|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nabokov's Pnin is a great character piece centered on Waindell College's Assistant Professor Pnin--a bumbling cartoonish Russian who teaches Russian--that reads like a warm-up for the Charles Kinbote character of Nabokov's next novel Pale Fire. The ...moreNabokov's Pnin is a great character piece centered on Waindell College's Assistant Professor Pnin--a bumbling cartoonish Russian who teaches Russian--that reads like a warm-up for the Charles Kinbote character of Nabokov's next novel Pale Fire. The book Pnin is enjoyable, although there isn't much by way of plot, intrigue, or puzzles, like the masterpiece PF. Pnin strikes me as a long short-story, and I love the artistry, like this description of...
"…a pencil sharpener—that highly satisfying, highly philosophical implement that goes ticonderoga-ticonderoga, feeding on the yellow finish and sweet wood, and ends up in a kind of soundlessly spinning ethereal void as we all must."
I find the point-of-view choice interesting, and again, it points toward Pale Fire's more complex (and more satisfying) exploration of truth in narration and other meta-stuff. Pnin is written in first person, and we don't learn the narrator's identity until the end. The narrator is condescending to Pnin, referring to him as "Our hero", calling his actions distinctly "Pninian", etc., with a wink to the reader that he's laughing--chortling, probably--at his quirky subject.
By the end we know the narrator has had no direct contact with Pnin, except for a brief encounter decades prior. Instead the narrator has learned Pnin's story through the faculty of Waindell College, and perhaps from only one faculty member who holds Pnin in low regard. This fact casts the character of Pnin in a new light--did we get the real Pnin? Probably not. So if Pnin isn't the caricature the narrator described, then who is he, and then--doesn't this story say more about this mysterious narrator than the subject?
In Pale Fire, Nabokov turns the key a few times more, and we get a deeper twist into this puzzle of narration, truth, and meaning in fiction. It is also a more artful approach. PF is more successful because the narrator is a consequential character to the story, and also because Nabokov blatantly puts art (Shade's 999 line poem) at the forefront, contrasted with Pnin, where Nabokov questions the meaning of fiction at the end when we see the narrator getting Pnin's story second-hand.
Pnin is like a reflection in a mirror, while Pale Fire is the infinite mirrored room of a fun house. But not to take away from Pnin, which I can recommend to any lover of Nabokov.(less)
|
|
|
|
|
|
"The Stranger" is a philosophical allegory representing an array of -isms that I would have studied in Philosophy 101 had I taken it in college. Luckily I have Wikipedia instead, so: absurdism, nihilism, and existentialism, and maybe others. Here's...more"The Stranger" is a philosophical allegory representing an array of -isms that I would have studied in Philosophy 101 had I taken it in college. Luckily I have Wikipedia instead, so: absurdism, nihilism, and existentialism, and maybe others. Here's the thing of this book: the main character is not a character, but instead a representation of a philosophical viewpoint. By necessity of the grand argument, the protagonist Mersault doesn't engage with the world on any kind of emotional level. He doesn't care at all when [spoilers in 3, 2, 1 liftoff] his mother dies, his girlfriend falls in love with him, or he kills someone. This makes him (I didn't take Psych 101 either)...what? Psychotic? Sociopathic? I don't know. It makes him not much of a character as far as I'm concerned. It makes him a tool in an interesting exploration about conforming to societal norms, or the meaninglessness of our relationships, or life itself. So-- thought provoking and well architected, but not very human. And since the vast majority of the world's population doesn't think like Mersault, i.e., indifferent to each other just as the universe is indifferent to us, as Camus argues, then what does that say about the value of this novel?(less)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is a somewhat philosophical and historical look at the techniques of realist fiction, the author's favored style. James Wood is a highly evolved life form. I would take leader-seeking aliens to him without reservation.
"How Fiction Works" giv...moreThis is a somewhat philosophical and historical look at the techniques of realist fiction, the author's favored style. James Wood is a highly evolved life form. I would take leader-seeking aliens to him without reservation.
"How Fiction Works" gives the perspective of a literary critic and an academic. For a more craft-oriented approach to this topic, from the view of a practitioner, check out Francine Prose's book:
http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/284...(less)
|