Can Neural Networks Really Do Any Kind of Reasoning?

A new research paper from McMaster University and the Vector Institute takes a bold step toward answering one of the biggest open questions in AI: What are the true limits of neural network reasoning?

The paper, titled “Quantifying The Limits of AI Reasoning: Systematic Neural Network Representations of Algorithms”, suggests something striking: any reasoning process that can be expressed as an algorithm can also be emulated by a neural network.

Why This Matters

When we talk about AI models like GPT-4 or Claude, we often say they’re good at “reasoning.” But what does that actually mean? Traditionally, researchers thought about neural networks as function approximators—they’re very good at mimicking inputs and outputs without necessarily understanding the structure of the problem. This is the basis of the famous “universal approximation theorem.”

But this new study reframes things. Instead of only thinking of neural networks as approximators, the researchers ask: Can neural networks replicate the step-by-step reasoning of algorithms? Their answer: yes, in principle, they can.

How They Did It

The researchers introduce a meta-algorithm that can convert essentially any computational circuit (think of it like the flow of logic gates or steps in an algorithm) into a feedforward neural network. Each logic gate or computational step—whether it’s arithmetic, logic, or dynamic programming—is replaced with a small neural module built from ReLU neurons (a common building block in deep learning).

Key points:

Exact Emulation: On a digital computer, their construction can exactly replicate the algorithm—no rounding or approximation needed.Tradeoff: The neural network ends up larger in size, but it mirrors the structure of the original algorithm.Applications: They show this approach works for things like shortest-path algorithms on graphs, simulating Turing machines, and even randomized Boolean circuits.Why This Is Different From Past Results

Earlier “universal approximation” results said that neural networks can approximate any function to a certain accuracy. But this new work goes further—it shows that neural networks can actually emulate the chain-of-thought of algorithms themselves.

In other words, it’s not just about matching inputs to outputs. Neural networks can, in principle, follow the same reasoning steps as a computer algorithm.

What This Could Mean for AIStronger Theoretical Foundations: It provides a concrete mathematical reason why large language models and other deep learning systems seem capable of reasoning.Interpretability: If a neural network is built to mirror an algorithm’s structure, its “thought process” could be easier to trace.Bridging AI and Logic: This could help unify two traditions in AI research—statistical pattern recognition and symbolic reasoning.The Catch

While the theory shows that neural networks can do this, the size of the networks needed can be enormous. For some algorithms, the required network might be far too large to ever train in practice. So, this isn’t about building such networks today—it’s about proving what’s possible in principle.

Final Thoughts

This research suggests that neural networks may not just be powerful approximators—they might be capable of representing any kind of reasoning we can write down as an algorithm. That’s a big deal, because it pushes the boundaries of what we think AI systems could eventually achieve.

The next frontier? Extending these ideas to more complex forms of reasoning, like those found in geometric deep learning or infinite-dimensional spaces.

In short: This paper strengthens the case that AI models aren’t just statistical parrots—they may, in principle, be capable of all algorithmic reasoning. The challenge now is figuring out how to make this practical!

The post Can Neural Networks Really Do Any Kind of Reasoning? appeared first on Jacob Robinson.