date
newest »
newest »
Right, he expresses this better than almost anyone. One interesting thing, which he doesn't say, is that many Indie books are not necessarily books that were deemed "unpublishable" in the "eyes" of some editor. In many cases, Indie writers want to write their books without even worrying about what that editor is going to think, and never even send it in to a traditional publisher. Now, it may do so well, review-wise or sales-wise, that the editor will come calling.
Very true. I think you and I both come from an iconoclastic place where were weren't concerned about sales or "audience." We weren't looking for a market. We were attempting to write a book that captures our own vision.
You're right. It was extremely liberating to know that when I was finished writing my book, I would just publish it. I didn't need to think about whether putting 1st century Chinese emperor Wang Mang and Oscar Wilde into a science fiction Western novel would make it seem less saleable to a guy in a midtown publishing house. I could do it just because I thought it would be good. This doesn't mean if an editor comes calling that I won't listen, just that the editor's approval is no longer something that I even needed to think about.



One of the biggest myths still prevalent in publishing is that if a book is self-published, it wasn’t good enough to be put out by a “real” publisher. Sometimes, that’s exactly the case. Sometimes the book in question is awkward, the prose is clumsy, the plot is convoluted or non-existent. But sometimes a book simply doesn’t fit into how the publisher perceives the marketplace. In their eyes, it’s unpublishable, but that doesn’t mean it’s a bad book. If it’s ever going to reach readers, the writer has to publish it and promote it himself.
I'd like to get him a copy of my book now!