All About Nothing.
How can a word such as nothing be so troublesome? This is especially true when put in context of the Universe.
From the time man first pondered his position in existence and looked up to the clear dark sky he gazed at twinkling lights scattered across the void of nothing. Little did he know that void later would be called Aether and in recent times counts for ninety five percent of a dark invisible part of the Universe. It is thought to have some connection to the accelerating motion of the inflationary Universe. If there is no change to the rate of the Universe’s inflation all visible galaxies will exceed the speed of light and even lose observational capability with each other.
So clearly nothing is something within the boundaries of this Universe but what is outside the time and matter of the Universe. Is that really nothing? If it was a something would it not have an affect on the inflation of the Universe?
What of the multi Universes? Are they separated by an endless void of nothing? What would stop them colliding with each other? If they were different dimensions and physical laws could they co-exist. Something like galaxies that merge as the Milky Way and Andromeda are destined to do so in the future.
What came first, nothing or something? Apparently they are two sides of the same coin.
It is important to refer to Professor Laurence Maxwell Krauss’ video called A Universe from Nothing. He is a charming and energetic chap although his self modesty is a little disconcerting as he frequently proclaims he can be wrong. Yet he states this is a good thing, as this is the way science can progress in finding the truth of reality.
In a concise form the physical properties of the Universe are such that spontaneously from absolute nothing our Universe could pop into existence.
The adage you can not get something from nothing when applied to the Universe means the total Mass and Energy must have a value of nothing, which it has, therefore the Universe is in a different form of nothing.
So could it be that nothing has different forms, so does that make nothing into something?
A good definition of nothing is, nothing is the absence of something.
So a simple question, would unstable positive or negative variation fields in Quantum Physics, alter a nothing into a something?
It is undeniable that nothing is in itself something when put into a scientific context. Terms can be extremely influential and meaningful depending on what basis they are used. Science and the progression that it has in our consciousness is astounding because from nothing something superb can grow and even in a most time relevant recognition, intriguing developments can mean that life may not ever be the same again.
From the time man first pondered his position in existence and looked up to the clear dark sky he gazed at twinkling lights scattered across the void of nothing. Little did he know that void later would be called Aether and in recent times counts for ninety five percent of a dark invisible part of the Universe. It is thought to have some connection to the accelerating motion of the inflationary Universe. If there is no change to the rate of the Universe’s inflation all visible galaxies will exceed the speed of light and even lose observational capability with each other.
So clearly nothing is something within the boundaries of this Universe but what is outside the time and matter of the Universe. Is that really nothing? If it was a something would it not have an affect on the inflation of the Universe?
What of the multi Universes? Are they separated by an endless void of nothing? What would stop them colliding with each other? If they were different dimensions and physical laws could they co-exist. Something like galaxies that merge as the Milky Way and Andromeda are destined to do so in the future.
What came first, nothing or something? Apparently they are two sides of the same coin.
It is important to refer to Professor Laurence Maxwell Krauss’ video called A Universe from Nothing. He is a charming and energetic chap although his self modesty is a little disconcerting as he frequently proclaims he can be wrong. Yet he states this is a good thing, as this is the way science can progress in finding the truth of reality.
In a concise form the physical properties of the Universe are such that spontaneously from absolute nothing our Universe could pop into existence.
The adage you can not get something from nothing when applied to the Universe means the total Mass and Energy must have a value of nothing, which it has, therefore the Universe is in a different form of nothing.
So could it be that nothing has different forms, so does that make nothing into something?
A good definition of nothing is, nothing is the absence of something.
So a simple question, would unstable positive or negative variation fields in Quantum Physics, alter a nothing into a something?
It is undeniable that nothing is in itself something when put into a scientific context. Terms can be extremely influential and meaningful depending on what basis they are used. Science and the progression that it has in our consciousness is astounding because from nothing something superb can grow and even in a most time relevant recognition, intriguing developments can mean that life may not ever be the same again.
No comments have been added yet.
