Breakdown
by
Sara Paretsky (Goodreads Author)
|
|
One of the things I admire most about Sara Paretsky is her ability to fully embrace the moment and the choices she's made. Like her character, V.I. Warshawski, she is smart, self-aware, passionate, and funny.
This is another series that I've been r...moreOne of the things I admire most about Sara Paretsky is her ability to fully embrace the moment and the choices she's made. Like her character, V.I. Warshawski, she is smart, self-aware, passionate, and funny.
This is another series that I've been reading for a very long time. V.I. is great character and Paretsky has done a wonderful job of placing the books in the series close enough in time that Warshawski doesn't age out too soon, but far enough that she does age and we get to go there along with her as priorities shift, stories change, choices become different, and her love for her friends and neighbors remain a constant.
Breakdown is the latest in the series and covers a murdered body in a mausoleum near where some high school girls are playing shapeshifter. This would normally be an interesting occurence (I know I'd follow the story on CNN), but it's made more interesting because two of the girls come from very prominent, wealthy, and powerful families.
There are multiple subplots all swirling around each other, sometimes touching, sometimes not - interrelated, but not necessarily central to the fact of the dead guy with rebar through his chest. Paretsky handles all of this skillfully and I could not put this book down - and I do mean that. I read this everywhere and was fortunate enough to be about halfway through so I could finish it straight through on a Saturday. Yes, it was really entertaining.
I love the way Ms. Paretsky has allowed V.I. to mature - she's not the V.I. she was at the start of the series - she's acquired a certain amount of grace, common sense, and even dignity - this is especially noticeable in this book - which may be one of the very best in the whole series. Must read.(less)
|
|
|
In retrospect I probably shouldn't have re-read Jane Eyre so close to my reading of The Flight of Gemma Hardy. I think I would've enjoyed the latter much more if it had been further in proximity from the former.
Ms. Livesey can write, and I'm defin...moreIn retrospect I probably shouldn't have re-read Jane Eyre so close to my reading of The Flight of Gemma Hardy. I think I would've enjoyed the latter much more if it had been further in proximity from the former.
Ms. Livesey can write, and I'm definitely curious about trying some of her other books, but most of this book doesn't work as well for me. Rather than being a book based on and containing elements of Jane Eyre (like Rebecca by Daphne Du Maurier), this book is based on and follows Jane Eyre too closely. It focuses the eye away from the new story and to a game of How Many Things from Jane Eyre Can You Recognize." It's very distracting and definitely detracts from what seems like a good story in the moments I could pay attention to it.
The characters are, of course, based on the original yet they seem more muted somehow - drained of the passion and dramatic turmoil and melodrama that make Jane Eyre fun. All of this changes in the last third of the book when Gemma Hardy finally takes flight into her very own conclusion.
Read this, just not in close proximity with the original.(less)
|
|
|
If you're looking for a scholarly literary article on Jane Eyre, you've come to the wrong place. I've already written that paper - twice, in fact (once in high school and once in college). The re-read this time was purely for pleasure and because t...moreIf you're looking for a scholarly literary article on Jane Eyre, you've come to the wrong place. I've already written that paper - twice, in fact (once in high school and once in college). The re-read this time was purely for pleasure and because tomorrow I'll be reviewing The Flight of Gemma Hardy by Margot Livesey (based on Jane Eyre) and I thought it'd be interesting to read them back-to-back.
About the time I was in middle school (and reading way above my grade level), my mother (a library director) would bring home pamphlets published by the American Library Association listing books for the college-bound. There were lots of different kinds of books on these, many of them classics, and I read choices from them throughout just about every summer. It was great because I read these without the overlay of academia and formed my own opinions about them, but those were 13-year-old opinions. That's not to say 13-year-old opinions are bad, but the way one reads things and the things that stick out or become understandable change with age. This reading had a price, though. By the time I got to high school I had to re-read and write papers on many of them, and then I rinsed and repeated in college. It made certain aspects of both super boring - I always wanted college at least to introduce me to new types of classics. I will say that college gave me Homer, Ovid, and Chaucer and I am grateful to it for that.
In any event, I decided last year that I would re-read Jane Eyre, Anna Karenina, and Madame Bovary again since it's been years. I didn't get to it last year, but hope to finish out the cycle this year. I loved all them as an adolescent for the romanticism buried in their hearts and want to find out what I love (or don't love) about them now.
Jane Eyre is surprisingly modern in its language, themes, and story. For many people I suspect it's all about Jane and Mr. Rochester (one of the original templates for the brooding emotionally unavailable hero in romance novels - more on that in a sec). For me it's all about Jane. The romance is a side-plot (and kind of a predictable boring one at that), but Jane and her interior and exterior journey is what makes this book a pleasure for me.
I felt such a connection with Jane - the smart, different, unloved little girl trying to grow up into better circumstances. Much of her story resonates with me, the party scenes perhaps most of all as she sits in her chair in the corner trying to hide behind a curtain. I like her defiance and her willingness to pay the price for it (because sometimes the defiance is worth every penny of the price). Her intellect and curiousity appeal as does her attempt to balance her religious ideals against the real and beautiful world. This is an ongoing struggle for society as we attempt to figure out where we are in relationship to nature and natural things when much is mediated through religion, politics, societal conventions, and technology.
I liked Mr. Rochester for similar reasons. Both he and Jane seem to me to be outsiders in their own ways and to reject the conventional behavior of the time, although both are strongly bound to them. Of course they fell in love! That's what kindred spirits do if they're lucky enough to meet. As I said earlier, Mr. Rochester is a whole host of unattractive behaviors, but they're complicated and tied up into a character with a tragic past, a mad wife in the attic, and a level of despair that I also understand. In later romance novels it is much less about the complexities of the unattractive behaviors, but rather the practice of them and the acceptance of them.
If you've never read this, or haven't in a long time, I recommend you do. It's a wonderful read, light in its own way, but filled with depth and many things that will make you think. I enjoyed the read very much.(less)
|
|
|
I wanted to read The Dispatcher because the story sounded like it would be good and because I panned the author's first book, Good Neighbors (yes, I know it won an award). Most of my issues with Good Neighbors had to do with some authorial and metaf...moreI wanted to read The Dispatcher because the story sounded like it would be good and because I panned the author's first book, Good Neighbors (yes, I know it won an award). Most of my issues with Good Neighbors had to do with some authorial and metafictional choices, but were mostly rooted in the fact that he was writing about the Kitty Genovese murder and I think Harlan Ellison wrote the definitive fictional work on that in his short story, The Whimper of Whipped Dogs. What I did know was that Mr. Jahn could write and I watched out for what he might write next.
Second books are hard - lots of people flub them badly. Mr. Jahn, however, wrote a great second book. He kept the cast of characters tight, the various stories and subplots woven together tightly, chose a great landscape with miles and miles of deserted highway, and he paced things just right. In fact, he paced them as if you and he were riding together in the main character's 1965 Mustang down those highways after the people who kidnapped your girl.
Mr. Jahn has a way with words and has proven that he can write a great story. I had a really hard time putting this book down - I devoured it in a day (a work day, even). I wasn't very sociable with my co-workers on break and at lunch because I was too enraptured to stop reading this book. It was a sort of a teenaged joyride of a book, complete with those bad moments that happen when you realize the car is stolen, you're probably too drunk to be in it, and you're definitely driving way too fast, but somehow you just can't stop. Excellent book - highly recommended for those who like a great thriller.(less)
|
The Crown
by
Nancy Bilyeau (Goodreads Author)
|
|
This book really gets off to a slow start (this was probably exacerbated by my having read it directly after Lionheart by Sharon Kay Penman - she tends to spoil other historical fiction for me in too close proximity). Just as I was beginning to thin...moreThis book really gets off to a slow start (this was probably exacerbated by my having read it directly after Lionheart by Sharon Kay Penman - she tends to spoil other historical fiction for me in too close proximity). Just as I was beginning to think that maybe I'm just bored with the Tudors (I've always liked the Plantagenants much more), I got hooked. Wow, did I get hooked - from that moment I had a really hard time putting this down.
Bilyeau writes well and the historical part of it all is interesting, but the best part is the mystery and the exploration of Joanna Stafford buried right underneath. Also interesting is seeing a somewhat different (but familiar) side of the great Protestant/Catholic divide - this time from the Catholic side.
Henry VIII isn't much loved by anyone in this book, but really did anybody truly love him? He was big, he was cranky, he liked to take off heads - not a lot to like there. Cromwell is a villain here and blamed for much which makes sense given his role in the disbanding of the monasteries and in his strong promotion of Protestantism, the publishing of the Bible in English, and on and on - the whole commoner risen above his natural rank plays a part, as well. I admire Cromwell and find the whole religious conflict interesting, but if I was a Catholic at the time I doubt I'd care for him.
Best of all, this book deals with the Catholic religious orders in England at the time, with the disgraced noble families of Stafford and Howard, and very much with the lives of common people living in religious community.
On the flip side, the mystery is a little too Dan Brown for me and the book could really use an editor for both cuts and pacing, but Joanna Stafford is a great character - hope to see more of her.(less)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've been reading Sharon Kaye Penman from the beginning with her very first book, The Sunne in Splendour. My copy of this book has been re-read so many times it's close to needing replacing. She is one of my favorite authors, although she does spoi...moreI've been reading Sharon Kaye Penman from the beginning with her very first book, The Sunne in Splendour. My copy of this book has been re-read so many times it's close to needing replacing. She is one of my favorite authors, although she does spoil you for historical fiction. Once you're hooked on Penman, most other historical fiction falls far short of the mark she sets. She's smart, she writes well, she does an enormous amount of study of primary sources before she writes, and the stories she tells are so fascinating you'll go back to them again and again.
Lionheart is the penultimate in Ms. Penman's books on Henry II, Eleanor of Aquitaine, and their Devil's Brood. I have a fondness for Henry II and Eleanor of Aquitaine and no one's written better about them. Given the name it's not hard to figure out that this one is about Richard the Lionheart - considered to be one of England's great kings and one of the greatest war commanders ever.
I've always been less fond of Richard than of the youngest of the brood, John. Richard is always presented as so big and bold - brash, daring, bigger than life, self-righteous, reckless. He's an amazing character, but something about John has also appealed to me (yes, I know, he's generally thought of as a villain). I think I like John because he was a survivor and because he was a pragmatist. He was always more concerned with the administration of his kingdom and of justice. He inherited a rudimentary justice system and spent a great deal of time expanding and formalizing it. He was also selfish, arrogant, sort of spineless, and left his father (who loved him greatly) to die alone.
In any event, Richard is very heroic and Ms. Penman has not forgotten that. This is a novel of the Third Crusade, with all its betrayals and internecine warfare between the various European factions attempting to work together to take Jerusalem. As we all know, this region has never been kind to invaders - has always been a hotbed of religious warfare. Seeing this through 12th century eyes is an interesting experience, particularly since the broad brush strokes of it all seem so very modern in their own way. It is as if the Crusades have never really ended and no one has learned anything from them.
Richard proves himself an almost invincible battle commander, charismatic, and pragmatic - opening discussions between himself and Saladin trying for a long-term peace over the ignominy of capturing Jerusalem only to see it lost again when he and the rest of the Crusaders returned home.
This is a wonderful and entertaining read, illuminating a time in history most of us know little about. As always Ms. Penman's writing and storytelling skills carry the day and will carry you through to end - leaving you craving more.(less)
|
|
|
|
|