4.06 ·

Rating details

· 177 ratings · 16 reviews

More filters

Sort order

Start your review of Twilight of the Idols/The Antichrist/Ecce Homo

Oct 17, 2016 Sawsan rated it liked it

Nietzsche's thinking is sharp, brilliant and accurate at some points
sometimes through reading i found him troubled, sarcastic and even narcissist
but he has his own philosophy to analyze and clarifies his ideas
for sure i don't like some of his views, but it's ok
generally his thoughts encourage and open many areas of life, emotions, and motives to think about. ...more

flag 40 likes · Like · see review

Feb 29, 2020 Κωνσταντίνος Τσεντεμεΐδης rated it really liked it · review of another edition

Η φιλοσοφία με το σφυρί λοιπόν... Αναμικτα συναισθήματα μπορώ να πω... Δε θέλω να μείνω στα ίδια, γιατί τα έχω ξαναπεί, επομένως θα σταθώ στα νέα ψηγματα γνώσης που κατάφερα να αποσπασω από τις εξορυξεις μου πάνω στα εδάφη του Νίτσε. Μεγάλος αντίπαλος του Νιτσε σε αυτό το βιβλίο ήταν ως επί το πλείστον το ιδεαλιστικο κίνημα που δεν ήταν άλλο από έναν καμουφλαρισμενο Σωκρατισμο. Η επιχειρηματολογια του για την κατακερματιση του Σωκρατικου πνεύματος, μου φάνηκε πολύ ελκυστική γιατί δεν ήταν καθόλο Η φιλοσοφία με το σφυρί λοιπόν... Αναμικτα συναισθήματα μπορώ να πω... Δε θέλω να μείνω στα ίδια, γιατί τα έχω ξαναπεί, επομένως θα σταθώ στα νέα ψηγματα γνώσης που κατάφερα να αποσπασω από τις εξορυξεις μου πάνω στα εδάφη του Νίτσε. Μεγάλος αντίπαλος του Νιτσε σε αυτό το βιβλίο ήταν ως επί το πλείστον το ιδεαλιστικο κίνημα που δεν ήταν άλλο από έναν καμουφλαρισμενο Σωκρατισμο. Η επιχειρηματολογια του για την κατακερματιση του Σωκρατικου πνεύματος, μου φάνηκε πολύ ελκυστική γιατί δεν ήταν καθόλου φιλοσοφικη. Κάθε άλλο! Η απάντηση ήταν η αίσθηση, η ποίηση, η μεθη! Εκεί που ο ισχνος Καντ δισασκε την σκέψη και την ανάλυση, προσπαθώντας να κρύψει την δειλία του απέναντι στο δράμα της στιγμής, ο Νιτσε, πατώντας πάνω στους προ-Σωκρατικους εξυψωνει την αμαλαγη καθαρή δράση, που δεν νοσει από τον ιό της υπεραναλυσης. Ένα τεράστιο Ναι σε όλα, είναι κάτι που ο καθένας χρειάζεται στη ζωή του, και ο νιτσε σχεδόν δια ροπαλου αλυχταει σε κάθε σελίδα προσπαθώντας να διδάξει το πνεύμα της τραγωδίας (το πραγματικό γενναιο οπτιμιστικο πνεύμα) όπως κάθε δάσκαλος που νοιάζεται τον μαθητή του, και σέβεται τον εαυτό του.

Ενδιαφέρουσες επίσης είναι και οι απόψεις του, περί στυλιστικου φιλοσοφικου ύφους πολλών συγκαιρινων του όπως Καρλαιλ, σπενσερ, εμερσον κλπ. Λίγοι βγαίνουν αλωβητοι όμως μετά την κρουση τους με το σφυρί. Ένα μέρος που πραγματικά με συναρπασε ήταν η πνευματική συγγένεια και ο σεβασμός που ένιωθε ο Νίτσε για τον ντοστογιεφσκι καθώς και οι απόψεις του σχετικά με το μυαλό του εγκληματία και της αποξενωσης του. Και είμαι σίγουρος πως εκείνο ήταν και το κομβικο σημείο της παρεξηγησης του, που τελικά έφερε διθυραμβους παραφιλολογιας και κουβέντες περι γενεαλογίας του ναζισμου.

Τέσσερα αστέρια γιατί, το αστέρι που χάθηκε πήγε σε παλιά κεκτημενα που τώρα θεωρώ τετριμμενα, ίσως λίγο φλυαρα και αχρειαστα λόγια.. Αλλά σίγουρα δε διαβάζεις Νίτσε αν δεν διαβάζεις σε κάθε βιβλίο μια καινοτομα ιδέα με την εσανς της παλιάς απαρεγκλητης φιλοσοφίας. ...more

flag 9 likes · Like · see review

Dec 01, 2018 Xander rated it it was ok

These three short books are the last works Friedrich Nietzsche wrote - before he flung himself around the neck of a horse, proclaimed it a saint, and collapsed. The rest of his life he spent, paralysed, in bed, while being cared for by his sister. This makes all three works, which he wrote within one year (1888) a peculiar collection - historically and from a philosophical point of view. Students of Nietzsche have claimed time and again that one can already see the signs of his coming demise in These three short books are the last works Friedrich Nietzsche wrote - before he flung himself around the neck of a horse, proclaimed it a saint, and collapsed. The rest of his life he spent, paralysed, in bed, while being cared for by his sister. This makes all three works, which he wrote within one year (1888) a peculiar collection - historically and from a philosophical point of view. Students of Nietzsche have claimed time and again that one can already see the signs of his coming demise in these three works. This is the same pseudo-psychologism as claiming one could already see Stalin's reign of terror in the way he played with his fellow classmates when he was a child. With hindsight, everything is explainable.

Anyway, the works themseves vary in quality and attractiveness. Götzendämmerung, or Twilight of the Idols, is the first and most interesting work. Nietzsche claims he 'philosophizes with a hammer' and with it, he smashes Socrates, Plato and Christianity in thousands of pieces. Socrates was the first decadent philosopher, the one who destroyed thinking for millennia. Why? Because he, and especially Plato, fled from this world into an imaginary world, a perfect world of Ideas. Christianity took this to a whole new level with its New Testament, fleeing from this life into an afterlife. Plato destroyed Hellenic superiority; Christianity destroyed Judaism, as practiced by the superior Kings of old. As far as Judaism was practiced in a priestly way, it was as servile and weak as Plato's philosophy and Christianity.

Christianity tamed 'the blond beast', according to Nietzsche. It has created a sick man, who revels in weakness and victimhood. For him, it is time to leave this sick morality of the victim behind us, and give ourselves up to the Will to power that rests in each of us. What this means, is basically to live your own life, to determine who you are with your own decisions and actions. Nietzsche's existentialism is an ethic of strength, health and action, as opposed to the herd-mentality of the religious and the socialists. He calls this the Dionysian life - a life full of vigour and passions, lived to the fullest.

Anyway, after dispelling with (1) Socratic and Platonic 'Hintlerweltlerei' - i.e. the positing of a better, imaginary world behind this real world -, (2) Kant's perversion of this other world (his'Welt an sich', as opposed to the 'Anschauungswelt' ) (3) and Schopenhauer's extension of Kant ('Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung'), Nietzsche decides in Der Antichrist to mount a full frontal assault on Christianity.

He destroys the origins and morality of both Judaism and Christianity. In essence, both religions are dominated by priests, who prey on the weak to subvert morality. Rabbinic Judaism and Christianity see in the meek the heroes, while promising eternal punishment in the afterlife to the strong. Nietzsche doesn't seem to hold back - he utterly degrades Christianity as a moral code. But not only this, we - modern man, decadent man - have destroyed God through science and philosophy. We have dismantled Christianity, but the Christian slave morality is still dominating, albeit in a much more nihilistic fashion. Mankind hasn't realized yet (as of writing, 1888) what he has accomplished - the next 200 years will be a struggle for Mankind to come to grips with the death of God and the nihilism that remains.

Der Antichrist is interesting from a religious perspective, in that it offers a unique insight into the son of a Lutheran priest gone wild. Especially interesting is his thesis that Judaism accomplished the denaturalization of man - the eradication of all natural influences and the retreat into the 'spirit'. One can see here the development of Western thinking, and its reaction (Science from Descartes onwards). Nevertheless, it becomes a bit tiring after a while. Nietzsche's style of prose, unfortunately, isn't the best suited for a long treatise on religious criticism...

With Ecce Homo (or, Behold here, Man) the trilogy comes to a close. In this little work, Nietzsche tries to paint a picture of himself, through his own eyes. Although the earlier two works were both difficult to follow and seemed to border on the insane (if not for the fact that Nietzsche already proclaimed these doctrines in his earlier works), Ecce Homo seems to be to be uninterpretable....

Nietzsche starts of by describing how his dead father and his living mother influenced him to be a decadent, but at the same time a very un-decadent philosopher. Then he explains all his suffering - digestion problems, blindness, depressions, etc. - and after this, he goes into detailed analysis and review of all his earlier books. Since I haven't read all of his earlier works (just Morgenröte, Zur Genealogie der Moral, Götzendämmerung and Der Antichrist), I cannot really say anything useful about these parts of the book. He ends the book with, once more, a critique on the slave morality of Christianity and signs off with 'Dionysus versus the Crucified'.

At this point in his career as a philosopher of culture - because that was what Nietzsche in essence was - he had uncovered the germ that causes the sick society he saw around him. The Christian slave morality and the death of God through science, had tamed the 'blonde beasts'. In this sense, it is interesting to note that Götzendämmerung (Twilight of the Idols) was originally intended to be the first part of a larger work, 'Der Umwertung aller Werte' - the transvaluation of all values. Nietzsche saw it as his task to, after destroying the slave morality, offer us new guidelines to a supreme morality.

Anyway, shortly after he succumbed to psychotic attacks and spend the rest of his days, until 1900, as a paralyzed patient suffering from strokes and nervous breakdowns. The life of Nietzsche is a strange one, also a tragic one. It is the life of a sick and lonely man, who grew up in a religious context but looked down on these dogmatic delusions, and who resented the world around him. His obsession with strength, courage, action and determining one's own life seems to stem from his own shortcomings as a human being. His crusade against weakness and resentment seems in reality to be a deep seated self-hatred. But I will not continue my pseudo-psychologizing of Nietzsche - it's just that his life and his circumstances almost seem to beg for the obvious remark that his philosophy was his own version of Idealism (in the Platonic sense).

Is this collection of Nietzsche's last three works worth reading? Well...I don't think one can get anything from it if one is unfamiliar with some of Nietzsche's earlier works. And even then, Nietzsche is a very peculiar taste in literature - I personally don't like his style of prose, at all. So read it, or maybe not... ...more

flag 4 likes · Like · see review

May 06, 2014 Brent McCulley rated it it was amazing

Shelves: philosophy, favorites

This review is for Twilight of the Idols and Ecce Homo. See my previous review of The Anti Christ here: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...

Nietzsche is utterly brilliant, and it doesn't take a skilled philosopher to realize this. In fact, most trained philosophers of the 21st century don't take Nietzsche seriously precisely because he was not a logician, or a systematic philosopher in any sense of the word. On the contrary, Nietzsche was a self-proclaimed disciple of Dionysus; the first imm This review is for Twilight of the Idols and Ecce Homo. See my previous review of The Anti Christ here: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...

Nietzsche is utterly brilliant, and it doesn't take a skilled philosopher to realize this. In fact, most trained philosophers of the 21st century don't take Nietzsche seriously precisely because he was not a logician, or a systematic philosopher in any sense of the word. On the contrary, Nietzsche was a self-proclaimed disciple of Dionysus; the first immoralist, psychologist, and Antichrist, he did not utilize propositional logic, nay he wrote in thunderbolts with flashes of divine inspiration of lightning—artistic ecstasy, and the will to power, the yea to life in a Dionysean orgaism . This is Nietzsche the prophet, not just Nietzsche the philosopher or philologist.

It is in the spirit of the aforesaid that Nietzsche wrote Twilight and Ecce during his later years previous to his breakdown. "Twilight of the Idols" is a brilliant piece wherein Nietzsche discusses things from "the problem of Socrates," seeing Socratic reason and virtue, and also Plato's idealism and forms, as wholly opposite of what the true Greek spirit stood for. Nietzsche ruminates on a lot of what he put forth in The Birth of Tragedy (see my review here: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... ) but he is here more concise and candid.

Nietzsche further discusses the "problems with the Germans," and rages pretty hard against nationalism, German culture or lack thereof, and German idealism (Nietzsche hates Kant as much as he hates Plato and Socrates, among others like Hegel and his ridiculous system). In short, Twilight is Nietzsche's harbinger against all idols which he defines as any idealism that takes away from the apparent world--which is the real world, and such a real world as postulated by the Christians, Kantians (or can't-ians as Nietzsche jested) is wholly a figment of projecting decadent morality to an ontological maximum, something unfounded and unwarranted given our natural Dionysian instincts of sensuality and power--and the senses, which is all humans have, and hence the truly strong willed must yield to their Dionysian nature. To hell with the Christian trick of free-will and consequent sin, remorse, and guilt—a grand trick by the priests and semi-priests of old, the weak and decadent.

"Ecce Homo" is Nietzsche's lucid thoughts concerning his life's work thitherto in his early forties. He recounts a lot of interesting personal notes one would not understand unless they were well acquainted with his works and life. Nietzsche also has, again, a nice diatribe against the Germans, and seems to want to exonerate his blood by trying to convince his readers he is mostly Polish anyway. To be sure, as much as Nietzsche was read and taught during his lifetime from Russia and Denmark to France and America, he was scarcely mentioned in his own native country, Germany.

In short, a great collection of Nietzschean thought, and as always, Nietzsche is dynamite with his aphorisms and maxims, but one needs to make sure that they are adept in Nietzschean hermeneutics, lest they wrestle the intended meaning of out of his wry and clever maxims. ...more

flag 2 likes · Like · see review

Feb 22, 2018 Michael Percy rated it it was amazing

Shelves: reviewed

The first interesting thing I discovered about Nietzsche is something I suspected when I read Beyond Good and Evil: Nietzsche "learnt much from La Rochefoucauld" (p. viii). And to start off with first principles, Nietzsche makes an interesting observation: morality is "a misrepresentation of certain phenomena, for there are no moral facts whatever (p. xi). I have now come to terms with the idea of Dionysian "chaos" versus the Apollonian "order". Interestingly, this struck me last night at the Ca The first interesting thing I discovered about Nietzsche is something I suspected when I read Beyond Good and Evil: Nietzsche "learnt much from La Rochefoucauld" (p. viii). And to start off with first principles, Nietzsche makes an interesting observation: morality is "a misrepresentation of certain phenomena, for there are no moral facts whatever (p. xi). I have now come to terms with the idea of Dionysian "chaos" versus the Apollonian "order". Interestingly, this struck me last night at the Canberra Symphony Orchestra's performances of Prokofiev's Piano Concerto No. 2 in G minor, op. 16 (with acclaimed Australian pianist Tamara-Anna Cislowska as the soloist), and Shostakovich's Symphony No. 9 in E flat major, op. 70. My friend and colleague, a sociologist, who invited us to the concert, has often spoken of these two opposing approaches. But until now, I have been ignorant to the depth of meaning that is so readily missed when one's antennae are not properly directed. And so, Nietzsche sees art as "Dionysian. It is amoral". "Christian art" is an oxymoron, yet Islam is "a virile religion, a religion for men". Nietzsche sees Christianity and alcohol as "the two great means of corruption" (p. 160). A central message (one of too many!) is that, "where the will to power is lacking, degeneration sets in" (p. 97). Nietzsche blames Saint Paul for destroying Rome, and Luther for destroying the Renaissance. Well I never! Kant perpetuated some of the decay, but Goethe, the antipodes of Kant, "disciplined himself into a harmonious whole, he created himself" (p. 81). Further, and while Nietzsche may well have predicted the World Wars, he may also have predicted the decay of our current institutions. Nietzsche argued that we have forgotten the purpose of our institutions (something that would seem apparent in my understanding of theories of institutional change), in effect, institutions require:

...a sort of will, instinct, imperative, which cannot be otherwise than antiliberal to the point of wickedness: the will to tradition, to authority, to responsibility for centuries to come, to solidarity in long family lines forwards and backwards in infinitum. If this will is present, something is founded which resembles the imperium Romanum: or Russia, the only great nation today that has some lasting grit in her.

In speaking of first principles, Nietzsche appears as a Neo-Con Flâneur (p. 72); yet he does not mince words:

First principle: a man must need to be strong, otherwise he will never attain it. - those great forcing-houses of the strong, of the strongest kind of men that have ever existed on earth, the aristocratic communities like those of Rome and Venice, understood freedom precisely as I understand the word: as something that one has and one has not, as something that one will have and that one seizes by force.

I can't pretend to know everything about Nietzsche, and I doubt I can commit to further study beyond a once-reading of the majority of his work. But something has changed in me as a result. I will blog about Ecce Homo in a subsequent post, as I am reading it in a separate book with an easier-to-read type-font, but from Nietzsche's autobiography, he arose from illness (and, paradoxically, to return to it soon after) to suffer no longer from "'ill-luck' nor 'guilt'". He "is strong enough to make everything turn to his own advantage" (p. 176). In this way, Nietzsche is much like Marcus Aurelius: Amor Fati. And no longer can my response be "merely" academic: I feel a weight of centuries lifting, I see why our institutions are crumbling, I fear the solution will not be forthcoming until the next major crisis disrupts human society yet again; I know that this will all be forgotten by future generations. And so time will march on. But Nietzsche does not leave me pessimistic, nor does he leave me disturbed as Viktor Frankl does. He leaves me free. Is this too dramatic? Read what I have read and tell me. I am all ears. ...more

flag 1 like · Like · see review

Aug 03, 2007 Scott rated it really liked it · review of another edition

I only read 'Twilight of the Idols' from this, but it was a blast. Nietzsche called himself the master of the aphorism, even said no one would top him. Typical Nietzschian bravado, posturing, verve and nuttiness with very little argument. I loved it. Great summer reading because it makes you want to be intoxicated with something, anything, especially yourself. ...more

flag 1 like · Like · see review

Jan 09, 2015 James Williams rated it really liked it

I opposed a lot of his views, but I respected his dialectical way of delivering his point of views. This book will challenge you to think outside the box and see religion, philosophy, and human rhetoric in a new light. It is definitely read worthy.

flag 1 like · Like · see review

May 28, 2020 Joel Gn rated it it was ok

Popped the Nietzsche cherry with this aphoristic collection of his later works - Twilight of the Idols was certainly a provocative read, but I probably need to familiarise myself with his earlier writings (e.g. Zarathustra) in order to gain a better understanding of what he was rambling about in Antichrist and Ecce Homo.

flag Like · see review

Jun 28, 2018 Dylan Rock rated it it was amazing

An excellent collection of Nitezsche writings

flag Like · see review

Jan 19, 2015 Sam rated it did not like it

I first heard of Nietzsche when a friend had to write an essay on his theories. I researched one of his theories and was fascinated by his concept of the world being metaphysical and that how we perceive the world may not actually be how it exists in terms of planes. However the works described within these pages are nothing akin to a theory such as this. These works are simply opinion based descriptions of how Nietzsche believed himself to be above everyone else. I wonder if these delusions of ...more

flag Like · see review

Feb 15, 2011 Russell Mark Olson rated it really liked it

Shelves: non-fiction, classics, philosophy

I loved the structure, ideas and arguments in the first two books of this collection. I think I would have given them individually five stars, but Ecce Homo let's them down. E H reads like the liner notes to a "greatest hits" collection. I understand why it was included in the collection (last lucid works) but based on substance, it probably would be better suited in a collection of essays and pamphlets. But for anyone who has never read Nietzsche, Twilight of the Idols is a fantastic romp. ...more

flag Like · see review

Oct 01, 2012 Vanja rated it it was amazing

my fav

flag Like · see review

Apr 13, 2014 Rachael rated it liked it

Just read "Twilight of the Idols." In short: Nietzsche is a real kick. Sardonic, sad, sarcastic, bitter, brilliant, troubled, direct, chauvinistic... Nietzsche is a veritable grab bag. ...more

flag Like · see review

Aug 17, 2015 Pedro Jorge rated it really liked it

Shelves: library, library-philosophy

excelent introduction to Nietzsche's writings through softer themes. Very insightful. ...more

flag Like · see review

David Winters rated it it was ok
Aug 26, 2020

Jorge Cano Febles rated it liked it
Feb 05, 2021

Anna rated it really liked it
Apr 25, 2014

Popa rated it really liked it
Jul 17, 2014

Amit Pokhrel rated it it was amazing
Jan 09, 2020

Sean Dx rated it really liked it
Oct 09, 2016

Konstantinos Mindcrimek rated it it was ok
Sep 04, 2017

Rati rated it it was amazing
Oct 23, 2019

Ştefan Bolea rated it it was amazing
Jul 02, 2012

Giorgia rated it really liked it
Aug 28, 2018

Kristijan rated it really liked it
Mar 16, 2020

Kārlis rated it liked it
Dec 23, 2019

b bb bbbb bbbbbbbb rated it it was ok
Jun 08, 2007

Giuseppe rated it it was amazing
Apr 09, 2013

Katarina rated it really liked it
Oct 27, 2014

Yves rated it really liked it
Mar 14, 2012

« previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 next »

new topic
Discuss This Book

There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Recommend It | Stats | Recent Status Updates

Readers also enjoyed

See similar books…

Genres

Philosophy

35 users

Nonfiction

5 users

Classics

3 users

European Literature > German Literature

2 users

See top shelves…

About Friedrich Nietzsche

Friedrich Nietzsche

16,174 followers

Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche was a German philosopher of the late 19th century who challenged the foundations of Christianity and traditional morality. He was interested in the enhancement of individual and cultural health, and believed in life, creativity, power, and the realities of the world we live in, rather than those situated in a world beyond. Central to his philosophy is the idea of “life- ...more

Books by Friedrich Nietzsche

More…

News & Interviews

42 New and Upcoming Historical Fiction Novels

Care to travel to past times for some serious drama? Check out this season's biggest historical fiction novels and be transported to tales of...

Trivia About Twilight of the I...

No trivia or quizzes yet. Add some now »

Quotes from Twilight of the I...

“Dostoevsky, by the way, the only psychologist who had anything to teach me:” — 1 likes

“The fact that education, that development–and not ‘the Reich’–is itself a goal, the fact that you need educators–and not schoolteachers or university scholars–to reach this goal, people have forgotten this” — 1 likes

More quotes…

See a Problem?

Preview — Twilight of the Idols/The Antichrist/Ecce Homo by Friedrich Nietzsche

Twilight of the Idols/The Antichrist/Ecce Homo

Get A Copy

Friend Reviews

Reader Q&A

Lists with This Book

Community Reviews

new topic
Discuss This Book

Readers also enjoyed

Genres

About Friedrich Nietzsche

Books by Friedrich Nietzsche

News & Interviews

Trivia About Twilight of the I...

Quotes from Twilight of the I...

See a Problem?

Preview — Twilight of the Idols/The Antichrist/Ecce Homo by Friedrich Nietzsche

Twilight of the Idols/The Antichrist/Ecce Homo

Get A Copy

Friend Reviews

Reader Q&A

Lists with This Book

Community Reviews

new topicDiscuss This Book

Readers also enjoyed

Genres

About Friedrich Nietzsche

Books by Friedrich Nietzsche

News & Interviews

Trivia About Twilight of the I...

Quotes from Twilight of the I...

new topic
Discuss This Book