John Reizer's Blog, page 341

While US Citizens Are Hypnotized by Media Coverage of Race Riots, The Vaccine is being Prepared

[image error]

As long as for-profit drug companies remain in existence, the intellectual properties of organized medicine (human and animal diseases) will never disappear.

– Dr. Reizer

The Homecoming Novel is Not My Attempt to Foretell Earth’s Future

[image error]

By Dr. John Reizer

For the visitors who have regularly frequented NoFakeNews during the past eight years, you are familiar with the fact that I write about many subjects that are rarely discussed in the mainstream media. More recently, my writings have focused primarily on the Covid-19 fakery being executed by the controlling policymakers of our planet.

My recent article that discussed other psyops that have been rolled out for the general population by the powers that be (AI being able to match wits with human intelligence, the fake moon landings, and the nuclear weapons hoax) has stirred up plenty of interest and commentary from readers.

Since the Covid-19 fairytale was unleashed on the world, the website traffic here has increased dramatically. It’s still a relatively low volume of visitors coming here as compared to many more prominent and well-known alternative media domains. Still, NoFakeNews continues to expand its readership every day. And for that fact, I am grateful. I want people to become more educated about the world.

I receive plenty of emails from readers that are generated through the website’s contact portal. I try my best to answer all of them. In many instances, visitors don’t want to leave a public message on the comment boards, and so they ask me a question via email. Not a problem, I understand people’s concern and their desire to maintain privacy. That’s why I created the contact portal in the first place.

As many of you know, I write sci-fi stories and shamelessly plug the novels on this website in an attempt to get visitors to purchase them. The royalties I earn from book sales are used to offset the maintenance fees associated with operating NoFakeNews.

I am thrilled that people are reading my novels and listening to the audiobook versions. I love to write fiction more than anything else. But I don’t want the fiction I write to bleed over into the real story content I cover on the website.

Quite a few visitors have asked me recently in emails if the Apophis meteor rumored to strike Earth in 2036 will be a real event. People are asking me if I have intentionally foretold the world about the catastrophic happening in my work of fiction, The Homecoming.

Let me make something blatantly clear; I am not a time traveler or a prophet. I have garnered no information about the future through the application of time travel.

The Homecoming is a fictional story and was written to entertain people while making them think about concepts that might affect or impact people in the real world. I encourage people to check out the novel, it’s a quick read and will make you scratch your head, but I am not referencing Apophis in the fictional plot of my story.

If you want to read more about the creation of my novel, The Homecoming, readers can access the interview I gave earlier this year at this link.

Thanks for reading my stories and, more importantly, thanks for visiting NoFakeNews and contributing to the different discussions concerning the published posts.

Armed officers with no insignias, badges or name tags “guarding” protest in Washington D.C.

By Dr. John Reizer

This story is something that all Americans should take notice of and continue to monitor in the future. I find it hard to believe that American servicemen and women would be willing to plunge vaccines into the arms of US citizens. Still, private government contractors or foreign military personnel might be a different story—no need to panic or blow it out of proportion at this time.

The government likely wanted to distance itself from any altercations potentially taking place between demonstrators and US military people. The government undoubtedly contracted the work out to private companies for this reason.

by Peter Penn

Journalist Alejandro Alvarez of WTOP news in Washington D.C. has been covering the protests in our nation’s capitol.  On June 3, he noticed that many of the security officers had no visible badges, insignias or name tags on their uniforms and posted photos of this on his Twitter account.

Alvarez later posted photos of a few insignias that were seen, that indicate some of these security officers were Federal Prison Officers from Texas.  The insignias included Three Rivers, and .

The Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP), whose Director is Michael Carvajal, is an agency under the Department of Justice and is responsible for the care, custody, and control of incarcerated individuals.  The National Capital Revitalization and Self-Government Improvement Act of 1997 transferred responsibility for adult felons convicted of violating District of Columbia laws to the Bureau.

According to the Department of Justice

291 more words

My Interview with the Editor of NoFakeNews

[image error]

By Gina Flores

Guest Contributor

I used to be a fulltime contributor for the website and have written my fair share of articles over the years. Although I am no longer involved regularly, I do occasionally write a post here and there and follow with interest Dr. Reizer’s views on various world occurrences.

Recently, I had an opportunity to interview the editor of NoFakeNews about the coronavirus pandemic and wanted to publish the transcript of that conversation for the readership:

GF: It has been several months since this whole coronavirus pandemic was set loose on the world. Here in the United States, the lockdowns have created plenty of hardship for the American people. Do you see things getting better or worse through the remainder of 2020?

JR: I think that we are in for a rough stretch ahead, concerning the way daily life will be allowed to operate. I don’t believe this is something that will be exclusive to the United States. I see all countries in the world having to contend with much of the same narrative that we have been previously dealing with since January of this year. I honestly believe that the powers that be have invested a lot of planning, resources, and energy into making this world pandemic something that will affect human life for the foreseeable future.

GF: I know you have a good understanding of the overall objectives that are being sought out by certain powerful bloodlines that are running the operations behind the scenes. You have obviously written so many useful and detailed articles about these psychopaths. In a few words, what is the end game that humanity has to look forward to in the years to come?

JR: The real governing construct that rules the world is a permanent one. Unlike the managerial elites that are temporarily elected into public office in the US and other global territories and visible to the citizenry, the permanent government that creates and hands down directives to the public government are the real decision-makers. They write and drive the policies that influence and shape the world decade after decade. These people are invisible to the general public. 

The world that they envision is one where people are microchipped, tracked, vaccinated, and tightly controlled in a cashless, almost Orwellian society. They envision a world that is significantly less populated, featuring a model world citizen who is dependent on the government for safety and protection.

It’s a world where computer surveillance will be so overwhelming, and in our face, people will have little to no privacy. What we refer to as Artificial Intelligence (AI) will be present everywhere people turn. But the AI will not be run by machines like the powers that be are trying to convey in movies and Hollywood scripts. No, these computer link-ups will very much be controlled and run by human intelligence.

GF: You have written in many articles and have said during live interviews that the coronavirus is not a real virus. After looking at the enormous amount of case numbers in the world, do you still believe that the pandemic is a scripted story that continues to be acted out by the powers that be?

JR: I absolutely believe that there is no Covid-19 virus in existence. It has been my contention all along that the case numbers have been generated by test kits that are completely unreliable and give false-positive results, the misreporting of other diseases as coronavirus cases, and the misreporting of fatalities from other illnesses that have been incorrectly attributed to Covid-19.  The case numbers are what ultimately create the buzz words, outbreak, epidemic, and pandemic. Without case numbers, you don’t get to write and publish those intimidating sounding words that scare the hell out of everybody.

GF: What do you think the vaccines will accomplish for the world government?

JR: I think anytime you have a concerted effort by the world’s governments to mass-produce enough vaccines to serve the entire global population, it should send chills up and down our spines. I think the vaccines will contain medicinal properties that will weaken human immunity, significantly decrease the reproductive capabilities of people, and provide tracking technology that might also be able to modulate human physiology and immune system functions. 

GF: Do you believe that the US Government and other countries will attempt to make the Covid-19 vaccine mandatory?

JR: I believe that there will be a massive marketing campaign designed to coerce people into voluntarily taking the vaccine for the greater good of the world community. In the US, they have been trying to convince the public that mandatory vaccines are constitutionally supported, but I don’t believe they are because of one important reason. The premise that compulsory vaccines are in alignment with the constitution is based on the outdated 1905 Supreme Court ruling, Jacobson v. Massachusetts. To apply that legality to the American public, however, the law of informed consent must be violated, which states that people have the right to choose not to have a medical procedure or product that possesses any risk to the patient’s health. A physician must disclose those risks to the patient and get the individual’s written informed consent before administering the products or services. This is the law! The failure to get a patient’s written informed consent precludes the physician from delivering care.

GF: What is your advice for people that are awake and understand that the pandemic is a hoax?

JR: Stay calm, obey the law, and keep a close watch on what regulations and executive orders are actually signed into law. There is likely to be a second-wave of increased case numbers in the weeks and months ahead. This will be part of the continued fakery written into the script. The controlling powers want to keep the members of society off balance and scared until a vaccine is ready to be rolled out by the beginning of 2021.

GF: Thank you, Dr. Reizer, for taking the time to answer my questions.

JR: You are welcome, Gina!

On Demand Protesting

[image error]

By Dr. John Reizer

I am passing on information that I received this morning from a NoFakeNews visitor about the staged protests occurring across the United States. This is precisely what I have been writing about.

On-demand protesters can be hired online and the website, http://www.demandprotest.com proves that this is really happening.

[image error]

Straight from the Website!

“We have the proven expertise required to expertly shape political, corporate, or public health perceptions.”  — Demand Protest

Special thanks to Shane for finding this and passing it along to me so I could share it with everyone.

Artificial Intelligence, Aerospace Technology, And Other Fairy Tales

[image error]

By Dr. John Reizer

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a remarkably exciting subject that people like Bill Gates and Elon Musk like to claim has the potential to kill all of us (if vaccines do not take us out first).

I must be honest with readers; I am not a computer savvy guy, and my understanding of computer programming is rudimentary at best. Although I might lack the technical knowledge of computer programming, I have a keen nose when it comes to sniffing out BS about amazing technologies that are supposedly being developed or have previously been developed and are mysteriously being kept hidden under lock and key.

I recently listened to an interview with Elon Musk, and he basically said in a nutshell, that the AI programs currently in existence are learning at such a rapid speed, the programmers do not know how to stop the learning process once it begins. He also alluded to the idea that eventually AI would become so dangerously intelligent, machinery might possibly take over the world. Musk thinks AI is more dangerous than nuclear weapons. He might be completely accurate when making that claim, as I will explain later in this post.

There are others out there also claiming similar scenarios — that AI programs are going to be the ruination of humanity. Is this scenario possible? Can computers and their related programs perform cognitive functions like a human brain? Are they capable of becoming smarter than their programmers? In other words, can computer programs perform the same functions exhibited by the human mind — functions that involve neurological precision and can ultimately lead to the creation of memories, sensory perception, imagery awareness, thinking, and finally, a capacity for judgment?

I believe AI is something that has been fleshed out in our minds through the science fiction plots we encounter on Netflix and other movie platforms. The idea that there is going to be some technological apocalypse in the future is more Hollywood propaganda than anything else, in my opinion.

AI is something that Musk, Gates, and others are trying to sell as an imaginary technology of the future that needs to be feared. It is pure fantasy and anchored more in human imagination than any real-world technology.

I believe that machines with sophisticated computer programs can be “taught” to learn specific patterns and, under the supervision of its designers and within the construct of its program, might be able to consistently simulate what appears to be a rudimentary form of learning. But I must believe that the learning curve of machines will always be dependent on the intelligence of its human programmers.

Anyone who pretends computers are intelligent and will be able to learn like the human mind obviously has no idea what intelligence really is or what requirements are necessary for intelligence to be expressed through the parameters of physical, living beings.

If Bill Gates is telling me that I should fear AI, I am not worried in the least about the technology becoming a threat to humanity. Remember, this is the same con-artist who is trying to convince seven and a half billion people to take a toxic Covid-19 vaccine.

As far as Elon Musk is concerned, I have strong suspicions that he, like Gates, and many other technocrats, is a frontman for the controlling powers. The give away for me is his rise and prominence within the aerospace industry. SpaceX is being touted as the next fantastic company that has the private sector doing the fakery NASA did priorly.

SpaceX will take us back to the Moon and then onto Mars in the future. Sure, it will, just as NASA took astronauts to the Moon with Apollo over fifty years ago in spacecraft that were bolted together like garbage dumpsters. The Apollo missions magically made it through the Van Allen Belts five decades ago, and then our space agency lost the plans and schematics to those technologies.

We are supposed to believe that NASA lost the blueprints and knowledge to get through the Van Allen Belts and to the Moon. NASA claims they have had to start from scratch. That is why we have never had deep space missions again after Apollo. That is why our space agency commenced the Space Shuttle program; they wanted to figure out a way to get humans through the Thermosphere and the Van Allen Belts.

So, now Elon Musk and SpaceX are charged with doing what NASA has never done, in my opinion. Call me crazy, call me a conspiracy theorist, I am convinced that we never went to the Moon with Apollo. It is one of those amazing technologies that we allegedly mastered long ago and have not been able to replicate in quite a while.

At this point, cognitive dissonance floods the brains of most people. They cannot handle the idea that astronauts did not go to the Moon. “But why would they lie to us about going to the moon?” a good friend of mine recently asked me. I explained, “The same reason they lie to us about the existence of nuclear weapons and the coronavirus; it gives the controlling powers plenty of leverage and control over certain sovereign territories and the general population.”

When Elon Musk states that he believes AI is more dangerous than nuclear weapons, I believe he is being honest. I do not think the nukes are real. It is just another one of those technologies that were allegedly showcased long ago and never heard from again. I will not go into all the details about the nuclear weapons hoax in this post because I have an entire page dedicated to the subject on NoFakeNews.

If the US Government has given Elon Musk and SpaceX their blessing to take over and run the rocket launches that will escort American astronauts to the ISS, then he knows the profound, dark, secret that Apollo never took a man to the Moon. The US government would have had to be honest with him, letting his aerospace company know what they are ultimately up against.

If Elon Musk were not a frontman for the US Government, his company would not have been chosen to be the outfit shooting rockets off from Florida’s space coast.

AI, aerospace, nuclear, and medical technologies are not what they appear to be. It is going to be hard for people to grab hold of all this, and perhaps this is where some folks will get off the merry-go-round.

We are living in the Matrix, my friends, and once you swallow the red pill and see the world for what it is, there is absolutely no way to unsee what has been revealed.

An Open Letter to the Readers of NoFakeNews from Van Robison

[image error]

Dear Readers,

A few months ago, I stumbled upon the NoFakeNews website. I have since read many articles posted by Dr. John Reizer. I am not meaning to embarrass Dr. Reizer, but I have to say that the time and energy he expends writing articles for NoFakeNews is quite amazing.

It is very obvious to me personally that Dr. Reizer is very intelligent and has great skill in writing and expressing real truth. He is a modern-day hero of truth. Others include Dr. Judy Mikovits, Dr. Rashid Buttar, and many other outspoken human beings against the powers of darkness.

In every age of human life on Earth, there are always individuals who speak out against evil. Dr. Reizer is one such individual.

Sincerely,

Van Robison

German Report Destroys Official Coronavirus Pandemic Narrative

[image error]

By Dr. John Reizer

A very telling government report that was leaked to the public by a whistleblower in early May has the German government and mainstream media backtracking and trying to minimize damage from the expose.

Major and shocking revelations from the report are:

— The dangerousness of Covid-19 was overestimated: probably at no point did the danger posed by the new virus go beyond the normal level.

— The people who die from Corona are essentially those who would statistically die this year, because they have reached the end of their lives and their weakened bodies can no longer cope with any random everyday stress (including the approximately 150 viruses currently in circulation).

— Worldwide, within a quarter of a year, there has been no more than 250,000 deaths from Covid-19, compared to 1.5 million deaths [25,100 in Germany] during the influenza wave 2017/18.

— The danger is obviously no greater than that of many other viruses. There is no evidence that this was more than a false alarm.

— A reproach could go along these lines: During the Corona crisis the State has proved itself as one of the biggest producers of Fake News.

The information in the German report confirms the opinions I have been writing on NoFakeNews for many months. What is happening in Germany is no different than what is transpiring in the United States and the rest of the world.

The all-out attempt to create a new world order and turn the existing models of society into a third-world medical surveillance state has been losing some steam.

For the most part, the sheeple population has been compliant, wearing protective facemasks as instructed, committing economic suicide by staying at home and watching mind-control television programming that reinforces the pandemic fakery.

The believability of the false flag event is being tested with each passing day because of many factors associated with the illogical nature of the script. One genuine problem that has existed from the inception of this fraud has been centered around the world governing construct’s ability to manifest and maintain the fatality and Covid-19 case numbers, while keeping medical personnel awkwardly silent about the fact that hospital centers have been, for all intents and purposes, empty.

The other sleight of hand trickery that is beginning to become more visible to those really paying attention is the completely outrageous acts of tyranny being committed by governments worldwide. The masses are sensitive to what is taking place and have begun the gradual process of awakening. Right now, most of society is still sleepy, but they are awake and becoming more aware each day.

The few who control the many are finding it more difficult to maintain complete control concerning the outflow of information. Alternative media, although not widely embraced by the majority of society has been slowly making a dent in sharing the truth about the fictitious narrative.

The world’s population is beginning to figure out what is happening and that the coronavirus is a well-written and produced psychological operation that has been unleashed across the globe to usher in a new way of life that will minimally resemble the one we are being asked to leave behind.

Challenging the Constitutionality of Mandatory Vaccines: Where There’s A Risk There Must Be A Choice!

[image error]

Dr. John L. Reizer

Regardless of the constitutionality of specific regulations and laws that have made it into existence, members of society must occasionally reexamine, and when necessary, retest those actions in a legal theatre. This is especially true when the morality and ethicality of such actions come into question and threaten the citizens the laws have allegedly been designed to protect.

Whether something being handed down by a governing body in America is constitutionally sound or not is decided by a group of justices (human beings) who don’t always agree with one another.

Regarding the question of whether or not mandatory vaccination laws are constitutionally protected (Jacobson v. Massachusetts), it’s important to remember the legal decision that answered this question was based in part on information that was available about vaccine products 115 years ago. The ruling justices had zero scientific information to examine that spoke of the public dangers vaccine products posed to society. If such information was available at the time, there undoubtedly would have been a different decision handed down.

Whenever there is a risk of harm to the public stemming from a medical procedure or product, patients must be offered the option of refusing the service. Patients must sign a form that serves as evidence they have consented to the medical products or services. This practice in medical care is referred to as informed consent and is the law.

Informed Consent Defined

Although the specific definition of informed consent may vary from state to state, it basically means that a physician (or other medical provider) must tell a patient all of the potential benefits, risks, and alternatives involved in any surgical procedure, medical procedure, or other course of treatment, and must obtain the patient’s written consent to proceed.

The concept is based on the principle that a physician has a duty to disclose information to the patient so they can make a reasonable decision regarding treatment.

The problem with mandatory vaccination laws is that they violate the basic laws of informed consent. When there is a health risk posed to the public from a medical product, the people must be offered a choice about whether or not they want to receive the product. This law is reasonable, ethical, and morally sound. Any rational-thinking person would agree with the legal process of informed consent.

It does not matter if you are a pro-vaxxer, anti-vaxxer, or something in between; common sense would dictate that where there’s a medical risk, there must be a choice and an option to refuse the medicinal product or service.

There is no doubt whatsoever, according to modern science, that a level of risk is associated with all vaccine products. This is undeniable because every vaccine product in existence is accompanied by a product insert that clearly informs doctors and patients of the risks associated with said products. I challenge anyone to find a medical vaccine that is currently in the marketplace that has zero risks associated with that product.

Because all vaccines come with some level of risk, patients must be given the right to refuse them. Anything less than a person being given the choice to refuse a dangerous medical product is unreasonable, unethical, and beneath the law, otherwise known as informed consent.

The question of whether or not mandatory vaccinations are constitutionally protected must be reexamined again by the SCOTUS. This time the justices must take into consideration the inherent public health risks associated with vaccine science.

Any doctor, healthcare professional, or agent of the government who administers a medical product or service to another human being without first gaining the patient’s written informed consent would be guilty of committing medical rape, which is a crime against humanity.

Are Mandatory Vaccine Laws Protected by the Constitution?

[image error]

By Dr. John Reizer

Many Americans have been recently asking the question: Are mandatory vaccine laws protected by the Constitution? If you type this question into a search engine on the Internet, you are going to be inundated with a plethora of legal opinions that thoroughly discuss the subject. The majority of the views will tell you that the federal government has a constitutional right to exercise mandatory vaccine laws.

The legal opinions referenced above are mostly made and influenced by a case that was decided by the SCOTUS on February 20, 1905, Jacobson v. Massachusetts. In that case, the Supreme Court decided that an individual’s liberty is not absolute and subject to police powers.

The decision handed down stated, “in every well-ordered society charged with the duty of conserving the safety of its members the rights of the individual in respect of his liberty may at times, under the pressure of great dangers, be subjected to such restraint, to be enforced by reasonable regulations, as the safety of the general public may demand” and that “[r]eal liberty for all could not exist under the operation of a principle which recognizes the right of each individual person to use his own, whether in respect of his person or his property, regardless of the injury that may be done to others.”

The court also ruled that mandatory vaccinations are not arbitrary or oppressive so long as they do not “go so far beyond what was reasonably required for the safety of the public.”

Now, I want to preface my remarks about this case by stating I am not a lawyer (although I do have an online Juris Doctorate that I worked really hard on many years ago), and I am not an expert on legal issues and have never pretended to be one. But strictly from a layperson’s perspective, I have to write that I agree with Robert F. Kennedy’s position that mandatory vaccine laws are unconstitutional.

Jacobson v. Massachusetts was heard and decided by the SCOTUS in 1905. That’s a long time ago, and there’s been a lot of new information uncovered about vaccines and the devastating effects they have on human physiology. A new argument could and should be laid out to retest and reverse this old and antiquated legal decision.

I believe that Jacobson v. Massachusetts could be successfully challenged and overturned in light of some of the new, damaging evidence that has been turned up about the vaccine industry. There are over 150 chronic diseases that the FDA has attributed to vaccinations, and there is a specialized National Vaccine Injury Compensation Court that was expressly set aside to hear vaccine injury cases and limit their awards to $250,000 to protect the big pharma industry. In addition to this, the soon to be released Covid-19 vaccine will have complete liability immunity from any injuries the product might potentially inflict on human lives.

In my opinion, Jacobson v. Massachusetts would yield a much different decision if heard in the year 2020. And I have spoken with a few lawyer friends who unequivocally agree with me. The minority dissenters in the case, Justices Brewer and Peckham, would likely have had more support from the majority ruling justices who heard the case if they had been made aware of the real dangers associated with the oxymoron known as vaccine science.

I think it is time to retest Jacobson v. Massachusetts in a modern-day legal setting, and one that takes into consideration the full extent of the safety issues associated with vaccines. These products have become overly oppressive in nature for all human beings because they pose serious health threats to the general public they have, in theory, been designed to protect. The current health risks stemming from vaccine products extend far beyond what the justices in 1905 considered safe for the general public.

In my opinion, the federal government will not try to mandate vaccines in the future because they would be afraid to place Jacobson v. Massachusetts in the line of fire of a real test. It has been tested in limited capacities in the past, but not with the argument that takes into consideration the case I have laid out in this post.

I think the powers that be would love to keep this precedent-setting decision right where it lies. To open it up to a brand new, real test scenario is opening a can of worms they can’t afford to open. If the decision was ever reversed, the controllers would lose their leverage and ability to populate search engines with articles that tell us that the federal government’s right to impose mandatory vaccines is protected by the US Constitution.

I, for one, would love to see this case revisited and put through a new legal test using the argument I have outlined.  Any lawyers out there that have more expertise than me concerning this subject, please feel free to weigh in on the conversation.