if Patrick is calling it "a bright nova star of horror" I'm not reading it while I'm home alone.

Margaret wrote: "House of Leaves by Mark Z. Danielewski

Ok but not alone."

What does that mean? Okay but not alone?

HoL is my favorite book of all time.

I just bought this book too!

House of Leaves by Mark Z. Danielewski

Ok but not alone.

You sure are in for a treat! HoL is a bright nova star of horror.

I just ordered it from abebooks and I wished I could have gotten it express. I can' wait til it gets here!

There is no way to really describe this book other than to say it is one of the weirdest, creepiest reading experiences I've ever had in my life. A story inside a story inside a story, there are footnotes, diary entries and a host of other weird text that you're not quite sure what to make of. I figure you can mine this story for the rest of your life and never "get" everything, but I guess the fun is in the trying. But don't feel like you have to "get" everything to enjoy it. I certainly didn't, but had a blast nonetheless.

By the time I reached the rambling, stream-of-consciousness text, I was skimming and skipping, but the story still had me. When some of the text appears inverted (meant to be read using a mirror), it completely creeped me out!

The main plot is enough to grab you, with or without the footnotes and all the other sleight of hand the author's pulling. Out of a relatively simple concept grows a post-post-modern nightmare. The story draws you in and does not let go. It plays with all of your perceptions and logic. Nothing is reliable (including the very weird narrator) and there is no way to guess how it's all going to end. In that sense, it's very Lovecraftian. So Lovecraft lovers should really enjoy this piece!

I've never read House of Leaves but just a bit of trivia for you all: It was partly used as inspiration for the video games Silent Hill 4: The Room and Silent Hill: Origins. Just thought I'd throw that out there for any game freaks like me!

I'm reading HOL now but I'm only on Chapter 2. Not freaked out yet but I'm sure it's coming!

I started HOL and made it through the introduction which definitely set an interesting tone. My hubby is out town this week so I had to set it aside. He'll also be gone next week so I think I'll have to wait until the following week before I pick it back up.

"but it's definitely a book that you have to keep reminding yourself is complete fiction"

I kept thinking I that needed to add 'The Navidson Record' to my netflix queue even though I was well aware it doesn't even exist.

Read Danielewski's follow-up, Only Revolutions...it's, well...*interesting*, but not in the same way HoL is. It's not something I'd want to read again.

I read it with the lights on. Seriously, mazes freak me out.

That is unfortunate for your friend.

This may sound like a very clichéd statement to make, but it's definitely a book that you have to keep reminding yourself is complete fiction, if only to save your sanity whilst reading it.

Also, I personally think it's safe to say that House of Leaves will always remain a literary work and will never be made into a film. I mean, parts of it could work, but it would be near impossible to recreate the same atmosphere and the sheer barrage of information that can only be absorbed by reading text.

Good read.

Has anyone read his new(ish) novel?

I totally agree with you Dan, I definitely feel like I missed something by skipping the footnotes the first time around. I want to go back and read it all the 2nd time! It can definitely creep you out! My friend that recommended it to me was diagnosed with a brain tumor when he finished. Did it have anything to do with it? Of course not.....but those of you that read the book will understand when I say.....I couldn't help but wonder...

Its deeply unsettling in parts, mainly because it doesn't explain itself most of the time, making you start to use your imagination to try and make sense (or lack thereof) of whats happening.

Don't be daunted by the length, you should fly through it, as most pages are articles or other junk. Though I wouldn't suggest skipping the footnotes (or anything else) as someone mentioned here. It's all there for a purpose and can only add to the author's intended experience of the book.

It's also one of the very few books that I've read that I have actually had a nightmare over. So take what you will of that.

King, I read Dhalgren and i hated it, but oddly enough skimming through the wiki entry on it, the two novels have some similarities for reasons I will not spoil here. But HoL is far more gripping...sort of 'The Blair Witch Project' of horror lit.

It intimidates me...

Kathy: some of the footnotes provide additional clues, some don't.

There is a repository of information and insights at the discussion group found at
www.houseofleaves.com; you must register an e-mail to join in.

I don't profess to understanding all of it myself (and I don't wish anyone to try to understand it all, either), particularly the connection of narrator Johnny Truant to the entire Navidson family story, but the rollercoaster ride that this is a blast.

I should also point out that the author's sister is the singer Poe, whose album 'Haunted' released in 2000 is somewhat inspired by the novel as well, and I highly recommend that album as well for listening pleasure.

I've flipped through it, but good lord...it looks like a lot of work for something I might not even understand. The only other book that's intimidated me this much is Samuel Delaney's "Dhalgren".

I'll have to check this out!

I read House of Leaves and really loved it! Very wierd, though. When I read it, my friend that recommended it, told me to save myself some confusion by skipping the footnotes the first time around. I followed his advice, but think I might have missed something. I have to reread with everything now. Looking forward to it!

Adding House of Leaves by Mark Z. Danielewski to our books list here. Anybody here read it? If not, it is HIGHLY RECOMMENDED by me. King makes a cameo appearance of sorts in it. ;)