Anoolka
is now following C.E. Murphy's reviews
|
|
|
|
It's a retelling of a fairytale that I always found rather boring - the Twelve Dancing Princesses. But the author takes this tale and adds stuff, for one it's set in Eastern Europe, in the historical time of Vlad the Impaler, and the heroine wants to...moreIt's a retelling of a fairytale that I always found rather boring - the Twelve Dancing Princesses. But the author takes this tale and adds stuff, for one it's set in Eastern Europe, in the historical time of Vlad the Impaler, and the heroine wants to go to a convent to be a herbalist instead of dreaming about princes. Not only that, we have shades of other fairytales and myths too (Beauty and the Beast, Hades and Persephone?). In general it feels pretty complex, with characters that are distinct, with interesting relationships, between Reveka and all the people working in the castle, between her and her father, and of course the mysterious Frumos. It's not just a retelling, it's a good YA fantasy story.(less)
|
|
|
I read the first chapter ages ago and it felt rather bland. I though, 'oh, here we go, vampires, same old, bitchy heroine', yeah. But it has pretty good ratings so I tried again, and surprisingly, it pulled me in.
Ok, I'm not a fan of vampires these...moreI read the first chapter ages ago and it felt rather bland. I though, 'oh, here we go, vampires, same old, bitchy heroine', yeah. But it has pretty good ratings so I tried again, and surprisingly, it pulled me in.
Ok, I'm not a fan of vampires these days, I guess I overloaded on them. But I kind of like them here. They're not quite as bland, or angsty, or entirely human wih only some little quirks to set them apart. They, and our heroine, feel like they really think a little differently, for one. She quite clearly sets herself apart from humans and sees them as food.
She's not as one trait as I expected either. She's strong, confident and smart but with emotional hangups (but interesting ones, at least for me). Her defection and change of heart are believable and slow but don't overload the book. The plot moves along fast.
The twists and intricacies of the political dealings weren't quite as complex as I would have liked. Just ok. No groundshaking events, though I did not expect that thing with Maisie. I would have liked a couple more characters for Sabina to interact with (though those we had in this book were pretty good - even the minor characters were pretty memorable), especially as not everyone survived this book.
Gighul was a nice touch. I pretty much liked everything about him, from how he enters the story to his charcterization and little quirks (shopping and catnip etc- funny but without going into slapstick), and how he influences Sabina.
So, I'll probably check out the next book.(less)
|
|
|
2.5 the second book might be better but I'm not sure I'll read it.
I liked the prequel a lot but the more and more I read this book the more dissapointed I got. You just can't ignore how damn similar it is to Vampire Academy.
Secondly, at times th...more2.5 the second book might be better but I'm not sure I'll read it.
I liked the prequel a lot but the more and more I read this book the more dissapointed I got. You just can't ignore how damn similar it is to Vampire Academy.
Secondly, at times the dialogue was rather painful. Alex was supposed to be so clever and insightful at times (psychoanalyzing Aiden) and was so blind in her judgement of others (Lea, Marcus). She felt inconsistent - one moment aware of the seriousness of the situation - training, dealing with grief, the next -partying, mouthing off and doing her best to fail at her goals, apparently. So I found it hard to emphasize with her.
The first half of the book -there is barely any plot. Parties and high school dealings and pseudo deep talk between Alex and her love interest. Then things speed up a little and it becomes more original. But too little too late.
You could substitute the Greeks for any other pantheon and it would not be much different. It's just that thinly presented. A shame, as I love mythology and Greek myths in particular are so easy to research too, but here it's just a couple of words here and there, exclamations like 'gods' and that's about it. Very americanized.
There were times were I felt some more description was needed. It felt very bare. Alex makes a big deal of wanting to wear a uniform when she meets her step father but it's not at all described other than color.
The way Alex obsesses over Lea and vice versa I was half expecting them to have a fling or something. At least that would have been a nice change from the 'vampire academy' feeling of this book.(less)
|
|
|
It's readable, mostly predictable, typical YA paranormal. Instead of being vampires, it's faery - pixies to be exact. But, wait, there's more, we get shifters too. Unfortunately the worldbuilding is pretty thin and feels very pastede on. With very li...moreIt's readable, mostly predictable, typical YA paranormal. Instead of being vampires, it's faery - pixies to be exact. But, wait, there's more, we get shifters too. Unfortunately the worldbuilding is pretty thin and feels very pastede on. With very little originality and depth.
The main character is mostly ok (minus the part where she talks to herself a lot), though can't say that characterization is this book's strong suit. New girl in school, with some issues, feeling lonely, abandoned and trying to navigate this new social circles - feels same old same old. Of course, she gets some faithfull sidekicks - two kids that don't fit in, almost right away, as well as two potential boyfriends.
This whole settling in and meeting people part takes about one third of the book. Once the paranormal actually starts being more relevent the pace picks up. But it's like the author spent too much time on getting the relationships going because she doesn't take as much too have our heroes, but mostly our heroine, convinced that there's something paranormal going on.
The clues are obvious, of course (sarcasm!), someone is stalking Zara, and he's moving from place to place too fast. (but not really, since he's not really moving any faster than she is...). So obviously, after consulting the Web, the answer is he's a pixie king. Logical. Oh, and he leaves dust behind. Gold dust - not that our heroine noticed that at first. She only notices the dust after that.
"Devyn and Issie, they have a theory about some stuff that's been happening to me. There's this guy who keeps showing up. They think he's a pixie. I know it sounds stupid. Pixie kings are supposed to leave dust like this."
Mmm, right. Perfectly logical. coulnd't possibly be anything else. He keeps showing up and there's dust - and that's all the evidence you need to belive in pixies.
And then our heroine admits that maybe he's just posing as a pixie - like a calling card, for a killer or something. with those two possible explanation our heroine decides to go running after dark. I guess it's supposed to show as she has martyr tendencies but for me it only means she's stupid.
The dialogues are awkward/painful at times, and the bits with the love triangle felt a little thin. There are some inconsistencies in characterization. Nick is supposed to have a temper and be a hot head, but the only time we really see it, is at the end, so for me it felt majorly out of character, and made him seem like a hipocrite and a jerk.
Zara is not consistent either: she accepts the pixies but freaks out about werewolves - having more evidence there and proof of shifters actually being the good guys.
That fight between Nick and Zara (view spoiler)[ about her being part pixie (hide spoiler)] near the end - that felt like artificial angst, for the sake of angst, reaction out of character and out of proportion.
And finally, my last annoyance, Zara's hypocrisy and stupidity in dealing with the pixie king.
A conversation between the pixie king and our pacifist heroine:
"Then I would die. Then another pixie, perhaps one more cruel, one less enamored of human peculiarities will take my place."
"So?"
Harsh, Zara. And stupid. And somewhat out of character given just how many times Amnesty International gets mentioned. She says: "People die all the time for the greater good. It's called being a martyr." Were is the sense in this? The set up is that the king needs to kill or have his queen. He can stop, but as he says, he'll die and the cycle won't stop. Another will take his place. And her answer is to tell him to die? (view spoiler)[Ignoring the fact he's her father, (hide spoiler)] that still doesn't really get at the core of the problem, does it?
Yeah, so over all, I was dissapointed with this book. The contradictions in characterization, the thin worldbuilding and lukewarm relationships don't make me want to read the next one.(less)
|
|
|
It's not really a single story. There is the contemporary part, still about polygamy, but with the main element being the mystery who killed this part's narrator's father. Was it his mother (19th wife of his father)? The second part takes place in the...moreIt's not really a single story. There is the contemporary part, still about polygamy, but with the main element being the mystery who killed this part's narrator's father. Was it his mother (19th wife of his father)? The second part takes place in the past, and centers around the life of another 19th wife, Ann Eliza and how she comes to leave the religion and fight against polygamy.
While I liked, in general, both plots, the book felt uneven, because the contemporary parts seem to be going much faster and the historical parts are peppered with additional information, often, in my opinion, presented in a way that makes reading it tedious. We switch povs too much there, with letters, diaries, wikipedia entries, even. It slows the book down a little and I didn't appreciate being yanked around from head to head - and everyone was wordy! Lorenzo's letters in particular grated. It lets the reader see a more complex picture of the situation, though. You see how the major players think, but apart from Ann Eliza it's only the men as far as the historical parts go. I'd have liked to read, if we had to have so many narrators, from anther's wife's perspective.
There is a little confusion just how much this is fiction or historical fact. There's a wikipedia entry after all- it is supposed to seem authentic, but it left me confused over all, as someone completely without knowledge of these people and religion just how much came from the author.
Over all, it doesn't condemn the religion, tries to show many facets of the same situation, heck the narration doesn't even condemn that much a rapist and pedophile (view spoiler)[the narrator's father, yeah, maybe his son is uncomfortable but the father's actions made me feel revulsion and to read his online friend's response to it was annoying. (hide spoiler)]. The mystery aspect is good. the contemporary parts tackle how the religion views homosexuality, though it's not as big part of the plot as polygamy, it's there, what with the main narrator of the contemporary part being gay.
Over all my quibbles: I'm not sure if I bought how fast Tom and Jordan's relationship settled, or Johny's characterization, but those issues were minor, my biggest annoyance was just how many different letters, diaries, excerpts from newspapers there were slowing down the story.(less)
|
|
|
I only wanted to sample this book and maybe put it away for later but it drew me in. The pacing is good. All the characters are pretty distinct and interesting. While the plot isn't terribly deep and unpredictable, it's not bad either. Yes, of course...moreI only wanted to sample this book and maybe put it away for later but it drew me in. The pacing is good. All the characters are pretty distinct and interesting. While the plot isn't terribly deep and unpredictable, it's not bad either. Yes, of course the heroine will show everyone how awesome she is and of course there's the romance and obviously it's with the guy who stole her spot, but it's a pleasant read, none the less.
It's a bit more on the juvenile side, I felt, and mostly predictable, which is why I'm not rating it higher. Still, it's more of a 3.5.
I liked the worldbuilding and was rather pleasantly surprised that it kept getting more complex, without aweful infodumps. OK, so there are some, but, imho, minor and spaced out well enough.
The story itself is not just about the fairy problems - we get the subplot with MCs parents and the romance, of course. Over all, it was nice to see a heroine work out her family conflicts, romance and keep healthy friendships.(less)
|
|
|
It pulled me in right away only to lose me the more and more the main character acted like a brat. I know, I know - there was dark magic at work and confusing dreams and new powers, but it did not make reading through all that a pleasure. I am glad I...moreIt pulled me in right away only to lose me the more and more the main character acted like a brat. I know, I know - there was dark magic at work and confusing dreams and new powers, but it did not make reading through all that a pleasure. I am glad I went on because the second part gets better again, once things clear up and the heroine begins acting more mature and badass. (And stops swooning about boys for a minute.) I love the whole idea of how the dragons and dragon lore works here. I liked all the characters, though not all the time, so props for making them more complex. I do hope the next one will follow with a bit more mature heroine, as she was near the end.(less)
|
|
|
2.5
It's hard to believe the heroine is supposed to be almost eighteen. I could buy her being sixteen, but... eh, she's just too naive, immature and unobservant.
I generally like Childs' writing style and here it was pretty good too, but the overall...more2.5
It's hard to believe the heroine is supposed to be almost eighteen. I could buy her being sixteen, but... eh, she's just too naive, immature and unobservant.
I generally like Childs' writing style and here it was pretty good too, but the overall setting and plot remind me a little too much of Disney movies. I guess her other series which I tried (OH My Gods) is a little like that too, but it felt far fluffier and cute here.
The romance, OK I liked them in the end, but it was stretched too much - there's a limit to how oblivious and stubborn you can make your main character, imo and have them still be likable.
Over all, I'd have loved this if I were a teen/tween myself. 2.5.
Wish there was more subtance to this book - Childs takes interesting myths/concepts and I see potential to how she goes about them but I just want some more depth to it (worldbuilding, plot, characterization).(less)
|
|
|
There's supposed to be time travel, I hope there is and soon, because otherwise this is pretty bad.
It's not an easy read- lots of terminology that is supposed to make the protagonist/narrator sound like a professional military guy, but for me is co...moreThere's supposed to be time travel, I hope there is and soon, because otherwise this is pretty bad.
It's not an easy read- lots of terminology that is supposed to make the protagonist/narrator sound like a professional military guy, but for me is completely alien. The guy also sounds like a jerk and unfortunately its a first person pov. The writing is very meh. A little too wordy in trying to be gritty/funny - the way it describes everyone and everything, its like it wants to paint everyone very vividly but ends with them being unlikable, including the protag and with the plot going rather slowly, bogged down.
Maybe it gets better...
1/3 in: The romance is unreal and thin. It's kind of insulting/embarassing how the female captain gets described and acts. Action bogged down by too much description, gets better at times, like when they finally go back in time (1/3 in), but it's uneven.
In the end I won't grab his next book, even though I finished this one, liked the concept, the execution was so so and I'd probably like it as a movie but as a book I don't like the writing style (or characters) enough to continue with this series.
"Błękitnochabrowe oczy patrzyły na mnie z życzliwością. Uśmiech był czymś więcej niż zwykłym służbowym grymasem. Poczułem coś w rodzaju złośliwej satysfakcji, że nie robi to na mnie specjalnego wrażenia." no nie bardzo łapie jak ten nasz bohater dochodzi do takich mysli. to trzecie chyba spotkanie z panią kapitan, wszystkie całkiem słuzbowe. tylko w jego myslach jakby nabrały zupełnie innych barw... no ale to chyba po prostu jakies skróty myslowe autora, bo ma to być zapowiedz romansu - pare stron dalej, pani kapitan i nasz bohater sie całują (ona taka bidna zszkowana brutalnoscia mezczyzn polskich i wdzieczna za pomoc - taa, pani kapitan). (view spoiler)[ no ok, okazuje sie ze ta para ma za soba historie romansu, tylko ze autor nie ujawnia tego az do połowy ksiazki wiec mysli i zachowanie narratora wydaje sie przez poł ksiazki troche dziwne jesli o pania kapitan chodzi (hide spoiler)].
Akcja rusza sie strasznie wolno bo autor nie może sie powstrzymac od opisywania wszystkiego (za dużo wtretów i przymiotników i dywagacji) i zbędnych scen - po co ta cała scena w barze? (jak z amerykańskiego filmu a nie polskich realiów) dla romansu? - który taki dla mnie mocno wymuszony, cienki i nierealny. nie wiem...
Znacznie lepiej czyta się jak wreszcie przenosza sie w czasie - tak w 1/3 ksiązki. Ale nie na tyle, żeby czytac to jednym tchem.
ETA: 1/2 - no dobra, romans nabiera trochę sensu, chociaz nadal nie do konca przekonuje. Ale akcja nabrała przynajmniej predkości.
Podsumowując po skończeniu - za długi wstęp, kiepski romans i postacie kobiece (zawsze opisane jak wyglądają- seksownie, krągle etc), zbyt wylewne opisy - spowalniają akcję. Pewnie nie przeczytam nastepnej jego książki.(less)
|