Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Meaning of Meaning” as Want to Read:
The Meaning of Meaning
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Meaning of Meaning

3.84  ·  Rating details ·  63 ratings  ·  7 reviews
Language is the most important of all the instruments of civilization. This is the premise of a work whose significance to the study of language, literature, and philosophy has remained undiminished since its original publication in 1923. New Introduction by Umberto Eco; Indices.
Paperback, 396 pages
Published June 26th 1989 by Mariner Books (first published 1923)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
3.84  · 
Rating details
 ·  63 ratings  ·  7 reviews


Filter
 | 
Sort order
Leon M
Sep 18, 2010 rated it really liked it
Books about philosophy of language always make my head go round in circles. This one did, too. But if you take the time to read and re-read the important bits, you gain an understanding of the importance of the subject and maybe even an understanding of the "Meaning of Meaning" itself.

One of the main points the book makes is the prevalence of the "proper meaning superstition" and the fact that there can be no serious discussion of the philosophy of language prior to its abolition. The proper mea
...more
Alex Lee
Feb 07, 2015 rated it it was ok
In many ways, this is a very unsatisfying book. Since it is written in the early 20th century, coming with this book is a reading of structuralism that is not quite formed, but definitely in full swing. The title is apt, but also guaranteed to be a let down, because if anything the book doesn't come close to providing any meaning of meaning, although that is what it is about.

As considered, the text was revolutionary for its time. You can see that the two rhetoricians went far in their attempt to
...more
Van
Nov 09, 2008 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: nonfiction
Well, there are some real gems in this book. Sometimes I can rate a book by how much I write on the margins of the book. I write a lot in the margins of this book. Sometimes it isn't really from the ideas in the book as much as they provoke my thinking about my ideas. I also like the historical aspect of reading a book that is about 90 years old and those (at that time) new authors he quotes and I also like his love (and my love) of footnotes. And, this said, the writing style was often tough fo ...more
Anna Bosman
Jan 09, 2012 rated it it was ok
Paged through rather than read, and since I can't see myself finishing it in either near or distant future, I'd rather remove it from the to-read list where the book clearly doesn't belong. It proved too abstract for my liking and happened to catch me in precisely that transition state when you become more aware of the strangeness and intrigue of the material world, giving up the in-depth studies of its bony abstract reflections in the verbal mirrors made by fellow human beings. Rationalisation ...more
Mary
Jun 17, 2011 rated it liked it
Shelves: field-exam, rhetoric
Okay. Less fun than Philosophy of Rhetoric was, and less immediately applicable to rhetoric. Darn structuralists--seems like I'm becoming quite well-read in them quite inadvertently. There are maybe 3 or 4 chapters that are fulfilling, and, admittedly, it took a little cross-research to understand what they were shooting for. On the plus side, I got to contribute to Wikipedia on this one. Can I count that as a publication?
Jeffry Larson
Supplement II reinforced my nominalism.
WndyJW
rated it liked it
Feb 13, 2016
Garrick
rated it really liked it
Nov 07, 2007
Stacey Douglas
rated it liked it
Apr 30, 2012
Sayedmk
rated it it was amazing
Feb 10, 2017
Spencer
rated it liked it
Mar 24, 2008
Mohammed Hamad
rated it it was ok
May 31, 2018
Taufik Nur Shidiq
rated it liked it
Jun 16, 2016
Roy Mullins
rated it really liked it
Dec 04, 2014
Alex
rated it it was amazing
Nov 01, 2017
Dan Clore
rated it really liked it
Oct 20, 2016
Qendrim
rated it it was ok
Dec 08, 2013
ماجد العثماني
rated it it was amazing
Jan 11, 2019
John
rated it really liked it
Feb 08, 2015
Ranna Wijaya
rated it it was amazing
Oct 06, 2014
Jessica
rated it really liked it
Nov 15, 2016
Think
rated it it was amazing
Apr 09, 2010
Julius Uy
rated it it was amazing
Sep 18, 2017
Aman Agarwal
rated it it was amazing
Sep 09, 2015
Phil Nichols
rated it really liked it
Jan 05, 2013
Matthew Osborn
rated it it was amazing
May 10, 2015
Tj Mclachlan
rated it really liked it
Nov 16, 2014
Kat
rated it it was amazing
Sep 02, 2018
Eric
rated it really liked it
Dec 27, 2016
« previous 1 3 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf
  • Close Calls With Nonsense: Reading New Poetry
  • The Gutenberg Elegies: The Fate of Reading in an Electronic Age
  • Principles of Literary Criticism (Routledge Classics)
  • Preface to Plato
  • Language in Literature
  • The Literary Mind: The Origins of Thought and Language
  • Twentieth Century Pleasures: Prose on Poetry
  • The Purloined Poe: Lacan, Derrida, and Psychoanalytic Reading
  • Over Her Dead Body: Death, Femininity and the Aesthetic
  • The Well Wrought Urn: Studies in the Structure of Poetry
  • The Coming of the Book: The Impact of Printing 1450-1800
  • After Babel: Aspects of Language and Translation
  • The Necessary Angel: Essays on Reality and the Imagination
  • The Sacred Wood
  • The Moral Obligation to Be Intelligent: Selected Essays of Lionel Trilling
  • Truth: A Guide
  • Theory of Prose
Charles Kay Ogden (1 June 1889 – 20 March 1957) was an English linguist, philosopher, and writer. Described as a polymath but also an eccentric and outsider, he took part in many ventures related to literature, politics, the arts and philosophy, having a broad effect particularly as an editor, translator, and activist on behalf of a reformed version of the English language. He is typically defined ...more