Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals” as Want to Read:
Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals

3.77  ·  Rating details ·  5,620 ratings  ·  624 reviews
First published in 1971, Rules for Radicals is Saul Alinsky's impassioned counsel to young radicals on how to effect constructive social change and know “the difference between being a realistic radical and being a rhetorical one.” Written in the midst of radical political developments whose direction Alinsky was one of the first to question, this volume exhibits his style ...more
Paperback, 196 pages
Published October 23rd 1989 by Vintage (first published December 12th 1969)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Rules for Radicals, please sign up.
Popular Answered Questions
MrsER Yes. My clue is that, following your same thought process, left-wing elites have stolen all copies of Conservative books I cannot find in my library.…moreYes. My clue is that, following your same thought process, left-wing elites have stolen all copies of Conservative books I cannot find in my library. Now, I highly suggest you read more about fascism. Most likely you will be surprised to learn it has nothing in common with Republican or Conservative philosophies. Cheerio! (less)

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
Rating details
Sort: Default
Mike (the Paladin)
Feb 02, 2010 rated it did not like it
Shelves: political
Freely admitting I did not read this "thing" in detail(please note I said "in detail" not that I hadn't read it)...this is not my first brush with this small yet putrid tomb oops, I mean tome. I graduated high school in 1970...was cursed for wearing my dress army greens...and had friends who bought/buy into the poison Alinsky (a hero to many of the current administration in the white house) spews. From the opening appeal to Lucifer through it's "the ends justify the means" attitude it turns my s ...more
So this is the infamous Rules for Radicals. Believed by some on the far right as the Gospel according to St. Stalin of the Church of Satanic-Marxism-Leninism.

To be fair, it does hold interesting discussions of community organization, communication, across class and racial bounds to demand reform. Something which will upset conservatives, naturally, as they prefer for things to stay the same, or changed more slowly. There is much valuable to be learned here, for both left and right.

The big gripe
Jan 18, 2009 rated it really liked it
I read Alinsky for the first time in graduate school, and pulled his books off the shelf again upon hearing that Barack Obama studied and was influenced by Alinsky in his days as a community organizer.

The book is as good as I remembered, and freshened upon re-reading by the ability to apply some of the discussion to Obama's campaign and early days in office. Alinsky was an organizer--a passionate pragmatist with a sense of humor, willing to compromise at any turn or use any means by which to ach
Jun 24, 2016 rated it did not like it
I read this book, because I had to try to understand how the Liberal mind works. Alinsky does a great job exposing it. Alinsky's philosophy is dirty, violent, extreme Left-wing. His goal was to destroy this Republic (the Founders did NOT want a democracy, by the way) by spreading anarchy. According to Alinsky, the ideal activist has no scruples: "He asks of ends only whether they are achievable and worth the cost; of means, only whether they will work. To say that corrupt means corrupt the ends ...more
Oct 30, 2008 rated it did not like it
Recommends it for: bleeding-hearts
Total hogwash. This is simply moral relativism clothed in political sophistry. Following the path of all relativistic philosophies, Alinsky contradicts himself constantly throughout the book. He argues the "duality of all phenomena" and then goes on to describe the status quo as intolerable. He makes statements like "He who fears corruption fears life" and then attacks the Pentagon for corrupt practices during the Vietnam war.

You can certainly see how The One drew much of his campaign philosophi
Jun 25, 2012 rated it did not like it
It’s very appropriate for Alinsky to dedicate this book to Satan. Like Satan, Alinsky mixes God’s word with his own lies to craft his socialist evil.
He warns those he calls “Have’s” to watch out for their “Have Not” neighbor because they’ll kill him and take what he has. Then he says the “Have Not” is justified in doing so. Well Alinsky, based on your stupid logic, the “Have” is also justified in killing the “Have Not” in defense. Alinsky states just the opposite. His stupid logic also says not
Aug 04, 2007 rated it liked it
Shelves: non-fiction, activism
There are definite aspects of Alinsky's book that are getting a little outdated. It's interesting to read the final chapters, and see his hope for what essentially has become the responsible investment movement - a large part of which is students on campuses getting their schools to divest from companies involved in business with unethical political regimes - and to know the limits of that movement, and its failure to cause 'a middle class revolution' like the one he envisions. But then, his hop ...more
Stephen Drake
Jan 05, 2009 rated it it was amazing
The first time I read this book was when I was sixteen. Since then, I have given away and replaced the book several times. Alinsky, who was active in both Chicago (where I lived for over ten years) and Rochester, NY (where I grew up and live now), was a terrific community organizer. The language is a little dated - definitely sexist by today's definitions - but it's a great reminder to those of us who get discouraged about fighting on unlevel playing fields. The playing fields have never been le ...more
Nov 14, 2008 rated it liked it
Ah, for the simpler days of radicalism, when you could get your college friends together for an impromptu rally, and no one had an excuse why they couldn't come.

That's not really what this book is about, but, having been written in 1971, it did inspire in me a bit of nostalgia for the kind of activism that was widespread then and is now alive and well only in places like San Francisco.

Alinsky is not anywhere near that idealistic. He was a down-and-dirty--and extremely effective--organizer who ha
May 11, 2010 rated it it was amazing
I've been meaning to get around to Alinsky for years, and am so glad I finally borrowed a copy of this book from a friend.

The thing I appreciate most about this book is that he is so practical. I often get impatient with philosophical/ethical discourses about right and wrong and actions and consequences. The fact of the matter is, people are motivated by self-interest, and if you want to bring about a successful movement for justice, you have to appeal to that.

I think it is important to balanc
Sep 22, 2014 rated it did not like it
Alinsky's message was never received in a significant sense. The Tactics weren't employed. The goals were not achieved. There was no Movement or revolution for which he made these rules. I don't think the Tactics would be effective if they were employed. They might have some effect against some low-level bureaucrats in the 1970's but the powers that be are insulated from Alinsky and his ways.

(Prologue) "What I have to say in this book is not the arrogance of unsolicited advice. It is the experie
Della Scott
Jul 12, 2010 rated it liked it
This is a book that I didn't want to read, but knew that I ought to read. During the 2008 presidential campaign, people were talking about it so much that one got the sense that maybe it wasn't necessary to read it--you already knew what was in it. But that's always a mistake. It's always better to go to the source. And actually, although the people on the talk radio stations that I listened to were taking about it a lot, people in mainstream media probably weren't talking about it enough, or el ...more
This book must have been recommended to me several dozen times over the course of the past year, from activists from either side if the ideological divide. Written by a rabid political organizer who cut his teeth organizing in the Depression-era south-side Chicago who makes no secret of the fact that he views a worker's revolution as inevitable and something that leftists should constantly work toward, and given that President Obama got his start organizing with the late Alinsky's group back in ...more
Sep 03, 2010 rated it liked it
Alinsky was the left side of a two headed system approved Jewish Hydra operation out of Chicago. On one side you had Strausser who spawned the Neo-Con cabal that ruled the white house from 2000-2008. On the other side you had Alinsky who either influenced or in some cases out and out mentored people like Hilary Clinton, Cesar Chavez, Barry Satoro Obama, Bill Ayers, etc, etc. So their little globalist Marxist operation was quite succesful no doubt.

Alinsky for all his notoriety for rabblerousing
Ryan Holiday
Jul 05, 2012 rated it it was amazing
Rules for Radicals is the 48 Laws of Power written for the power hungry with a conscience. Alinksy was the liaison for many civil rights, union and student causes in the late 50's and 60's and though most of his efforts were temporal, he immortalized the tactics in this book. He teaches how to implement your radical agenda without using radical tactics, how to disarm with words and media as opposed to arms and Utopian rhetoric.

What's most impressive about Alinsky is how his books become more rel
Feb 17, 2008 rated it it was amazing
Recommends it for: social workers, activists
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Dec 01, 2008 rated it liked it
In an amazing start to his book, Alinsky acknowledges "the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom--Lucifer." While I wouldn't put Alinsky in the same category as Lucifer, it does make me wonder why he would put radicals in the same category. I guess he has his reasons, and certainly those bomb throwers (Alinsky speaks against) belong to Lucifer.
Parts of the book were pretty slow (the first half.) It seems l
Douglas Wilson
Jun 27, 2009 rated it it was ok
Shelves: politics
Alinsky was a tactical genius, but when it gets to foundational issues he is beyond sophomoric. A hard leftist, who did not know where he was going or why, but he was the kind of driver who knew how to make good time.
Sep 02, 2017 rated it did not like it
کتاب را با تصور به این که یک کتاب استراتژی قرص و محکم برای یک فرمانده ی جنگی که در صدد رسیدن به قدرت است خوندم، ولی کتاب اون چیزی نبود که انتظار داشتم، این کتاب که اصلاً با لحن و نوشتار قدیمی نویسنده حال نکردم و به نظرم سخت و دیرفهم برایم بود راجع به این است که چه روش هایی را به کار ببرید که به عنوان یک چپ افراطی که با قوانین مثلاً بانکداری کشور یا یک سازمانی مشکل دارید نیروها و افراد خودتون رو چطور سازماندهی کنید
که تویه این شورشی که به پا کردید به هدفتون و اهداف حزبی تون برسید (به صورت مدنی و
May 30, 2010 rated it really liked it
Alinsky's classic about organizing in America is a fascinating work which is in many ways timeless. I found it inspiring and it definitely got me thinking about the often overlooked possibilities for creativity within collective action. In our modern era of letter-writing campaigns, call-in campaigns, and even protests, we can forget that "realistic radicals" have a much broader arsenal of rhetoric and media-grabbing actions (that can be more effective and more fun for their cadres to participat ...more
Larry Bassett
Jun 03, 2010 rated it it was amazing
Newt Gingrich is criticizing Barack Obama by associating him with Saul Alinsky. Read this book if you want to know what Mr. Alinski thought and how he organized people without power to make their lives better.

I am not sure if Saul said, "Power to the people!" but I am sure that is what he meant. This book is a classic for community organizing.
Dec 11, 2009 rated it really liked it
Shelves: resource, political
Rating this GOOD is not accurate. But it is a Must Read unless what's going on now in America os not affecting you, or you don't care.
This is a reread from years ago in my social activist days. Amazing how one can see these techniques in use if our eyes are open.
Jun 27, 2007 rated it it was amazing
Recommends it for: The Young and those who need their fire lit
Shelves: bestreadsever
This is just one of those books that people who are young and on fire should read. It is inspiring and thought provoking if not a little contreversial at times- especially when it was published I imagine.
Darran Mclaughlin
Nov 08, 2018 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: american, politics
A really extraordinary book. I remember hearing about Alinsky for the first time years ago when I read Dreams From My Father by Barack Obama, when Obama referred to the fact that he had learned from Alinsky and been influenced by him when he worked as a community organiser in Chicago. I recall having my interest piqued because his work was described as being in the line of Machiavelli and Nietzsche, which is a very unusual thing to hear about a book on political organising. Well the comparisons ...more
Dec 02, 2017 rated it it was amazing
Surprisingly full of wacky hijinks, this book still manages to be a fundamentally rationalist primer on how to bring people together, find out what they want, and how to get them to work together to get it. Entertaining and educational.
Brian Napoletano
Mar 08, 2009 rated it liked it
Saul Alinsky presents those of us who talk about change without acting on it with an uncomfortable challenge: you are either actively opposing the establishment or you are siding with it. This challenge struck home with me and inspired me to invest more effort into connecting to local activists and engaging in direct action.

On the other hand, I found Alinsky's discussion of ends and means rather troubling. Alinsky tends to judge actions solely by their ends, and is so certain of the righteousnes
Feb 17, 2014 rated it liked it
I liked this book. It was filled with some really great information and truths, as well as many false ideas, some of which might sound true.

I understand how young persons could be swept away by his rhetoric. As he states in the prologue--this book is for those who ask the greatest question: "Why am I here?" The reason why Alinsky must write this book is because the atheists have thrown out the purpose of life, which all end in Jesus Christ.

Christians don't need a mortal handbook to try to help
عمران ابن مصر
Feb 22, 2018 rated it really liked it
Shelves: عادات
يطلق مفهوم الراديكالية على اتجاه في الفلسفة الانجليزية2 الذي يمثله بنتام ومل وينادي باللبيرالية والفردانية والديمقراطية التمثيلية وحق النساء في التصويت ولكن يعني هذا الاتجاه في فرنسا تيارا سياسيا جمهوريا يمثله ألان3 ويجمع بين اللائكية والتحررية، ومن حيث المبدأ يذهب الفيلسوف الراديكالي إلى حيث الجذور من الأشياء ويطلب التغيير بصورة ملموسة وفعلية بدل البقاء في المظاهر والسطوح ويتبنى استراتيجية التجذير ويبلور عملية التجديد بدل سياسة الهدم والتدمير والتخريب.
لقد استعمل الشك عند رونيه ديكارت بصيغة راد
Gordon Hilgers
Apr 17, 2015 rated it really liked it
All the right wing hullabaloo over Saul Alinsky's "Rules For Radicaals", published in 1971, is what made me decide to read this--horrors!--book about community organizing. Since I have been involved in community organizing before, it only seemed logical to see if I could find some of the things I learned on the fly in Alinsky's book. And you know what? I did. Accident and necessity sometimes become crossing points where you act before you develop a rationale, and I remember interviewing a Dallas ...more
Been hearing horrors about this book from the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy since at least last millennium. Since Hilary Clinton’s association with Saul Alinksy was raised by our Secretary of Housing and Urban Development at the Republican National Convention as one of the reasons we should Fear Her, I decided I should read it.

It’s a short little book recounting some of the things a particularly effective community organizer learned in his decades of trying to make America live up to the true mean
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
Somewhat dated but a must read for radicals 2 16 Nov 17, 2012 10:36AM  
War on the Middle Class 3 41 Mar 04, 2012 02:44PM  
  • Organizing for Social Change: Midwest Academy Manual for Activists
  • Poor People's Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail
  • The Activist's Handbook: A Primer
  • Stir It Up: Lessons in Community Organizing and Advocacy
  • The Revolution Will Not Be Funded: Beyond the Non-Profit Industrial Complex
  • Conscience Of A Liberal: Reclaiming The Compassionate Agenda
  • Going Public: An Organizer's Guide to Citizen Action
  • No More Prisons: Urban Life, Home-Schooling, Hip-Hop Leadership, the Cool Rich Kids Movement, a Hitchhiker's Guide to Community Organzing, and Why Philanthropy is the Greatest Art Form of the 21st Century!
  • Power and Struggle
  • Building Powerful Community Organizations: A Personal Guide to Creating Groups that Can Solve Problems and Change the World
  • Better Together: Restoring the American Community
  • Don't Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate: The Essential Guide for Progressives
  • The Global Activists' Manual: Acting Locally to Transform the World
  • Direct Action: An Ethnography
  • We Are Everywhere: The Irresistible Rise of Global Anti-Capitalism
  • Moyers on Democracy
  • The Radical Reader: A Documentary History of the American Radical Tradition
  • Which Side Are You On?: Trying to Be for Labor When It's Flat on Its Back
Saul David Alinsky was an American community organizer and writer. He is generally considered to be the founder of modern community organizing. His organizing skills were focused on improving the living conditions of poor communities across North America.
“Curiosity and irreverence go together. Curiosity cannot exist without the other. Curiosity asks, "Is this true?" "Just because this has always been the way, is the best or right way of life, the best or right religion, political or economic value, morality?" To the questioner, nothing is sacred. He detests dogma, defies any finite definition of morality, rebels against any repression of a free, open search of ideas no matter where they may lead. He is challenging, insulting, agitating, discrediting. He stirs unrest.” 74 likes
“A word about my personal philosophy. It is anchored in optimism. It must be, for optimism brings with it hope, a future with a purpose, and therefore, a will to fight for a better world. Without this optimism, there is no reason to carry on. If we think of the struggle as aclimb up a mountain, then we must visualize a mountain with no top. We see a top, but when we finall yreach it, the overcast rises and we find ourselves merely on a bluff. The mountain continues on up. Now we see the "real" top ahead of us, and strive for it, only to find we've reached another bluff, the top still above us. And so it goes on, interminably.
Knowing that the mountain has no top, that it is a perpetual quest from plateau to plateau, the question arises, "Why the struggle, the conflict, the heartbreak, the danger, the sacrifice. Why the constant climb?" Our answer is the same as that which a real mountain climber gives when he is asked why he does what he does. "Because it's there." Because life is there ahead of you and either one tests oneself in its challenges or huddles in the valleys of a dreamless day-to-day existence whose only purpose is the preservation of a illusory security and safety. The latter is what the vast majority of people choose to do, fearing the adventure into the known. Paradocically, they give up the dream of what may lie ahead on the heighs of tomorrow for a perpetual nightmare - an endless succession of days fearing the loss of a tenuous security.”
More quotes…