Is Message Not Received a Departure?
Over the last few weeks, I’ve moved from editing mode to media-whore/marketing mode. This is very much the hard part about books. Truth be told, I prefer the former to the latter, but the fleas come with the dog.
As I recently tweeted:
#Writing is easy. #Marketing is hard.
— Phil Simon (@philsimon) January 31, 2015
Some of my friends and media contacts are a bit surprised about the subject of Message Not Received. Questions have included:
Why such a departure?
Why write a book about business communication as opposed to, say, the Internet of Things?
Wouldn’t that make more sense?
After all, aren’t you a tech and data guy?
These are all valid queries. In fact, I spoke with a publisher about a writing a book on the Internet of Things but the passion wasn’t there. Sure, it’s cool, but it’s a ways off and most organizations are still struggling with many technologies and concepts, some of which are no longer brand-spankin’-new.
Why write this book?
To paraphrase the inimitable Krusty the Clown, let me be blunt:
Organizations usually squander the massive opportunities that data and technology provide because their employees can’t effectively communicate. Period.
I can’t state it any simpler than that.
Simon Says
When viewed against that lens, Message Not Received is anything but a departure from my previous work. Effective communication is usually a necessary—but not sufficient—condition for success these days. Rare is the company that succeeds in spite of itself.
Feedback
What say you?
The post Is Message Not Received a Departure? appeared first on Phil Simon.


