|
|
|
|
|
Can't wait to read this one! The Dabbler Book Club (http://thedabbler.co.uk/the-dabbler-book...) is sending me a free copy. I highly recommend them. UK book club that sponsors regular give-aways, offers free membership, has a website that's laid out ...moreCan't wait to read this one! The Dabbler Book Club (http://thedabbler.co.uk/the-dabbler-book...) is sending me a free copy. I highly recommend them. UK book club that sponsors regular give-aways, offers free membership, has a website that's laid out in impressively eye-pleasing and gentle colors. There's no downside here.(less)
|
|
|
|
|
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it,
click here.
The main problem with the approach behind this book manifests in the chapters on marriage and work, chapters that offer nothing new to speak of and present lessons that conflict. Many pieces of advice expressed by interviewed elders speak, understand...moreThe main problem with the approach behind this book manifests in the chapters on marriage and work, chapters that offer nothing new to speak of and present lessons that conflict. Many pieces of advice expressed by interviewed elders speak, understandably and simply, to the fact that temperaments differ; for instance, one recommends understanding early-on that fighting is not the end of the world and that you've gotta roll with it, while others offer advice on how to cool down before speaking so that fights don't break out. Of course, there's nothing harmful about hearing how those with disparate personalities deal with the same challenges ... it's just not particularly helpful either.
The most evident example of disintegration within the lesson structure comes in the chapter on work, the specific problem being that, when you whittle each lesson-at-large down to the thought that underlies it, you see that the thoughts inspiring different lessons necessarily contradict each other. One lesson that is counted as an important one to long-term happiness relevant to the workplace involves doing what you love, regardless of money made. Fine lesson. The ultimate value of any undertaking considers total experience. Doing everything you do to the best of your ability--having pride in your work--is counted as important. Agreed. That's stressed in nearly every self-help text in existence, as well as books dealing with the joy of the mental flow state. Another lesson states directly that emotional intelligence trumps everything else, and that you have to learn to people-please in order to get anywhere. While the first lessons stem from the idea that work needs to be enjoyable to you as an individual, or else you've cursed yourself for all your years as a worker, this last-mentioned lesson is indicative of the thought that, above both how well you do your work and what work you choose for yourself, is the consideration of how likable you render yourself to the people who work with you. Because they hold a net of sorts around you. An example is even used of a person whose requested raise was put to a vote; those voting decided against it because they didn't like him, plain 'n simple. His work was top-notch, a point of pride to the company ... and they voted against giving him a raise, effectively sending him away to another company, because they didn't like him. The only "lesson" I could see milking from this is that people foolish enough to vote against a person whose work benefits them all get what they deserve. By any account, I think the lesson here is most definitely NOT "get along with people, so this doesn't happen to you." That seems, in fact, to adamantly contradict the lifelong-happiness advice of doing what you truly love in a manner that leaves you feeling personally proud.
It could be argued: what do you expect, given that you're collecting advice from such a diverse group, who only have their (rather broad) age-range in common? Again, this is more a criticism of the actual approach. If this were just a sociologically interesting look at what this group of people, on average, hold to be important, that would be one thing. It is, however, presented as lessons for the good life, directed at those who haven't been there/done that.
I don't think the book fails in all ways; there are certain focuses that seem appropriately explored by interviews with those who are older. Specifically: living in such a way that you look back on the years of your life without regrets, and raising your children. The latter yields up some helpful thoughts, primarily because the interview subjects are focusing on tips that will not just cure a certain behavior in the short-term, but will contribute to the long-range happiness of children and the long-term stability of parents' relationships to their grown children. In other words, readers are treated to tips that concentrate on the very real context of parenthood, a period of time that lasts much longer than the period of time in which a certain undesirable childhood behavior might rear its head.
Appreciated is the fact that this book emphasizes the value of concrete things learned by an older generation. It makes perfect sense that younger people should, for their own well-being, pay attention to lessons learned by those who have already lived through circumstances similar to those that lie ahead for the younger. However, that is only true to the extent that these passed-down messages are individually evaluated for their relevance, their truthfulness, and how they knit together in a philosophically integrated whole. In light of that, there are many contradictory lessons that shouldn't pass through a rational and self-interested individual's filters as-is.(less)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The book-back blurb from Time, "Imagine Sex and the City, if the city in question were Riyadh," says it all. I don't like Sex and the City, or its next of kin. Some of the braided-in cultural info was interesting; for me, that was it.
|
|
|
I didn't consider the ending perfect (then, there are sacred few endings I have found perfect, and the few have not consistently capped off perfect-to-match books) and I didn't get many of the cultural references (though, hey, I knew enough to know t...moreI didn't consider the ending perfect (then, there are sacred few endings I have found perfect, and the few have not consistently capped off perfect-to-match books) and I didn't get many of the cultural references (though, hey, I knew enough to know they were cultural references), but this novel dazzled me. There's no point in hiding the fact that I like Penn Jillette more than most humans [can be accurately read as either: "I, more so than most humans, like Penn Jillette" or "Penn Jillette, more so than most humans, commands my favor"] and went into this with high hopes. And just a hint of nervous anticipation. The latter because it's such a test--writing a novel. And I was fascinated and hopeful and a dash nervous to see what this statuesque, obnoxious, nudity-loving dream-man o' mine [the writer of this review is gay--"dream-man" here translates to platonic dream-man] would do with his self-appointed opportunity to recreate the world in his own image. That's one whopper of a critique-standard to lay on a first novel, I'm aware, but on this first novel did I lay it.
It didn't disappoint.
While I enjoyed certain of the stylistic choices Jillette made to the extent of having to shut the book over my hand-serving-as-bookmark and just look away for a moment and bask, the stand-out praiseworthy element was the point it insistently, but never gratuitously, made: that you do not injure anyone, regardless of that person's held belief system, by stating the truth as you perceive and logically comprehend it. That it is respect for another person's essential humanness that dictates you do not "spare" that person from the truth. My New Year's resolution arose from thoughts stirred by this important, funny, sex-talking, unusual novel. That good. Excellent. My platonic dream-man all the dreamier. Sha-zam.(less)
|
|
|