Kathleen Stock

Kathleen Stock’s Followers (99)

member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo

Kathleen Stock


Website

Twitter

Genre


Kathleen Stock is a professor of philosophy at the University of Sussex. She has published on aesthetics, fiction, imagination, and sexual objectification. She is currently the vice-president of the British Society of Aesthetics. In her monograph Only Imagine: Fiction, Interpretation and Imagination (2017) she examines the nature of fictional content. She has also written a book examining the UK Gender Recognition Act and trans self-identification.

Stock has written one monograph and articles in peer-reviewed academic journals and has contributed several chapters to edited volumes. She edited Philosophers on Music: Experience, Meaning, and Work (first edition 2007) and together with Katherine Thomson-Jones she edited New Waves in Aesthetics
...more

Average rating: 4.18 · 1,233 ratings · 196 reviews · 5 distinct worksSimilar authors
Material Girls: Why Reality...

4.20 avg rating — 1,208 ratings — published 2021 — 10 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Only Imagine: Fiction, Inte...

3.17 avg rating — 12 ratings3 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Philosophers on Music: Expe...

2.86 avg rating — 7 ratings — published 2007 — 4 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Aesthetics and the Sciences...

by
2.80 avg rating — 5 ratings — published 2014 — 3 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
New Waves in Aesthetics

by
2.50 avg rating — 2 ratings — published 2008 — 5 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
More books by Kathleen Stock…
Quotes by Kathleen Stock  (?)
Quotes are added by the Goodreads community and are not verified by Goodreads. (Learn more)

“A first thing to note, in case it’s unclear, is that I am not arguing against legal protections for trans people against violence, discrimination or coercive surgeries. I enthusiastically support these protections.”
Kathleen Stock, Material Girls: Why Reality Matters for Feminism

“some 70s feminists then seemed to reason in a couple of defective ways about biological determinism and sex. On the one hand, some assumed all binary theories of sex must imply determinism: that is, that these theories must be saying something about the fundamental individual ‘natures’ of males and females in terms of dominance for males, and passivity and submission for females. Working backwards, they therefore concluded that, since biological determinism isn’t true, binary sex must be a myth. Meanwhile, an alternative feminist response from some seemed to go roughly: ‘If there were no natural differences at all between males and females, biological determinism would obviously be false. We all want biological determinism to be false. Hence there are no natural differences between males and females.’ Compare: Jed really wants it to be false that he’s got cancer. If there were no such thing as cancer, it would be false that he’s got it. Hence, Jed concludes, there’s no such thing as cancer.”
Kathleen Stock, Material Girls: Why Reality Matters for Feminism

“Stable biological facts have contingent social effects in a given society in conjunction with other social aspects. A society can always choose to mitigate those effects by instigating different social arrangements and structures.”
Kathleen Stock, Material Girls: Why Reality Matters for Feminism



Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite Kathleen to Goodreads.