Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Sexual Personae: Art and Decadence from Nefertiti to Emily Dickinson” as Want to Read:
Sexual Personae: Art and Decadence from Nefertiti to Emily Dickinson
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Sexual Personae: Art and Decadence from Nefertiti to Emily Dickinson

3.94  ·  Rating details ·  2,219 ratings  ·  183 reviews
From ancient Egypt through the nineteenth century, Sexual Personae explores the provocative connections between art and pagan ritual; between Emily Dickinson and the Marquis de Sade; between Lord Byron and Elvis Presley. It ultimately challenges the cultural assumptions of both conservatives and traditional liberals. 47 photographs.
Paperback, 736 pages
Published September 10th 2001 by Yale University Press (first published 1990)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Sexual Personae, please sign up.
Popular Answered Questions
Cd0467 Short answer:
Ayn Rand draws her ideas on the Apollonian-vs-Dionysian dichotomy from Nietzsche, while Paglia draws her ideas on the same dichotomy more…more
Short answer:
Ayn Rand draws her ideas on the Apollonian-vs-Dionysian dichotomy from Nietzsche, while Paglia draws her ideas on the same dichotomy more from Jung. The two routes are similar, but there are some differences.

Long answer:
Nietzsche is the modern beginning of the Apollonian-vs-Dionysian dichotomy (though not the first to come up with the idea). To oversimplify, he basically identified two trends in human culture: The emotional (Dionysian) vs the rational (Apollonian). Nietzsche himself identified with the Dionysian/emotional side: He felt that if you are too rational, you end up getting cut off from your roots and lose your cultural and spiritual mooring.

Ayn Rand basically accepted Nietzsche's dichotomy as presented, but she differed from Nietzsche in that she herself favored the Apollonian/rational side. To her, the Dionysian/emotional side was nothing more than hedonistic self-indulgence and partying, whereas the Apollonian/rational side represented technology and progress. As a good capitalist, her sympathies were with the Apollonian/rational side. At least, that's the argument she made in her article "Apollo and Dionysus." Link: https://campus.aynrand.org/works/1969...

In the meantime, Carl Jung was developing a theory that everyone has two sides to their psychology: a male side and a female side (an animus and an anima). In dealing with these two sides of your nature, it's usually considered healthiest to recognize and embrace both sides to some extent. By comparison, if you skew too heavily to one side and attempt to ignore or repress the "opposite" side, you risk creating a situation where the repressed opposite side comes back at you in the form of nightmares and neuroses and mid-life crises.

Over time, Jung and his followers developed this Jungian male-vs-female dichotomy into "archetypes," and they tracked and analyzed these archetypes as they appeared in mythology and religion. Eventually the Dionysian/emotional side of Nietzsche's dichotomy got conflated with the female side of the Jungian dichotomy (Dionysus was a follower of the Great Mother religion), and the Apollonian/rational side got conflated with the male side. The result: Now you have an Apollonian/male-vs-Dionysian/female dichotomy.

Finally, Paglia comes in on the tail end of the Jungian thread. She is a big admirer of one of Jung's students who worked with Jungian archetypes, Erich Neumann. Paglia continues to develop the Apollonian/male-vs-Dionysian/female dichotomy. As explained in the Wikipedia article entitled "Apollonian and Dionysian": In "Sexual Personae," the Dionysian "is associated with females, wild/chaotic nature, and unconstrained sex/procreation. In contrast, the Apollonian is associated with males, clarity, celibacy and/or homosexuality, rationality/reason, and solidity, along with the goal of oriented progress." Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollon...

In fact, that's pretty much the main idea of "Sexual Personae." Similar to the way that Jung and his students tracked development of the male vs. female archetypes in myth and religion, Paglia analyzes the various cultural trends in art and literature throughout human history by showing the degree to which they skewed toward the Apollonian/male side or toward the Dionysian/female side. She also analyzes how much they tended to repress or shut out their "opposite" side, which resulted in appearances of "daemonic" influences in art: Vampires and martyrs and sadomasochism and all that fun stuff--basically the artistic equivalent of Jung's nightmares, neuroses, and mid-life crises.

Probably more than you wanted to know, but there it is, in oversimplified terms.(less)
Dylan Relatively, yeah. She says what she means, and packs her sentences well. Though if you still need to read the material she covers (which is…moreRelatively, yeah. She says what she means, and packs her sentences well. Though if you still need to read the material she covers (which is recommended) it will take you awhile to get through SP. And expect to be bombarded with appropriately dense sentences, paragraphs, etc. Her uncompromising energy definitely isn't lost in prose.(less)

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
3.94  · 
Rating details
 ·  2,219 ratings  ·  183 reviews


More filters
 | 
Sort order
Warwick
Few books have roused in me the same mixture of confusion and stimulation as this bizarre doorstop of passionate, un-PC artistic engagement. Paglia, as an iconoclastic feminist who hates feminism, might have been co-opted by the right in the way that, say, Christina Hoff Sommers was co-opted; but this fate was precluded by her conservative-repellant persona of pro-drug, porn-mad lesbianism. So, unclaimed and unwanted by any special interest groups, she relishes her position as a universal provoc ...more
Hadrian
This is a book which deserves pondering - I have settled on three stars because I'm not sure how to give it both five and one.

In this book's preface, Paglia candidly admits that her goal is to be "sensational". This is perhaps the only sentence beyond dispute in the entire book. It is a book of contradictions, even in the front cover. See the juxtapose of the regal visage of Queen Nefertiti and the concealing modesty of Emily Dickinson.

Out of her many broad Nietzschean ukases on art history, mo
...more
Eric
Aug 27, 2007 rated it really liked it
Paglia - as a friend of mine once said to her face at a signing - is a gateway drug. I got ahold of this in high school and it functioned as a syllabus for the next few years. She showed me how raunchy, perverse and gorgeously gilded Spenser can be. She turned me on to Gautier, Pater, and, above all others, to Baudelaire. I continue to return to her readings of Byron and Wilde. This book is nigh-impossible to read cover to cover. Don't try it. The prose is an unceasingly percussive hammering of ...more
Dusty
As another reviewer said Paglia is like a "gateway drug". Read her and you’re on your way down the yellow brick road of subversive decadence. Whether you agree with her or not, you will be challenged to think. Camille isn’t looking for a gaggle of cheerleaders, she looking for an intellectual bar brawl.
mark monday
Oct 30, 2010 rated it it was ok
camille paglia: so misguided! despite the sheer idiocy behind many of her theses, she is a compelling, exuberant author, very readable, and definitely brings a certain kind of gusto and an often unique viewpoint to many classic authors. her rather operatic take on emily dickinson is particularly enjoyable. if this book in any way acts as a gateway drug to classic literature, then i suppose there is something positive to it all. that said, and exciting writing style aside, her reductive view of t ...more
Andrew
OK, so her theoretical basis is absolute bullshit, combining personal bias, excessive Freudianism, and reactionary sexual politics into an obnoxious combination. However, the analyses themselves are quite wonderful. Having sat through any number of dry college lectures on the deemed classics of the Western canon, it was nice to see their dark, chthonic qualities exposed. This doesn't have the academic rigor that I was expecting, but it was a very fun read, and now I feel like going back through ...more
Erik Graff
Nov 26, 2009 rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: no one
Recommended to Erik by: Paula DeVoto
Shelves: literature
I will usually read the books I'm given and this one was from a coworker at Loyola University Chicago. I doubt if she, a believing Catholic, read it herself. She likely would have been even more offended than I was.

With the exception of overt, practiced racism and sexism, I believe I'm hard to offend, but Paglia's two-faced book did it. On the one hand, she tries to be sexy, treating the literary canon as resting on a seething bed of academically neglected eroticism. On the other hand, she write
...more
Stephen Bird
Mar 21, 2010 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
This book is one of my all-time favorites and my favorite of Paglia's. I prefer Paglia the "academic" as opposed to the "media whore" (i.e. as she has expressed herself in her column for Salon.com) as I am at least 50% in disagreement with her political / geopolitical and often right-leaning Libertarian point of view. In "Sexual Personae" she presents herself in full-on scholarly mode, in a way that she has not, unfortunately, repeated since this work was published. I have read this book at leas ...more
Myridian
Mar 22, 2008 rated it did not like it
This book was horrible. Paglia's worldview is bizarrely Freudian. Paglia writes only the loosest and most unsatisfactory of evidence for any of her assertions. She ignores the lack of evidence for the majority of psychodynamic theory in general and for the "family romance" in particular. When you ignore empirical evidence all you have left is what resonates for you personally, which Freudian theory does not. Though she even picks through psychodynamic theory. The book makes me want to shake her. ...more
Christy
Dec 02, 2016 rated it really liked it
"Shock jock" of academia and belligerence more than a groundbreaking new theoretical synthesis of sex and gender, and about 30 years after a similar radical-feminist sexuality was propounded by several others. I did have a chill of excitement when I read this, though, back in the day... As others have noted, hard to tell if more brilliant or crazy (not knocking either - whatever gets you through the night.)

For my money, Donna Haraway's book that came out the same year said much more about nature
...more
ALLEN
Oct 21, 2018 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
"Once you get into it, it isn't as hard as it looks" and "It changed my life" are phrases we often invoke to help stress the importance of important books we'd like to see more people read. Well, in the case of Camille Paglia's SEXUAL PERSONAE, first published in 1990, those phrases are no mere cliches -- they matter, and this book matters.

It is important to understand that Paglia earned her academic "chops" teaching students at an art academy. She was no mere Ivy League theorist, with analysis
...more
James
An incomparable, unique, and often ridiculous study of sexuality and literature. I took my time reading this as there is a huge amount of information to absorb, and Paglia's style (made up of brief but incredibly pungent sentences) is wearying, although I don't mean that as a criticism. In the contrary, it gives the reader all the more reason to savor this radically different take on Emily Dickinson, The Fearie Queen, Shakespeare, Whitman, and so many more. One needn't agree with all or even mos ...more
Anne
Jul 23, 2008 rated it really liked it
Ah, Camille Paglia. What can I say that hasn't already been said? This book is well-written and absorbing, but if you are a female with half a backbone at all, you will want to rip it into pieces, piss on it, then set it on fire (which I guess won't be very effective if you just pissed on it). Paglia's main thesis is that men are the movers and shakers, and women are slothful baby producers. Civilation wouldn't exist without men because women have no drive to do anything except sit around and wa ...more
Tom
Sep 09, 2011 rated it it was amazing
A bit of an academic show-off, and later, a celebrity-hound, with some really f*cked-up ideas about the importance of Madonna, Paglia penned her most important (and best-written) book here. Won't say it changed my life, but I couldn't stop talking about for weeks after I finished it. Her take on Emily Dickinson as a super-sadist is dead on the money. This will be read long after everyone has forgotten the pseudo-feminist junk that was popular when this book debuted. You know who I'm talking abou ...more
Matt


She inadvertantly turned me into the psychopath reader I am today, but doing a line by line interpretation of "Stairway To Heaven" in Guitar World about 10 years ago. This close reading of a classic, unavoidable song blew me right away and impressed me, showing me that brainy reading is something even I could do.

There's a lot of repetiton here, I mean how many times can you hear about the gilded masochistic whatever in repressive societal repressiveness until you get sick and tired?

Nonetheless,
...more
A.K.
A clearly insane person. A clearly fierce intellect. (It is clear that her intellect is fierce; not that the fierceness possesses great clarity.) I won't be putting this down unless it's to throw it in front of an oncoming train and/or soak it with my sad, sad, non-transcendent womanly piss.

---

Cut to 3/4 of the way through. Bored now. Nice troll, tho.
Mary
Nov 22, 2009 rated it liked it
Camille Paglia's completely obnoxious and over-the-line and I only agree with her about 1/4 of the time. But when I do, I feel like she's slit open the deepest rivers of impassioned, tangled instincts I have about intellectual women and the utter foolishness of much of the feminist movement - and the dangers of being a woman who lives too far above the waist. Paglia nails it on these topics. Even tho' I'm sure if I ever sat next to her at a dinner party I'd end up wanting to slap her.
Izzy Rey
Jan 14, 2012 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: brilliant
Do not get me wrong, I do not buy into all of her theories. Some sound like utter BS, but she is SO fun to read and argue with (in your head). What makes me love this book is the way she categorizes authors and works, and all the little details she points out. How some male authors are femenine in their writing and some females are masculine. Also, this is the book that lead me to works I may have never read. I did not go to school to become an english professor and am not required to have more ...more
Marley
Feb 03, 2011 rated it it was amazing
I don't even know where to begin with this, so I won't. Oddly, Sexual Personae explained my life to me. I was shocked. What does any of this have to do with me, but it did. Paglia blew me away with her non-namby-pamby feminism that upset all the liberals.
Douglas Wilson
May 29, 2009 rated it liked it
She's a lunatic and a pagan, but very helpful.
Alexander
Jun 14, 2014 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
The most intriguing book I’ve read in years—the feelings elicited are similar to when I first picked up Beyond Good and Evil. A libidinous romp through Western art that implacably presses its premise of a ubiquitous underlying pornography, Paglia’s “guerrilla scholarship” (quoth my edition’s blurb) reads like a death metal percussionist at the height of his exalted solo, or Bloom at his most virile and grandiose. Sexual Personae possess an infectious, bombastic panache I’ve yet to see in any aca ...more
Veronica
Nov 29, 2018 rated it liked it
I read this book a while ago, counting in book-time (As in 6 or 7 books ago—temporally, not too long ago).

I can't articulate my thoughts on this titan of a book as of now. I know I loved reading it as well as I know that I disagreed with most of its primary assertions.

Also,
I have a strange desire to physically fight Camille Paglia.

I'm a waif, so I definitely would not hurt her. She simply seems like she would be a fun person to wrestle.

(Paglia in a video: "I'm in an in-your-face feminist", dur
...more
Szplug
Feb 25, 2011 marked it as intermittently-reading  ·  review of another edition
Mint condition for ninety-nine cents—an unbeatable deal, even with the Canuck dollar scorching along at record breaking levels (thanks stuffy Big Six Banks and innate Canadian caution!)—and an author I've not a lot of experience with. I've heard lots about Paglia, split pretty evenly into camps that, whether they love or loathe her, seem to share the opinion that a little bit of Camille goes a long way. The recent columns of hers that I've stumbled across generally contain a dram of counter-intu ...more
Tara
Jan 08, 2008 rated it it was amazing
Recommends it for: lit crit., culture studies, gender studies
So far, I'm loving this book! I read a little bit of it each evening so that I can at least attempt to really digest her argument. Some of the things she says are a little scary. But, like Angela Carter's work, Paglia definitely wants to create an emotional response in her readers and she does this brilliantly. I think the elicitation of emotional response - whether in agreement or anger - forces us to examine standard cultural beliefs and grants an opportunity for different ways of seeing. Pagl ...more
Natalie
I stopped reading after 150 pages of unsupported theory, grad-school hackery, over-reliance on the myths of the Greek pantheon to "explain" art and gender behavior, and severe overuse of the word "chthonian." Paglia's not and never is boring, but after I found myself rolling my eyes and flipping ahead to see if I was going to get a break from the above-mentioned complaints, I figured I wasn't going to make it through the remaining 600 pages.
Mawr
Apr 11, 2008 rated it it was amazing
This book single-handedly resurrected my love of literature, philosophy and history. What is especially good about it is its preference for the enduring truths of human experience over faddish post-modernism.
Johnny D
Jan 30, 2009 rated it it was amazing
Sexual Personae was a bombshell of guerilla scholarship released in the 1990s, and it made its author - Camille Paglia - a star and media darling during that time. The scope of the book is breathtaking. Paglia begins by summarizing Freud's theory on the invention of religion in pre-history, then goes on to track the human agon of art v. nature from the time of the ancient Egyptians to the nineteen hundreds.

Paglia sees two archetypal forces at work in literature and art: The Appolonian (concerned
...more
Dan
Mar 06, 2008 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Harold Bloom’s influence on Paglia is clear: most of her commentary is on poets associated with the Romantic tradition, and her analytic approach is a mixture of Friedrich Nietzsche and Sigmund Freud. Her chapter on Emily Dickinson in particular changed the way I read that poet.
Bryn
Jan 28, 2008 rated it it was ok
Shelves: gay-gay-gay
"Come on guys, old dead white guys aren't so bad."
Charles Rouse
Sep 22, 2014 rated it really liked it
One of the reviewers said that they gave her three stars because they didn't know how to give her both five stars and one star. That kind of gives you an indication of people's reaction to Paglia. Paglia's ideas are inflammatory, odd, brilliant, sometimes, in my opinion, just wrong. I note that her ideas on society are basically radically libertarian. Since I have decided that my views are radically libertarian, I'm interested, but I don't think that's my crowning virtue, in fact I'm troubled th ...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Readers also enjoyed

  • David Bomberg
  • In Bluebeard's Castle: Some Notes Towards the Redefinition of Culture
  • Beyond the Brillo Box: The Visual Arts in Post-Historical Perspective
  • Writers at Work: The Paris Review Interviews, First Series
  • All The Emperor's Horses
  • Nowhere to Run: The Story of Soul Music
  • A Grave for a Dolphin
  • Octobriana and the Russian Underground
  • The Western Canon: The Books and School of the Ages
  • The Sound of the City: The Rise of Rock and Roll
  • Awopbopaloobop Alopbamboom: The Golden Age of Rock
  • Tales of Beatnik Glory
  • The Life And Times Of Little Richard
  • Modernism: The Lure of Heresy from Baudelaire to Beckett and Beyond
  • Strange People
  • Teenage: The Creation of Youth Culture
  • Interviews with Francis Bacon
  • What Ever Happened to Modernism?
See similar books…
594 followers
Camille Anna Paglia is an American social critic, author and teacher. Her book, Sexual Personae: Art and Decadence from Nefertiti to Emily Dickinson, published in 1990, became a bestseller. She is a professor of humanities and media studies at the University of the Arts in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

She has been variously called the "feminist that other feminists love to hate," a "post-feminist fe
...more
“Men chase by night those they will not greet by day.” 61 likes
“Eroticism is mystique; that is, the aura of emotion and imagination around sex. It cannot be 'fixed' by codes of social or moral convenience, whether from the political left or right. For nature's fascism is greater than that of any society. There is a daemonic instability in sexual relations that we may have to accept.” 25 likes
More quotes…