DOCUMENTATION AND ADDITIONAL READING PART 1 (0:0 - 11:39):
──────────────────
The Flawed Legal Logic in Yesterday’s Supreme Court Decision on LGBTQ and Discrimination
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia
PART 2 (11:40 - 20:59):
──────────────────
What Is the Proper Role of the Supreme Court? Hint: It’s Not What It Did Yesterday — Legislate
CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW (JUSTICE NEIL M. GORSUCH)
Of Lions and Bears, Judges and Legislators, and the Legacy of Justice Scalia
PART 3 (20:60 - 25:58):
──────────────────
Textualism? Originalism? Strict Constructionism? The Differences in the Terms Really Matter
WALL STREET JOURNAL (THE EDITORIAL BOARD)
The Supreme Court’s Textualism Test
Published on June 16, 2020 02:00