A Job That Americans Are All Too Eager to Do
That job? Voter fraud.
In three states where major elections are within the margin of fraud, ballot boxes are miraculously appearing in solid Democratic counties after Republicans appeared victorious.
This is a time-honored tactic. It’s how “Landslide Lyndon” Johnson obtained his nickname. After it appeared that LBJ had lost a Senate primary to Coke Stevenson, several ballot boxes containing 20,000 votes miraculously appeared, giving Johnson victory by an 87 vote margin.
So spare me chin pulling–and hysteria–about foreign interference in American elections. American interference in American elections is a far greater threat to democracy. And it’s a job Americans have been doing–and doing all too well–since the beginning of the Republic.
Reading about the shenanigans in Florida, Arizona, and Georgia spurred me to Google “Landslide Lyndon” to refresh my memory about his 1948 “victory.” The first several hits were from MSM (NYT, WaPo) reviews of Robert Caro’s biography of Johnson that documented the fraud. Given how Johnson had been savaged by the left during Vietnam, it was astounding to see the lengths to which mainline liberal/leftist publications went to defend Johnson and criticize Caro. It was like T-cells attacking a foreign body. Yes, LBJ was a bastard–but he’s our (Democratic) bastard!
This is particularly revealing given the incredible research that Caro had done. But he attacked one of the tribe, so he must be destroyed.
I remember vividly reading this Caro volume. I finished about half of it, and had to put it down. Johnson was such a loathsome human being–to put it charitably–it was nauseating to read the details. I cannot think of one redeeming quality in the man. Not a single one.
I was already pretty cynical about American politics by that time. Caro’s Means of Ascent turned me into a die-hard cynic. It was a perfect illustration of Hayek’s principle: the worst always get on top.
What is going on in the aftermath of the 2018 midterms is putting an exclamation point to that cynicism. (Not that there were no reinforcing events in the intervening years–far from it.) And we should not be surprised. As government has grown in scope and power, the stakes of winning elections have grown commensurately. If fraud paid in 1948 (or 1960), it pays far more now.
Indeed, I suspect that the obsession with idiotic Facebook posts or tweets allegedly posted by Russians is driven by the fact it is a very convenient distraction from far more real–and far more enduring–threats to the integrity of American elections. Homegrown threats. But if you read the MSM, Russian meddling is a real and important threat, but even entertaining the possibility that American elections are rife with domestic fraud is to advance a conspiracy theory. This is another illustration of their incomparable ability to invert reality.
Craig Pirrong's Blog
- Craig Pirrong's profile
- 2 followers

