group discussion


104 views

topic: Old Truths > Presidential Reading/Nerd Adjacency/Myers-Briggs





Comments (showing 18-67)    post a comment »

message 67: by Jackie "the Librarian", Cool Star Trek Nerd (new)

289556 I'm an ISTJ, usually, which is a good combination for a librarian.


message 66: by BunWat , Book Club Cheerleader (last edited Feb 03, 2009 03:15PM) (new)

747169 :D
I also vote for Christy's brand of crazy.

Christy I'm an INTP no J no P no J, no wait, INFP... It varies. But the spinning top lands in your area at least 40% of the time.


message 65: by Monica (last edited Feb 03, 2009 03:08PM) (new)

347123 An amazing thought, Jude but it would be far too cold up here in Antartica.


message 64: by Jude (new)

925949 crazy in glass houses: my dream colony


message 63: by Christy (new)

935176 Yes, I usually dig myself in deeper and deeper.


message 62: by Jackie "the Librarian", Cool Star Trek Nerd (new)

289556 Christy: Also, I said that in response to a post that has since disappeared, so now I look extra crazy :)

That's what we like about you, Christy. EXTRA crazy with every post!



message 61: by Christy (new)

935176 I’m an INTJ. Every time I read descriptions of INTJs it makes us sound like assholes. We do things like argue points that we don’t even necessarily agree with and are generally intolerant of mistakes or slipups. I use it as an excuse for my bad personality.

Also, I said that in response to a post that has since disappeared, so now I look extra crazy :)


message 60: by a well wisher (new)

1309716 Well, I have to ask (and, as I started the thread, I feel entitled to interrupt), what is your Myers-Briggs type, Christy?


message 59: by Christy (new)

935176 Yeah, that's because it was a mess of italics that never ended so I took it away until I could fix it. A bit anal retentive on my part, I know. I have a Myers-Briggs personality type to make me feel a little better about being uptight. It's not my fault!


message 58: by Christy (last edited Jan 29, 2009 01:13PM) (new)

935176 Well, we were discussing whether it's non-partisan or not. So I guess the question is are they encouraging people to participate in politics in general and vote no matter who they vote for?

I think I was asking a question you already answered -- didn't see post #56.


message 57: by Jude (new)

925949 Christy wrote: "But what are they being encouraged to do about it? I thought they promoted voting for Obama specifically, but maybe I'm wrong about that. "

yes MoveOn supported Obama. but i don't understand your question - encourage who to do what about what?


message 56: by Christy (new)

935176 But what are they being encouraged to do about it? I thought they promoted voting for Obama specifically, but maybe I'm wrong about that.


message 55: by Jude (new)

925949 welp - as a nobody-is-actually-liberal-enough-to-suit-me kinda gal, i'd say MoveOn is pretty damn partisan - the part way over on the left where i find my friends. still completely annoyed by style, however, so i spammed em.


message 54: by Monica (new)

347123 I don't disagree with you. MoveOn appealed to me because it's non partisan. There are many members who voted for Bush, don't like what he did, and want to do something about it.


message 53: by Christy (new)

935176 Wasn't the purpose of MoveOn to get past the partisanship and let "real people" participate in politics? That concept is great, but I'm afraid it has just become so partisan (or at least it appears that way to “outsiders”) that it does itself a disservice. I might not be correct about what the goal of the organization is, and I can accept that. All I can say is I think they would be even more effective if they tried to appeal to a broader range of citizens.


message 52: by Monica (new)

347123 It's the choir who has to get out and vote. MoveOn's aim is not to convert people, it's to empower people politically.


message 51: by Ruth (new)

335159 Christy wrote: "The issue I have with MoveOn.org is (as the Onion parody notes) they spend much of their time preaching to the choir."

As do many issue-oriented organizations. The choir is who they know about, who they can contact. I've belonged to Move On almost since its inception and I haven't noticed that they're any more aggressive than other organizations that consistently show up in my mailbox.




message 50: by Christy (new)

935176 The issue I have with MoveOn.org is (as the Onion parody notes) they spend much of their time preaching to the choir. Their approach is aggressive and off-putting and doesn’t appeal to many people who don’t already agree with what they’re promoting. Just as PETA does little to appeal to people who are meat-eating/fur-wearers, MoveOn doesn’t market itself very well to people who haven’t “seen the light,” as you suggest, or who might be on the fence.


message 49: by Monica (new)

347123 In early '04 came to the very sad and deeply disturbing realization my country's governmental policies were evil. I felt helpless and depressed. What could I do? Someone recommended MoveOn to me and I was able to channel my anger. I canvassed my neighborhood to get the vote out for John Kerry, spoke out on the local TV news against Karl Rove, demonstrated against the war, delivered signatures to Carl Levin.
I helped bring about change.

MoveOn is the best thing that ever happened to this sonambulistic society.


message 48: by BunWat , Book Club Cheerleader (last edited Jan 28, 2009 09:17AM) (new)

747169 Yep.
MoveOn.org
Spamming our way to a better tomorrow.


message 47: by Christy (new)

935176 I think that successfully answers the question "what's wrong with MoveOn.org?"


message 46: by BunWat , Book Club Cheerleader (new)

747169 I remember that! Its awesome!

Obama said. "I'm trying to make the world a better place, but with all the time I've been spending deleting e-mails, it's going to take me forever."

Hahahahahaha!!!


message 45: by Christy (new)

935176 I love it!


message 44: by Sandi (new)

811687 I love The Onion.


message 42: by Monica (new)

347123 What's wrong with Move On?


message 41: by Lori (new)

744602 I totally understand that, Sandi, I even wish Moveon.org would just Move On.


message 40: by Sandi (new)

811687 Jackie "the Librarian" wrote: "Yeah, it's hard to stomach sanctimonious, no matter what side it's coming from."

Exactly! My husband likes listening to Air America, but I can't stand it for the same reason I can't stand Rush Limbaugh. Neither Democrats nor Republicans are 100% bad or 100% good. Both sides have valid viewpoints and both sides have crappy viewpoints. The reason I voted for Obama is because he promised a move away from the venom that has infected politics in the last couple of decades.


message 39: by Jackie "the Librarian", Cool Star Trek Nerd (new)

289556 Yeah, it's hard to stomach sanctimonious, no matter what side it's coming from.


message 38: by David (new)

1287856 Rush is funny much of the time; Bill O is a sanctimonious jerk.


message 37: by Sarah Pi, lost in the supermarket (last edited Jan 26, 2009 11:27AM) (new)

642041 So you're nerd-adjacent :)

Or at least, adjacent to a nerd.


message 36: by Monica (new)

347123 Thanks Bun and Sandy, much appreciated. I'm not a sci-fi type but it's all my brother reads...


message 35: by Mindy (new)

1069458 Nerd adjacent!!! LMAO!


message 32: by BunWat , Book Club Cheerleader (new)

747169 Woot!


message 31: by Sandi (new)

811687 I read about it on Tor.com before the election. Apparently, he did the "Live long and prosper" thing during a speech somewhere and he's referred to Star Wars several times.


message 30: by BunWat , Book Club Cheerleader (new)

747169 We don't know he is a sci fi geek, but Sandi heard it somewhere.


message 29: by Monica (new)

347123 How do we know Obama is a sci-fi geek?


message 28: by Jude (new)

925949 well i'm old enough to be unsurprised by anything at this point, but i am sorta thinkin we might get to see news dominated by a reality-based politician...


message 27: by Mindy (new)

1069458 Unh unh, I understand we can't shut them down because of the damn 1st Amendment and all, but I really do think they are dangerous. I know soooo many people (most of my family, unfortunately) who listen to what they say as gospel. If nothing else, I think all of their shows should have a real-time fact check ticker scrolling under all of their broadcasts. (Not sure how that would happen in radio...)


message 26: by Sarah Pi, lost in the supermarket (new)

642041 Good point...


message 25: by Jude (new)

925949 I wish we got a four year break from Rush and Bill.

ah no - i think wounded sputtering is gonna be every bit as amusing as arrogant gloating - without the by-product despair :->!


message 24: by Sarah Pi, lost in the supermarket (new)

642041 Yes, Mr. Limbaugh seems to be reinvigorated as well, unfortunately.

And I love that Bill O, in his capacity as a rational and unbiased voice of reason, is now appealing to Obama to watch out for those left wing idealogues.

I wish we got a four year break from Rush and Bill.




message 23: by Jude (new)

925949 Sarah Pi wrote: "But think of all the unfortunates who made their livings off of Bushism calendars..."

well, there's always Fox News- those folks are apparently digging their heels into whacko for the duration.


message 22: by Sarah Pi, lost in the supermarket (new)

642041 But think of all the unfortunates who made their livings off of Bushism calendars...


message 21: by Charly (new)

584414 Not only that he is well read and more intelligent than I, but he speaks eloquently as well. It will be nice to go 4 hopefully 8 years without a national shudder every time the president gets near a michrophone.

I may be a bit old for giddy but I do like the blue sky image Jude used. Smiling now and then because we have an intelligent leader is as close as I'm likely to get to giddy.


message 20: by Jackie "the Librarian", Cool Star Trek Nerd (new)

289556 Julia wrote: "I'm with Sandi, I'd rec "The Sparrow," to him, but I'm so ***giddy*** that we have a president who is better read than I!!! "

Welcome, Julia! And I share that giddy feeling! I love having a smart and well-read president! Yay!!!


message 19: by Julia (new)

1303301 I'm with Sandi, I'd rec "The Sparrow," to him, but I'm so ***giddy*** that we have a president who is better read than I!!!


message 18: by Jude (new)

925949 Lori, out on the leftish, we have issues with the graceful and entertaining Zakaria. Not the least of which is that he makes so many questionable things sound reasonable.


« previous 1
back to top

unread topics | mark unread

Books mentioned in this topic

The Sparrow (other topics)
Moby Dick (other topics)
Parting the Waters: Martin Luther King and the Civil Rights Movement 1954-63 (other topics)
Song of Solomon (other topics)
Self-Reliance (other topics)
More...