This topic has been viewed by 24 unique people.
> 100 classic novels
(showing 1-5 of 5)
post a comment »
Jul 11, 2011 07:21AM
Calgary blogger Bryan Wright is on a quest to read the 100 novels on the Time All-Time Novels list. He's about 2/5 of the way through the list.
It's a great list of books, so we have to know: how many have you read?
Check out the poll and interview here.
Jul 11, 2011 09:34AM
The CBC says it's a list of "classic" books while _Time_ says it's a list of their favourite books. That's quite a difference. Stendhal's _Red and the Black_ is a classic; _The Corrections_ isn't, as it's only been 10 years (oh, and it's a piece of junk), and neither is _White Teeth_
Are there any french or german or italian titles there? Anything not first written in english? Where's Céline, Cendrars, Calvino, Dostoevsky, Musil, Joseph Roth, Solzhenitsyn, Mati Unt, and so on? Or, for books written first in english, Markson, McElroy, BS Johnson, Gabriel Josipovici?
This isn't a list anyone can regard as serious or comprehensive. Not that Bryan's wasting his time; he's just got an inferior, skewed list.
Jul 11, 2011 09:52AM
I have read about 10 or so, although I do have majority of the books I haven't read on my TBR shelf. Work in progress.
Jul 11, 2011 03:03PM
I have read 39 of the books on the Time list. I think it is cool Wright is taking this challenge on for himself.
Jeff wrote: "The CBC says it's a list of "classic" books while _Time_ says it's a list of their favourite books. That's quite a difference. Stendhal's _Red and the Black_ is a classic; _The Corrections_ isn't, ..."
It is noted in the link, that the compilation from
"a list of their all-time favourite novels published since 1923, when Time first launched."
Whenever a list is comprised of "favourites" there is always going to be disagreement as everyone's personal preferences will vary. Given the
list was arrived at through consensus and compromise will also impact the titles selected. I notice very similar debates/discussions whenever high profile best-of book lists are covered by the media.
(I also notice only 16 women included on the list.)
Jul 14, 2011 06:34AM
Jeff, you're right, they aren't "classics" in the traditional sense (unless you want to call them contemporary classics or modern classics), but all is correct in the story. Sorry about the confusion everyone!
Jennifer, excellent catch on how few women are on the list. Do you know what the gender breakdown was for the BBC list? And why listmakers tend to overlook the gender breakdown?
back to top
post a comment »
Add a reference:
Search for a book to add a reference
Flagging a post will send it to the Goodreads Customer Care team for review. We take abuse seriously in our discussion boards. Only flag comments that clearly need our attention. As a general rule we do not censor any content on the site. The only content we will consider removing is spam, slanderous attacks on other members, or extremely offensive content (eg. pornography, pro-Nazi, child abuse, etc). We will not remove any content for bad language alone, or being critical of a particular book.
© 2015 Goodreads Inc
Welcome back. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account.