"
Well, yay textbook mediaeval warfare! Jane-Rhea caught me laughing out loud when I got to the point where (not really a spoiler, this) they were being right well besieged in Rome that warm-temperate city with all the basillicas and popes and things a...
"
Read more of this review »
|
|
|
I finally gave in and traded my used hardcovers for this single-volume version just to save some shelf space, but I've read these books probably a dozen times each - so this is a very jaded review. (And they get four stars out of pure nostalgia, and ...moreI finally gave in and traded my used hardcovers for this single-volume version just to save some shelf space, but I've read these books probably a dozen times each - so this is a very jaded review. (And they get four stars out of pure nostalgia, and also because they're almost as addictive as the Belgariad, but if I were just encountering them now I'd probably give them three.
There's not much point in addressing them as individual volumes, because it's basically one long adventure. And it's an entertaining adventure - let me start by establishing that. The Elenium is focused on Sparhawk, who is a 40ish knight with a hell of a lot of experience (in contrast to the Belgariad, which is a pure bildungsroman.) Sparhawk is essentially a good, honest, honorable guy, but he's also ruthless and willing to look first in his scabbard for the solution to his problems. This is mitigated in large part because the series is essentially an ensemble piece, and the various stock characters he surrounds himself with (Dumb but Good-Hearted Best Friend, Wise Older Companion, Beautiful and Mysterious Enchantress, Cocky Young Thief, etc etc) balance out the various encounters.
I like these books, don't get me wrong - they're fast-paced and fun and the election sequence in the third book involves some of the most readable political shenanigans I've come across in fantasy - but they're far from perfect. Eddings doesn't have a ton of range in either his characters or his dialogue, and while this is not the same as the Belgariad at all (mostly in that it's an R-rated series - lots of blood and guts and even some sex, or at least the implication of sex) it's particularly jarring when he re-uses lines of dialogue. It really highlights his limitations.
And the worldbuilding is just sloppy. Sloppy! The Bhelliom (the magic jewel they spend the first two books questing for) changes origin and powers every fifty pages. It's evil! It's True Neutral! It's the force that created the world! It's too dangerous even to look at, although it was displayed on a hat that kings wore for centuries! We must destroy it! We should probably destroy it although it might blow up! We might have to destroy it even though it will probably take out a few mountain ranges when it goes! Sparhawk can touch it because he has the rings! Sparhawk can touch it because he was destined to! No one else can touch it, except those inconvenient kings and the Troll and a goddess and possibly the hundreds of people who've been searching for it for millennia!
The Mysterious Enchantress has different powers depending on the situation, Berit is an apprentice knight then an novice then an apprentice then a novice and then, finally, is "promoted to a rank seldom used by the militant orders," an apprentice knight. And in the most obvious and laughable example, at the end of the first book, Sparhawk "for the first time in his life, contemplated the deliberate murder of an unarmed man." Except that in the very first chapter, we see him picking up some wire to use to strangle a drunkard when he comes out to pick up some more wine.
I don't think these issues totally detract from the entertainment value of the books, but they do stick out to me after all these rereads, and I don't have the patience - or maybe the obliviousness - I did when I was 15. The trilogy pretty much reads like Eddings sat down one day, started at the beginning, and shipped each chapter off without ever reading it again. Which is fine, I guess, but I hold my epic fantasy to higher standards nowadays.(less)
|
|
|
This was much more readable than her first book - the lack of terrible poetry was a huge relief. I find Roseanne as a character fascinating in a trainwreck sort of way, and I have to keep reminding myself as I read that she's a comedian, she's totall...moreThis was much more readable than her first book - the lack of terrible poetry was a huge relief. I find Roseanne as a character fascinating in a trainwreck sort of way, and I have to keep reminding myself as I read that she's a comedian, she's totally writing this stuff for effect, but I still flinch at a lot of the ethnic stereotyping.
I don't know that I'd recommend this book particularly, but it was entertaining enough. I think the vast majority of it would work much better as standup comedy, and I'm totally done hearing about Roseanne's childhood (I had expected this one to focus more on her adult and recent career, and it did, to some extend, but she still spent a good third of the book talking about growing up in Utah.) But it wasn't bad, exactly, and I'm not sorry I picked it up.(less)
|
|
|
Also an excellent addition to the universe. I appreciated that it comes to a satisfying conclusion while still leaving some major plot threads hanging for the third book (which comes out tomorrow - how convenient for me!)
I find Moon's prose workmanl...moreAlso an excellent addition to the universe. I appreciated that it comes to a satisfying conclusion while still leaving some major plot threads hanging for the third book (which comes out tomorrow - how convenient for me!)
I find Moon's prose workmanlike at best, and her attention to detail can make the pace of her novels rather slow, but they're carefully plotted, her characters all feel realistic, and I always appreciate a fantasy series where female characters are both assumed (by the author) to be as competent as the males and where sexism still crops up and is overtly addressed.(less)
|
|
|
I have had a mixed experience with the Paks books - liked the original trilogy rather a lot, disliked Surrender None, loathed Liar's Oath - so I approached this with a little trepidation.
But it's good! Maybe even better than the original books, if ...moreI have had a mixed experience with the Paks books - liked the original trilogy rather a lot, disliked Surrender None, loathed Liar's Oath - so I approached this with a little trepidation.
But it's good! Maybe even better than the original books, if only because Moon has developed so much as a writer in the last twenty years. Paks herself is now a bit character, but her adventures are the foundation of the plot, and the three main characters in this series are all engaging and sympathetic. I can even see where the Gird/Luap books add something in terms of backstory (although my opinion that they were shitty novels hasn't changed.)
I would heartily recommend this series to fans of the Deed of Paksenarrion. Totally worth it.(less)
|
|
|
|
I wish I had found some of these sooner, especially "One Word Answer," but they were fun even read out of order. None of them were all that profound, but they mostly featured the bits I like best about the series - clever worldbuilding and small-town...moreI wish I had found some of these sooner, especially "One Word Answer," but they were fun even read out of order. None of them were all that profound, but they mostly featured the bits I like best about the series - clever worldbuilding and small-town politics. Definitely worth a read for fans, although they'd probably be totally baffling to people who'd never picked up the series.(less)
|
|
|
This is also sort of all over the place, but in a much better way - the various bits hang together and the emotional arcs build off of each other rather than being distracting.
Eric's "family" is fascinating, although I have seen about enough of the "...moreThis is also sort of all over the place, but in a much better way - the various bits hang together and the emotional arcs build off of each other rather than being distracting.
Eric's "family" is fascinating, although I have seen about enough of the "royalty who died suddenly is actually a vampire" trope (Tanya Huff did it much better.) Bill's "family," likewise - and I love love LOVE that it appears that he's finally put to rest as a love interest. Because jeez, man, that's been pretty much over for five books now, and he's just a mopey annoyance at this stage.
Also, Hunter! Just great. Seeing Sookie confront some of her own demons as she helps him prepare for the stuff she went through is really satisfying.
So yeah, overall one of the better ones. I am sort of dreading the follow-up as implied by the ending, but then I'm always more bored than interested by the tribulations of romance.(less)
|
|
|
Ah, yes, the torture scene. Pretty much inevitable in urban fantasy. I never like it - I doubt I ever will. But when you've got to write fourteen books, you have to keep upping the stakes.
I like the fairies as a concept, but they seem awfully one-sh...moreAh, yes, the torture scene. Pretty much inevitable in urban fantasy. I never like it - I doubt I ever will. But when you've got to write fourteen books, you have to keep upping the stakes.
I like the fairies as a concept, but they seem awfully one-shot to me. We saw some of them last book, and of course Claudine has been a long-running bit character, but this sort of wraps them up in a way that makes the whole thing seem sort of pointless.
I like the Were debut - we're able to see the details of that in a way that was totally glossed over when it came to the vamps. It's probably one of the more interesting threads in the series, in my opinion, and it rescues this book from being nothing but one gross-out irritation after another.
(Also, Murderous Closeted Gay Dude? Really?)(less)
|
|
|
Kind of a muddled mess, plot-wise, although it was nice to get resolution on so many long-running subplots. The body count in the series has passed the point of no return, for me - it's probably inevitable in any really long-running mystery series, p...moreKind of a muddled mess, plot-wise, although it was nice to get resolution on so many long-running subplots. The body count in the series has passed the point of no return, for me - it's probably inevitable in any really long-running mystery series, particularly one that doesn't shy away from racking up the corpses, but I've sort of stopped caring about everybody because the odds that they survive are so low.
I like the last scene quite a bit - the implications are fascinating - but it's very much undercut by the above apathy.(less)
|
|
|
On the one hand, I like the larger picture featured here - I'm always into worldbuilding and seeing more of the vampire government and culture is neat. I also appreciated the return of Barry Bellboy - he's a great character to provide an alternate pe...moreOn the one hand, I like the larger picture featured here - I'm always into worldbuilding and seeing more of the vampire government and culture is neat. I also appreciated the return of Barry Bellboy - he's a great character to provide an alternate perspective that isn't clouded by Sookie's "unique" status.
On the other hand, Harris is trying *very* hard to both give enough clues that we can put together what's coming without making her characters look like oblivious idiots, and while I applaud her efforts, it doesn't really work. This is not a series I read for the rigor of the plots, but still, it's annoying to watch Sookie overlook screamingly obvious clues until the very last possible moment.
Still, it's a good read and the consequences give it some heft. Not one of my very favorites, but still pretty good.(less)
|