group discussion


topic: suggestions & questions > Can we add an actual picture to our posts?

dateDown_arrow
(showing 1-25 of 49)

message 1: by Lori
05/08/2008 07:19AM

369169 I know we can link a photo, but is there a way to show the actual picture right in the thread post? Similar to myspace where you cut and paste the code and the photo appears?

I think that would be a great addition if it is not something we can already do....

flag abuse *

message 2: by Ruth
05/08/2008 07:49AM

335159 I would really, really, really like to be able to do this, too. Part of Constant Reader's modus operandi is to show writers' photos, and sometimes to discuss art. It would be so much better if we could actually see the images in the posts.

If it's too much to ask that we be able to upload images directly here, could the ones we link to at least show?

flag abuse *

message 3: by Sherry (last edited 05/08/2008 10:23AM)
05/08/2008 10:22AM

193297 I would love this feature, too. I've never asked for it, though, since I've asked for so many other things already.



flag abuse *

message 4: by Lisa (last edited 05/08/2008 01:52PM)
05/08/2008 01:51PM

111194 No offense, but this might not be such a good idea. Picture posts invariably lead to blinkies, memes, and cat macros. I would be devastated if this site was ever reduced to being MySpace with Books.

I vote no (I'm pretending like I have a vote!), just because I know where this will all end up. You have a nice discussion of Proust going, things get slightly off topic, someone posts a picture of that cat with the melon on it's head, and the whole operation falls apart. No. Please no.

flag abuse *

message 5: by Lori
05/08/2008 03:02PM

369169 It would be up to the moderator to lay out the rules of the site, tho. If someone is abusing it, posting ridiculos photos, then it would be up to them to remove them or to ban the poster...

I think it would add to some of the threads... As it stands now, we can hyperlink.. so why not take it to the next level...??

flag abuse *

message 6: by Ruth
05/08/2008 03:33PM

335159 We had the ability to have pictures on our previous site. No one ever posted any blinkies or other stupid stuff.

flag abuse *

message 7: by Otis
05/08/2008 07:41PM

1 We've had this on our todo list (near the very bottom) for a long time - so thanks for the votes! If/when we do launch this we will certainly take care to give people controls to avoid blinking cats. Yuck :)

flag abuse *

message 8: by Sherry
05/08/2008 07:42PM

193297 Except in the birthday threads. But that was me, and appropriate (since I'm always appropriate).

flag abuse *

message 9: by rivka
05/08/2008 07:45PM

flag abuse *

message 10: by deleted member
05/08/2008 09:35PM

haha
never saw the blinking cat before
dancing hamsters yes
blinking cats no

flag abuse *

message 11: by Ryan
05/09/2008 08:40PM

979215 OOOOOOOO that idea is so cool!

flag abuse *

message 12: by Lori
05/13/2008 12:10PM

369169 Thanks for the support. I cant wait until this come to light. Otis..does this mean that it will be moved up a little higher on your list of things to do?? (pretty please... with sugar on top?)

flag abuse *

message 13: by Otis
05/13/2008 02:57PM

1 Yup - a few more votes :)

flag abuse *

message 14: by Oakwar
05/13/2008 06:12PM

724728 I vote yes! I alwayed wanted to be able to post pics here..

flag abuse *

message 15: by Sherry
05/14/2008 08:45AM

193297 Can I vote again? Please. I promise not to stuff the ballot box too much.

flag abuse *

message 16: by Logan
05/14/2008 09:22AM

70078 I would love this feature! It seems like it's rather essential to communicating in a message board set-up. This is the first board that I've ever used that doesn't allow it. What about just allowing the < img src= / > html tags? That wouldn't be too hard, would it?

flag abuse *

message 17: by Ruth
05/14/2008 09:23AM

335159 Me too. Pictures would vastly enhance my enjoyment, all right, addiction, to Goodreads.


flag abuse *

message 18: by Lori
05/14/2008 02:45PM

369169 Yee Hee,,,, more supporters!!!
Thank you everyone!

flag abuse *

message 19: by Michael
05/14/2008 03:15PM

834216 Actually, my interest in images is fairly low (although not zero), but in the broader context I'd like to see more support of general html (or bb) formatting features within the discussion boards, such as color.

The general concern is that the images and/or other formatting features will be abused and/or become irritating, but they can certainly be useful on occasion.

flag abuse *

message 20: by Sherry
05/14/2008 04:39PM

193297 I would like color and other html tricks, too.

flag abuse *

message 21: by Sarah (last edited 05/14/2008 07:37PM)
05/14/2008 07:36PM

193255 I vote for html and posting pictures and the like. Each group's moderator can be in charge of what they want people to be able to post or not post. Moderators should have an option not to allow html code in their group.

flag abuse *

message 22: by Emma
05/14/2008 07:46PM

611251 I'd really really like to do this. It would be more convenient and open so many doors.

flag abuse *

message 23: by rivka
05/14/2008 07:49PM

171430 Moderators should have an option not to allow html code in their group.

I'm no programmer (and the ones GR has are an awfully creative bunch!), but that sounds fairly difficult to implement.

flag abuse *

message 24: by Sherry
05/14/2008 07:53PM

193297 I'm no programmer (and the ones GR has are an awfully creative bunch!), but that sounds fairly difficult to implement.

I agree, especially since we do already have a few html things we can use.

flag abuse *

message 25: by Sherry
05/15/2008 08:40AM

949090 I vote yes!I'd really appreciate this feature being added.

flag abuse *



back to top
« previous 1

search discussion posts

unread topics