,
Daniella Martin

Daniella Martin’s Followers (22)

member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
Mimi
224 books | 43 friends

Allison
1,493 books | 46 friends

Paula
546 books | 49 friends

Leila
329 books | 49 friends

Kristin
4,041 books | 105 friends

Kathleen
746 books | 77 friends

Katie B...
270 books | 56 friends

Zenith
873 books | 77 friends

More friends…

Daniella Martin

Goodreads Author


Born
The United States
Website

Twitter

Member Since
October 2013


DANIELLA MARTIN is a certified entomophagist, or bug-eating expert. She has been featured in the Huffington Post, The New Yorker, the Wall Streeet Journal, SF Weekly, and AOL News. www.girlmeetsbug.com ...more

Average rating: 3.87 · 487 ratings · 121 reviews · 1 distinct workSimilar authors
Edible: An Adventure into t...

3.87 avg rating — 487 ratings — published 2014 — 8 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating

* Note: these are all the books on Goodreads for this author. To add more, click here.

Vampires in the L...
Daniella Martin is currently reading
by Karen Russell (Goodreads Author)
bookshelves: currently-reading
Rate this book
Clear rating

 
The Metamorphosis
Daniella Martin is currently reading
bookshelves: currently-reading
Rate this book
Clear rating

 
Quotes by Daniella Martin  (?)
Quotes are added by the Goodreads community and are not verified by Goodreads. (Learn more)

“So where does one begin if one wants to eat something as unusual and traditionally reviled as bugs?”
Daniella Martin, Edible: An Adventure into the World of Eating Insects and the Last Great Hope to Save the Planet

Topics Mentioning This Author

topics posts views last activity  
2023 Reading Chal...: #readwomen2014 - 2014 855 607 Dec 31, 2014 08:04PM  
“What do you think science is? There's nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. Which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?”
Steven Novella




Comments (showing 1-1)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Blake

Blake Hi Daniella! I can't believe you're an author! What a fabulous looking book you have written!


back to top